-
Methodology to Create Analysis-Naive Holdout Records as well as Train and Test Records for Machine Learning Analyses in Healthcare
Authors:
Michele Bennett,
Mehdi Nekouei,
Armand Prieditis Rajesh Mehta,
Ewa Kleczyk,
Karin Hayes
Abstract:
It is common for researchers to holdout data from a study pool to be used for external validation as well as for future research, and the same desire is true to those using machine learning modeling research. For this discussion, the purpose of the holdout sample it is preserve data for research studies that will be analysis-naive and randomly selected from the full dataset. Analysis-naive are rec…
▽ More
It is common for researchers to holdout data from a study pool to be used for external validation as well as for future research, and the same desire is true to those using machine learning modeling research. For this discussion, the purpose of the holdout sample it is preserve data for research studies that will be analysis-naive and randomly selected from the full dataset. Analysis-naive are records that are not used for testing or training machine learning (ML) models and records that do not participate in any aspect of the current machine learning study. The methodology suggested for creating holdouts is a modification of k-fold cross validation, which takes into account randomization and efficiently allows a three-way split (holdout, test and training) as part of the method without forcing. The paper also provides a working example using set of automated functions in Python and some scenarios for applicability in healthcare.
△ Less
Submitted 8 May, 2022;
originally announced May 2022.
-
The Silent Problem -- Machine Learning Model Failure -- How to Diagnose and Fix Ailing Machine Learning Models
Authors:
Michele Bennett,
Jaya Balusu,
Karin Hayes,
Ewa J. Kleczyk
Abstract:
The COVID-19 pandemic has dramatically changed how healthcare is delivered to patients, how patients interact with healthcare providers, and how healthcare information is disseminated to both healthcare providers and patients. Analytical models that were trained and tested pre-pandemic may no longer be performing up to expectations, providing unreliable and irrelevant learning (ML) models given th…
▽ More
The COVID-19 pandemic has dramatically changed how healthcare is delivered to patients, how patients interact with healthcare providers, and how healthcare information is disseminated to both healthcare providers and patients. Analytical models that were trained and tested pre-pandemic may no longer be performing up to expectations, providing unreliable and irrelevant learning (ML) models given that ML depends on the basic principle that what happened in the past are likely to repeat in the future. ML faced to two important degradation principles, concept drift, when the underlying properties and characteristics of the variables change and data drift, when the data distributions, probabilities, co-variates, and other variable relationships change, both of which are prime culprits of model failure. Therefore, detecting and diagnosing drift in existing models is something that has become an imperative. And perhaps even more important is a shift in our mindset towards a conscious recognition that drift is inevitable, and model building must incorporate intentional resilience, the ability to offset and recover quickly from failure, and proactive robustness, avoiding failure by developing models that are less vulnerable to drift and disruption.
△ Less
Submitted 21 April, 2022;
originally announced April 2022.
-
Similarities and Differences between Machine Learning and Traditional Advanced Statistical Modeling in Healthcare Analytics
Authors:
Michele Bennett,
Karin Hayes,
Ewa J. Kleczyk,
Rajesh Mehta
Abstract:
Data scientists and statisticians are often at odds when determining the best approach, machine learning or statistical modeling, to solve an analytics challenge. However, machine learning and statistical modeling are more cousins than adversaries on different sides of an analysis battleground. Choosing between the two approaches or in some cases using both is based on the problem to be solved and…
▽ More
Data scientists and statisticians are often at odds when determining the best approach, machine learning or statistical modeling, to solve an analytics challenge. However, machine learning and statistical modeling are more cousins than adversaries on different sides of an analysis battleground. Choosing between the two approaches or in some cases using both is based on the problem to be solved and outcomes required as well as the data available for use and circumstances of the analysis. Machine learning and statistical modeling are complementary, based on similar mathematical principles, but simply using different tools in an overall analytics knowledge base. Determining the predominant approach should be based on the problem to be solved as well as empirical evidence, such as size and completeness of the data, number of variables, assumptions or lack thereof, and expected outcomes such as predictions or causality. Good analysts and data scientists should be well versed in both techniques and their proper application, thereby using the right tool for the right project to achieve the desired results.
△ Less
Submitted 7 January, 2022;
originally announced January 2022.
