-
The 1/3-conjectures for domination in cubic graphs
Authors:
Paul Dorbec,
Michael Antony Henning
Abstract:
A set S of vertices in a graph G is a dominating set of G if every vertex not in S is adjacent to a vertex in S . The domination number of G, denoted by $γ$(G), is the minimum cardinality of a dominating set in G. In a breakthrough paper in 2008, L{ö}wenstein and Rautenbach proved that if G is a cubic graph of order n and girth at least 83, then $γ$(G) $\le$ n/3. A natural question is if this girt…
▽ More
A set S of vertices in a graph G is a dominating set of G if every vertex not in S is adjacent to a vertex in S . The domination number of G, denoted by $γ$(G), is the minimum cardinality of a dominating set in G. In a breakthrough paper in 2008, L{ö}wenstein and Rautenbach proved that if G is a cubic graph of order n and girth at least 83, then $γ$(G) $\le$ n/3. A natural question is if this girth condition can be lowered. The question gave birth to two 1/3-conjectures for domination in cubic graphs. The first conjecture, posed by Verstraete in 2010, states that if G is a cubic graph on n vertices with girth at least 6, then $γ$(G) $\le$ n/3. The second conjecture, first posed as a question by Kostochka in 2009, states that if G is a cubic, bipartite graph of order n, then $γ$(G) $\le$n/3. In this paper, we prove Verstraete's conjecture when there is no 7-cycle and no 8-cycle, and we prove the Kostochka's related conjecture for bipartite graphs when there is no 4-cycle and no 8-cycle.
△ Less
Submitted 31 January, 2024;
originally announced January 2024.
-
The minmin coalition number in graphs
Authors:
Davood Bakhshesh,
Michael A. Henning
Abstract:
A set $S$ of vertices in a graph $G$ is a dominating set if every vertex of $V(G) \setminus S$ is adjacent to a vertex in $S$. A coalition in $G$ consists of two disjoint sets of vertices $X$ and $Y$ of $G$, neither of which is a dominating set but whose union $X \cup Y$ is a dominating set of $G$. Such sets $X$ and $Y$ form a coalition in $G$. A coalition partition, abbreviated $c$-partition, in…
▽ More
A set $S$ of vertices in a graph $G$ is a dominating set if every vertex of $V(G) \setminus S$ is adjacent to a vertex in $S$. A coalition in $G$ consists of two disjoint sets of vertices $X$ and $Y$ of $G$, neither of which is a dominating set but whose union $X \cup Y$ is a dominating set of $G$. Such sets $X$ and $Y$ form a coalition in $G$. A coalition partition, abbreviated $c$-partition, in $G$ is a partition $\mathcal{X} = \{X_1,\ldots,X_k\}$ of the vertex set $V(G)$ of $G$ such that for all $i \in [k]$, each set $X_i \in \mathcal{X}$ satisfies one of the following two conditions: (1) $X_i$ is a dominating set of $G$ with a single vertex, or (2) $X_i$ forms a coalition with some other set $X_j \in \mathcal{X}$. %The coalition number ${C}(G)$ is the maximum cardinality of a $c$-partition of $G$. Let ${\cal A} = \{A_1,\ldots,A_r\}$ and ${\cal B}= \{B_1,\ldots, B_s\}$ be two partitions of $V(G)$. Partition ${\cal B}$ is a refinement of partition ${\cal A}$ if every set $B_i \in {\cal B} $ is either equal to, or a proper subset of, some set $A_j \in {\cal A}$. Further if ${\cal A} \ne {\cal B}$, then ${\cal B}$ is a proper refinement of ${\cal A}$. Partition ${\cal A}$ is a minimal $c$-partition if it is not a proper refinement of another $c$-partition. Haynes et al. [AKCE Int. J. Graphs Combin. 17 (2020), no. 2, 653--659] defined the minmin coalition number $c_{\min}(G)$ of $G$ to equal the minimum order of a minimal $c$-partition of $G$. We show that $2 \le c_{\min}(G) \le n$, and we characterize graphs $G$ of order $n$ satisfying $c_{\min}(G) = n$. A polynomial-time algorithm is given to determine if $c_{\min}(G)=2$ for a given graph $G$. A necessary and sufficient condition for a graph $G$ to satisfy $c_{\min}(G) \ge 3$ is given, and a characterization of graphs $G$ with minimum degree~$2$ and $c_{\min}(G)= 4$ is provided.
