Showing 1–8 of 8 results for author: Hicke, Y

The Life Cycle of Large Language Models: A Review of Biases in Education

Authors: Jinsook Lee, Yann Hicke, Renzhe Yu, Christopher Brooks, René F. Kizilcec

Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly adopted in educational contexts to provide personalized support to students and teachers. The unprecedented capacity of LLM-based applications to understand and generate natural language can potentially improve instructional effectiveness and learning outcomes, but the integration of LLMs in education technology has renewed concerns over algorithmic bi… ▽ More Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly adopted in educational contexts to provide personalized support to students and teachers. The unprecedented capacity of LLM-based applications to understand and generate natural language can potentially improve instructional effectiveness and learning outcomes, but the integration of LLMs in education technology has renewed concerns over algorithmic bias which may exacerbate educational inequities. In this review, building on prior work on mapping the traditional machine learning life cycle, we provide a holistic map of the LLM life cycle from the initial development of LLMs to customizing pre-trained models for various applications in educational settings. We explain each step in the LLM life cycle and identify potential sources of bias that may arise in the context of education. We discuss why current measures of bias from traditional machine learning fail to transfer to LLM-generated content in education, such as tutoring conversations because the text is high-dimensional, there can be multiple correct responses, and tailoring responses may be pedagogically desirable rather than unfair. This review aims to clarify the complex nature of bias in LLM applications and provide practical guidance for their evaluation to promote educational equity. △ Less

Submitted 3 June, 2024; originally announced July 2024.

Comments: 20 pages, 2 figures, preprint for British Journal of Educational Technology submission

Knowledge Tracing Challenge: Optimal Activity Sequencing for Students

Authors: Yann Hicke

Abstract: Knowledge tracing is a method used in education to assess and track the acquisition of knowledge by individual learners. It involves using a variety of techniques, such as quizzes, tests, and other forms of assessment, to determine what a learner knows and does not know about a particular subject. The goal of knowledge tracing is to identify gaps in understanding and provide targeted instruction t… ▽ More Knowledge tracing is a method used in education to assess and track the acquisition of knowledge by individual learners. It involves using a variety of techniques, such as quizzes, tests, and other forms of assessment, to determine what a learner knows and does not know about a particular subject. The goal of knowledge tracing is to identify gaps in understanding and provide targeted instruction to help learners improve their understanding and retention of material. This can be particularly useful in situations where learners are working at their own pace, such as in online learning environments. By providing regular feedback and adjusting instruction based on individual needs, knowledge tracing can help learners make more efficient progress and achieve better outcomes. Effectively solving the KT problem would unlock the potential of computer-aided education applications such as intelligent tutoring systems, curriculum learning, and learning materials recommendations. In this paper, we will present the results of the implementation of two Knowledge Tracing algorithms on a newly released dataset as part of the AAAI2023 Global Knowledge Tracing Challenge. △ Less

Submitted 13 November, 2023; originally announced November 2023.

Journal ref: Course Project, 2022

AI-TA: Towards an Intelligent Question-Answer Teaching Assistant using Open-Source LLMs

Authors: Yann Hicke, Anmol Agarwal, Qianou Ma, Paul Denny

Abstract: Responding to the thousands of student questions on online QA platforms each semester has a considerable human cost, particularly in computing courses with rapidly growing enrollments. To address the challenges of scalable and intelligent question-answering (QA), we introduce an innovative solution that leverages open-source Large Language Models (LLMs) from the LLaMA-2 family to ensure data priva… ▽ More Responding to the thousands of student questions on online QA platforms each semester has a considerable human cost, particularly in computing courses with rapidly growing enrollments. To address the challenges of scalable and intelligent question-answering (QA), we introduce an innovative solution that leverages open-source Large Language Models (LLMs) from the LLaMA-2 family to ensure data privacy. Our approach combines augmentation techniques such as retrieval augmented generation (RAG), supervised fine-tuning (SFT), and learning from human preferences data using Direct Preference Optimization (DPO). Through extensive experimentation on a Piazza dataset from an introductory CS course, comprising 10,000 QA pairs and 1,500 pairs of preference data, we demonstrate a significant 30% improvement in the quality of answers, with RAG being a particularly impactful addition. Our contributions include the development of a novel architecture for educational QA, extensive evaluations of LLM performance utilizing both human assessments and LLM-based metrics, and insights into the challenges and future directions of educational data processing. This work paves the way for the development of AI-TA, an intelligent QA assistant customizable for courses with an online QA platform △ Less

Submitted 18 December, 2023; v1 submitted 5 November, 2023; originally announced November 2023.

