-
Incremental XAI: Memorable Understanding of AI with Incremental Explanations
Authors:
Jessica Y. Bo,
Pan Hao,
Brian Y. Lim
Abstract:
Many explainable AI (XAI) techniques strive for interpretability by providing concise salient information, such as sparse linear factors. However, users either only see inaccurate global explanations, or highly-varying local explanations. We propose to provide more detailed explanations by leveraging the human cognitive capacity to accumulate knowledge by incrementally receiving more details. Focu…
▽ More
Many explainable AI (XAI) techniques strive for interpretability by providing concise salient information, such as sparse linear factors. However, users either only see inaccurate global explanations, or highly-varying local explanations. We propose to provide more detailed explanations by leveraging the human cognitive capacity to accumulate knowledge by incrementally receiving more details. Focusing on linear factor explanations (factors $\times$ values = outcome), we introduce Incremental XAI to automatically partition explanations for general and atypical instances by providing Base + Incremental factors to help users read and remember more faithful explanations. Memorability is improved by reusing base factors and reducing the number of factors shown in atypical cases. In modeling, formative, and summative user studies, we evaluated the faithfulness, memorability and understandability of Incremental XAI against baseline explanation methods. This work contributes towards more usable explanation that users can better ingrain to facilitate intuitive engagement with AI.
△ Less
Submitted 10 April, 2024;
originally announced April 2024.
-
IRIS: Interpretable Rubric-Informed Segmentation for Action Quality Assessment
Authors:
Hitoshi Matsuyama,
Nobuo Kawaguchi,
Brian Y. Lim
Abstract:
AI-driven Action Quality Assessment (AQA) of sports videos can mimic Olympic judges to help score performances as a second opinion or for training. However, these AI methods are uninterpretable and do not justify their scores, which is important for algorithmic accountability. Indeed, to account for their decisions, instead of scoring subjectively, sports judges use a consistent set of criteria -…
▽ More
AI-driven Action Quality Assessment (AQA) of sports videos can mimic Olympic judges to help score performances as a second opinion or for training. However, these AI methods are uninterpretable and do not justify their scores, which is important for algorithmic accountability. Indeed, to account for their decisions, instead of scoring subjectively, sports judges use a consistent set of criteria - rubric - on multiple actions in each performance sequence. Therefore, we propose IRIS to perform Interpretable Rubric-Informed Segmentation on action sequences for AQA. We investigated IRIS for scoring videos of figure skating performance. IRIS predicts (1) action segments, (2) technical element score differences of each segment relative to base scores, (3) multiple program component scores, and (4) the summed final score. In a modeling study, we found that IRIS performs better than non-interpretable, state-of-the-art models. In a formative user study, practicing figure skaters agreed with the rubric-informed explanations, found them useful, and trusted AI judgments more. This work highlights the importance of using judgment rubrics to account for AI decisions.
△ Less
Submitted 16 March, 2023;
originally announced March 2023.
-
RePrompt: Automatic Prompt Editing to Refine AI-Generative Art Towards Precise Expressions
Authors:
Yunlong Wang,
Shuyuan Shen,
Brian Y. Lim
Abstract:
Generative AI models have shown impressive ability to produce images with text prompts, which could benefit creativity in visual art creation and self-expression. However, it is unclear how precisely the generated images express contexts and emotions from the input texts. We explored the emotional expressiveness of AI-generated images and developed RePrompt, an automatic method to refine text prom…
▽ More
Generative AI models have shown impressive ability to produce images with text prompts, which could benefit creativity in visual art creation and self-expression. However, it is unclear how precisely the generated images express contexts and emotions from the input texts. We explored the emotional expressiveness of AI-generated images and developed RePrompt, an automatic method to refine text prompts toward precise expression of the generated images. Inspired by crowdsourced editing strategies, we curated intuitive text features, such as the number and concreteness of nouns, and trained a proxy model to analyze the feature effects on the AI-generated image. With model explanations of the proxy model, we curated a rubric to adjust text prompts to optimize image generation for precise emotion expression. We conducted simulation and user studies, which showed that RePrompt significantly improves the emotional expressiveness of AI-generated images, especially for negative emotions.
△ Less
Submitted 19 March, 2023; v1 submitted 18 February, 2023;
originally announced February 2023.
