Showing 1–20 of 20 results for author: Naderi, B

ICASSP 2024 Speech Signal Improvement Challenge

Authors: Nicolae Catalin Ristea, Ando Saabas, Ross Cutler, Babak Naderi, Sebastian Braun, Solomiya Branets

Abstract: The ICASSP 2024 Speech Signal Improvement Grand Challenge is intended to stimulate research in the area of improving the speech signal quality in communication systems. This marks our second challenge, building upon the success from the previous ICASSP 2023 Grand Challenge. We enhance the competition by introducing a dataset synthesizer, enabling all participating teams to start at a higher baseli… ▽ More The ICASSP 2024 Speech Signal Improvement Grand Challenge is intended to stimulate research in the area of improving the speech signal quality in communication systems. This marks our second challenge, building upon the success from the previous ICASSP 2023 Grand Challenge. We enhance the competition by introducing a dataset synthesizer, enabling all participating teams to start at a higher baseline, an objective metric for our extended P.804 tests, transcripts for the 2023 test set, and we add Word Accuracy (WAcc) as a metric. We evaluate a total of 13 systems in the real-time track and 11 systems in the non-real-time track using both subjective P.804 and objective Word Accuracy metrics. △ Less

Submitted 25 January, 2024; originally announced January 2024.

Multi-dimensional Speech Quality Assessment in Crowdsourcing

Authors: Babak Naderi, Ross Cutler, Nicolae-Catalin Ristea

Abstract: Subjective speech quality assessment is the gold standard for evaluating speech enhancement processing and telecommunication systems. The commonly used standard ITU-T Rec. P.800 defines how to measure speech quality in lab environments, and ITU-T Rec.~P.808 extended it for crowdsourcing. ITU-T Rec. P.835 extends P.800 to measure the quality of speech in the presence of noise. ITU-T Rec. P.804 targ… ▽ More Subjective speech quality assessment is the gold standard for evaluating speech enhancement processing and telecommunication systems. The commonly used standard ITU-T Rec. P.800 defines how to measure speech quality in lab environments, and ITU-T Rec.~P.808 extended it for crowdsourcing. ITU-T Rec. P.835 extends P.800 to measure the quality of speech in the presence of noise. ITU-T Rec. P.804 targets the conversation test and introduces perceptual speech quality dimensions which are measured during the listening phase of the conversation. The perceptual dimensions are noisiness, coloration, discontinuity, and loudness. We create a crowdsourcing implementation of a multi-dimensional subjective test following the scales from P.804 and extend it to include reverberation, the speech signal, and overall quality. We show the tool is both accurate and reproducible. The tool has been used in the ICASSP 2023 Speech Signal Improvement challenge and we show the utility of these speech quality dimensions in this challenge. The tool will be publicly available as open-source at https://github.com/microsoft/P.808. △ Less

Submitted 13 September, 2023; originally announced September 2023.

Comments: arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:2303.06566

VCD: A Video Conferencing Dataset for Video Compression

Authors: Babak Naderi, Ross Cutler, Nabakumar Singh Khongbantabam, Yasaman Hosseinkashi, Henrik Turbell, Albert Sadovnikov, Quan Zhou

Abstract: Commonly used datasets for evaluating video codecs are all very high quality and not representative of video typically used in video conferencing scenarios. We present the Video Conferencing Dataset (VCD) for evaluating video codecs for real-time communication, the first such dataset focused on video conferencing. VCD includes a wide variety of camera qualities and spatial and temporal information… ▽ More Commonly used datasets for evaluating video codecs are all very high quality and not representative of video typically used in video conferencing scenarios. We present the Video Conferencing Dataset (VCD) for evaluating video codecs for real-time communication, the first such dataset focused on video conferencing. VCD includes a wide variety of camera qualities and spatial and temporal information. It includes both desktop and mobile scenarios and two types of video background processing. We report the compression efficiency of H.264, H.265, H.266, and AV1 in low-delay settings on VCD and compare it with the non-video conferencing datasets UVC, MLC-JVC, and HEVC. The results show the source quality and the scenarios have a significant effect on the compression efficiency of all the codecs. VCD enables the evaluation and tuning of codecs for this important scenario. The VCD is publicly available as an open-source dataset at https://github.com/microsoft/VCD. △ Less

Submitted 13 November, 2023; v1 submitted 13 September, 2023; originally announced September 2023.