Comments: Updates for camera-ready submission

Journal ref: NeurIPS Workshop on Generative AI for Education (GAIED), 2023

Automated Essay Scoring in Argumentative Writing: DeBERTeachingAssistant

Authors: Yann Hicke, Tonghua Tian, Karan Jha, Choong Hee Kim

Abstract: Automated Essay scoring has been explored as a research and industry problem for over 50 years. It has drawn a lot of attention from the NLP community because of its clear educational value as a research area that can engender the creation of valuable time-saving tools for educators around the world. Yet, these tools are generally focused on detecting good grammar, spelling mistakes, and organizat… ▽ More Automated Essay scoring has been explored as a research and industry problem for over 50 years. It has drawn a lot of attention from the NLP community because of its clear educational value as a research area that can engender the creation of valuable time-saving tools for educators around the world. Yet, these tools are generally focused on detecting good grammar, spelling mistakes, and organization quality but tend to fail at incorporating persuasiveness features in their final assessment. The responsibility to give actionable feedback to the student to improve the strength of their arguments is left solely on the teacher's shoulders. In this work, we present a transformer-based architecture capable of achieving above-human accuracy in annotating argumentative writing discourse elements for their persuasiveness quality and we expand on planned future work investigating the explainability of our model so that actionable feedback can be offered to the student and thus potentially enable a partnership between the teacher's advice and the machine's advice. △ Less

Submitted 9 July, 2023; originally announced July 2023.

Journal ref: LAK23: Workshop on Partnerships for Cocreating Educational Content, 2023

Assessing the efficacy of large language models in generating accurate teacher responses

Authors: Yann Hicke, Abhishek Masand, Wentao Guo, Tushaar Gangavarapu

Abstract: (Tack et al., 2023) organized the shared task hosted by the 18th Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications on generation of teacher language in educational dialogues. Following the structure of the shared task, in this study, we attempt to assess the generative abilities of large language models in providing informative and helpful insights to students, thereby simula… ▽ More (Tack et al., 2023) organized the shared task hosted by the 18th Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications on generation of teacher language in educational dialogues. Following the structure of the shared task, in this study, we attempt to assess the generative abilities of large language models in providing informative and helpful insights to students, thereby simulating the role of a knowledgeable teacher. To this end, we present an extensive evaluation of several benchmarking generative models, including GPT-4 (few-shot, in-context learning), fine-tuned GPT-2, and fine-tuned DialoGPT. Additionally, to optimize for pedagogical quality, we fine-tuned the Flan-T5 model using reinforcement learning. Our experimental findings on the Teacher-Student Chatroom Corpus subset indicate the efficacy of GPT-4 over other fine-tuned models, measured using BERTScore and DialogRPT. We hypothesize that several dataset characteristics, including sampling, representativeness, and dialog completeness, pose significant challenges to fine-tuning, thus contributing to the poor generalizability of the fine-tuned models. Finally, we note the need for these generative models to be evaluated with a metric that relies not only on dialog coherence and matched language modeling distribution but also on the model's ability to showcase pedagogical skills. △ Less

Submitted 9 July, 2023; originally announced July 2023.

Journal ref: ACL, Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications Workshop, 2023

Exploring the MIT Mathematics and EECS Curriculum Using Large Language Models

Authors: Sarah J. Zhang, Samuel Florin, Ariel N. Lee, Eamon Niknafs, Andrei Marginean, Annie Wang, Keith Tyser, Zad Chin, Yann Hicke, Nikhil Singh, Madeleine Udell, Yoon Kim, Tonio Buonassisi, Armando Solar-Lezama, Iddo Drori

Abstract: We curate a comprehensive dataset of 4,550 questions and solutions from problem sets, midterm exams, and final exams across all MIT Mathematics and Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (EECS) courses required for obtaining a degree. We evaluate the ability of large language models to fulfill the graduation requirements for any MIT major in Mathematics and EECS. Our results demonstrate that… ▽ More We curate a comprehensive dataset of 4,550 questions and solutions from problem sets, midterm exams, and final exams across all MIT Mathematics and Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (EECS) courses required for obtaining a degree. We evaluate the ability of large language models to fulfill the graduation requirements for any MIT major in Mathematics and EECS. Our results demonstrate that GPT-3.5 successfully solves a third of the entire MIT curriculum, while GPT-4, with prompt engineering, achieves a perfect solve rate on a test set excluding questions based on images. We fine-tune an open-source large language model on this dataset. We employ GPT-4 to automatically grade model responses, providing a detailed performance breakdown by course, question, and answer type. By embedding questions in a low-dimensional space, we explore the relationships between questions, topics, and classes and discover which questions and classes are required for solving other questions and classes through few-shot learning. Our analysis offers valuable insights into course prerequisites and curriculum design, highlighting language models' potential for learning and improving Mathematics and EECS education. △ Less

Submitted 24 June, 2023; v1 submitted 15 June, 2023; originally announced June 2023.

