-
Mechanistic interpretability of large language models with applications to the financial services industry
Authors:
Ashkan Golgoon,
Khashayar Filom,
Arjun Ravi Kannan
Abstract:
Large Language Models such as GPTs (Generative Pre-trained Transformers) exhibit remarkable capabilities across a broad spectrum of applications. Nevertheless, due to their intrinsic complexity, these models present substantial challenges in interpreting their internal decision-making processes. This lack of transparency poses critical challenges when it comes to their adaptation by financial inst…
▽ More
Large Language Models such as GPTs (Generative Pre-trained Transformers) exhibit remarkable capabilities across a broad spectrum of applications. Nevertheless, due to their intrinsic complexity, these models present substantial challenges in interpreting their internal decision-making processes. This lack of transparency poses critical challenges when it comes to their adaptation by financial institutions, where concerns and accountability regarding bias, fairness, and reliability are of paramount importance. Mechanistic interpretability aims at reverse engineering complex AI models such as transformers. In this paper, we are pioneering the use of mechanistic interpretability to shed some light on the inner workings of large language models for use in financial services applications. We offer several examples of how algorithmic tasks can be designed for compliance monitoring purposes. In particular, we investigate GPT-2 Small's attention pattern when prompted to identify potential violation of Fair Lending laws. Using direct logit attribution, we study the contributions of each layer and its corresponding attention heads to the logit difference in the residual stream. Finally, we design clean and corrupted prompts and use activation patching as a causal intervention method to localize our task completion components further. We observe that the (positive) heads $10.2$ (head $2$, layer $10$), $10.7$, and $11.3$, as well as the (negative) heads $9.6$ and $10.6$ play a significant role in the task completion.
△ Less
Submitted 15 July, 2024;
originally announced July 2024.
-
MS-IMAP -- A Multi-Scale Graph Embedding Approach for Interpretable Manifold Learning
Authors:
Shay Deutsch,
Lionel Yelibi,
Alex Tong Lin,
Arjun Ravi Kannan
Abstract:
Deriving meaningful representations from complex, high-dimensional data in unsupervised settings is crucial across diverse machine learning applications. This paper introduces a framework for multi-scale graph network embedding based on spectral graph wavelets that employs a contrastive learning approach. A significant feature of the proposed embedding is its capacity to establish a correspondence…
▽ More
Deriving meaningful representations from complex, high-dimensional data in unsupervised settings is crucial across diverse machine learning applications. This paper introduces a framework for multi-scale graph network embedding based on spectral graph wavelets that employs a contrastive learning approach. A significant feature of the proposed embedding is its capacity to establish a correspondence between the embedding space and the input feature space which aids in deriving feature importance of the original features. We theoretically justify our approach and demonstrate that, in Paley-Wiener spaces on combinatorial graphs, the spectral graph wavelets operator offers greater flexibility and better control over smoothness properties compared to the Laplacian operator. We validate the effectiveness of our proposed graph embedding on a variety of public datasets through a range of downstream tasks, including clustering and unsupervised feature importance.
△ Less
Submitted 5 June, 2024; v1 submitted 4 June, 2024;
originally announced June 2024.
-
Approximation of group explainers with coalition structure using Monte Carlo sampling on the product space of coalitions and features
Authors:
Konstandinos Kotsiopoulos,
Alexey Miroshnikov,
Khashayar Filom,
Arjun Ravi Kannan
Abstract:
In recent years, many Machine Learning (ML) explanation techniques have been designed using ideas from cooperative game theory. These game-theoretic explainers suffer from high complexity, hindering their exact computation in practical settings. In our work, we focus on a wide class of linear game values, as well as coalitional values, for the marginal game based on a given ML model and predictor…
▽ More
In recent years, many Machine Learning (ML) explanation techniques have been designed using ideas from cooperative game theory. These game-theoretic explainers suffer from high complexity, hindering their exact computation in practical settings. In our work, we focus on a wide class of linear game values, as well as coalitional values, for the marginal game based on a given ML model and predictor vector. By viewing these explainers as expectations over appropriate sample spaces, we design a novel Monte Carlo sampling algorithm that estimates them at a reduced complexity that depends linearly on the size of the background dataset. We set up a rigorous framework for the statistical analysis and obtain error bounds for our sampling methods. The advantage of this approach is that it is fast, easily implementable, and model-agnostic. Furthermore, it has similar statistical accuracy as other known estimation techniques that are more complex and model-specific. We provide rigorous proofs of statistical convergence, as well as numerical experiments whose results agree with our theoretical findings.
△ Less
Submitted 18 April, 2024; v1 submitted 17 March, 2023;
originally announced March 2023.
