Showing 1–2 of 2 results for author: Madge, C
-
A LLM Benchmark based on the Minecraft Builder Dialog Agent Task
Authors:
Chris Madge,
Massimo Poesio
Abstract:
In this work we proposing adapting the Minecraft builder task into an LLM benchmark suitable for evaluating LLM ability in spatially orientated tasks, and informing builder agent design. Previous works have proposed corpora with varying complex structures, and human written instructions. We instead attempt to provide a comprehensive synthetic benchmark for testing builder agents over a series of d…
▽ More
In this work we proposing adapting the Minecraft builder task into an LLM benchmark suitable for evaluating LLM ability in spatially orientated tasks, and informing builder agent design. Previous works have proposed corpora with varying complex structures, and human written instructions. We instead attempt to provide a comprehensive synthetic benchmark for testing builder agents over a series of distinct tasks that comprise of common building operations. We believe this approach allows us to probe specific strengths and weaknesses of different agents, and test the ability of LLMs in the challenging area of spatial reasoning and vector based math.
△ Less
Submitted 17 July, 2024;
originally announced July 2024.
-
Large Language Models as Minecraft Agents
Authors:
Chris Madge,
Massimo Poesio
Abstract:
In this work we examine the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) in the challenging setting of acting as a Minecraft agent. We apply and evaluate LLMs in the builder and architect settings, introduce clarification questions and examining the challenges and opportunities for improvement. In addition, we present a platform for online interaction with the agents and an evaluation against previous work…
▽ More
In this work we examine the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) in the challenging setting of acting as a Minecraft agent. We apply and evaluate LLMs in the builder and architect settings, introduce clarification questions and examining the challenges and opportunities for improvement. In addition, we present a platform for online interaction with the agents and an evaluation against previous works.
△ Less
Submitted 13 February, 2024;
originally announced February 2024.