Showing 1–9 of 9 results for author: Henderson, S

AlphaStar Unplugged: Large-Scale Offline Reinforcement Learning

Authors: Michaël Mathieu, Sherjil Ozair, Srivatsan Srinivasan, Caglar Gulcehre, Shangtong Zhang, Ray Jiang, Tom Le Paine, Richard Powell, Konrad Żołna, Julian Schrittwieser, David Choi, Petko Georgiev, Daniel Toyama, Aja Huang, Roman Ring, Igor Babuschkin, Timo Ewalds, Mahyar Bordbar, Sarah Henderson, Sergio Gómez Colmenarejo, Aäron van den Oord, Wojciech Marian Czarnecki, Nando de Freitas, Oriol Vinyals

Abstract: StarCraft II is one of the most challenging simulated reinforcement learning environments; it is partially observable, stochastic, multi-agent, and mastering StarCraft II requires strategic planning over long time horizons with real-time low-level execution. It also has an active professional competitive scene. StarCraft II is uniquely suited for advancing offline RL algorithms, both because of it… ▽ More StarCraft II is one of the most challenging simulated reinforcement learning environments; it is partially observable, stochastic, multi-agent, and mastering StarCraft II requires strategic planning over long time horizons with real-time low-level execution. It also has an active professional competitive scene. StarCraft II is uniquely suited for advancing offline RL algorithms, both because of its challenging nature and because Blizzard has released a massive dataset of millions of StarCraft II games played by human players. This paper leverages that and establishes a benchmark, called AlphaStar Unplugged, introducing unprecedented challenges for offline reinforcement learning. We define a dataset (a subset of Blizzard's release), tools standardizing an API for machine learning methods, and an evaluation protocol. We also present baseline agents, including behavior cloning, offline variants of actor-critic and MuZero. We improve the state of the art of agents using only offline data, and we achieve 90% win rate against previously published AlphaStar behavior cloning agent. △ Less

Submitted 7 August, 2023; originally announced August 2023.

Comments: 32 pages, 13 figures, previous version published as a NeurIPS 2021 workshop: https://openreview.net/forum?id=Np8Pumfoty

Scheduling with Predictions

Authors: Woo-Hyung Cho, Shane Henderson, David Shmoys

Abstract: There is significant interest in deploying machine learning algorithms for diagnostic radiology, as modern learning techniques have made it possible to detect abnormalities in medical images within minutes. While machine-assisted diagnoses cannot yet reliably replace human reviews of images by a radiologist, they could inform prioritization rules for determining the order by which to review patien… ▽ More There is significant interest in deploying machine learning algorithms for diagnostic radiology, as modern learning techniques have made it possible to detect abnormalities in medical images within minutes. While machine-assisted diagnoses cannot yet reliably replace human reviews of images by a radiologist, they could inform prioritization rules for determining the order by which to review patient cases so that patients with time-sensitive conditions could benefit from early intervention. We study this scenario by formulating it as a learning-augmented online scheduling problem. We are given information about each arriving patient's urgency level in advance, but these predictions are inevitably error-prone. In this formulation, we face the challenges of decision making under imperfect information, and of responding dynamically to prediction error as we observe better data in real-time. We propose a simple online policy and show that this policy is in fact the best possible in certain stylized settings. We also demonstrate that our policy achieves the two desiderata of online algorithms with predictions: consistency (performance improvement with prediction accuracy) and robustness (protection against the worst case). We complement our theoretical findings with empirical evaluations of the policy under settings that more accurately reflect clinical scenarios in the real world. △ Less

Submitted 20 December, 2022; originally announced December 2022.