-
On marginal feature attributions of tree-based models
Authors:
Khashayar Filom,
Alexey Miroshnikov,
Konstandinos Kotsiopoulos,
Arjun Ravi Kannan
Abstract:
Due to their power and ease of use, tree-based machine learning models, such as random forests and gradient-boosted tree ensembles, have become very popular. To interpret them, local feature attributions based on marginal expectations, e.g. marginal (interventional) Shapley, Owen or Banzhaf values, may be employed. Such methods are true to the model and implementation invariant, i.e. dependent onl…
▽ More
Due to their power and ease of use, tree-based machine learning models, such as random forests and gradient-boosted tree ensembles, have become very popular. To interpret them, local feature attributions based on marginal expectations, e.g. marginal (interventional) Shapley, Owen or Banzhaf values, may be employed. Such methods are true to the model and implementation invariant, i.e. dependent only on the input-output function of the model. We contrast this with the popular TreeSHAP algorithm by presenting two (statistically similar) decision trees that compute the exact same function for which the "path-dependent" TreeSHAP yields different rankings of features, whereas the marginal Shapley values coincide. Furthermore, we discuss how the internal structure of tree-based models may be leveraged to help with computing their marginal feature attributions according to a linear game value. One important observation is that these are simple (piecewise-constant) functions with respect to a certain grid partition of the input space determined by the trained model. Another crucial observation, showcased by experiments with XGBoost, LightGBM and CatBoost libraries, is that only a portion of all features appears in a tree from the ensemble. Thus, the complexity of computing marginal Shapley (or Owen or Banzhaf) feature attributions may be reduced. This remains valid for a broader class of game values which we shall axiomatically characterize. A prime example is the case of CatBoost models where the trees are oblivious (symmetric) and the number of features in each of them is no larger than the depth. We exploit the symmetry to derive an explicit formula, with improved complexity and only in terms of the internal model parameters, for marginal Shapley (and Banzhaf and Owen) values of CatBoost models. This results in a fast, accurate algorithm for estimating these feature attributions.
△ Less
Submitted 5 May, 2024; v1 submitted 16 February, 2023;
originally announced February 2023.
-
Model-agnostic bias mitigation methods with regressor distribution control for Wasserstein-based fairness metrics
Authors:
Alexey Miroshnikov,
Konstandinos Kotsiopoulos,
Ryan Franks,
Arjun Ravi Kannan
Abstract:
This article is a companion paper to our earlier work Miroshnikov et al. (2021) on fairness interpretability, which introduces bias explanations. In the current work, we propose a bias mitigation methodology based upon the construction of post-processed models with fairer regressor distributions for Wasserstein-based fairness metrics. By identifying the list of predictors contributing the most to…
▽ More
This article is a companion paper to our earlier work Miroshnikov et al. (2021) on fairness interpretability, which introduces bias explanations. In the current work, we propose a bias mitigation methodology based upon the construction of post-processed models with fairer regressor distributions for Wasserstein-based fairness metrics. By identifying the list of predictors contributing the most to the bias, we reduce the dimensionality of the problem by mitigating the bias originating from those predictors. The post-processing methodology involves reshaping the predictor distributions by balancing the positive and negative bias explanations and allows for the regressor bias to decrease. We design an algorithm that uses Bayesian optimization to construct the bias-performance efficient frontier over the family of post-processed models, from which an optimal model is selected. Our novel methodology performs optimization in low-dimensional spaces and avoids expensive model retraining.
△ Less
Submitted 19 November, 2021;
originally announced November 2021.
-
Stability theory of game-theoretic group feature explanations for machine learning models
Authors:
Alexey Miroshnikov,
Konstandinos Kotsiopoulos,
Khashayar Filom,
Arjun Ravi Kannan
Abstract:
In this article, we study feature attributions of Machine Learning (ML) models originating from linear game values and coalitional values defined as operators on appropriate functional spaces. The main focus is on random games based on the conditional and marginal expectations. The first part of our work formulates a stability theory for these explanation operators by establishing certain bounds f…
▽ More
In this article, we study feature attributions of Machine Learning (ML) models originating from linear game values and coalitional values defined as operators on appropriate functional spaces. The main focus is on random games based on the conditional and marginal expectations. The first part of our work formulates a stability theory for these explanation operators by establishing certain bounds for both marginal and conditional explanations. The differences between the two games are then elucidated, such as showing that the marginal explanations can become discontinuous on some naturally-designed domains, while the conditional explanations remain stable. In the second part of our work, group explanation methodologies are devised based on game values with coalition structure, where the features are grouped based on dependencies. We show analytically that grouping features this way has a stabilizing effect on the marginal operator on both group and individual levels, and allows for the unification of marginal and conditional explanations. Our results are verified in a number of numerical experiments where an information-theoretic measure of dependence is used for grouping.
△ Less
Submitted 10 August, 2024; v1 submitted 22 February, 2021;
originally announced February 2021.
-
Wasserstein-based fairness interpretability framework for machine learning models
Authors:
Alexey Miroshnikov,
Konstandinos Kotsiopoulos,
Ryan Franks,
Arjun Ravi Kannan
Abstract:
The objective of this article is to introduce a fairness interpretability framework for measuring and explaining the bias in classification and regression models at the level of a distribution. In our work, we measure the model bias across sub-population distributions in the model output using the Wasserstein metric. To properly quantify the contributions of predictors, we take into account the fa…
▽ More
The objective of this article is to introduce a fairness interpretability framework for measuring and explaining the bias in classification and regression models at the level of a distribution. In our work, we measure the model bias across sub-population distributions in the model output using the Wasserstein metric. To properly quantify the contributions of predictors, we take into account the favorability of both the model and predictors with respect to the non-protected class. The quantification is accomplished by the use of transport theory, which gives rise to the decomposition of the model bias and bias explanations to positive and negative contributions. To gain more insight into the role of favorability and allow for additivity of bias explanations, we adapt techniques from cooperative game theory.
△ Less
Submitted 8 March, 2022; v1 submitted 5 November, 2020;
originally announced November 2020.