△ Less
Submitted 2 July, 2023;
originally announced July 2023.
-
Singleton Coalition Graph Chains
Authors:
Davood Bakhshesh,
Michael A. Henning,
Dinabandhu Pradhan
Abstract:
Let $G$ be graph with vertex set $V$ and order $n=|V|$. A coalition in $G$ is a combination of two distinct sets, $A\subseteq V$ and $B\subseteq V$, which are disjoint and are not dominating sets of $G$, but $A\cup B$ is a dominating set of $G$. A coalition partition of $G$ is a partition $\mathcal{P}=\{S_1,\ldots,S_k\}$ of its vertex set $V$, where each set $S_i\in \mathcal{P}$ is either a domina…
▽ More
Let $G$ be graph with vertex set $V$ and order $n=|V|$. A coalition in $G$ is a combination of two distinct sets, $A\subseteq V$ and $B\subseteq V$, which are disjoint and are not dominating sets of $G$, but $A\cup B$ is a dominating set of $G$. A coalition partition of $G$ is a partition $\mathcal{P}=\{S_1,\ldots,S_k\}$ of its vertex set $V$, where each set $S_i\in \mathcal{P}$ is either a dominating set of $G$ with only one vertex, or it is not a dominating set but forms a coalition with some other set $S_j \in \mathcal{P}$. The coalition number $C(G)$ is the maximum cardinality of a coalition partition of $G$. To represent a coalition partition $\mathcal{P}$ of $G$, a coalition graph $\CG(G, \mathcal{P})$ is created, where each vertex of the graph corresponds to a member of $\mathcal{P}$ and two vertices are adjacent if and only if their corresponding sets form a coalition in $G$. A coalition partition $\mathcal{P}$ of $G$ is a singleton coalition partition if every set in $\mathcal{P}$ consists of a single vertex. If a graph $G$ has a singleton coalition partition, then $G$ is referred to as a singleton-partition graph. A graph $H$ is called a singleton coalition graph of a graph $G$ if there exists a singleton coalition partition $\mathcal{P}$ of $G$ such that the coalition graph $\CG(G,\mathcal{P})$ is isomorphic to $H$. A singleton coalition graph chain with an initial graph $G_1$ is defined as the sequence $G_1\rightarrow G_2\rightarrow G_3\rightarrow\cdots$ where all graphs $G_i$ are singleton-partition graphs, and $\CG(G_i,Γ_1)=G_{i+1}$, where $Γ_1$ represents a singleton coalition partition of $G_i$. In this paper, we address two open problems posed by Haynes et al. We characterize all graphs $G$ of order $n$ and minimum degree $δ(G)=2$ such that $C(G)=n$ and investigate the singleton coalition graph chain starting with graphs $G$ where $δ(G)\le 2$.
△ Less
Submitted 15 April, 2023;
originally announced April 2023.
-
Understanding issues related to personal data and data protection in open source projects on GitHub
Authors:
Anne Henning,
Lukas Schulte,
Steffen Herbold,
Oksana Kulyk,
Peter Mayer
Abstract:
Context: Data protection regulations such as the GDPR and the CCPA affect how software may handle the personal data of its users and how consent for handling of such data may be given. Prior literature focused on how this works in operation, but lacks a perspective of the impact on the software development process.