Comments: Did not receive permission to release the data or model fine-tuned on the data

Human Evaluation of Text-to-Image Models on a Multi-Task Benchmark

Authors: Vitali Petsiuk, Alexander E. Siemenn, Saisamrit Surbehera, Zad Chin, Keith Tyser, Gregory Hunter, Arvind Raghavan, Yann Hicke, Bryan A. Plummer, Ori Kerret, Tonio Buonassisi, Kate Saenko, Armando Solar-Lezama, Iddo Drori

Abstract: We provide a new multi-task benchmark for evaluating text-to-image models. We perform a human evaluation comparing the most common open-source (Stable Diffusion) and commercial (DALL-E 2) models. Twenty computer science AI graduate students evaluated the two models, on three tasks, at three difficulty levels, across ten prompts each, providing 3,600 ratings. Text-to-image generation has seen rapid… ▽ More We provide a new multi-task benchmark for evaluating text-to-image models. We perform a human evaluation comparing the most common open-source (Stable Diffusion) and commercial (DALL-E 2) models. Twenty computer science AI graduate students evaluated the two models, on three tasks, at three difficulty levels, across ten prompts each, providing 3,600 ratings. Text-to-image generation has seen rapid progress to the point that many recent models have demonstrated their ability to create realistic high-resolution images for various prompts. However, current text-to-image methods and the broader body of research in vision-language understanding still struggle with intricate text prompts that contain many objects with multiple attributes and relationships. We introduce a new text-to-image benchmark that contains a suite of thirty-two tasks over multiple applications that capture a model's ability to handle different features of a text prompt. For example, asking a model to generate a varying number of the same object to measure its ability to count or providing a text prompt with several objects that each have a different attribute to identify its ability to match objects and attributes correctly. Rather than subjectively evaluating text-to-image results on a set of prompts, our new multi-task benchmark consists of challenge tasks at three difficulty levels (easy, medium, and hard) and human ratings for each generated image. △ Less

Submitted 22 November, 2022; originally announced November 2022.

Comments: NeurIPS 2022 Workshop on Human Evaluation of Generative Models (HEGM)

From Human Days to Machine Seconds: Automatically Answering and Generating Machine Learning Final Exams

Authors: Iddo Drori, Sarah J. Zhang, Reece Shuttleworth, Sarah Zhang, Keith Tyser, Zad Chin, Pedro Lantigua, Saisamrit Surbehera, Gregory Hunter, Derek Austin, Leonard Tang, Yann Hicke, Sage Simhon, Sathwik Karnik, Darnell Granberry, Madeleine Udell

Abstract: A final exam in machine learning at a top institution such as MIT, Harvard, or Cornell typically takes faculty days to write, and students hours to solve. We demonstrate that large language models pass machine learning finals at a human level, on finals available online after the models were trained, and automatically generate new human-quality final exam questions in seconds. Previous work has de… ▽ More A final exam in machine learning at a top institution such as MIT, Harvard, or Cornell typically takes faculty days to write, and students hours to solve. We demonstrate that large language models pass machine learning finals at a human level, on finals available online after the models were trained, and automatically generate new human-quality final exam questions in seconds. Previous work has developed program synthesis and few-shot learning methods to solve university-level problem set questions in mathematics and STEM courses. In this work, we develop and compare methods that solve final exams, which differ from problem sets in several ways: the questions are longer, have multiple parts, are more complicated, and span a broader set of topics. We curate a dataset and benchmark of questions from machine learning final exams available online and code for answering these questions and generating new questions. We show how to generate new questions from other questions and course notes. For reproducibility and future research on this final exam benchmark, we use automatic checkers for multiple-choice, numeric, and questions with expression answers. We perform ablation studies comparing zero-shot learning with few-shot learning and chain-of-thought prompting using GPT-3, OPT, Codex, and ChatGPT across machine learning topics and find that few-shot learning methods perform best. We highlight the transformative potential of language models to streamline the writing and solution of large-scale assessments, significantly reducing the workload from human days to mere machine seconds. Our results suggest that rather than banning large language models such as ChatGPT in class, instructors should teach students to harness them by asking students meta-questions about correctness, completeness, and originality of the responses generated, encouraging critical thinking in academic studies. △ Less

Submitted 28 June, 2023; v1 submitted 11 June, 2022; originally announced June 2022.

Comments: 9 pages