-
Crowd-Calibrator: Can Annotator Disagreement Inform Calibration in Subjective Tasks?
Authors:
Urja Khurana,
Eric Nalisnick,
Antske Fokkens,
Swabha Swayamdipta
Abstract:
Subjective tasks in NLP have been mostly relegated to objective standards, where the gold label is decided by taking the majority vote. This obfuscates annotator disagreement and the inherent uncertainty of the label. We argue that subjectivity should factor into model decisions and play a direct role via calibration under a selective prediction setting. Specifically, instead of calibrating confid…
▽ More
Subjective tasks in NLP have been mostly relegated to objective standards, where the gold label is decided by taking the majority vote. This obfuscates annotator disagreement and the inherent uncertainty of the label. We argue that subjectivity should factor into model decisions and play a direct role via calibration under a selective prediction setting. Specifically, instead of calibrating confidence purely from the model's perspective, we calibrate models for subjective tasks based on crowd worker agreement. Our method, Crowd-Calibrator, models the distance between the distribution of crowd worker labels and the model's own distribution over labels to inform whether the model should abstain from a decision. On two highly subjective tasks, hate speech detection and natural language inference, our experiments show Crowd-Calibrator either outperforms or achieves competitive performance with existing selective prediction baselines. Our findings highlight the value of bringing human decision-making into model predictions.
△ Less
Submitted 26 August, 2024;
originally announced August 2024.
-
Towards Feature Engineering with Human and AI's Knowledge: Understanding Data Science Practitioners' Perceptions in Human&AI-Assisted Feature Engineering Design
Authors:
Qian Zhu,
Dakuo Wang,
Shuai Ma,
April Yi Wang,
Zixin Chen,
Udayan Khurana,
Xiaojuan Ma
Abstract:
As AI technology continues to advance, the importance of human-AI collaboration becomes increasingly evident, with numerous studies exploring its potential in various fields. One vital field is data science, including feature engineering (FE), where both human ingenuity and AI capabilities play pivotal roles. Despite the existence of AI-generated recommendations for FE, there remains a limited und…
▽ More
As AI technology continues to advance, the importance of human-AI collaboration becomes increasingly evident, with numerous studies exploring its potential in various fields. One vital field is data science, including feature engineering (FE), where both human ingenuity and AI capabilities play pivotal roles. Despite the existence of AI-generated recommendations for FE, there remains a limited understanding of how to effectively integrate and utilize humans' and AI's knowledge. To address this gap, we design a readily-usable prototype, human\&AI-assisted FE in Jupyter notebooks. It harnesses the strengths of humans and AI to provide feature suggestions to users, seamlessly integrating these recommendations into practical workflows. Using the prototype as a research probe, we conducted an exploratory study to gain valuable insights into data science practitioners' perceptions, usage patterns, and their potential needs when presented with feature suggestions from both humans and AI. Through qualitative analysis, we discovered that the Creator of the feature (i.e., AI or human) significantly influences users' feature selection, and the semantic clarity of the suggested feature greatly impacts its adoption rate. Furthermore, our findings indicate that users perceive both differences and complementarity between features generated by humans and those generated by AI. Lastly, based on our study results, we derived a set of design recommendations for future human&AI FE design. Our findings show the collaborative potential between humans and AI in the field of FE.
△ Less
Submitted 22 May, 2024;
originally announced May 2024.
-
Leveraging Few-Shot Data Augmentation and Waterfall Prompting for Response Generation
Authors:
Lea Krause,
Selene Báez Santamaría,
Michiel van der Meer,
Urja Khurana
Abstract:
This paper discusses our approaches for task-oriented conversational modelling using subjective knowledge, with a particular emphasis on response generation. Our methodology was shaped by an extensive data analysis that evaluated key factors such as response length, sentiment, and dialogue acts present in the provided dataset. We used few-shot learning to augment the data with newly generated subj…
▽ More
This paper discusses our approaches for task-oriented conversational modelling using subjective knowledge, with a particular emphasis on response generation. Our methodology was shaped by an extensive data analysis that evaluated key factors such as response length, sentiment, and dialogue acts present in the provided dataset. We used few-shot learning to augment the data with newly generated subjective knowledge items and present three approaches for DSTC11: (1) task-specific model exploration, (2) incorporation of the most frequent question into all generated responses, and (3) a waterfall prompting technique using a combination of both GPT-3 and ChatGPT.