Objective: Within our work, we will address this gap and explore how software dev…
▽ More
Context: Data protection regulations such as the GDPR and the CCPA affect how software may handle the personal data of its users and how consent for handling of such data may be given. Prior literature focused on how this works in operation, but lacks a perspective of the impact on the software development process.
Objective: Within our work, we will address this gap and explore how software development itself is impacted. We want to understand which data protection-related issues are reported, who reports them, and how developers react to such issues.
Method: We will conduct an exploratory study based on issues that are reported with respect to data protection in open source software on GitHub. We will determine the roles of the actors involved, the status of such issues, and we use inductive coding to understand the data protection issues. We qualitatively analyze the issues as part of the inductive coding and further explore the reasoning for resolutions. We quantitatively analyze the relation between the roles, resolutions, and data protection issues to understand correlations.
△ Less
Submitted 13 April, 2023;
originally announced April 2023.
-
Complexity of total dominator coloring in graphs
Authors:
Michael A. Henning,
Kusum,
Arti Pandey,
Kaustav Paul
Abstract:
Let $G=(V,E)$ be a graph with no isolated vertices. A vertex $v$ totally dominate a vertex $w$ ($w \ne v$), if $v$ is adjacent to $w$. A set $D \subseteq V$ called a total dominating set of $G$ if every vertex $v\in V$ is totally dominated by some vertex in $D$. The minimum cardinality of a total dominating set is the total domination number of $G$ and is denoted by $γ_t(G)$. A total dominator col…
▽ More
Let $G=(V,E)$ be a graph with no isolated vertices. A vertex $v$ totally dominate a vertex $w$ ($w \ne v$), if $v$ is adjacent to $w$. A set $D \subseteq V$ called a total dominating set of $G$ if every vertex $v\in V$ is totally dominated by some vertex in $D$. The minimum cardinality of a total dominating set is the total domination number of $G$ and is denoted by $γ_t(G)$. A total dominator coloring of graph $G$ is a proper coloring of vertices of $G$, so that each vertex totally dominates some color class. The total dominator chromatic number $χ_{td}(G)$ of $G$ is the least number of colors required for a total dominator coloring of $G$. The Total Dominator Coloring problem is to find a total dominator coloring of $G$ using the minimum number of colors. It is known that the decision version of this problem is NP-complete for general graphs. We show that it remains NP-complete even when restricted to bipartite, planar and split graphs. We further study the Total Dominator Coloring problem for various graph classes, including trees, cographs and chain graphs. First, we characterize the trees having $χ_{td}(T)=γ_t(T)+1$, which completes the characterization of trees achieving all possible values of $χ_{td}(T)$. Also, we show that for a cograph $G$, $χ_{td}(G)$ can be computed in linear-time. Moreover, we show that $2 \le χ_{td}(G) \le 4$ for a chain graph $G$ and give characterization of chain graphs for every possible value of $χ_{td}(G)$ in linear-time.
△ Less
Submitted 3 March, 2023;
originally announced March 2023.
-
Progress towards the two-thirds conjecture on locating-total dominating sets
Authors:
Dipayan Chakraborty,
Florent Foucaud,
Anni Hakanen,
Michael A. Henning,
Annegret K. Wagler
Abstract:
We study upper bounds on the size of optimum locating-total dominating sets in graphs. A set $S$ of vertices of a graph $G$ is a locating-total dominating set if every vertex of $G$ has a neighbor in $S$, and if any two vertices outside $S$ have distinct neighborhoods within $S$. The smallest size of such a set is denoted by $γ^L_t(G)$. It has been conjectured that $γ^L_t(G)\leq\frac{2n}{3}$ holds…
▽ More
We study upper bounds on the size of optimum locating-total dominating sets in graphs. A set $S$ of vertices of a graph $G$ is a locating-total dominating set if every vertex of $G$ has a neighbor in $S$, and if any two vertices outside $S$ have distinct neighborhoods within $S$. The smallest size of such a set is denoted by $γ^L_t(G)$. It has been conjectured that $γ^L_t(G)\leq\frac{2n}{3}$ holds for every twin-free graph $G$ of order $n$ without isolated vertices. We prove that the conjecture holds for cobipartite graphs, split graphs, block graphs and subcubic graphs.