Full Reference Video Quality Assessment for Machine Learning-Based Video Codecs

Authors: Abrar Majeedi, Babak Naderi, Yasaman Hosseinkashi, Juhee Cho, Ruben Alvarez Martinez, Ross Cutler

Abstract: Machine learning-based video codecs have made significant progress in the past few years. A critical area in the development of ML-based video codecs is an accurate evaluation metric that does not require an expensive and slow subjective test. We show that existing evaluation metrics that were designed and trained on DSP-based video codecs are not highly correlated to subjective opinion when used… ▽ More Machine learning-based video codecs have made significant progress in the past few years. A critical area in the development of ML-based video codecs is an accurate evaluation metric that does not require an expensive and slow subjective test. We show that existing evaluation metrics that were designed and trained on DSP-based video codecs are not highly correlated to subjective opinion when used with ML video codecs due to the video artifacts being quite different between ML and video codecs. We provide a new dataset of ML video codec videos that have been accurately labeled for quality. We also propose a new full reference video quality assessment (FRVQA) model that achieves a Pearson Correlation Coefficient (PCC) of 0.99 and a Spearman's Rank Correlation Coefficient (SRCC) of 0.99 at the model level. We make the dataset and FRVQA model open source to help accelerate research in ML video codecs, and so that others can further improve the FRVQA model. △ Less

Submitted 1 September, 2023; originally announced September 2023.

LSTM-based Video Quality Prediction Accounting for Temporal Distortions in Videoconferencing Calls

Authors: Gabriel Mittag, Babak Naderi, Vishak Gopal, Ross Cutler

Abstract: Current state-of-the-art video quality models, such as VMAF, give excellent prediction results by comparing the degraded video with its reference video. However, they do not consider temporal distortions (e.g., frame freezes or skips) that occur during videoconferencing calls. In this paper, we present a data-driven approach for modeling such distortions automatically by training an LSTM with subj… ▽ More Current state-of-the-art video quality models, such as VMAF, give excellent prediction results by comparing the degraded video with its reference video. However, they do not consider temporal distortions (e.g., frame freezes or skips) that occur during videoconferencing calls. In this paper, we present a data-driven approach for modeling such distortions automatically by training an LSTM with subjective quality ratings labeled via crowdsourcing. The videos were collected from live videoconferencing calls in 83 different network conditions. We applied QR codes as markers on the source videos to create aligned references and compute temporal features based on the alignment vectors. Using these features together with VMAF core features, our proposed model achieves a PCC of 0.99 on the validation set. Furthermore, our model outputs per-frame quality that gives detailed insight into the cause of video quality impairments. The VCM model and dataset are open-sourced at https://github.com/microsoft/Video_Call_MOS. △ Less

Submitted 22 March, 2023; originally announced March 2023.

Comments: Accepted at ICASSP 2023

ICASSP 2023 Deep Noise Suppression Challenge

Authors: Harishchandra Dubey, Ashkan Aazami, Vishak Gopal, Babak Naderi, Sebastian Braun, Ross Cutler, Alex Ju, Mehdi Zohourian, Min Tang, Hannes Gamper, Mehrsa Golestaneh, Robert Aichner

Abstract: Deep Speech Enhancement Challenge is the 5th edition of deep noise suppression (DNS) challenges organized at ICASSP 2023 Signal Processing Grand Challenges. DNS challenges were organized during 2019-2023 to stimulate research in deep speech enhancement (DSE). Previous DNS challenges were organized at INTERSPEECH 2020, ICASSP 2021, INTERSPEECH 2021, and ICASSP 2022. From prior editions, we learnt t… ▽ More Deep Speech Enhancement Challenge is the 5th edition of deep noise suppression (DNS) challenges organized at ICASSP 2023 Signal Processing Grand Challenges. DNS challenges were organized during 2019-2023 to stimulate research in deep speech enhancement (DSE). Previous DNS challenges were organized at INTERSPEECH 2020, ICASSP 2021, INTERSPEECH 2021, and ICASSP 2022. From prior editions, we learnt that improving signal quality (SIG) is challenging particularly in presence of simultaneously active interfering talkers and noise. This challenge aims to develop models for joint denosing, dereverberation and suppression of interfering talkers. When primary talker wears a headphone, certain acoustic properties of their speech such as direct-to-reverberation (DRR), signal to noise ratio (SNR) etc. make it possible to suppress neighboring talkers even without enrollment data for primary talker. This motivated us to create two tracks for this challenge: (i) Track-1 Headset; (ii) Track-2 Speakerphone. Both tracks has fullband (48kHz) training data and testset, and each testclips has a corresponding enrollment data (10-30s duration) for primary talker. Each track invited submissions of personalized and non-personalized models all of which are evaluated through same subjective evaluation. Most models submitted to challenge were personalized models, same team is winner in both tracks where the best models has improvement of 0.145 and 0.141 in challenge's Score as compared to noisy blind testset. △ Less

Submitted 8 May, 2023; v1 submitted 20 March, 2023; originally announced March 2023.

