-
A large-scale and PCR-referenced vocal audio dataset for COVID-19
Authors:
Jobie Budd,
Kieran Baker,
Emma Karoune,
Harry Coppock,
Selina Patel,
Ana Tendero Cañadas,
Alexander Titcomb,
Richard Payne,
David Hurley,
Sabrina Egglestone,
Lorraine Butler,
Jonathon Mellor,
George Nicholson,
Ivan Kiskin,
Vasiliki Koutra,
Radka Jersakova,
Rachel A. McKendry,
Peter Diggle,
Sylvia Richardson,
Björn W. Schuller,
Steven Gilmour,
Davide Pigoli,
Stephen Roberts,
Josef Packham,
Tracey Thornley
, et al. (1 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The UK COVID-19 Vocal Audio Dataset is designed for the training and evaluation of machine learning models that classify SARS-CoV-2 infection status or associated respiratory symptoms using vocal audio. The UK Health Security Agency recruited voluntary participants through the national Test and Trace programme and the REACT-1 survey in England from March 2021 to March 2022, during dominant transmi…
▽ More
The UK COVID-19 Vocal Audio Dataset is designed for the training and evaluation of machine learning models that classify SARS-CoV-2 infection status or associated respiratory symptoms using vocal audio. The UK Health Security Agency recruited voluntary participants through the national Test and Trace programme and the REACT-1 survey in England from March 2021 to March 2022, during dominant transmission of the Alpha and Delta SARS-CoV-2 variants and some Omicron variant sublineages. Audio recordings of volitional coughs, exhalations, and speech were collected in the 'Speak up to help beat coronavirus' digital survey alongside demographic, self-reported symptom and respiratory condition data, and linked to SARS-CoV-2 test results. The UK COVID-19 Vocal Audio Dataset represents the largest collection of SARS-CoV-2 PCR-referenced audio recordings to date. PCR results were linked to 70,794 of 72,999 participants and 24,155 of 25,776 positive cases. Respiratory symptoms were reported by 45.62% of participants. This dataset has additional potential uses for bioacoustics research, with 11.30% participants reporting asthma, and 27.20% with linked influenza PCR test results.
△ Less
Submitted 3 November, 2023; v1 submitted 15 December, 2022;
originally announced December 2022.
-
Go local: The key to controlling the COVID-19 pandemic in the post lockdown era
Authors:
Isabel Bennett,
Jobie Budd,
Erin M. Manning,
Ed Manley,
Mengdie Zhuang,
Ingemar J. Cox,
Michael Short,
Anne M. Johnson,
Deenan Pillay,
Rachel A. McKendry
Abstract:
The UK government announced its first wave of lockdown easing on 10 May 2020, two months after the non-pharmaceutical measures to reduce the spread of COVID-19 were first introduced on 23 March 2020. Analysis of reported case rate data from Public Health England and aggregated and anonymised crowd level mobility data shows variability across local authorities in the UK. A locality-based approach t…
▽ More
The UK government announced its first wave of lockdown easing on 10 May 2020, two months after the non-pharmaceutical measures to reduce the spread of COVID-19 were first introduced on 23 March 2020. Analysis of reported case rate data from Public Health England and aggregated and anonymised crowd level mobility data shows variability across local authorities in the UK. A locality-based approach to lockdown easing is needed, enabling local public health and associated health and social care services to rapidly respond to emerging hotspots of infection. National level data will hide an increasing heterogeneity of COVID-19 infections and mobility, and new ways of real-time data presentation to the public are required. Data sources (including mobile) allow for faster visualisation than more traditional data sources, and are part of a wider trend towards near real-time analysis of outbreaks needed for timely, targeted local public health interventions. Real time data visualisation may give early warnings of unusual levels of activity which warrant further investigation by local public health authorities.
△ Less
Submitted 6 July, 2020;
originally announced July 2020.
-
Tracking COVID-19 using online search
Authors:
Vasileios Lampos,
Maimuna S. Majumder,
Elad Yom-Tov,
Michael Edelstein,
Simon Moura,
Yohhei Hamada,
Molebogeng X. Rangaka,
Rachel A. McKendry,
Ingemar J. Cox
Abstract:
Previous research has demonstrated that various properties of infectious diseases can be inferred from online search behaviour. In this work we use time series of online search query frequencies to gain insights about the prevalence of COVID-19 in multiple countries. We first develop unsupervised modelling techniques based on associated symptom categories identified by the United Kingdom's Nationa…
▽ More
Previous research has demonstrated that various properties of infectious diseases can be inferred from online search behaviour. In this work we use time series of online search query frequencies to gain insights about the prevalence of COVID-19 in multiple countries. We first develop unsupervised modelling techniques based on associated symptom categories identified by the United Kingdom's National Health Service and Public Health England. We then attempt to minimise an expected bias in these signals caused by public interest -- as opposed to infections -- using the proportion of news media coverage devoted to COVID-19 as a proxy indicator. Our analysis indicates that models based on online searches precede the reported confirmed cases and deaths by 16.7 (10.2 - 23.2) and 22.1 (17.4 - 26.9) days, respectively. We also investigate transfer learning techniques for mapping supervised models from countries where the spread of disease has progressed extensively to countries that are in earlier phases of their respective epidemic curves. Furthermore, we compare time series of online search activity against confirmed COVID-19 cases or deaths jointly across multiple countries, uncovering interesting querying patterns, including the finding that rarer symptoms are better predictors than common ones. Finally, we show that web searches improve the short-term forecasting accuracy of autoregressive models for COVID-19 deaths. Our work provides evidence that online search data can be used to develop complementary public health surveillance methods to help inform the COVID-19 response in conjunction with more established approaches.
△ Less
Submitted 10 February, 2021; v1 submitted 18 March, 2020;
originally announced March 2020.