-
Diagrammatization: Rationalizing with diagrammatic AI explanations for abductive-deductive reasoning on hypotheses
Authors:
Brian Y. Lim,
Joseph P. Cahaly,
Chester Y. F. Sng,
Adam Chew
Abstract:
Many visualizations have been developed for explainable AI (XAI), but they often require further reasoning by users to interpret. We argue that XAI should support diagrammatic and abductive reasoning for the AI to perform hypothesis generation and evaluation to reduce the interpretability gap. We propose Diagrammatization to i) perform Peircean abductive-deductive reasoning, ii) follow domain conv…
▽ More
Many visualizations have been developed for explainable AI (XAI), but they often require further reasoning by users to interpret. We argue that XAI should support diagrammatic and abductive reasoning for the AI to perform hypothesis generation and evaluation to reduce the interpretability gap. We propose Diagrammatization to i) perform Peircean abductive-deductive reasoning, ii) follow domain conventions, and iii) explain with diagrams visually or verbally. We implemented DiagramNet for a clinical application to predict cardiac diagnoses from heart auscultation, and explain with shape-based murmur diagrams. In modeling studies, we found that DiagramNet not only provides faithful murmur shape explanations, but also has better prediction performance than baseline models. We further demonstrate the interpretability and trustworthiness of diagrammatic explanations in a qualitative user study with medical students, showing that clinically-relevant, diagrammatic explanations are preferred over technical saliency map explanations. This work contributes insights into providing domain-conventional abductive explanations for user-centric XAI.
△ Less
Submitted 12 July, 2023; v1 submitted 2 February, 2023;
originally announced February 2023.
-
IF-City: Intelligible Fair City Planning to Measure, Explain and Mitigate Inequality
Authors:
Yan Lyu,
Hangxin Lu,
Min Kyung Lee,
Gerhard Schmitt,
Brian Y. Lim
Abstract:
With the increasing pervasiveness of Artificial Intelligence (AI), many visual analytics tools have been proposed to examine fairness, but they mostly focus on data scientist users. Instead, tackling fairness must be inclusive and involve domain experts with specialized tools and workflows. Thus, domain-specific visualizations are needed for algorithmic fairness. Furthermore, while much work on AI…
▽ More
With the increasing pervasiveness of Artificial Intelligence (AI), many visual analytics tools have been proposed to examine fairness, but they mostly focus on data scientist users. Instead, tackling fairness must be inclusive and involve domain experts with specialized tools and workflows. Thus, domain-specific visualizations are needed for algorithmic fairness. Furthermore, while much work on AI fairness has focused on predictive decisions, less has been done for fair allocation and planning, which require human expertise and iterative design to integrate myriad constraints. We propose the Intelligible Fair Allocation (IF-Alloc) Framework that leverages explanations of causal attribution (Why), contrastive (Why Not) and counterfactual reasoning (What If, How To) to aid domain experts to assess and alleviate unfairness in allocation problems. We apply the framework to fair urban planning for designing cities that provide equal access to amenities and benefits for diverse resident types. Specifically, we propose an interactive visual tool, Intelligible Fair City Planner (IF-City), to help urban planners to perceive inequality across groups, identify and attribute sources of inequality, and mitigate inequality with automatic allocation simulations and constraint-satisfying recommendations. We demonstrate and evaluate the usage and usefulness of IF-City on a real neighborhood in New York City, US, with practicing urban planners from multiple countries, and discuss generalizing our findings, application, and framework to other use cases and applications of fair allocation.
△ Less
Submitted 15 February, 2022;
originally announced February 2022.
-
Debiased-CAM to mitigate systematic error with faithful visual explanations of machine learning
Authors:
Wencan Zhang,
Mariella Dimiccoli,
Brian Y. Lim
Abstract:
Model explanations such as saliency maps can improve user trust in AI by highlighting important features for a prediction. However, these become distorted and misleading when explaining predictions of images that are subject to systematic error (bias). Furthermore, the distortions persist despite model fine-tuning on images biased by different factors (blur, color temperature, day/night). We prese…
▽ More
Model explanations such as saliency maps can improve user trust in AI by highlighting important features for a prediction. However, these become distorted and misleading when explaining predictions of images that are subject to systematic error (bias). Furthermore, the distortions persist despite model fine-tuning on images biased by different factors (blur, color temperature, day/night). We present Debiased-CAM to recover explanation faithfulness across various bias types and levels by training a multi-input, multi-task model with auxiliary tasks for explanation and bias level predictions. In simulation studies, the approach not only enhanced prediction accuracy, but also generated highly faithful explanations about these predictions as if the images were unbiased. In user studies, debiased explanations improved user task performance, perceived truthfulness and perceived helpfulness. Debiased training can provide a versatile platform for robust performance and explanation faithfulness for a wide range of applications with data biases.