△ Less
Submitted 7 August, 2024; v1 submitted 25 November, 2022;
originally announced November 2022.
-
On the coalition number of trees
Authors:
Davood Bakhshesh,
Michael A. Henning,
Dinabandhu Pradhan
Abstract:
Let $G$ be a graph with vertex set $V$ and of order $n = |V|$, and let $δ(G)$ and $Δ(G)$ be the minimum and maximum degree of $G$, respectively. Two disjoint sets $V_1, V_2 \subseteq V$ form a coalition in $G$ if none of them is a dominating set of $G$ but their union $V_1\cup V_2$ is. A vertex partition $Ψ=\{V_1,\ldots, V_k\}$ of $V$ is a coalition partition of $G$ if every set $V_i\in Ψ$ is eith…
▽ More
Let $G$ be a graph with vertex set $V$ and of order $n = |V|$, and let $δ(G)$ and $Δ(G)$ be the minimum and maximum degree of $G$, respectively. Two disjoint sets $V_1, V_2 \subseteq V$ form a coalition in $G$ if none of them is a dominating set of $G$ but their union $V_1\cup V_2$ is. A vertex partition $Ψ=\{V_1,\ldots, V_k\}$ of $V$ is a coalition partition of $G$ if every set $V_i\in Ψ$ is either a dominating set of $G$ with the cardinality $|V_i|=1$, or is not a dominating set but for some $V_j\in Ψ$, $V_i$ and $V_j$ form a coalition. The maximum cardinality of a coalition partition of $G$ is the coalition number $\mathcal{C}(G)$ of $G$. Given a coalition partition $Ψ= \{V_1, \ldots, V_k\}$ of $G$, a coalition graph $\CG(G, Ψ)$ is associated on $Ψ$ such that there is a one-to-one correspondence between its vertices and the members of $Ψ$, where two vertices of $\CG(G, Ψ)$ are adjacent if and only if the corresponding sets form a coalition in $G$. In this paper, we partially solve one of the open problems posed in Haynes et al. \cite{coal0} and we solve two open problems posed by Haynes et al. \cite{coal1}. We characterize all graphs $G$ with $δ(G) \le 1$ and $\mathcal{C}(G)=n$, and we characterize all trees $T$ with $\mathcal{C}(T)=n-1$. We determine the number of coalition graphs that can be defined by all coalition partitions of a given path. Furthermore, we show that there is no universal coalition path, a path whose coalition partitions defines all possible coalition graphs.
△ Less
Submitted 1 November, 2022; v1 submitted 17 November, 2021;
originally announced November 2021.
-
Semipaired Domination in Some Subclasses of Chordal Graphs
Authors:
Michael A. Henning,
Arti Pandey,
Vikash Tripathi
Abstract:
A dominating set $D$ of a graph $G$ without isolated vertices is called semipaired dominating set if $D$ can be partitioned into $2$-element subsets such that the vertices in each set are at distance at most $2$. The semipaired domination number, denoted by $γ_{pr2}(G)$ is the minimum cardinality of a semipaired dominating set of $G$. Given a graph $G$ with no isolated vertices, the \textsc{Minimu…
▽ More
A dominating set $D$ of a graph $G$ without isolated vertices is called semipaired dominating set if $D$ can be partitioned into $2$-element subsets such that the vertices in each set are at distance at most $2$. The semipaired domination number, denoted by $γ_{pr2}(G)$ is the minimum cardinality of a semipaired dominating set of $G$. Given a graph $G$ with no isolated vertices, the \textsc{Minimum Semipaired Domination} problem is to find a semipaired dominating set of $G$ of cardinality $γ_{pr2}(G)$. The decision version of the \textsc{Minimum Semipaired Domination} problem is already known to be NP-complete for chordal graphs, an important graph class. In this paper, we show that the decision version of the \textsc{Minimum Semipaired Domination} problem remains NP-complete for split graphs, a subclass of chordal graphs. On the positive side, we propose a linear-time algorithm to compute a minimum cardinality semipaired dominating set of block graphs. In addition, we prove that the \textsc{Minimum Semipaired Domination} problem is APX-complete for graphs with maximum degree $3$.
