-
Unexpected Benefits of Self-Modeling in Neural Systems
Authors:
Vickram N. Premakumar,
Michael Vaiana,
Florin Pop,
Judd Rosenblatt,
Diogo Schwerz de Lucena,
Kirsten Ziman,
Michael S. A. Graziano
Abstract:
Self-models have been a topic of great interest for decades in studies of human cognition and more recently in machine learning. Yet what benefits do self-models confer? Here we show that when artificial networks learn to predict their internal states as an auxiliary task, they change in a fundamental way. To better perform the self-model task, the network learns to make itself simpler, more regul…
▽ More
Self-models have been a topic of great interest for decades in studies of human cognition and more recently in machine learning. Yet what benefits do self-models confer? Here we show that when artificial networks learn to predict their internal states as an auxiliary task, they change in a fundamental way. To better perform the self-model task, the network learns to make itself simpler, more regularized, more parameter-efficient, and therefore more amenable to being predictively modeled. To test the hypothesis of self-regularizing through self-modeling, we used a range of network architectures performing three classification tasks across two modalities. In all cases, adding self-modeling caused a significant reduction in network complexity. The reduction was observed in two ways. First, the distribution of weights was narrower when self-modeling was present. Second, a measure of network complexity, the real log canonical threshold (RLCT), was smaller when self-modeling was present. Not only were measures of complexity reduced, but the reduction became more pronounced as greater training weight was placed on the auxiliary task of self-modeling. These results strongly support the hypothesis that self-modeling is more than simply a network learning to predict itself. The learning has a restructuring effect, reducing complexity and increasing parameter efficiency. This self-regularization may help explain some of the benefits of self-models reported in recent machine learning literature, as well as the adaptive value of self-models to biological systems. In particular, these findings may shed light on the possible interaction between the ability to model oneself and the ability to be more easily modeled by others in a social or cooperative context.
△ Less
Submitted 23 July, 2024; v1 submitted 14 July, 2024;
originally announced July 2024.
-
Rethinking harmless refusals when fine-tuning foundation models
Authors:
Florin Pop,
Judd Rosenblatt,
Diogo Schwerz de Lucena,
Michael Vaiana
Abstract:
In this paper, we investigate the degree to which fine-tuning in Large Language Models (LLMs) effectively mitigates versus merely conceals undesirable behavior. Through the lens of semi-realistic role-playing exercises designed to elicit such behaviors, we explore the response dynamics of LLMs post fine-tuning interventions. Our methodology involves prompting models for Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reas…
▽ More
In this paper, we investigate the degree to which fine-tuning in Large Language Models (LLMs) effectively mitigates versus merely conceals undesirable behavior. Through the lens of semi-realistic role-playing exercises designed to elicit such behaviors, we explore the response dynamics of LLMs post fine-tuning interventions. Our methodology involves prompting models for Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning and analyzing the coherence between the reasoning traces and the resultant outputs. Notably, we identify a pervasive phenomenon we term \emph{reason-based deception}, where models either stop producing reasoning traces or produce seemingly ethical reasoning traces that belie the unethical nature of their final outputs. We further examine the efficacy of response strategies (polite refusal versus explicit rebuttal) in curbing the occurrence of undesired behavior in subsequent outputs of multi-turn interactions. Our findings reveal that explicit rebuttals significantly outperform polite refusals in preventing the continuation of undesired outputs and nearly eliminate reason-based deception, challenging current practices in model fine-tuning. Accordingly, the two key contributions of this paper are (1) defining and studying reason-based deception, a new type of hidden behavior, and (2) demonstrating that rebuttals provide a more robust response model to harmful requests than refusals, thereby highlighting the need to reconsider the response strategies in fine-tuning approaches.
△ Less
Submitted 27 June, 2024;
originally announced June 2024.
-
Exploring the intersection of Generative AI and Software Development
Authors:
Filipe Calegario,
Vanilson Burégio,
Francisco Erivaldo,
Daniel Moraes Costa Andrade,
Kailane Felix,
Nathalia Barbosa,
Pedro Lucas da Silva Lucena,
César França
Abstract:
In the ever-evolving landscape of Artificial Intelligence (AI), the synergy between generative AI and Software Engineering emerges as a transformative frontier. This whitepaper delves into the unexplored realm, elucidating how generative AI techniques can revolutionize software development. Spanning from project management to support and updates, we meticulously map the demands of each development…
▽ More
In the ever-evolving landscape of Artificial Intelligence (AI), the synergy between generative AI and Software Engineering emerges as a transformative frontier. This whitepaper delves into the unexplored realm, elucidating how generative AI techniques can revolutionize software development. Spanning from project management to support and updates, we meticulously map the demands of each development stage and unveil the potential of generative AI in addressing them. Techniques such as zero-shot prompting, self-consistency, and multimodal chain-of-thought are explored, showcasing their unique capabilities in enhancing generative AI models. The significance of vector embeddings, context, plugins, tools, and code assistants is underscored, emphasizing their role in capturing semantic information and amplifying generative AI capabilities. Looking ahead, this intersection promises to elevate productivity, improve code quality, and streamline the software development process. This whitepaper serves as a guide for stakeholders, urging discussions and experiments in the application of generative AI in Software Engineering, fostering innovation and collaboration for a qualitative leap in the efficiency and effectiveness of software development.