△ Less
Submitted 28 February, 2022; v1 submitted 30 January, 2022;
originally announced January 2022.
-
Towards Relatable Explainable AI with the Perceptual Process
Authors:
Wencan Zhang,
Brian Y. Lim
Abstract:
Machine learning models need to provide contrastive explanations, since people often seek to understand why a puzzling prediction occurred instead of some expected outcome. Current contrastive explanations are rudimentary comparisons between examples or raw features, which remain difficult to interpret, since they lack semantic meaning. We argue that explanations must be more relatable to other co…
▽ More
Machine learning models need to provide contrastive explanations, since people often seek to understand why a puzzling prediction occurred instead of some expected outcome. Current contrastive explanations are rudimentary comparisons between examples or raw features, which remain difficult to interpret, since they lack semantic meaning. We argue that explanations must be more relatable to other concepts, hypotheticals, and associations. Inspired by the perceptual process from cognitive psychology, we propose the XAI Perceptual Processing Framework and RexNet model for relatable explainable AI with Contrastive Saliency, Counterfactual Synthetic, and Contrastive Cues explanations. We investigated the application of vocal emotion recognition, and implemented a modular multi-task deep neural network to predict and explain emotions from speech. From think-aloud and controlled studies, we found that counterfactual explanations were useful and further enhanced with semantic cues, but not saliency explanations. This work provides insights into providing and evaluating relatable contrastive explainable AI for perception applications.
△ Less
Submitted 28 March, 2022; v1 submitted 28 December, 2021;
originally announced December 2021.
-
SalienTrack: providing salient information for semi-automated self-tracking feedback with model explanations
Authors:
Yunlong Wang,
Jiaying Liu,
Homin Park,
Jordan Schultz-McArdle,
Stephanie Rosenthal,
Judy Kay,
Brian Y. Lim
Abstract:
Self-tracking can improve people's awareness of their unhealthy behaviors and support reflection to inform behavior change. Increasingly, new technologies make tracking easier, leading to large amounts of tracked data. However, much of that information is not salient for reflection and self-awareness. To tackle this burden for reflection, we created the SalienTrack framework, which aims to 1) iden…
▽ More
Self-tracking can improve people's awareness of their unhealthy behaviors and support reflection to inform behavior change. Increasingly, new technologies make tracking easier, leading to large amounts of tracked data. However, much of that information is not salient for reflection and self-awareness. To tackle this burden for reflection, we created the SalienTrack framework, which aims to 1) identify salient tracking events, 2) select the salient details of those events, 3) explain why they are informative, and 4) present the details as manually elicited or automatically shown feedback. We implemented SalienTrack in the context of nutrition tracking. To do this, we first conducted a field study to collect photo-based mobile food tracking over 1-5 weeks. We then report how we used this data to train an explainable-AI model of salience. Finally, we created interfaces to present salient information and conducted a formative user study to gain insights about how SalienTrack could be integrated into an interface for reflection. Our key contributions are the SalienTrack framework, a demonstration of its implementation for semi-automated feedback in an important and challenging self-tracking context and a discussion of the broader uses of the framework.
△ Less
Submitted 16 February, 2022; v1 submitted 21 September, 2021;
originally announced September 2021.
-
Interpretable Directed Diversity: Leveraging Model Explanations for Iterative Crowd Ideation
Authors:
Yunlong Wang,
Priyadarshini Venkatesh,
Brian Y. Lim
Abstract:
Feedback in creativity support tools can help crowdworkers to improve their ideations. However, current feedback methods require human assessment from facilitators or peers. This is not scalable to large crowds. We propose Interpretable Directed Diversity to automatically predict ideation quality and diversity scores, and provide AI explanations - Attribution, Contrastive Attribution, and Counterf…
▽ More
Feedback in creativity support tools can help crowdworkers to improve their ideations. However, current feedback methods require human assessment from facilitators or peers. This is not scalable to large crowds. We propose Interpretable Directed Diversity to automatically predict ideation quality and diversity scores, and provide AI explanations - Attribution, Contrastive Attribution, and Counterfactual Suggestions - to feedback on why ideations were scored (low), and how to get higher scores. These explanations provide multi-faceted feedback as users iteratively improve their ideations. We conducted formative and controlled user studies to understand the usage and usefulness of explanations to improve ideation diversity and quality. Users appreciated that explanation feedback helped focus their efforts and provided directions for improvement. This resulted in explanations improving diversity compared to no feedback or feedback with scores only. Hence, our approach opens opportunities for explainable AI towards scalable and rich feedback for iterative crowd ideation and creativity support tools.