△ Less
Submitted 2 August, 2023;
originally announced August 2023.
-
A Vision for Semantically Enriched Data Science
Authors:
Udayan Khurana,
Kavitha Srinivas,
Sainyam Galhotra,
Horst Samulowitz
Abstract:
The recent efforts in automation of machine learning or data science has achieved success in various tasks such as hyper-parameter optimization or model selection. However, key areas such as utilizing domain knowledge and data semantics are areas where we have seen little automation. Data Scientists have long leveraged common sense reasoning and domain knowledge to understand and enrich data for b…
▽ More
The recent efforts in automation of machine learning or data science has achieved success in various tasks such as hyper-parameter optimization or model selection. However, key areas such as utilizing domain knowledge and data semantics are areas where we have seen little automation. Data Scientists have long leveraged common sense reasoning and domain knowledge to understand and enrich data for building predictive models. In this paper we discuss important shortcomings of current data science and machine learning solutions. We then envision how leveraging "semantic" understanding and reasoning on data in combination with novel tools for data science automation can help with consistent and explainable data augmentation and transformation. Additionally, we discuss how semantics can assist data scientists in a new manner by helping with challenges related to trust, bias, and explainability in machine learning. Semantic annotation can also help better explore and organize large data sources.
△ Less
Submitted 2 March, 2023;
originally announced March 2023.
-
Will It Blend? Mixing Training Paradigms & Prompting for Argument Quality Prediction
Authors:
Michiel van der Meer,
Myrthe Reuver,
Urja Khurana,
Lea Krause,
Selene Báez Santamaría
Abstract:
This paper describes our contributions to the Shared Task of the 9th Workshop on Argument Mining (2022). Our approach uses Large Language Models for the task of Argument Quality Prediction. We perform prompt engineering using GPT-3, and also investigate the training paradigms multi-task learning, contrastive learning, and intermediate-task training. We find that a mixed prediction setup outperform…
▽ More
This paper describes our contributions to the Shared Task of the 9th Workshop on Argument Mining (2022). Our approach uses Large Language Models for the task of Argument Quality Prediction. We perform prompt engineering using GPT-3, and also investigate the training paradigms multi-task learning, contrastive learning, and intermediate-task training. We find that a mixed prediction setup outperforms single models. Prompting GPT-3 works best for predicting argument validity, and argument novelty is best estimated by a model trained using all three training paradigms.
△ Less
Submitted 5 October, 2022; v1 submitted 19 September, 2022;
originally announced September 2022.
-
Hate Speech Criteria: A Modular Approach to Task-Specific Hate Speech Definitions
Authors:
Urja Khurana,
Ivar Vermeulen,
Eric Nalisnick,
Marloes van Noorloos,
Antske Fokkens
Abstract:
\textbf{Offensive Content Warning}: This paper contains offensive language only for providing examples that clarify this research and do not reflect the authors' opinions. Please be aware that these examples are offensive and may cause you distress.
The subjectivity of recognizing \textit{hate speech} makes it a complex task. This is also reflected by different and incomplete definitions in NLP.…
▽ More
\textbf{Offensive Content Warning}: This paper contains offensive language only for providing examples that clarify this research and do not reflect the authors' opinions. Please be aware that these examples are offensive and may cause you distress.