Comments: 6 pages, 1 figure. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:2202.13288

A Transfer Learning Based Model for Text Readability Assessment in German

Authors: Salar Mohtaj, Babak Naderi, Sebastian Möller, Faraz Maschhur, Chuyang Wu, Max Reinhard

Abstract: Text readability assessment has a wide range of applications for different target people, from language learners to people with disabilities. The fast pace of textual content production on the web makes it impossible to measure text complexity without the benefit of machine learning and natural language processing techniques. Although various research addressed the readability assessment of Englis… ▽ More Text readability assessment has a wide range of applications for different target people, from language learners to people with disabilities. The fast pace of textual content production on the web makes it impossible to measure text complexity without the benefit of machine learning and natural language processing techniques. Although various research addressed the readability assessment of English text in recent years, there is still room for improvement of the models for other languages. In this paper, we proposed a new model for text complexity assessment for German text based on transfer learning. Our results show that the model outperforms more classical solutions based on linguistic features extraction from input text. The best model is based on the BERT pre-trained language model achieved the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of 0.483. △ Less

Submitted 6 September, 2022; v1 submitted 13 July, 2022; originally announced July 2022.

ConferencingSpeech 2022 Challenge: Non-intrusive Objective Speech Quality Assessment (NISQA) Challenge for Online Conferencing Applications

Authors: Gaoxiong Yi, Wei Xiao, Yiming Xiao, Babak Naderi, Sebastian Möller, Wafaa Wardah, Gabriel Mittag, Ross Cutler, Zhuohuang Zhang, Donald S. Williamson, Fei Chen, Fuzheng Yang, Shidong Shang

Abstract: With the advances in speech communication systems such as online conferencing applications, we can seamlessly work with people regardless of where they are. However, during online meetings, speech quality can be significantly affected by background noise, reverberation, packet loss, network jitter, etc. Because of its nature, speech quality is traditionally assessed in subjective tests in laborato… ▽ More With the advances in speech communication systems such as online conferencing applications, we can seamlessly work with people regardless of where they are. However, during online meetings, speech quality can be significantly affected by background noise, reverberation, packet loss, network jitter, etc. Because of its nature, speech quality is traditionally assessed in subjective tests in laboratories and lately also in crowdsourcing following the international standards from ITU-T Rec. P.800 series. However, those approaches are costly and cannot be applied to customer data. Therefore, an effective objective assessment approach is needed to evaluate or monitor the speech quality of the ongoing conversation. The ConferencingSpeech 2022 challenge targets the non-intrusive deep neural network models for the speech quality assessment task. We open-sourced a training corpus with more than 86K speech clips in different languages, with a wide range of synthesized and live degradations and their corresponding subjective quality scores through crowdsourcing. 18 teams submitted their models for evaluation in this challenge. The blind test sets included about 4300 clips from wide ranges of degradations. This paper describes the challenge, the datasets, and the evaluation methods and reports the final results. △ Less

Submitted 31 March, 2022; v1 submitted 29 March, 2022; originally announced March 2022.

Bias-Aware Loss for Training Image and Speech Quality Prediction Models from Multiple Datasets

Authors: Gabriel Mittag, Saman Zadtootaghaj, Thilo Michael, Babak Naderi, Sebastian Möller

Abstract: The ground truth used for training image, video, or speech quality prediction models is based on the Mean Opinion Scores (MOS) obtained from subjective experiments. Usually, it is necessary to conduct multiple experiments, mostly with different test participants, to obtain enough data to train quality models based on machine learning. Each of these experiments is subject to an experiment-specific… ▽ More The ground truth used for training image, video, or speech quality prediction models is based on the Mean Opinion Scores (MOS) obtained from subjective experiments. Usually, it is necessary to conduct multiple experiments, mostly with different test participants, to obtain enough data to train quality models based on machine learning. Each of these experiments is subject to an experiment-specific bias, where the rating of the same file may be substantially different in two experiments (e.g. depending on the overall quality distribution). These different ratings for the same distortion levels confuse neural networks during training and lead to lower performance. To overcome this problem, we propose a bias-aware loss function that estimates each dataset's biases during training with a linear function and considers it while optimising the network weights. We prove the efficiency of the proposed method by training and validating quality prediction models on synthetic and subjective image and speech quality datasets. △ Less

Submitted 20 April, 2021; originally announced April 2021.