△ Less
Submitted 28 March, 2022; v1 submitted 21 September, 2021;
originally announced September 2021.
-
Exploiting Explanations for Model Inversion Attacks
Authors:
Xuejun Zhao,
Wencan Zhang,
Xiaokui Xiao,
Brian Y. Lim
Abstract:
The successful deployment of artificial intelligence (AI) in many domains from healthcare to hiring requires their responsible use, particularly in model explanations and privacy. Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) provides more information to help users to understand model decisions, yet this additional knowledge exposes additional risks for privacy attacks. Hence, providing explanation ha…
▽ More
The successful deployment of artificial intelligence (AI) in many domains from healthcare to hiring requires their responsible use, particularly in model explanations and privacy. Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) provides more information to help users to understand model decisions, yet this additional knowledge exposes additional risks for privacy attacks. Hence, providing explanation harms privacy. We study this risk for image-based model inversion attacks and identified several attack architectures with increasing performance to reconstruct private image data from model explanations. We have developed several multi-modal transposed CNN architectures that achieve significantly higher inversion performance than using the target model prediction only. These XAI-aware inversion models were designed to exploit the spatial knowledge in image explanations. To understand which explanations have higher privacy risk, we analyzed how various explanation types and factors influence inversion performance. In spite of some models not providing explanations, we further demonstrate increased inversion performance even for non-explainable target models by exploiting explanations of surrogate models through attention transfer. This method first inverts an explanation from the target prediction, then reconstructs the target image. These threats highlight the urgent and significant privacy risks of explanations and calls attention for new privacy preservation techniques that balance the dual-requirement for AI explainability and privacy.
△ Less
Submitted 14 March, 2022; v1 submitted 26 April, 2021;
originally announced April 2021.
-
Show or Suppress? Managing Input Uncertainty in Machine Learning Model Explanations
Authors:
Danding Wang,
Wencan Zhang,
Brian Y. Lim
Abstract:
Feature attribution is widely used in interpretable machine learning to explain how influential each measured input feature value is for an output inference. However, measurements can be uncertain, and it is unclear how the awareness of input uncertainty can affect the trust in explanations. We propose and study two approaches to help users to manage their perception of uncertainty in a model expl…
▽ More
Feature attribution is widely used in interpretable machine learning to explain how influential each measured input feature value is for an output inference. However, measurements can be uncertain, and it is unclear how the awareness of input uncertainty can affect the trust in explanations. We propose and study two approaches to help users to manage their perception of uncertainty in a model explanation: 1) transparently show uncertainty in feature attributions to allow users to reflect on, and 2) suppress attribution to features with uncertain measurements and shift attribution to other features by regularizing with an uncertainty penalty. Through simulation experiments, qualitative interviews, and quantitative user evaluations, we identified the benefits of moderately suppressing attribution uncertainty, and concerns regarding showing attribution uncertainty. This work adds to the understanding of handling and communicating uncertainty for model interpretability.
△ Less
Submitted 23 January, 2021;
originally announced January 2021.
-
Directed Diversity: Leveraging Language Embedding Distances for Collective Creativity in Crowd Ideation
Authors:
Samuel Rhys Cox,
Yunlong Wang,
Ashraf Abdul,
Christian von der Weth,
Brian Y. Lim
Abstract:
Crowdsourcing can collect many diverse ideas by prompting ideators individually, but this can generate redundant ideas. Prior methods reduce redundancy by presenting peers' ideas or peer-proposed prompts, but these require much human coordination. We introduce Directed Diversity, an automatic prompt selection approach that leverages language model embedding distances to maximize diversity. Ideator…
▽ More
Crowdsourcing can collect many diverse ideas by prompting ideators individually, but this can generate redundant ideas. Prior methods reduce redundancy by presenting peers' ideas or peer-proposed prompts, but these require much human coordination. We introduce Directed Diversity, an automatic prompt selection approach that leverages language model embedding distances to maximize diversity. Ideators can be directed towards diverse prompts and away from prior ideas, thus improving their collective creativity. Since there are diverse metrics of diversity, we present a Diversity Prompting Evaluation Framework consolidating metrics from several research disciplines to analyze along the ideation chain - prompt selection, prompt creativity, prompt-ideation mediation, and ideation creativity. Using this framework, we evaluated Directed Diversity in a series of a simulation study and four user studies for the use case of crowdsourcing motivational messages to encourage physical activity. We show that automated diverse prompting can variously improve collective creativity across many nuanced metrics of diversity.