The subjectivity of recognizing \textit{hate speech} makes it a complex task. This is also reflected by different and incomplete definitions in NLP. We present \textit{hate speech} criteria, developed with perspectives from law and social science, with the aim of helping researchers create more precise definitions and annotation guidelines on five aspects: (1) target groups, (2) dominance, (3) perpetrator characteristics, (4) type of negative group reference, and the (5) type of potential consequences/effects. Definitions can be structured so that they cover a more broad or more narrow phenomenon. As such, conscious choices can be made on specifying criteria or leaving them open. We argue that the goal and exact task developers have in mind should determine how the scope of \textit{hate speech} is defined. We provide an overview of the properties of English datasets from \url{hatespeechdata.com} that may help select the most suitable dataset for a specific scenario.
△ Less
Submitted 30 June, 2022;
originally announced June 2022.
-
A Survey on Semantics in Automated Data Science
Authors:
Udayan Khurana,
Kavitha Srinivas,
Horst Samulowitz
Abstract:
Data Scientists leverage common sense reasoning and domain knowledge to understand and enrich data for building predictive models. In recent years, we have witnessed a surge in tools and techniques for {\em automated machine learning}. While data scientists can employ various such tools to help with model building, many other aspects such as {\em feature engineering} that require semantic understa…
▽ More
Data Scientists leverage common sense reasoning and domain knowledge to understand and enrich data for building predictive models. In recent years, we have witnessed a surge in tools and techniques for {\em automated machine learning}. While data scientists can employ various such tools to help with model building, many other aspects such as {\em feature engineering} that require semantic understanding of concepts, remain manual to a large extent. In this paper we discuss important shortcomings of current automated data science solutions and machine learning. We discuss how leveraging basic semantic reasoning on data in combination with novel tools for data science automation can help with consistent and explainable data augmentation and transformation. Moreover, semantics can assist data scientists in a new manner by helping with challenges related to {\em trust}, {\em bias}, and {\em explainability}.
△ Less
Submitted 16 May, 2022;
originally announced May 2022.
-
How Emotionally Stable is ALBERT? Testing Robustness with Stochastic Weight Averaging on a Sentiment Analysis Task
Authors:
Urja Khurana,
Eric Nalisnick,
Antske Fokkens
Abstract:
Despite their success, modern language models are fragile. Even small changes in their training pipeline can lead to unexpected results. We study this phenomenon by examining the robustness of ALBERT (arXiv:1909.11942) in combination with Stochastic Weight Averaging (SWA) (arXiv:1803.05407) -- a cheap way of ensembling -- on a sentiment analysis task (SST-2). In particular, we analyze SWA's stabil…
▽ More
Despite their success, modern language models are fragile. Even small changes in their training pipeline can lead to unexpected results. We study this phenomenon by examining the robustness of ALBERT (arXiv:1909.11942) in combination with Stochastic Weight Averaging (SWA) (arXiv:1803.05407) -- a cheap way of ensembling -- on a sentiment analysis task (SST-2). In particular, we analyze SWA's stability via CheckList criteria (arXiv:2005.04118), examining the agreement on errors made by models differing only in their random seed. We hypothesize that SWA is more stable because it ensembles model snapshots taken along the gradient descent trajectory. We quantify stability by comparing the models' mistakes with Fleiss' Kappa (Fleiss, 1971) and overlap ratio scores. We find that SWA reduces error rates in general; yet the models still suffer from their own distinct biases (according to CheckList).
△ Less
Submitted 18 November, 2021;
originally announced November 2021.
-
How Much Automation Does a Data Scientist Want?
