-
Prospective Learning: Principled Extrapolation to the Future
Authors:
Ashwin De Silva,
Rahul Ramesh,
Lyle Ungar,
Marshall Hussain Shuler,
Noah J. Cowan,
Michael Platt,
Chen Li,
Leyla Isik,
Seung-Eon Roh,
Adam Charles,
Archana Venkataraman,
Brian Caffo,
Javier J. How,
Justus M Kebschull,
John W. Krakauer,
Maxim Bichuch,
Kaleab Alemayehu Kinfu,
Eva Yezerets,
Dinesh Jayaraman,
Jong M. Shin,
Soledad Villar,
Ian Phillips,
Carey E. Priebe,
Thomas Hartung,
Michael I. Miller
, et al. (18 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Learning is a process which can update decision rules, based on past experience, such that future performance improves. Traditionally, machine learning is often evaluated under the assumption that the future will be identical to the past in distribution or change adversarially. But these assumptions can be either too optimistic or pessimistic for many problems in the real world. Real world scenari…
▽ More
Learning is a process which can update decision rules, based on past experience, such that future performance improves. Traditionally, machine learning is often evaluated under the assumption that the future will be identical to the past in distribution or change adversarially. But these assumptions can be either too optimistic or pessimistic for many problems in the real world. Real world scenarios evolve over multiple spatiotemporal scales with partially predictable dynamics. Here we reformulate the learning problem to one that centers around this idea of dynamic futures that are partially learnable. We conjecture that certain sequences of tasks are not retrospectively learnable (in which the data distribution is fixed), but are prospectively learnable (in which distributions may be dynamic), suggesting that prospective learning is more difficult in kind than retrospective learning. We argue that prospective learning more accurately characterizes many real world problems that (1) currently stymie existing artificial intelligence solutions and/or (2) lack adequate explanations for how natural intelligences solve them. Thus, studying prospective learning will lead to deeper insights and solutions to currently vexing challenges in both natural and artificial intelligences.
△ Less
Submitted 13 July, 2023; v1 submitted 18 January, 2022;
originally announced January 2022.
-
Hidden Markov Modeling for Maximum Likelihood Neuron Reconstruction
Authors:
Thomas L. Athey,
Daniel J. Tward,
Ulrich Mueller,
Joshua T. Vogelstein,
Michael I. Miller
Abstract:
Recent advances in brain clearing and imaging have made it possible to image entire mammalian brains at sub-micron resolution. These images offer the potential to assemble brain-wide atlases of neuron morphology, but manual neuron reconstruction remains a bottleneck. Several automatic reconstruction algorithms exist, but most focus on single neuron images. In this paper, we present a probabilistic…
▽ More
Recent advances in brain clearing and imaging have made it possible to image entire mammalian brains at sub-micron resolution. These images offer the potential to assemble brain-wide atlases of neuron morphology, but manual neuron reconstruction remains a bottleneck. Several automatic reconstruction algorithms exist, but most focus on single neuron images. In this paper, we present a probabilistic reconstruction method, ViterBrain, which combines a hidden Markov state process that encodes neuron geometry with a random field appearance model of neuron fluorescence. Our method utilizes dynamic programming to compute the global maximizers of what we call the "most probable" neuron path. Our most probable estimation method models the task of reconstructing neuronal processes in the presence of other neurons, and thus is applicable in images with several neurons. Our method operates on image segmentations in order to leverage cutting edge computer vision technology. We applied our algorithm to imperfect image segmentations where false negatives severed neuronal processes, and showed that it can follow axons in the presence of noise or nearby neurons. Additionally, it creates a framework where users can intervene to, for example, fit start and endpoints. The code used in this work is available in our open-source Python package brainlit.
△ Less
Submitted 27 January, 2022; v1 submitted 4 June, 2021;
originally announced June 2021.
-
Fitting Splines to Axonal Arbors Quantifies Relationship between Branch Order and Geometry
Authors:
Thomas L. Athey,
Jacopo Teneggi,
Joshua T. Vogelstein,
Daniel Tward,
Ulrich Mueller,
Michael I. Miller
Abstract:
Neuromorphology is crucial to identifying neuronal subtypes and understanding learning. It is also implicated in neurological disease. However, standard morphological analysis focuses on macroscopic features such as branching frequency and connectivity between regions, and often neglects the internal geometry of neurons. In this work, we treat neuron trace points as a sampling of differentiable cu…
▽ More
Neuromorphology is crucial to identifying neuronal subtypes and understanding learning. It is also implicated in neurological disease. However, standard morphological analysis focuses on macroscopic features such as branching frequency and connectivity between regions, and often neglects the internal geometry of neurons. In this work, we treat neuron trace points as a sampling of differentiable curves and fit them with a set of branching B-splines. We designed our representation with the Frenet-Serret formulas from differential geometry in mind. The Frenet-Serret formulas completely characterize smooth curves, and involve two parameters, curvature and torsion. Our representation makes it possible to compute these parameters from neuron traces in closed form. These parameters are defined continuously along the curve, in contrast to other parameters like tortuosity which depend on start and end points. We applied our method to a dataset of cortical projection neurons traced in two mouse brains, and found that the parameters are distributed differently between primary, collateral, and terminal axon branches, thus quantifying geometric differences between different components of an axonal arbor. The results agreed in both brains, further validating our representation. The code used in this work can be readily applied to neuron traces in SWC format and is available in our open-source Python package brainlit: http://brainlit.neurodata.io/.