△ Less
Submitted 3 July, 2021; v1 submitted 31 August, 2020;
originally announced August 2020.
-
Independent Domination in Subcubic Graphs
Authors:
A. Akbari,
S. Akbari,
A. Doosthosseini,
Z. Hadizadeh,
Michael A. Henning,
A. Naraghi
Abstract:
A set $S$ of vertices in a graph $G$ is a dominating set if every vertex not in $S$ is adjacent to a vertex in $S$. If, in addition, $S$ is an independent set, then $S$ is an independent dominating set. The independent domination number $i(G)$ of $G$ is the minimum cardinality of an independent dominating set in $G$. In 2013 Goddard and Henning [Discrete Math 313 (2013), 839--854] conjectured that…
▽ More
A set $S$ of vertices in a graph $G$ is a dominating set if every vertex not in $S$ is adjacent to a vertex in $S$. If, in addition, $S$ is an independent set, then $S$ is an independent dominating set. The independent domination number $i(G)$ of $G$ is the minimum cardinality of an independent dominating set in $G$. In 2013 Goddard and Henning [Discrete Math 313 (2013), 839--854] conjectured that if $G$ is a connected cubic graph of order $n$, then $i(G) \le \frac{3}{8}n$, except if $G$ is the complete bipartite graph $K_{3,3}$ or the $5$-prism $C_5 \, \Box \, K_2$. Further they construct two infinite families of connected cubic graphs with independent domination three-eighths their order. They remark that perhaps it is even true that for $n > 10$ these two families are only families for which equality holds. In this paper, we provide a new family of connected cubic graphs $G$ of order $n$ such that $i(G) = \frac{3}{8}n$. We also show that if $G$ is a subcubic graph of order $n$ with no isolated vertex, then $i(G) \le \frac{1}{2}n$, and we characterize the graphs achieving equality in this bound.
△ Less
Submitted 9 January, 2020;
originally announced January 2020.
-
Complexity and Algorithms for Semipaired Domination in Graphs
Authors:
Michael A. Henning,
Arti Pandey,
Vikash Tripathi
Abstract:
For a graph $G=(V,E)$ with no isolated vertices, a set $D\subseteq V$ is called a semipaired dominating set of G if $(i)$ $D$ is a dominating set of $G$, and $(ii)$ $D$ can be partitioned into two element subsets such that the vertices in each two element set are at distance at most two. The minimum cardinality of a semipaired dominating set of $G$ is called the semipaired domination number of…
▽ More
For a graph $G=(V,E)$ with no isolated vertices, a set $D\subseteq V$ is called a semipaired dominating set of G if $(i)$ $D$ is a dominating set of $G$, and $(ii)$ $D$ can be partitioned into two element subsets such that the vertices in each two element set are at distance at most two. The minimum cardinality of a semipaired dominating set of $G$ is called the semipaired domination number of $G$, and is denoted by $γ_{pr2}(G)$. The \textsc{Minimum Semipaired Domination} problem is to find a semipaired dominating set of $G$ of cardinality $γ_{pr2}(G)$. In this paper, we initiate the algorithmic study of the \textsc{Minimum Semipaired Domination} problem. We show that the decision version of the \textsc{Minimum Semipaired Domination} problem is NP-complete for bipartite graphs and split graphs. On the positive side, we present a linear-time algorithm to compute a minimum cardinality semipaired dominating set of interval graphs and trees. We also propose a $1+\ln(2Δ+2)$-approximation algorithm for the \textsc{Minimum Semipaired Domination} problem, where $Δ$ denote the maximum degree of the graph and show that the \textsc{Minimum Semipaired Domination} problem cannot be approximated within $(1-ε) \ln|V|$ for any $ε> 0$ unless NP $\subseteq$ DTIME$(|V|^{O(\log\log|V|)})$.