Scaling Language Models: Methods, Analysis & Insights from Training Gopher

Authors: Jack W. Rae, Sebastian Borgeaud, Trevor Cai, Katie Millican, Jordan Hoffmann, Francis Song, John Aslanides, Sarah Henderson, Roman Ring, Susannah Young, Eliza Rutherford, Tom Hennigan, Jacob Menick, Albin Cassirer, Richard Powell, George van den Driessche, Lisa Anne Hendricks, Maribeth Rauh, Po-Sen Huang, Amelia Glaese, Johannes Welbl, Sumanth Dathathri, Saffron Huang, Jonathan Uesato, John Mellor , et al. (55 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: Language modelling provides a step towards intelligent communication systems by harnessing large repositories of written human knowledge to better predict and understand the world. In this paper, we present an analysis of Transformer-based language model performance across a wide range of model scales -- from models with tens of millions of parameters up to a 280 billion parameter model called Gop… ▽ More Language modelling provides a step towards intelligent communication systems by harnessing large repositories of written human knowledge to better predict and understand the world. In this paper, we present an analysis of Transformer-based language model performance across a wide range of model scales -- from models with tens of millions of parameters up to a 280 billion parameter model called Gopher. These models are evaluated on 152 diverse tasks, achieving state-of-the-art performance across the majority. Gains from scale are largest in areas such as reading comprehension, fact-checking, and the identification of toxic language, but logical and mathematical reasoning see less benefit. We provide a holistic analysis of the training dataset and model's behaviour, covering the intersection of model scale with bias and toxicity. Finally we discuss the application of language models to AI safety and the mitigation of downstream harms. △ Less

Submitted 21 January, 2022; v1 submitted 8 December, 2021; originally announced December 2021.

Comments: 120 pages

Acme: A Research Framework for Distributed Reinforcement Learning

Authors: Matthew W. Hoffman, Bobak Shahriari, John Aslanides, Gabriel Barth-Maron, Nikola Momchev, Danila Sinopalnikov, Piotr Stańczyk, Sabela Ramos, Anton Raichuk, Damien Vincent, Léonard Hussenot, Robert Dadashi, Gabriel Dulac-Arnold, Manu Orsini, Alexis Jacq, Johan Ferret, Nino Vieillard, Seyed Kamyar Seyed Ghasemipour, Sertan Girgin, Olivier Pietquin, Feryal Behbahani, Tamara Norman, Abbas Abdolmaleki, Albin Cassirer, Fan Yang , et al. (14 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: Deep reinforcement learning (RL) has led to many recent and groundbreaking advances. However, these advances have often come at the cost of both increased scale in the underlying architectures being trained as well as increased complexity of the RL algorithms used to train them. These increases have in turn made it more difficult for researchers to rapidly prototype new ideas or reproduce publishe… ▽ More Deep reinforcement learning (RL) has led to many recent and groundbreaking advances. However, these advances have often come at the cost of both increased scale in the underlying architectures being trained as well as increased complexity of the RL algorithms used to train them. These increases have in turn made it more difficult for researchers to rapidly prototype new ideas or reproduce published RL algorithms. To address these concerns this work describes Acme, a framework for constructing novel RL algorithms that is specifically designed to enable agents that are built using simple, modular components that can be used at various scales of execution. While the primary goal of Acme is to provide a framework for algorithm development, a secondary goal is to provide simple reference implementations of important or state-of-the-art algorithms. These implementations serve both as a validation of our design decisions as well as an important contribution to reproducibility in RL research. In this work we describe the major design decisions made within Acme and give further details as to how its components can be used to implement various algorithms. Our experiments provide baselines for a number of common and state-of-the-art algorithms as well as showing how these algorithms can be scaled up for much larger and more complex environments. This highlights one of the primary advantages of Acme, namely that it can be used to implement large, distributed RL algorithms that can run at massive scales while still maintaining the inherent readability of that implementation. This work presents a second version of the paper which coincides with an increase in modularity, additional emphasis on offline, imitation and learning from demonstrations algorithms, as well as various new agents implemented as part of Acme. △ Less

Submitted 20 September, 2022; v1 submitted 1 June, 2020; originally announced June 2020.