Authors:
Dakuo Wang,
Q. Vera Liao,
Yunfeng Zhang,
Udayan Khurana,
Horst Samulowitz,
Soya Park,
Michael Muller,
Lisa Amini
Abstract:
Data science and machine learning (DS/ML) are at the heart of the recent advancements of many Artificial Intelligence (AI) applications. There is an active research thread in AI, \autoai, that aims to develop systems for automating end-to-end the DS/ML Lifecycle. However, do DS and ML workers really want to automate their DS/ML workflow? To answer this question, we first synthesize a human-centere…
▽ More
Data science and machine learning (DS/ML) are at the heart of the recent advancements of many Artificial Intelligence (AI) applications. There is an active research thread in AI, \autoai, that aims to develop systems for automating end-to-end the DS/ML Lifecycle. However, do DS and ML workers really want to automate their DS/ML workflow? To answer this question, we first synthesize a human-centered AutoML framework with 6 User Role/Personas, 10 Stages and 43 Sub-Tasks, 5 Levels of Automation, and 5 Types of Explanation, through reviewing research literature and marketing reports. Secondly, we use the framework to guide the design of an online survey study with 217 DS/ML workers who had varying degrees of experience, and different user roles "matching" to our 6 roles/personas. We found that different user personas participated in distinct stages of the lifecycle -- but not all stages. Their desired levels of automation and types of explanation for AutoML also varied significantly depending on the DS/ML stage and the user persona. Based on the survey results, we argue there is no rationale from user needs for complete automation of the end-to-end DS/ML lifecycle. We propose new next steps for user-controlled DS/ML automation.
△ Less
Submitted 6 January, 2021;
originally announced January 2021.
-
Semantic Annotation for Tabular Data
Authors:
Udayan Khurana,
Sainyam Galhotra
Abstract:
Detecting semantic concept of columns in tabular data is of particular interest to many applications ranging from data integration, cleaning, search to feature engineering and model building in machine learning. Recently, several works have proposed supervised learning-based or heuristic pattern-based approaches to semantic type annotation. Both have shortcomings that prevent them from generalizin…
▽ More
Detecting semantic concept of columns in tabular data is of particular interest to many applications ranging from data integration, cleaning, search to feature engineering and model building in machine learning. Recently, several works have proposed supervised learning-based or heuristic pattern-based approaches to semantic type annotation. Both have shortcomings that prevent them from generalizing over a large number of concepts or examples. Many neural network based methods also present scalability issues. Additionally, none of the known methods works well for numerical data. We propose $C^2$, a column to concept mapper that is based on a maximum likelihood estimation approach through ensembles. It is able to effectively utilize vast amounts of, albeit somewhat noisy, openly available table corpora in addition to two popular knowledge graphs to perform effective and efficient concept prediction for structured data. We demonstrate the effectiveness of $C^2$ over available techniques on 9 datasets, the most comprehensive comparison on this topic so far.
△ Less
Submitted 15 December, 2020;
originally announced December 2020.
-
How can AI Automate End-to-End Data Science?
Authors:
Charu Aggarwal,
Djallel Bouneffouf,
Horst Samulowitz,
Beat Buesser,
Thanh Hoang,
Udayan Khurana,
Sijia Liu,
Tejaswini Pedapati,
Parikshit Ram,
Ambrish Rawat,
Martin Wistuba,
Alexander Gray
Abstract:
Data science is labor-intensive and human experts are scarce but heavily involved in every aspect of it. This makes data science time consuming and restricted to experts with the resulting quality heavily dependent on their experience and skills. To make data science more accessible and scalable, we need its democratization. Automated Data Science (AutoDS) is aimed towards that goal and is emergin…
▽ More
Data science is labor-intensive and human experts are scarce but heavily involved in every aspect of it. This makes data science time consuming and restricted to experts with the resulting quality heavily dependent on their experience and skills. To make data science more accessible and scalable, we need its democratization. Automated Data Science (AutoDS) is aimed towards that goal and is emerging as an important research and business topic. We introduce and define the AutoDS challenge, followed by a proposal of a general AutoDS framework that covers existing approaches but also provides guidance for the development of new methods. We categorize and review the existing literature from multiple aspects of the problem setup and employed techniques. Then we provide several views on how AI could succeed in automating end-to-end AutoDS. We hope this survey can serve as insightful guideline for the AutoDS field and provide inspiration for future research.
△ Less
Submitted 22 October, 2019;
originally announced October 2019.
