Transcriptional Response of SK-N-AS Cells to Methamidophos
Authors:
Akos Vertes,
Albert-Baskar Arul,
Peter Avar,
Andrew R. Korte,
Lida Parvin,
Ziad J. Sahab,
Deborah I. Bunin,
Merrill Knapp,
Denise Nishita,
Andrew Poggio,
Mark-Oliver Stehr,
Carolyn L. Talcott,
Brian M. Davis,
Christine A. Morton,
Christopher J. Sevinsky,
Maria I. Zavodszky
Abstract:
Transcriptomics response of SK-N-AS cells to methamidophos (an acetylcholine esterase inhibitor) exposure was measured at 10 time points between 0.5 and 48 h. The data was analyzed using a combination of traditional statistical methods and novel machine learning algorithms for detecting anomalous behavior and infer causal relations between time profiles. We identified several processes that appear…
▽ More
Transcriptomics response of SK-N-AS cells to methamidophos (an acetylcholine esterase inhibitor) exposure was measured at 10 time points between 0.5 and 48 h. The data was analyzed using a combination of traditional statistical methods and novel machine learning algorithms for detecting anomalous behavior and infer causal relations between time profiles. We identified several processes that appeared to be upregulated in cells treated with methamidophos including: unfolded protein response, response to cAMP, calcium ion response, and cell-cell signaling. The data confirmed the expected consequence of acetylcholine buildup. In addition, transcripts with potentially key roles were identified and causal networks relating these transcripts were inferred using two different computational methods: Siamese convolutional networks and time warp causal inference. Two types of anomaly detection algorithms, one based on Autoencoders and the other one based on Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs), were applied to narrow down the set of relevant transcripts.
△ Less
Submitted 10 August, 2019;
originally announced August 2019.
Learning Causality: Synthesis of Large-Scale Causal Networks from High-Dimensional Time Series Data
Authors:
Mark-Oliver Stehr,
Peter Avar,
Andrew R. Korte,
Lida Parvin,
Ziad J. Sahab,
Deborah I. Bunin,
Merrill Knapp,
Denise Nishita,
Andrew Poggio,
Carolyn L. Talcott,
Brian M. Davis,
Christine A. Morton,
Christopher J. Sevinsky,
Maria I. Zavodszky,
Akos Vertes
Abstract:
There is an abundance of complex dynamic systems that are critical to our daily lives and our society but that are hardly understood, and even with today's possibilities to sense and collect large amounts of experimental data, they are so complex and continuously evolving that it is unlikely that their dynamics will ever be understood in full detail. Nevertheless, through computational tools we ca…
▽ More
There is an abundance of complex dynamic systems that are critical to our daily lives and our society but that are hardly understood, and even with today's possibilities to sense and collect large amounts of experimental data, they are so complex and continuously evolving that it is unlikely that their dynamics will ever be understood in full detail. Nevertheless, through computational tools we can try to make the best possible use of the current technologies and available data. We believe that the most useful models will have to take into account the imbalance between system complexity and available data in the context of limited knowledge or multiple hypotheses. The complex system of biological cells is a prime example of such a system that is studied in systems biology and has motivated the methods presented in this paper. They were developed as part of the DARPA Rapid Threat Assessment (RTA) program, which is concerned with understanding of the mechanism of action (MoA) of toxins or drugs affecting human cells. Using a combination of Gaussian processes and abstract network modeling, we present three fundamentally different machine-learning-based approaches to learn causal relations and synthesize causal networks from high-dimensional time series data. While other types of data are available and have been analyzed and integrated in our RTA work, we focus on transcriptomics (that is gene expression) data obtained from high-throughput microarray experiments in this paper to illustrate capabilities and limitations of our algorithms. Our algorithms make different but overall relatively few biological assumptions, so that they are applicable to other types of biological data and potentially even to other complex systems that exhibit high dimensionality but are not of biological nature.
△ Less
Submitted 6 May, 2019;
originally announced May 2019.