Comments: This work presents a second version of the paper which coincides with an increase in modularity, additional emphasis on offline, imitation and learning from demonstrations algorithms, as well as various new agents implemented as part of Acme

Bayes-Optimal Entropy Pursuit for Active Choice-Based Preference Learning

Authors: Stephen N. Pallone, Peter I. Frazier, Shane G. Henderson

Abstract: We analyze the problem of learning a single user's preferences in an active learning setting, sequentially and adaptively querying the user over a finite time horizon. Learning is conducted via choice-based queries, where the user selects her preferred option among a small subset of offered alternatives. These queries have been shown to be a robust and efficient way to learn an individual's prefer… ▽ More We analyze the problem of learning a single user's preferences in an active learning setting, sequentially and adaptively querying the user over a finite time horizon. Learning is conducted via choice-based queries, where the user selects her preferred option among a small subset of offered alternatives. These queries have been shown to be a robust and efficient way to learn an individual's preferences. We take a parametric approach and model the user's preferences through a linear classifier, using a Bayesian prior to encode our current knowledge of this classifier. The rate at which we learn depends on the alternatives offered at every time epoch. Under certain noise assumptions, we show that the Bayes-optimal policy for maximally reducing entropy of the posterior distribution of this linear classifier is a greedy policy, and that this policy achieves a linear lower bound when alternatives can be constructed from the continuum. Further, we analyze a different metric called misclassification error, proving that the performance of the optimal policy that minimizes misclassification error is bounded below by a linear function of differential entropy. Lastly, we numerically compare the greedy entropy reduction policy with a knowledge gradient policy under a number of scenarios, examining their performance under both differential entropy and misclassification error. △ Less

Submitted 24 February, 2017; originally announced February 2017.

Minimizing Multimodular Functions and Allocating Capacity in Bike-Sharing Systems

Authors: Daniel Freund, Shane G. Henderson, David B. Shmoys

Abstract: The growing popularity of bike-sharing systems around the world has motivated recent attention to models and algorithms for their effective operation. Most of this literature focuses on their daily operation for managing asymmetric demand. In this work, we consider the more strategic question of how to (re-)allocate dock-capacity in such systems. We develop mathematical formulations for variations… ▽ More The growing popularity of bike-sharing systems around the world has motivated recent attention to models and algorithms for their effective operation. Most of this literature focuses on their daily operation for managing asymmetric demand. In this work, we consider the more strategic question of how to (re-)allocate dock-capacity in such systems. We develop mathematical formulations for variations of this problem (either for service performance over the course of one day or for a long-run-average) and exhibit discrete convex properties in associated optimization problems. This allows us to design a practically fast polynomial-time allocation algorithm to compute an optimal solution for this problem, which can also handle practically motivated constraints, such as a limit on the number of docks moved in the system. We apply our algorithm to data sets from Boston, New York City, and Chicago to investigate how different dock allocations can yield better service in these systems. Recommendations based on our analysis have led to changes in the system design in Chicago and New York City. Beyond optimizing for improved quality of service through better allocations, our results also provide a metric to compare the impact of strategically reallocating docks and the rebalancing of bikes. △ Less

Submitted 14 March, 2022; v1 submitted 28 November, 2016; originally announced November 2016.

Efficient Ranking and Selection in Parallel Computing Environments

Authors: Eric C. Ni, Dragos F. Ciocan, Shane G. Henderson, Susan R. Hunter

Abstract: The goal of ranking and selection (R&S) procedures is to identify the best stochastic system from among a finite set of competing alternatives. Such procedures require constructing estimates of each system's performance, which can be obtained simultaneously by running multiple independent replications on a parallel computing platform. However, nontrivial statistical and implementation issues arise… ▽ More The goal of ranking and selection (R&S) procedures is to identify the best stochastic system from among a finite set of competing alternatives. Such procedures require constructing estimates of each system's performance, which can be obtained simultaneously by running multiple independent replications on a parallel computing platform. However, nontrivial statistical and implementation issues arise when designing R&S procedures for a parallel computing environment. Thus we propose several design principles for parallel R&S procedures that preserve statistical validity and maximize core utilization, especially when large numbers of alternatives or cores are involved. These principles are followed closely by our parallel Good Selection Procedure (GSP), which, under the assumption of normally distributed output, (i) guarantees to select a system in the indifference zone with high probability, (ii) runs efficiently on up to 1,024 parallel cores, and (iii) in an example uses smaller sample sizes compared to existing parallel procedures, particularly for large problems (over $10^6$ alternatives). In our computational study we discuss two methods for implementing GSP on parallel computers, namely the Message-Passing Interface (MPI) and Hadoop MapReduce and show that the latter provides good protection against core failures at the expense of a significant drop in utilization due to periodic unavoidable synchronization. △ Less

Submitted 16 June, 2015; originally announced June 2015.

