Queer In AI: A Case Study in Community-Led Participatory AI
Authors:
Organizers Of QueerInAI,
:,
Anaelia Ovalle,
Arjun Subramonian,
Ashwin Singh,
Claas Voelcker,
Danica J. Sutherland,
Davide Locatelli,
Eva Breznik,
Filip Klubička,
Hang Yuan,
Hetvi J,
Huan Zhang,
Jaidev Shriram,
Kruno Lehman,
Luca Soldaini,
Maarten Sap,
Marc Peter Deisenroth,
Maria Leonor Pacheco,
Maria Ryskina,
Martin Mundt,
Milind Agarwal,
Nyx McLean,
Pan Xu,
A Pranav
, et al. (26 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We present Queer in AI as a case study for community-led participatory design in AI. We examine how participatory design and intersectional tenets started and shaped this community's programs over the years. We discuss different challenges that emerged in the process, look at ways this organization has fallen short of operationalizing participatory and intersectional principles, and then assess th…
▽ More
We present Queer in AI as a case study for community-led participatory design in AI. We examine how participatory design and intersectional tenets started and shaped this community's programs over the years. We discuss different challenges that emerged in the process, look at ways this organization has fallen short of operationalizing participatory and intersectional principles, and then assess the organization's impact. Queer in AI provides important lessons and insights for practitioners and theorists of participatory methods broadly through its rejection of hierarchy in favor of decentralization, success at building aid and programs by and for the queer community, and effort to change actors and institutions outside of the queer community. Finally, we theorize how communities like Queer in AI contribute to the participatory design in AI more broadly by fostering cultures of participation in AI, welcoming and empowering marginalized participants, critiquing poor or exploitative participatory practices, and bringing participation to institutions outside of individual research projects. Queer in AI's work serves as a case study of grassroots activism and participatory methods within AI, demonstrating the potential of community-led participatory methods and intersectional praxis, while also providing challenges, case studies, and nuanced insights to researchers developing and using participatory methods.
△ Less
Submitted 8 June, 2023; v1 submitted 29 March, 2023;
originally announced March 2023.
The Ethical Implications of Digital Contact Tracing for LGBTQIA+ Communities
Authors:
Izak van Zyl,
Nyx McLean
Abstract:
The onset of COVID-19 has led to the introduction of far-reaching digital interventions in the interest of public health. Among these, digital contact tracing has been proposed as a viable means of targeted control in countries across the globe, including on the African continent. This, in turn, creates significant ethical challenges for vulnerable communities, including LGBTQIA+ persons. In this…
▽ More
The onset of COVID-19 has led to the introduction of far-reaching digital interventions in the interest of public health. Among these, digital contact tracing has been proposed as a viable means of targeted control in countries across the globe, including on the African continent. This, in turn, creates significant ethical challenges for vulnerable communities, including LGBTQIA+ persons. In this research paper, we explore some of the ethical implications of digital contact tracing for the LGBTQIA+ community. We refer specifically to the digital infringement of freedoms, and ground our discussion in the discourse of data colonisation and Big Tech. We propose a critical intersectional feminism towards developing inclusive technology that is decentralised and user controlled. This approach is informed by a feminist ethics of care that emphasises multiple lived experiences.
△ Less
Submitted 23 August, 2021;
originally announced August 2021.