△ Less
Submitted 1 April, 2019;
originally announced April 2019.
-
Algorithmic Aspects of Semitotal Domination in Graphs
Authors:
Michael A. Henning,
Arti Pandey
Abstract:
For a graph $G=(V,E)$, a set $D \subseteq V$ is called a semitotal dominating set of $G$ if $D$ is a dominating set of $G$, and every vertex in $D$ is within distance~$2$ of another vertex of~$D$. The \textsc{Minimum Semitotal Domination} problem is to find a semitotal dominating set of minimum cardinality. Given a graph $G$ and a positive integer $k$, the \textsc{Semitotal Domination Decision} pr…
▽ More
For a graph $G=(V,E)$, a set $D \subseteq V$ is called a semitotal dominating set of $G$ if $D$ is a dominating set of $G$, and every vertex in $D$ is within distance~$2$ of another vertex of~$D$. The \textsc{Minimum Semitotal Domination} problem is to find a semitotal dominating set of minimum cardinality. Given a graph $G$ and a positive integer $k$, the \textsc{Semitotal Domination Decision} problem is to decide whether $G$ has a semitotal dominating set of cardinality at most $k$. The \textsc{Semitotal Domination Decision} problem is known to be NP-complete for general graphs. In this paper, we show that the \textsc{Semitotal Domination Decision} problem remains NP-complete for planar graphs, split graphs and chordal bipartite graphs. We give a polynomial time algorithm to solve the \textsc{Minimum Semitotal Domination} problem in interval graphs. We show that the \textsc{Minimum Semitotal Domination} problem in a graph with maximum degree~$Δ$ admits an approximation algorithm that achieves the approximation ratio of $2+3\ln(Δ+1)$, showing that the problem is in the class log-APX. We also show that the \textsc{Minimum Semitotal Domination} problem cannot be approximated within $(1 - ε)\ln |V| $ for any $ε> 0$ unless NP $\subseteq$ DTIME $(|V|^{O(\log \log |V|)})$. Finally, we prove that the \textsc{Minimum Semitotal Domination} problem is APX-complete for bipartite graphs with maximum degree $4$.
△ Less
Submitted 29 November, 2017;
originally announced November 2017.
-
Multiple State EFN Transistors
Authors:
Gideon Segev,
Iddo Amit,
Andrey Godkin,
Alex Henning,
Yossi Rosenwaks
Abstract:
Electrostatically Formed Nanowire (EFN) based transistors have been suggested in the past as gas sensing devices. These transistors are multiple gate transistors in which the source to drain conduction path is determined by the bias applied to the back gate, and two junction gates. If a specific bias is applied to the side gates, the conduction band electrons between them are confined to a well-de…
▽ More
Electrostatically Formed Nanowire (EFN) based transistors have been suggested in the past as gas sensing devices. These transistors are multiple gate transistors in which the source to drain conduction path is determined by the bias applied to the back gate, and two junction gates. If a specific bias is applied to the side gates, the conduction band electrons between them are confined to a well-defined area forming a narrow channel- the Electrostatically Formed Nanowire. Recent work has shown that by applying non-symmetric bias on the side gates, the lateral position of the EFN can be controlled. We propose a novel Multiple State EFN Transistor (MSET) that utilizes this degree of freedom for the implementation of complete multiplexer functionality in a single transistor like device. The multiplexer functionality allows a very simple implementation of binary and multiple valued logic functions.
△ Less
Submitted 19 March, 2015; v1 submitted 25 February, 2015;
originally announced February 2015.