On the Shoulders of Giants: The Growing Impact of Older Articles

Authors: Alex Verstak, Anurag Acharya, Helder Suzuki, Sean Henderson, Mikhail Iakhiaev, Cliff Chiung Yu Lin, Namit Shetty

Abstract: In this paper, we examine the evolution of the impact of older scholarly articles. We attempt to answer four questions. First, how often are older articles cited and how has this changed over time. Second, how does the impact of older articles vary across different research fields. Third, is the change in the impact of older articles accelerating or slowing down. Fourth, are these trends different… ▽ More In this paper, we examine the evolution of the impact of older scholarly articles. We attempt to answer four questions. First, how often are older articles cited and how has this changed over time. Second, how does the impact of older articles vary across different research fields. Third, is the change in the impact of older articles accelerating or slowing down. Fourth, are these trends different for much older articles. To answer these questions, we studied citations from articles published in 1990-2013. We computed the fraction of citations to older articles from articles published each year as the measure of impact. We considered articles that were published at least 10 years before the citing article as older articles. We computed these numbers for 261 subject categories and 9 broad areas of research. Finally, we repeated the computation for two other definitions of older articles, 15 years and older and 20 years and older. There are three conclusions from our study. First, the impact of older articles has grown substantially over 1990-2013. In 2013, 36% of citations were to articles that are at least 10 years old; this fraction has grown 28% since 1990. The fraction of older citations increased over 1990-2013 for 7 out of 9 broad areas and 231 out of 261 subject categories. Second, the increase over the second half (2002-2013) was double the increase in the first half (1990-2001). Third, the trend of a growing impact of older articles also holds for even older articles. In 2013, 21% of citations were to articles >= 15 years old with an increase of 30% since 1990 and 13% of citations were to articles >= 20 years old with an increase of 36%. Now that finding and reading relevant older articles is about as easy as finding and reading recently published articles, significant advances aren't getting lost on the shelves and are influencing work worldwide for years after. △ Less

Submitted 2 November, 2014; originally announced November 2014.

Rise of the Rest: The Growing Impact of Non-Elite Journals

Authors: Anurag Acharya, Alex Verstak, Helder Suzuki, Sean Henderson, Mikhail Iakhiaev, Cliff Chiung Yu Lin, Namit Shetty

Abstract: In this paper, we examine the evolution of the impact of non-elite journals. We attempt to answer two questions. First, what fraction of the top-cited articles are published in non-elite journals and how has this changed over time. Second, what fraction of the total citations are to non-elite journals and how has this changed over time. We studied citations to articles published in 1995-2013. We… ▽ More In this paper, we examine the evolution of the impact of non-elite journals. We attempt to answer two questions. First, what fraction of the top-cited articles are published in non-elite journals and how has this changed over time. Second, what fraction of the total citations are to non-elite journals and how has this changed over time. We studied citations to articles published in 1995-2013. We computed the 10 most-cited journals and the 1000 most-cited articles each year for all 261 subject categories in Scholar Metrics. We marked the 10 most-cited journals in a category as the elite journals for the category and the rest as non-elite. There are two conclusions from our study. First, the fraction of top-cited articles published in non-elite journals increased steadily over 1995-2013. While the elite journals still publish a substantial fraction of high-impact articles, many more authors of well-regarded papers in diverse research fields are choosing other venues. The number of top-1000 papers published in non-elite journals for the representative subject category went from 149 in 1995 to 245 in 2013, a growth of 64%. Looking at broad research areas, 4 out of 9 areas saw at least one-third of the top-cited articles published in non-elite journals in 2013. For 6 out of 9 areas, the fraction of top-cited papers published in non-elite journals for the representative subject category grew by 45% or more. Second, now that finding and reading relevant articles in non-elite journals is about as easy as finding and reading articles in elite journals, researchers are increasingly building on and citing work published everywhere. Considering citations to all articles, the percentage of citations to articles in non-elite journals went from 27% in 1995 to 47% in 2013. Six out of nine broad areas had at least 50% of citations going to articles published in non-elite journals in 2013. △ Less

Submitted 8 October, 2014; originally announced October 2014.