-
Learning to Recover from Plan Execution Errors during Robot Manipulation: A Neuro-symbolic Approach
Authors:
Namasivayam Kalithasan,
Arnav Tuli,
Vishal Bindal,
Himanshu Gaurav Singh,
Parag Singla,
Rohan Paul
Abstract:
Automatically detecting and recovering from failures is an important but challenging problem for autonomous robots. Most of the recent work on learning to plan from demonstrations lacks the ability to detect and recover from errors in the absence of an explicit state representation and/or a (sub-) goal check function. We propose an approach (blending learning with symbolic search) for automated er…
▽ More
Automatically detecting and recovering from failures is an important but challenging problem for autonomous robots. Most of the recent work on learning to plan from demonstrations lacks the ability to detect and recover from errors in the absence of an explicit state representation and/or a (sub-) goal check function. We propose an approach (blending learning with symbolic search) for automated error discovery and recovery, without needing annotated data of failures. Central to our approach is a neuro-symbolic state representation, in the form of dense scene graph, structured based on the objects present within the environment. This enables efficient learning of the transition function and a discriminator that not only identifies failures but also localizes them facilitating fast re-planning via computation of heuristic distance function. We also present an anytime version of our algorithm, where instead of recovering to the last correct state, we search for a sub-goal in the original plan minimizing the total distance to the goal given a re-planning budget. Experiments on a physics simulator with a variety of simulated failures show the effectiveness of our approach compared to existing baselines, both in terms of efficiency as well as accuracy of our recovery mechanism.
△ Less
Submitted 29 May, 2024;
originally announced May 2024.
-
Sketch-Plan-Generalize: Continual Few-Shot Learning of Inductively Generalizable Spatial Concepts
Authors:
Namasivayam Kalithasan,
Sachit Sachdeva,
Himanshu Gaurav Singh,
Vishal Bindal,
Arnav Tuli,
Gurarmaan Singh Panjeta,
Divyanshu Aggarwal,
Rohan Paul,
Parag Singla
Abstract:
Our goal is to enable embodied agents to learn inductively generalizable spatial concepts, e.g., learning staircase as an inductive composition of towers of increasing height. Given a human demonstration, we seek a learning architecture that infers a succinct ${program}$ representation that explains the observed instance. Additionally, the approach should generalize inductively to novel structures…
▽ More
Our goal is to enable embodied agents to learn inductively generalizable spatial concepts, e.g., learning staircase as an inductive composition of towers of increasing height. Given a human demonstration, we seek a learning architecture that infers a succinct ${program}$ representation that explains the observed instance. Additionally, the approach should generalize inductively to novel structures of different sizes or complex structures expressed as a hierarchical composition of previously learned concepts. Existing approaches that use code generation capabilities of pre-trained large (visual) language models, as well as purely neural models, show poor generalization to a-priori unseen complex concepts. Our key insight is to factor inductive concept learning as (i) ${\it Sketch:}$ detecting and inferring a coarse signature of a new concept (ii) ${\it Plan:}$ performing MCTS search over grounded action sequences (iii) ${\it Generalize:}$ abstracting out grounded plans as inductive programs. Our pipeline facilitates generalization and modular reuse, enabling continual concept learning. Our approach combines the benefits of the code generation ability of large language models (LLM) along with grounded neural representations, resulting in neuro-symbolic programs that show stronger inductive generalization on the task of constructing complex structures in relation to LLM-only and neural-only approaches. Furthermore, we demonstrate reasoning and planning capabilities with learned concepts for embodied instruction following.
△ Less
Submitted 29 May, 2024; v1 submitted 11 April, 2024;
originally announced April 2024.
-
Learning Neuro-symbolic Programs for Language Guided Robot Manipulation
Authors:
Namasivayam Kalithasan,
Himanshu Singh,
Vishal Bindal,
Arnav Tuli,
Vishwajeet Agrawal,
Rahul Jain,
Parag Singla,
Rohan Paul
Abstract:
Given a natural language instruction and an input scene, our goal is to train a model to output a manipulation program that can be executed by the robot. Prior approaches for this task possess one of the following limitations: (i) rely on hand-coded symbols for concepts limiting generalization beyond those seen during training [1] (ii) infer action sequences from instructions but require dense sub…
▽ More
Given a natural language instruction and an input scene, our goal is to train a model to output a manipulation program that can be executed by the robot. Prior approaches for this task possess one of the following limitations: (i) rely on hand-coded symbols for concepts limiting generalization beyond those seen during training [1] (ii) infer action sequences from instructions but require dense sub-goal supervision [2] or (iii) lack semantics required for deeper object-centric reasoning inherent in interpreting complex instructions [3]. In contrast, our approach can handle linguistic as well as perceptual variations, end-to-end trainable and requires no intermediate supervision. The proposed model uses symbolic reasoning constructs that operate on a latent neural object-centric representation, allowing for deeper reasoning over the input scene. Central to our approach is a modular structure consisting of a hierarchical instruction parser and an action simulator to learn disentangled action representations. Our experiments on a simulated environment with a 7-DOF manipulator, consisting of instructions with varying number of steps and scenes with different number of objects, demonstrate that our model is robust to such variations and significantly outperforms baselines, particularly in the generalization settings. The code, dataset and experiment videos are available at https://nsrmp.github.io
△ Less
Submitted 10 March, 2023; v1 submitted 12 November, 2022;
originally announced November 2022.