△ Less
Submitted 5 June, 2021; v1 submitted 3 April, 2021;
originally announced April 2021.
-
A Large Deformation Diffeomorphic Approach to Registration of CLARITY Images via Mutual Information
Authors:
Kwame S. Kutten,
Nicolas Charon,
Michael I. Miller,
J. T. Ratnanather,
Jordan Matelsky,
Alexander D. Baden,
Kunal Lillaney,
Karl Deisseroth,
Li Ye,
Joshua T. Vogelstein
Abstract:
CLARITY is a method for converting biological tissues into translucent and porous hydrogel-tissue hybrids. This facilitates interrogation with light sheet microscopy and penetration of molecular probes while avoiding physical slicing. In this work, we develop a pipeline for registering CLARIfied mouse brains to an annotated brain atlas. Due to the novelty of this microscopy technique it is impract…
▽ More
CLARITY is a method for converting biological tissues into translucent and porous hydrogel-tissue hybrids. This facilitates interrogation with light sheet microscopy and penetration of molecular probes while avoiding physical slicing. In this work, we develop a pipeline for registering CLARIfied mouse brains to an annotated brain atlas. Due to the novelty of this microscopy technique it is impractical to use absolute intensity values to align these images to existing standard atlases. Thus we adopt a large deformation diffeomorphic approach for registering images via mutual information matching. Furthermore we show how a cascaded multi-resolution approach can improve registration quality while reducing algorithm run time. As acquired image volumes were over a terabyte in size, they were far too large for work on personal computers. Therefore the NeuroData computational infrastructure was deployed for multi-resolution storage and visualization of these images and aligned annotations on the web.
△ Less
Submitted 11 August, 2017; v1 submitted 1 December, 2016;
originally announced December 2016.
-
Deformably Registering and Annotating Whole CLARITY Brains to an Atlas via Masked LDDMM
Authors:
Kwame S. Kutten,
Joshua T. Vogelstein,
Nicolas Charon,
Li Ye,
Karl Deisseroth,
Michael I. Miller
Abstract:
The CLARITY method renders brains optically transparent to enable high-resolution imaging in the structurally intact brain. Anatomically annotating CLARITY brains is necessary for discovering which regions contain signals of interest. Manually annotating whole-brain, terabyte CLARITY images is difficult, time-consuming, subjective, and error-prone. Automatically registering CLARITY images to a pre…
▽ More
The CLARITY method renders brains optically transparent to enable high-resolution imaging in the structurally intact brain. Anatomically annotating CLARITY brains is necessary for discovering which regions contain signals of interest. Manually annotating whole-brain, terabyte CLARITY images is difficult, time-consuming, subjective, and error-prone. Automatically registering CLARITY images to a pre-annotated brain atlas offers a solution, but is difficult for several reasons. Removal of the brain from the skull and subsequent storage and processing cause variable non-rigid deformations, thus compounding inter-subject anatomical variability. Additionally, the signal in CLARITY images arises from various biochemical contrast agents which only sparsely label brain structures. This sparse labeling challenges the most commonly used registration algorithms that need to match image histogram statistics to the more densely labeled histological brain atlases. The standard method is a multiscale Mutual Information B-spline algorithm that dynamically generates an average template as an intermediate registration target. We determined that this method performs poorly when registering CLARITY brains to the Allen Institute's Mouse Reference Atlas (ARA), because the image histogram statistics are poorly matched. Therefore, we developed a method (Mask-LDDMM) for registering CLARITY images, that automatically find the brain boundary and learns the optimal deformation between the brain and atlas masks. Using Mask-LDDMM without an average template provided better results than the standard approach when registering CLARITY brains to the ARA. The LDDMM pipelines developed here provide a fast automated way to anatomically annotate CLARITY images. Our code is available as open source software at http://NeuroData.io.
△ Less
Submitted 6 May, 2016;
originally announced May 2016.