Comments: Accepted at QoMEX 2021

NISQA: A Deep CNN-Self-Attention Model for Multidimensional Speech Quality Prediction with Crowdsourced Datasets

Authors: Gabriel Mittag, Babak Naderi, Assmaa Chehadi, Sebastian Möller

Abstract: In this paper, we present an update to the NISQA speech quality prediction model that is focused on distortions that occur in communication networks. In contrast to the previous version, the model is trained end-to-end and the time-dependency modelling and time-pooling is achieved through a Self-Attention mechanism. Besides overall speech quality, the model also predicts the four speech quality di… ▽ More In this paper, we present an update to the NISQA speech quality prediction model that is focused on distortions that occur in communication networks. In contrast to the previous version, the model is trained end-to-end and the time-dependency modelling and time-pooling is achieved through a Self-Attention mechanism. Besides overall speech quality, the model also predicts the four speech quality dimensions Noisiness, Coloration, Discontinuity, and Loudness, and in this way gives more insight into the cause of a quality degradation. Furthermore, new datasets with over 13,000 speech files were created for training and validation of the model. The model was finally tested on a new, live-talking test dataset that contains recordings of real telephone calls. Overall, NISQA was trained and evaluated on 81 datasets from different sources and showed to provide reliable predictions also for unknown speech samples. The code, model weights, and datasets are open-sourced. △ Less

Submitted 19 April, 2021; originally announced April 2021.

Comments: Submitted to Interspeech 2021

Speech Quality Assessment in Crowdsourcing: Comparison Category Rating Method

Authors: Babak Naderi, Sebastian Möller, Ross Cutler

Abstract: Traditionally, Quality of Experience (QoE) for a communication system is evaluated through a subjective test. The most common test method for speech QoE is the Absolute Category Rating (ACR), in which participants listen to a set of stimuli, processed by the underlying test conditions, and rate their perceived quality for each stimulus on a specific scale. The Comparison Category Rating (CCR) is a… ▽ More Traditionally, Quality of Experience (QoE) for a communication system is evaluated through a subjective test. The most common test method for speech QoE is the Absolute Category Rating (ACR), in which participants listen to a set of stimuli, processed by the underlying test conditions, and rate their perceived quality for each stimulus on a specific scale. The Comparison Category Rating (CCR) is another standard approach in which participants listen to both reference and processed stimuli and rate their quality compared to the other one. The CCR method is particularly suitable for systems that improve the quality of input speech. This paper evaluates an adaptation of the CCR test procedure for assessing speech quality in the crowdsourcing set-up. The CCR method was introduced in the ITU-T Rec. P.800 for laboratory-based experiments. We adapted the test for the crowdsourcing approach following the guidelines from ITU-T Rec. P.800 and P.808. We show that the results of the CCR procedure via crowdsourcing are highly reproducible. We also compared the CCR test results with widely used ACR test procedures obtained in the laboratory and crowdsourcing. Our results show that the CCR procedure in crowdsourcing is a reliable and valid test method. △ Less

Submitted 9 April, 2021; originally announced April 2021.

Comments: Accepted for QoMEX2021

Effect of Language Proficiency on Subjective Evaluation of Noise Suppression Algorithms

Authors: Babak Naderi, Gabriel Mittag, Rafael Zequeira Jim\a'enez, Sebastian Möller

Abstract: Speech communication systems based on Voice-over-IP technology are frequently used by native as well as non-native speakers of a target language, e.g. in international phone calls or telemeetings. Frequently, such calls also occur in a noisy environment, making noise suppression modules necessary to increase perceived quality of experience. Whereas standard tests for assessing perceived quality ma… ▽ More Speech communication systems based on Voice-over-IP technology are frequently used by native as well as non-native speakers of a target language, e.g. in international phone calls or telemeetings. Frequently, such calls also occur in a noisy environment, making noise suppression modules necessary to increase perceived quality of experience. Whereas standard tests for assessing perceived quality make use of native listeners, we assume that noise-reduced speech and residual noise may affect native and non-native listeners of a target language in different ways. To test this assumption, we report results of two subjective tests conducted with English and German native listeners who judge the quality of speech samples recorded by native English, German, and Mandarin speakers, which are degraded with different background noise levels and noise suppression effects. The experiments were conducted following the standardized ITU-T Rec. P.835 approach, however implemented in a crowdsourcing setting according to ITU-T Rec. P.808. Our results show a significant influence of language on speech signal ratings and, consequently, on the overall perceived quality in specific conditions. △ Less

Submitted 25 October, 2020; originally announced October 2020.

