Impressions of the GDMC AI Settlement Generation Challenge in Minecraft
Authors:
Christoph Salge,
Claus Aranha,
Adrian Brightmoore,
Sean Butler,
Rodrigo Canaan,
Michael Cook,
Michael Cerny Green,
Hagen Fischer,
Christian Guckelsberger,
Jupiter Hadley,
Jean-Baptiste Hervé,
Mark R Johnson,
Quinn Kybartas,
David Mason,
Mike Preuss,
Tristan Smith,
Ruck Thawonmas,
Julian Togelius
Abstract:
The GDMC AI settlement generation challenge is a PCG competition about producing an algorithm that can create an "interesting" Minecraft settlement for a given map. This paper contains a collection of written experiences with this competition, by participants, judges, organizers and advisors. We asked people to reflect both on the artifacts themselves, and on the competition in general. The aim of…
▽ More
The GDMC AI settlement generation challenge is a PCG competition about producing an algorithm that can create an "interesting" Minecraft settlement for a given map. This paper contains a collection of written experiences with this competition, by participants, judges, organizers and advisors. We asked people to reflect both on the artifacts themselves, and on the competition in general. The aim of this paper is to offer a shareable and edited collection of experiences and qualitative feedback - which seem to contain a lot of insights on PCG and computational creativity, but would otherwise be lost once the output of the competition is reduced to scalar performance values. We reflect upon some organizational issues for AI competitions, and discuss the future of the GDMC competition.
△ Less
Submitted 6 August, 2021;
originally announced August 2021.
HEPCloud, a New Paradigm for HEP Facilities: CMS Amazon Web Services Investigation
Authors:
Burt Holzman,
Lothar A. T. Bauerdick,
Brian Bockelman,
Dave Dykstra,
Ian Fisk,
Stuart Fuess,
Gabriele Garzoglio,
Maria Girone,
Oliver Gutsche,
Dirk Hufnagel,
Hyunwoo Kim,
Robert Kennedy,
Nicolo Magini,
David Mason,
Panagiotis Spentzouris,
Anthony Tiradani,
Steve Timm,
Eric W. Vaandering
Abstract:
Historically, high energy physics computing has been performed on large purpose-built computing systems. These began as single-site compute facilities, but have evolved into the distributed computing grids used today. Recently, there has been an exponential increase in the capacity and capability of commercial clouds. Cloud resources are highly virtualized and intended to be able to be flexibly de…
▽ More
Historically, high energy physics computing has been performed on large purpose-built computing systems. These began as single-site compute facilities, but have evolved into the distributed computing grids used today. Recently, there has been an exponential increase in the capacity and capability of commercial clouds. Cloud resources are highly virtualized and intended to be able to be flexibly deployed for a variety of computing tasks. There is a growing nterest among the cloud providers to demonstrate the capability to perform large-scale scientific computing. In this paper, we discuss results from the CMS experiment using the Fermilab HEPCloud facility, which utilized both local Fermilab resources and virtual machines in the Amazon Web Services Elastic Compute Cloud. We discuss the planning, technical challenges, and lessons learned involved in performing physics workflows on a large-scale set of virtualized resources. In addition, we will discuss the economics and operational efficiencies when executing workflows both in the cloud and on dedicated resources.
△ Less
Submitted 29 September, 2017;
originally announced October 2017.
