-
Research Software Engineering in 2030
Authors:
Daniel S. Katz,
Simon Hettrick
Abstract:
This position paper for an invited talk on the "Future of eScience" discusses the Research Software Engineering Movement and where it might be in 2030. Because of the authors' experiences, it is aimed globally but with examples that focus on the United States and United Kingdom.
This position paper for an invited talk on the "Future of eScience" discusses the Research Software Engineering Movement and where it might be in 2030. Because of the authors' experiences, it is aimed globally but with examples that focus on the United States and United Kingdom.
△ Less
Submitted 27 September, 2023; v1 submitted 15 August, 2023;
originally announced August 2023.
-
Addressing Research Software Sustainability via Institutes
Authors:
Daniel S. Katz,
Jeffrey C. Carver,
Neil P. Chue Hong,
Sandra Gesing,
Simon Hettrick,
Tom Honeyman,
Karthik Ram,
Nicholas Weber
Abstract:
Research software is essential to modern research, but it requires ongoing human effort to sustain: to continually adapt to changes in dependencies, to fix bugs, and to add new features. Software sustainability institutes, amongst others, develop, maintain, and disseminate best practices for research software sustainability, and build community around them. These practices can both reduce the amou…
▽ More
Research software is essential to modern research, but it requires ongoing human effort to sustain: to continually adapt to changes in dependencies, to fix bugs, and to add new features. Software sustainability institutes, amongst others, develop, maintain, and disseminate best practices for research software sustainability, and build community around them. These practices can both reduce the amount of effort that is needed and create an environment where the effort is appreciated and rewarded. The UK SSI is such an institute, and the US URSSI and the Australian AuSSI are planning to become institutes, and this extended abstract discusses them and the strengths and weaknesses of this approach.
△ Less
Submitted 5 March, 2021;
originally announced March 2021.
-
FAIR and Open Computer Science Research Software
Authors:
Wilhelm Hasselbring,
Leslie Carr,
Simon Hettrick,
Heather Packer,
Thanassis Tiropanis
Abstract:
In computational science and in computer science, research software is a central asset for research. Computational science is the application of computer science and software engineering principles to solving scientific problems, whereas computer science is the study of computer hardware and software design.
The Open Science agenda holds that science advances faster when we can build on existing…
▽ More
In computational science and in computer science, research software is a central asset for research. Computational science is the application of computer science and software engineering principles to solving scientific problems, whereas computer science is the study of computer hardware and software design.
The Open Science agenda holds that science advances faster when we can build on existing results. Therefore, research software has to be reusable for advancing science. Thus, we need proper research software engineering for obtaining reusable and sustainable research software. This way, software engineering methods may improve research in other disciplines. However, research in software engineering and computer science itself will also benefit from reuse when research software is involved.
For good scientific practice, the resulting research software should be open and adhere to the FAIR principles (findable, accessible, interoperable and repeatable) to allow repeatability, reproducibility, and reuse. Compared to research data, research software should be both archived for reproducibility and actively maintained for reusability. The FAIR data principles do not require openness, but research software should be open source software. Established open source software licenses provide sufficient licensing options, such that it should be the rare exception to keep research software closed.
We review and analyze the current state in this area in order to give recommendations for making computer science research software FAIR and open. We observe that research software publishing practices in computer science and in computational science show significant differences.
△ Less
Submitted 16 August, 2019;
originally announced August 2019.
-
Community Organizations: Changing the Culture in Which Research Software Is Developed and Sustained
Authors:
Daniel S. Katz,
Lois Curfman McInnes,
David E. Bernholdt,
Abigail Cabunoc Mayes,
Neil P. Chue Hong,
Jonah Duckles,
Sandra Gesing,
Michael A. Heroux,
Simon Hettrick,
Rafael C. Jimenez,
Marlon Pierce,
Belinda Weaver,
Nancy Wilkins-Diehr
Abstract:
Software is the key crosscutting technology that enables advances in mathematics, computer science, and domain-specific science and engineering to achieve robust simulations and analysis for science, engineering, and other research fields. However, software itself has not traditionally received focused attention from research communities; rather, software has evolved organically and inconsistently…
▽ More
Software is the key crosscutting technology that enables advances in mathematics, computer science, and domain-specific science and engineering to achieve robust simulations and analysis for science, engineering, and other research fields. However, software itself has not traditionally received focused attention from research communities; rather, software has evolved organically and inconsistently, with its development largely as by-products of other initiatives. Moreover, challenges in scientific software are expanding due to disruptive changes in computer hardware, increasing scale and complexity of data, and demands for more complex simulations involving multiphysics, multiscale modeling and outer-loop analysis. In recent years, community members have established a range of grass-roots organizations and projects to address these growing technical and social challenges in software productivity, quality, reproducibility, and sustainability. This article provides an overview of such groups and discusses opportunities to leverage their synergistic activities while nurturing work toward emerging software ecosystems.
△ Less
Submitted 7 December, 2018; v1 submitted 20 November, 2018;
originally announced November 2018.
-
Report on the Fourth Workshop on Sustainable Software for Science: Practice and Experiences (WSSSPE4)
Authors:
Daniel S. Katz,
Kyle E. Niemeyer,
Sandra Gesing,
Lorraine Hwang,
Wolfgang Bangerth,
Simon Hettrick,
Ray Idaszak,
Jean Salac,
Neil Chue Hong,
Santiago Núñez Corrales,
Alice Allen,
R. Stuart Geiger,
Jonah Miller,
Emily Chen,
Anshu Dubey,
Patricia Lago
Abstract:
This report records and discusses the Fourth Workshop on Sustainable Software for Science: Practice and Experiences (WSSSPE4). The report includes a description of the keynote presentation of the workshop, the mission and vision statements that were drafted at the workshop and finalized shortly after it, a set of idea papers, position papers, experience papers, demos, and lightning talks, and a pa…
▽ More
This report records and discusses the Fourth Workshop on Sustainable Software for Science: Practice and Experiences (WSSSPE4). The report includes a description of the keynote presentation of the workshop, the mission and vision statements that were drafted at the workshop and finalized shortly after it, a set of idea papers, position papers, experience papers, demos, and lightning talks, and a panel discussion. The main part of the report covers the set of working groups that formed during the meeting, and for each, discusses the participants, the objective and goal, and how the objective can be reached, along with contact information for readers who may want to join the group. Finally, we present results from a survey of the workshop attendees.
△ Less
Submitted 18 May, 2017; v1 submitted 7 May, 2017;
originally announced May 2017.