Subjective Evaluation of Noise Suppression Algorithms in Crowdsourcing

Authors: Babak Naderi, Ross Cutler

Abstract: The quality of the speech communication systems, which include noise suppression algorithms, are typically evaluated in laboratory experiments according to the ITU-T Rec. P.835, in which participants rate background noise, speech signal, and overall quality separately. This paper introduces an open-source toolkit for conducting subjective quality evaluation of noise suppressed speech in crowdsourc… ▽ More The quality of the speech communication systems, which include noise suppression algorithms, are typically evaluated in laboratory experiments according to the ITU-T Rec. P.835, in which participants rate background noise, speech signal, and overall quality separately. This paper introduces an open-source toolkit for conducting subjective quality evaluation of noise suppressed speech in crowdsourcing. We followed the ITU-T Rec. P.835, and P.808 and highly automate the process to prevent moderator's error. To assess the validity of our evaluation method, we compared the Mean Opinion Scores (MOS), calculate using ratings collected with our implementation, and the MOS values from a standard laboratory experiment conducted according to the ITU-T Rec P.835. Results show a high validity in all three scales namely background noise, speech signal and overall quality (average PCC = 0.961). Results of a round-robin test (N=5) showed that our implementation is also a highly reproducible evaluation method (PCC=0.99). Finally, we used our implementation in the INTERSPEECH 2021 Deep Noise Suppression Challenge as the primary evaluation metric, which demonstrates it is practical to use at scale. The results are analyzed to determine why the overall performance was the best in terms of background noise and speech quality. △ Less

Submitted 16 April, 2021; v1 submitted 25 October, 2020; originally announced October 2020.

Crowdsourcing approach for subjective evaluation of echo impairment

Authors: Ross Cutler, Babak Naderi, Markus Loide, Sten Sootla, Ando Saabas

Abstract: The quality of acoustic echo cancellers (AECs) in real-time communication systems is typically evaluated using objective metrics like ERLE and PESQ, and less commonly with lab-based subjective tests like ITU-T Rec. P.831. We will show that these objective measures are not well correlated to subjective measures. We then introduce an open-source crowdsourcing approach for subjective evaluation of ec… ▽ More The quality of acoustic echo cancellers (AECs) in real-time communication systems is typically evaluated using objective metrics like ERLE and PESQ, and less commonly with lab-based subjective tests like ITU-T Rec. P.831. We will show that these objective measures are not well correlated to subjective measures. We then introduce an open-source crowdsourcing approach for subjective evaluation of echo impairment which can be used to evaluate the performance of AECs. We provide a study that shows this tool is accurate and highly reproducible. This new tool has been recently used in the ICASSP 2021 AEC Challenge which made the challenge possible to do quickly and cost effectively. △ Less

Submitted 27 February, 2022; v1 submitted 25 October, 2020; originally announced October 2020.

QUALINET White Paper on Definitions of Immersive Media Experience (IMEx)