△ Less
Submitted 15 January, 2021;
originally announced January 2021.
-
Debiased-CAM to mitigate image perturbations with faithful visual explanations of machine learning
Authors:
Wencan Zhang,
Mariella Dimiccoli,
Brian Y. Lim
Abstract:
Model explanations such as saliency maps can improve user trust in AI by highlighting important features for a prediction. However, these become distorted and misleading when explaining predictions of images that are subject to systematic error (bias) by perturbations and corruptions. Furthermore, the distortions persist despite model fine-tuning on images biased by different factors (blur, color…
▽ More
Model explanations such as saliency maps can improve user trust in AI by highlighting important features for a prediction. However, these become distorted and misleading when explaining predictions of images that are subject to systematic error (bias) by perturbations and corruptions. Furthermore, the distortions persist despite model fine-tuning on images biased by different factors (blur, color temperature, day/night). We present Debiased-CAM to recover explanation faithfulness across various bias types and levels by training a multi-input, multi-task model with auxiliary tasks for explanation and bias level predictions. In simulation studies, the approach not only enhanced prediction accuracy, but also generated highly faithful explanations about these predictions as if the images were unbiased. In user studies, debiased explanations improved user task performance, perceived truthfulness and perceived helpfulness. Debiased training can provide a versatile platform for robust performance and explanation faithfulness for a wide range of applications with data biases.
△ Less
Submitted 29 March, 2022; v1 submitted 10 December, 2020;
originally announced December 2020.
-
NaMemo: Enhancing Lecturers' Interpersonal Competence of Remembering Students' Names
Authors:
Guang Jiang,
Mengzhen Shi,
Ying Su,
Pengcheng An,
Brian Y. Lim,
Yunlong Wang
Abstract:
Addressing students by their names helps a teacher to start building rapport with students and thus facilitates their classroom participation. However, this basic yet effective skill has become rather challenging for university lecturers, who have to handle large-sized (sometimes exceeding 100) groups in their daily teaching. To enhance lecturers' competence in delivering interpersonal interaction…
▽ More
Addressing students by their names helps a teacher to start building rapport with students and thus facilitates their classroom participation. However, this basic yet effective skill has become rather challenging for university lecturers, who have to handle large-sized (sometimes exceeding 100) groups in their daily teaching. To enhance lecturers' competence in delivering interpersonal interaction, we developed NaMemo, a real-time name-indicating system based on a dedicated face-recognition pipeline. This paper presents the system design, the pilot feasibility test, and our plan for the following study, which aims to evaluate NaMemo's impacts on learning and teaching, as well as to probe design implications including privacy considerations.
△ Less
Submitted 19 April, 2020; v1 submitted 20 November, 2019;
originally announced November 2019.
-
Harmonization among national cyber security and cybercrime response organizations: New challenges of cybercrime
Authors:
Yunsik Jake Jang,
Bo young Lim
Abstract:
This paper will discuss the need for national-level organizational strategies to effectively combat cyber security threats and cybercrime. In many countries, new agencies have been established and/or new roles have been allotted to existing agencies to cope with the needs for cyber security or fighting against cybercrime. The two pillars of organizational structure and functions (i.e., security vs…
▽ More
This paper will discuss the need for national-level organizational strategies to effectively combat cyber security threats and cybercrime. In many countries, new agencies have been established and/or new roles have been allotted to existing agencies to cope with the needs for cyber security or fighting against cybercrime. The two pillars of organizational structure and functions (i.e., security vs. law enforcement) have given new challenges to us, especially in the context of traditional criminal justice system. To illustrate the challenges, a case study examining the responses to major security incidents followed by nationwide debates and remarkable organizational changes in Korea will be given.
△ Less
Submitted 10 August, 2013;
originally announced August 2013.
