The METRIC-framework for assessing data quality for trustworthy AI in medicine: a systematic review
Authors:
Daniel Schwabe,
Katinka Becker,
Martin Seyferth,
Andreas Klaß,
Tobias Schäffter
Abstract:
The adoption of machine learning (ML) and, more specifically, deep learning (DL) applications into all major areas of our lives is underway. The development of trustworthy AI is especially important in medicine due to the large implications for patients' lives. While trustworthiness concerns various aspects including ethical, technical and privacy requirements, we focus on the importance of data q…
▽ More
The adoption of machine learning (ML) and, more specifically, deep learning (DL) applications into all major areas of our lives is underway. The development of trustworthy AI is especially important in medicine due to the large implications for patients' lives. While trustworthiness concerns various aspects including ethical, technical and privacy requirements, we focus on the importance of data quality (training/test) in DL. Since data quality dictates the behaviour of ML products, evaluating data quality will play a key part in the regulatory approval of medical AI products. We perform a systematic review following PRISMA guidelines using the databases PubMed and ACM Digital Library. We identify 2362 studies, out of which 62 records fulfil our eligibility criteria. From this literature, we synthesise the existing knowledge on data quality frameworks and combine it with the perspective of ML applications in medicine. As a result, we propose the METRIC-framework, a specialised data quality framework for medical training data comprising 15 awareness dimensions, along which developers of medical ML applications should investigate a dataset. This knowledge helps to reduce biases as a major source of unfairness, increase robustness, facilitate interpretability and thus lays the foundation for trustworthy AI in medicine. Incorporating such systematic assessment of medical datasets into regulatory approval processes has the potential to accelerate the approval of ML products and builds the basis for new standards.
△ Less
Submitted 21 February, 2024;
originally announced February 2024.
Uncertainty-aware Evaluation of Time-Series Classification for Online Handwriting Recognition with Domain Shift
Authors:
Andreas Klaß,
Sven M. Lorenz,
Martin W. Lauer-Schmaltz,
David Rügamer,
Bernd Bischl,
Christopher Mutschler,
Felix Ott
Abstract:
For many applications, analyzing the uncertainty of a machine learning model is indispensable. While research of uncertainty quantification (UQ) techniques is very advanced for computer vision applications, UQ methods for spatio-temporal data are less studied. In this paper, we focus on models for online handwriting recognition, one particular type of spatio-temporal data. The data is observed fro…
▽ More
For many applications, analyzing the uncertainty of a machine learning model is indispensable. While research of uncertainty quantification (UQ) techniques is very advanced for computer vision applications, UQ methods for spatio-temporal data are less studied. In this paper, we focus on models for online handwriting recognition, one particular type of spatio-temporal data. The data is observed from a sensor-enhanced pen with the goal to classify written characters. We conduct a broad evaluation of aleatoric (data) and epistemic (model) UQ based on two prominent techniques for Bayesian inference, Stochastic Weight Averaging-Gaussian (SWAG) and Deep Ensembles. Next to a better understanding of the model, UQ techniques can detect out-of-distribution data and domain shifts when combining right-handed and left-handed writers (an underrepresented group).
△ Less
Submitted 17 June, 2022;
originally announced June 2022.