Authors: Andrew Perkis, Christian Timmerer, Sabina Baraković, Jasmina Baraković Husić, Søren Bech, Sebastian Bosse, Jean Botev, Kjell Brunnström, Luis Cruz, Katrien De Moor, Andrea de Polo Saibanti, Wouter Durnez, Sebastian Egger-Lampl, Ulrich Engelke, Tiago H. Falk, Jesús Gutiérrez, Asim Hameed, Andrew Hines, Tanja Kojic, Dragan Kukolj, Eirini Liotou, Dragorad Milovanovic, Sebastian Möller, Niall Murray, Babak Naderi , et al. (19 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: With the coming of age of virtual/augmented reality and interactive media, numerous definitions, frameworks, and models of immersion have emerged across different fields ranging from computer graphics to literary works. Immersion is oftentimes used interchangeably with presence as both concepts are closely related. However, there are noticeable interdisciplinary differences regarding definitions,… ▽ More With the coming of age of virtual/augmented reality and interactive media, numerous definitions, frameworks, and models of immersion have emerged across different fields ranging from computer graphics to literary works. Immersion is oftentimes used interchangeably with presence as both concepts are closely related. However, there are noticeable interdisciplinary differences regarding definitions, scope, and constituents that are required to be addressed so that a coherent understanding of the concepts can be achieved. Such consensus is vital for paving the directionality of the future of immersive media experiences (IMEx) and all related matters. The aim of this white paper is to provide a survey of definitions of immersion and presence which leads to a definition of immersive media experience (IMEx). The Quality of Experience (QoE) for immersive media is described by establishing a relationship between the concepts of QoE and IMEx followed by application areas of immersive media experience. Influencing factors on immersive media experience are elaborated as well as the assessment of immersive media experience. Finally, standardization activities related to IMEx are highlighted and the white paper is concluded with an outlook related to future developments. △ Less

Submitted 24 November, 2020; v1 submitted 10 June, 2020; originally announced July 2020.

An Open source Implementation of ITU-T Recommendation P.808 with Validation

Authors: Babak Naderi, Ross Cutler

Abstract: The ITU-T Recommendation P.808 provides a crowdsourcing approach for conducting a subjective assessment of speech quality using the Absolute Category Rating (ACR) method. We provide an open-source implementation of the ITU-T Rec. P.808 that runs on the Amazon Mechanical Turk platform. We extended our implementation to include Degradation Category Ratings (DCR) and Comparison Category Ratings (CCR)… ▽ More The ITU-T Recommendation P.808 provides a crowdsourcing approach for conducting a subjective assessment of speech quality using the Absolute Category Rating (ACR) method. We provide an open-source implementation of the ITU-T Rec. P.808 that runs on the Amazon Mechanical Turk platform. We extended our implementation to include Degradation Category Ratings (DCR) and Comparison Category Ratings (CCR) test methods. We also significantly speed up the test process by integrating the participant qualification step into the main rating task compared to a two-stage qualification and rating solution. We provide program scripts for creating and executing the subjective test, and data cleansing and analyzing the answers to avoid operational errors. To validate the implementation, we compare the Mean Opinion Scores (MOS) collected through our implementation with MOS values from a standard laboratory experiment conducted based on the ITU-T Rec. P.800. We also evaluate the reproducibility of the result of the subjective speech quality assessment through crowdsourcing using our implementation. Finally, we quantify the impact of parts of the system designed to improve the reliability: environmental tests, gold and trapping questions, rating patterns, and a headset usage test. △ Less

Submitted 16 May, 2020; originally announced May 2020.

Transformation of Mean Opinion Scores to Avoid Misleading of Ranked based Statistical Techniques

Authors: Babak Naderi, Sebastian Möller

Abstract: The rank correlation coefficients and the ranked-based statistical tests (as a subset of non-parametric techniques) might be misleading when they are applied to subjectively collected opinion scores. Those techniques assume that the data is measured at least at an ordinal level and define a sequence of scores to represent a tied rank when they have precisely an equal numeric value. In this paper… ▽ More The rank correlation coefficients and the ranked-based statistical tests (as a subset of non-parametric techniques) might be misleading when they are applied to subjectively collected opinion scores. Those techniques assume that the data is measured at least at an ordinal level and define a sequence of scores to represent a tied rank when they have precisely an equal numeric value. In this paper, we show that the definition of tied rank, as mentioned above, is not suitable for Mean Opinion Scores (MOS) and might be misleading conclusions of rank-based statistical techniques. Furthermore, we introduce a method to overcome this issue by transforming the MOS values considering their $95\%$ Confidence Intervals. The rank correlation coefficients and ranked-based statistical tests can then be safely applied to the transformed values. We also provide open-source software packages in different programming languages to utilize the application of our transformation method in the quality of experience domain. △ Less

Submitted 23 April, 2020; originally announced April 2020.