-
Automating Predictive Modeling Process using Reinforcement Learning
Authors:
Udayan Khurana,
Horst Samulowitz
Abstract:
Building a good predictive model requires an array of activities such as data imputation, feature transformations, estimator selection, hyper-parameter search and ensemble construction. Given the large, complex and heterogenous space of options, off-the-shelf optimization methods are infeasible for realistic response times. In practice, much of the predictive modeling process is conducted by exper…
▽ More
Building a good predictive model requires an array of activities such as data imputation, feature transformations, estimator selection, hyper-parameter search and ensemble construction. Given the large, complex and heterogenous space of options, off-the-shelf optimization methods are infeasible for realistic response times. In practice, much of the predictive modeling process is conducted by experienced data scientists, who selectively make use of available tools. Over time, they develop an understanding of the behavior of operators, and perform serial decision making under uncertainty, colloquially referred to as educated guesswork. With an unprecedented demand for application of supervised machine learning, there is a call for solutions that automatically search for a good combination of parameters across these tasks to minimize the modeling error. We introduce a novel system called APRL (Autonomous Predictive modeler via Reinforcement Learning), that uses past experience through reinforcement learning to optimize such sequential decision making from within a set of diverse actions under a time constraint on a previously unseen predictive learning problem. APRL actions are taken to optimize the performance of a final ensemble. This is in contrast to other systems, which maximize individual model accuracy first and create ensembles as a disconnected post-processing step. As a result, APRL is able to reduce up to 71\% of classification error on average over a wide variety of problems.
△ Less
Submitted 2 March, 2019;
originally announced March 2019.
-
Feature Engineering for Predictive Modeling using Reinforcement Learning
Authors:
Udayan Khurana,
Horst Samulowitz,
Deepak Turaga
Abstract:
Feature engineering is a crucial step in the process of predictive modeling. It involves the transformation of given feature space, typically using mathematical functions, with the objective of reducing the modeling error for a given target. However, there is no well-defined basis for performing effective feature engineering. It involves domain knowledge, intuition, and most of all, a lengthy proc…
▽ More
Feature engineering is a crucial step in the process of predictive modeling. It involves the transformation of given feature space, typically using mathematical functions, with the objective of reducing the modeling error for a given target. However, there is no well-defined basis for performing effective feature engineering. It involves domain knowledge, intuition, and most of all, a lengthy process of trial and error. The human attention involved in overseeing this process significantly influences the cost of model generation. We present a new framework to automate feature engineering. It is based on performance driven exploration of a transformation graph, which systematically and compactly enumerates the space of given options. A highly efficient exploration strategy is derived through reinforcement learning on past examples.
△ Less
Submitted 21 September, 2017;
originally announced September 2017.
-
Storing and Analyzing Historical Graph Data at Scale
Authors:
Udayan Khurana,
Amol Deshpande
Abstract:
The work on large-scale graph analytics to date has largely focused on the study of static properties of graph snapshots. However, a static view of interactions between entities is often an oversimplification of several complex phenomena like the spread of epidemics, information diffusion, formation of online communities}, and so on. Being able to find temporal interaction patterns, visualize the…
▽ More
The work on large-scale graph analytics to date has largely focused on the study of static properties of graph snapshots. However, a static view of interactions between entities is often an oversimplification of several complex phenomena like the spread of epidemics, information diffusion, formation of online communities}, and so on. Being able to find temporal interaction patterns, visualize the evolution of graph properties, or even simply compare them across time, adds significant value in reasoning over graphs. However, because of lack of underlying data management support, an analyst today has to manually navigate the added temporal complexity of dealing with large evolving graphs. In this paper, we present a system, called Historical Graph Store, that enables users to store large volumes of historical graph data and to express and run complex temporal graph analytical tasks against that data. It consists of two key components: a Temporal Graph Index (TGI), that compactly stores large volumes of historical graph evolution data in a partitioned and distributed fashion; it provides support for retrieving snapshots of the graph as of any timepoint in the past or evolution histories of individual nodes or neighborhoods; and a Spark-based Temporal Graph Analysis Framework (TAF), for expressing complex temporal analytical tasks and for executing them in an efficient and scalable manner. Our experiments demonstrate our system's efficient storage, retrieval and analytics across a wide variety of queries on large volumes of historical graph data.