△ Less
Submitted 21 December, 2023;
originally announced December 2023.
-
Large Language Models for Education: Grading Open-Ended Questions Using ChatGPT
Authors:
Gustavo Pinto,
Isadora Cardoso-Pereira,
Danilo Monteiro Ribeiro,
Danilo Lucena,
Alberto de Souza,
Kiev Gama
Abstract:
As a way of addressing increasingly sophisticated problems, software professionals face the constant challenge of seeking improvement. However, for these individuals to enhance their skills, their process of studying and training must involve feedback that is both immediate and accurate. In the context of software companies, where the scale of professionals undergoing training is large, but the nu…
▽ More
As a way of addressing increasingly sophisticated problems, software professionals face the constant challenge of seeking improvement. However, for these individuals to enhance their skills, their process of studying and training must involve feedback that is both immediate and accurate. In the context of software companies, where the scale of professionals undergoing training is large, but the number of qualified professionals available for providing corrections is small, delivering effective feedback becomes even more challenging. To circumvent this challenge, this work presents an exploration of using Large Language Models (LLMs) to support the correction process of open-ended questions in technical training. In this study, we utilized ChatGPT to correct open-ended questions answered by 42 industry professionals on two topics. Evaluating the corrections and feedback provided by ChatGPT, we observed that it is capable of identifying semantic details in responses that other metrics cannot observe. Furthermore, we noticed that, in general, subject matter experts tended to agree with the corrections and feedback given by ChatGPT.
△ Less
Submitted 1 August, 2023; v1 submitted 31 July, 2023;
originally announced July 2023.
-
Supporting the Careers of Developers with Disabilities: Lessons from Zup Innovation
Authors:
Isadora Cardoso-Pereira,
Geraldo Gomes,
Danilo Monteiro Ribeiro,
Alberto de Souza,
Danilo Lucena,
Gustavo Pinto
Abstract:
People with still face discrimination, which creates significant obstacles to accessing higher education, ultimately hindering their access to high-skilled occupations. In this study we present Catalisa, an eight-month training camp (developed by Zup Innovation) that hires and trains people with disabilities as software developers. We interviewed 12 Catalisa participants to better understand their…
▽ More
People with still face discrimination, which creates significant obstacles to accessing higher education, ultimately hindering their access to high-skilled occupations. In this study we present Catalisa, an eight-month training camp (developed by Zup Innovation) that hires and trains people with disabilities as software developers. We interviewed 12 Catalisa participants to better understand their challenges and limitations regarding inclusion and accessibility. We offer four recommendations to improve inclusion and accessibility in Catalisa-like programs, that we hope could motive others to build a more inclusive and equitable workplace that benefits everyone.
△ Less
Submitted 26 May, 2023; v1 submitted 9 March, 2023;
originally announced March 2023.
-
Changing Software Engineers' Self-Efficacy with Bootcamps:A Research Proposal
Authors:
Danilo Monteiro Ribeiro,
Alberto Souza,
Victor Santiago,
Danilo Lucena,
Geraldo Gomes,
Gustavo Pinto
Abstract:
In several areas of knowledge, self-efficacy is related to the perfomance of individuals, including in Software Engineering. However,it is not clear how self-efficacy can be modified in training conducted by the industry. Furthermore, we still do not understand how self-efficacy can impact an individual's team and career in the industry. This lack of understanding can negatively impact how compani…
▽ More
In several areas of knowledge, self-efficacy is related to the perfomance of individuals, including in Software Engineering. However,it is not clear how self-efficacy can be modified in training conducted by the industry. Furthermore, we still do not understand how self-efficacy can impact an individual's team and career in the industry. This lack of understanding can negatively impact how companies and individuals perceive the importance of self-efficacy in the field. Therefore, We present a research proposal that aims to understand the relationship between self-efficacy and training in Software Engineering. Moreover, we look to understand the role of self-efficacy at Software Development industry. We propose a longitudinal case study with software engineers at Zup Innovation that participating of our bootcamp training. We expect to collect data to support our assumptions that self-efficacy can be related to training in Software Engineering. The other assumption is that self-efficacy at the beginning of training is higher than the middle, and that self-efficacy at the end of training is higher than the middle. We expect that the study proposed in this article will motivate a discussion about self-efficacy and the importance of training employers in the industry of software development.
△ Less
Submitted 26 October, 2021; v1 submitted 23 October, 2021;
originally announced October 2021.