Comments: his paper has been accepted for publication in the 2020 Twelfth International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX)

Application of Just-Noticeable Difference in Quality as Environment Suitability Test for Crowdsourcing Speech Quality Assessment Task

Authors: Babak Naderi, Sebastian Möller

Abstract: Crowdsourcing micro-task platforms facilitate subjective media quality assessment by providing access to a highly scale-able, geographically distributed and demographically diverse pool of crowd workers. Those workers participate in the experiment remotely from their own working environment, using their own hardware. In the case of speech quality assessment, preliminary work showed that environmen… ▽ More Crowdsourcing micro-task platforms facilitate subjective media quality assessment by providing access to a highly scale-able, geographically distributed and demographically diverse pool of crowd workers. Those workers participate in the experiment remotely from their own working environment, using their own hardware. In the case of speech quality assessment, preliminary work showed that environmental noise at the listener's side and the listening device (loudspeaker or headphone) significantly affect perceived quality, and consequently the reliability and validity of subjective ratings. As a consequence, ITU-T Rec. P.808 specifies requirements for the listening environment of crowd workers when assessing speech quality. In this paper, we propose a new Just Noticeable Difference of Quality (JNDQ) test as a remote screening method for assessing the suitability of the work environment for participating in speech quality assessment tasks. In a laboratory experiment, participants performed this JNDQ test with different listening devices in different listening environments, including a silent room according to ITU-T Rec. P.800 and a simulated background noise scenario. Results show a significant impact of the environment and the listening device on the JNDQ threshold. Thus, the combination of listening device and background noise needs to be screened in a crowdsourcing speech quality test. We propose a minimum threshold of our JNDQ test as an easily applicable screening method for this purpose. △ Less

Submitted 11 April, 2020; originally announced April 2020.

Comments: This paper has been accepted for publication in the 2020 Twelfth International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX)

Impact of the Number of Votes on the Reliability and Validity of Subjective Speech Quality Assessment in the Crowdsourcing Approach

Authors: Babak Naderi, Tobias Hossfeld, Matthias Hirth, Florian Metzger, Sebastian Möller, Rafael Zequeira Jiménez

Abstract: The subjective quality of transmitted speech is traditionally assessed in a controlled laboratory environment according to ITU-T Rec. P.800. In turn, with crowdsourcing, crowdworkers participate in a subjective online experiment using their own listening device, and in their own working environment. Despite such less controllable conditions, the increased use of crowdsourcing micro-task platforms… ▽ More The subjective quality of transmitted speech is traditionally assessed in a controlled laboratory environment according to ITU-T Rec. P.800. In turn, with crowdsourcing, crowdworkers participate in a subjective online experiment using their own listening device, and in their own working environment. Despite such less controllable conditions, the increased use of crowdsourcing micro-task platforms for quality assessment tasks has pushed a high demand for standardized methods, resulting in ITU-T Rec. P.808. This work investigates the impact of the number of judgments on the reliability and the validity of quality ratings collected through crowdsourcing-based speech quality assessments, as an input to ITU-T Rec. P.808 . Three crowdsourcing experiments on different platforms were conducted to evaluate the overall quality of three different speech datasets, using the Absolute Category Rating procedure. For each dataset, the Mean Opinion Scores (MOS) are calculated using differing numbers of crowdsourcing judgements. Then the results are compared to MOS values collected in a standard laboratory experiment, to assess the validity of crowdsourcing approach as a function of number of votes. In addition, the reliability of the average scores is analyzed by checking inter-rater reliability, gain in certainty, and the confidence of the MOS. The results provide a suggestion on the required number of votes per condition, and allow to model its impact on validity and reliability. △ Less

Submitted 25 March, 2020; originally announced March 2020.

Comments: This paper has been accepted for publication in the 2020 Twelfth International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX)

Subjective Assessment of Text Complexity: A Dataset for German Language

Authors: Babak Naderi, Salar Mohtaj, Kaspar Ensikat, Sebastian Möller

Abstract: This paper presents TextComplexityDE, a dataset consisting of 1000 sentences in German language taken from 23 Wikipedia articles in 3 different article-genres to be used for developing text-complexity predictor models and automatic text simplification in German language. The dataset includes subjective assessment of different text-complexity aspects provided by German learners in level A and B. In… ▽ More This paper presents TextComplexityDE, a dataset consisting of 1000 sentences in German language taken from 23 Wikipedia articles in 3 different article-genres to be used for developing text-complexity predictor models and automatic text simplification in German language. The dataset includes subjective assessment of different text-complexity aspects provided by German learners in level A and B. In addition, it contains manual simplification of 250 of those sentences provided by native speakers and subjective assessment of the simplified sentences by participants from the target group. The subjective ratings were collected using both laboratory studies and crowdsourcing approach. △ Less

Submitted 16 April, 2019; originally announced April 2019.