△ Less
Submitted 29 September, 2015;
originally announced September 2015.
-
Efficient Snapshot Retrieval over Historical Graph Data
Authors:
Udayan Khurana,
Amol Deshpande
Abstract:
We address the problem of managing historical data for large evolving information networks like social networks or citation networks, with the goal to enable temporal and evolutionary queries and analysis. We present the design and architecture of a distributed graph database system that stores the entire history of a network and provides support for efficient retrieval of multiple graphs from arb…
▽ More
We address the problem of managing historical data for large evolving information networks like social networks or citation networks, with the goal to enable temporal and evolutionary queries and analysis. We present the design and architecture of a distributed graph database system that stores the entire history of a network and provides support for efficient retrieval of multiple graphs from arbitrary time points in the past, in addition to maintaining the current state for ongoing updates. Our system exposes a general programmatic API to process and analyze the retrieved snapshots. We introduce DeltaGraph, a novel, extensible, highly tunable, and distributed hierarchical index structure that enables compactly recording the historical information, and that supports efficient retrieval of historical graph snapshots for single-site or parallel processing. Along with the original graph data, DeltaGraph can also maintain and index auxiliary information; this functionality can be used to extend the structure to efficiently execute queries like subgraph pattern matching over historical data. We develop analytical models for both the storage space needed and the snapshot retrieval times to aid in choosing the right parameters for a specific scenario. In addition, we present strategies for materializing portions of the historical graph state in memory to further speed up the retrieval process. Secondly, we present an in-memory graph data structure called GraphPool that can maintain hundreds of historical graph instances in main memory in a non-redundant manner. We present a comprehensive experimental evaluation that illustrates the effectiveness of our proposed techniques at managing historical graph information.
△ Less
Submitted 24 July, 2012;
originally announced July 2012.
-
Decision Sort and its Parallel Implementation
Authors:
Udayan Khuarana
Abstract:
In this paper, a sorting technique is presented that takes as input a data set whose primary key domain is known to the sorting algorithm, and works with an time efficiency of O(n+k), where k is the primary key domain. It is shown that the algorithm has applicability over a wide range of data sets. Later, a parallel formulation of the same is proposed and its effectiveness is argued. Though this…
▽ More
In this paper, a sorting technique is presented that takes as input a data set whose primary key domain is known to the sorting algorithm, and works with an time efficiency of O(n+k), where k is the primary key domain. It is shown that the algorithm has applicability over a wide range of data sets. Later, a parallel formulation of the same is proposed and its effectiveness is argued. Though this algorithm is applicable over a wide range of general data sets, it finds special application (much superior to others) in places where sorting information that arrives in parts and in cases where input data is huge in size.
△ Less
Submitted 24 May, 2005;
originally announced May 2005.
-
Text Compression and Superfast Searching
Authors:
Udayan Khurana,
Anirudh Koul
Abstract:
In this paper, a new compression scheme for text is presented. The same is efficient in giving high compression ratios and enables super fast searching within the compressed text. Typical compression ratios of 70-80% and reducing the search time by 80-85% are the features of this paper. Till now, a trade-off between high ratios and searchability within compressed text has been seen. In this pape…
▽ More
In this paper, a new compression scheme for text is presented. The same is efficient in giving high compression ratios and enables super fast searching within the compressed text. Typical compression ratios of 70-80% and reducing the search time by 80-85% are the features of this paper. Till now, a trade-off between high ratios and searchability within compressed text has been seen. In this paper, we show that greater the compression, faster the search. This finds applicability in so many places where data as natural language text is present.
△ Less
Submitted 23 May, 2005;
originally announced May 2005.