Showing 1–8 of 8 results for author: Peek, J E G

pathfinder: A Semantic Framework for Literature Review and Knowledge Discovery in Astronomy

Authors: Kartheik G. Iyer, Mikaeel Yunus, Charles O'Neill, Christine Ye, Alina Hyk, Kiera McCormick, Ioana Ciuca, John F. Wu, Alberto Accomazzi, Simone Astarita, Rishabh Chakrabarty, Jesse Cranney, Anjalie Field, Tirthankar Ghosal, Michele Ginolfi, Marc Huertas-Company, Maja Jablonska, Sandor Kruk, Huiling Liu, Gabriel Marchidan, Rohit Mistry, J. P. Naiman, J. E. G. Peek, Mugdha Polimera, Sergio J. Rodriguez , et al. (5 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: The exponential growth of astronomical literature poses significant challenges for researchers navigating and synthesizing general insights or even domain-specific knowledge. We present Pathfinder, a machine learning framework designed to enable literature review and knowledge discovery in astronomy, focusing on semantic searching with natural language instead of syntactic searches with keywords.… ▽ More The exponential growth of astronomical literature poses significant challenges for researchers navigating and synthesizing general insights or even domain-specific knowledge. We present Pathfinder, a machine learning framework designed to enable literature review and knowledge discovery in astronomy, focusing on semantic searching with natural language instead of syntactic searches with keywords. Utilizing state-of-the-art large language models (LLMs) and a corpus of 350,000 peer-reviewed papers from the Astrophysics Data System (ADS), Pathfinder offers an innovative approach to scientific inquiry and literature exploration. Our framework couples advanced retrieval techniques with LLM-based synthesis to search astronomical literature by semantic context as a complement to currently existing methods that use keywords or citation graphs. It addresses complexities of jargon, named entities, and temporal aspects through time-based and citation-based weighting schemes. We demonstrate the tool's versatility through case studies, showcasing its application in various research scenarios. The system's performance is evaluated using custom benchmarks, including single-paper and multi-paper tasks. Beyond literature review, Pathfinder offers unique capabilities for reformatting answers in ways that are accessible to various audiences (e.g. in a different language or as simplified text), visualizing research landscapes, and tracking the impact of observatories and methodologies. This tool represents a significant advancement in applying AI to astronomical research, aiding researchers at all career stages in navigating modern astronomy literature. △ Less

Submitted 2 August, 2024; originally announced August 2024.

Comments: 25 pages, 9 figures, submitted to AAS jorunals. Comments are welcome, and the tools mentioned are available online at https://pfdr.app

Designing an Evaluation Framework for Large Language Models in Astronomy Research

Authors: John F. Wu, Alina Hyk, Kiera McCormick, Christine Ye, Simone Astarita, Elina Baral, Jo Ciuca, Jesse Cranney, Anjalie Field, Kartheik Iyer, Philipp Koehn, Jenn Kotler, Sandor Kruk, Michelle Ntampaka, Charles O'Neill, Joshua E. G. Peek, Sanjib Sharma, Mikaeel Yunus

Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are shifting how scientific research is done. It is imperative to understand how researchers interact with these models and how scientific sub-communities like astronomy might benefit from them. However, there is currently no standard for evaluating the use of LLMs in astronomy. Therefore, we present the experimental design for an evaluation study on how astronomy rese… ▽ More Large Language Models (LLMs) are shifting how scientific research is done. It is imperative to understand how researchers interact with these models and how scientific sub-communities like astronomy might benefit from them. However, there is currently no standard for evaluating the use of LLMs in astronomy. Therefore, we present the experimental design for an evaluation study on how astronomy researchers interact with LLMs. We deploy a Slack chatbot that can answer queries from users via Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG); these responses are grounded in astronomy papers from arXiv. We record and anonymize user questions and chatbot answers, user upvotes and downvotes to LLM responses, user feedback to the LLM, and retrieved documents and similarity scores with the query. Our data collection method will enable future dynamic evaluations of LLM tools for astronomy. △ Less

Submitted 30 May, 2024; originally announced May 2024.

Comments: 7 pages, 3 figures. Code available at https://github.com/jsalt2024-evaluating-llms-for-astronomy/astro-arxiv-bot

Constructing Impactful Machine Learning Research for Astronomy: Best Practices for Researchers and Reviewers

Authors: D. Huppenkothen, M. Ntampaka, M. Ho, M. Fouesneau, B. Nord, J. E. G. Peek, M. Walmsley, J. F. Wu, C. Avestruz, T. Buck, M. Brescia, D. P. Finkbeiner, A. D. Goulding, T. Kacprzak, P. Melchior, M. Pasquato, N. Ramachandra, Y. -S. Ting, G. van de Ven, S. Villar, V. A. Villar, E. Zinger

Abstract: Machine learning has rapidly become a tool of choice for the astronomical community. It is being applied across a wide range of wavelengths and problems, from the classification of transients to neural network emulators of cosmological simulations, and is shifting paradigms about how we generate and report scientific results. At the same time, this class of method comes with its own set of best pr… ▽ More Machine learning has rapidly become a tool of choice for the astronomical community. It is being applied across a wide range of wavelengths and problems, from the classification of transients to neural network emulators of cosmological simulations, and is shifting paradigms about how we generate and report scientific results. At the same time, this class of method comes with its own set of best practices, challenges, and drawbacks, which, at present, are often reported on incompletely in the astrophysical literature. With this paper, we aim to provide a primer to the astronomical community, including authors, reviewers, and editors, on how to implement machine learning models and report their results in a way that ensures the accuracy of the results, reproducibility of the findings, and usefulness of the method. △ Less

Submitted 19 October, 2023; originally announced October 2023.

Comments: 14 pages, 3 figures; submitted to the Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society

Predicting galaxy spectra from images with hybrid convolutional neural networks

Authors: John F. Wu, J. E. G. Peek

Abstract: Galaxies can be described by features of their optical spectra such as oxygen emission lines, or morphological features such as spiral arms. Although spectroscopy provides a rich description of the physical processes that govern galaxy evolution, spectroscopic data are observationally expensive to obtain. For the first time, we are able to robustly predict galaxy spectra directly from broad-band i… ▽ More Galaxies can be described by features of their optical spectra such as oxygen emission lines, or morphological features such as spiral arms. Although spectroscopy provides a rich description of the physical processes that govern galaxy evolution, spectroscopic data are observationally expensive to obtain. For the first time, we are able to robustly predict galaxy spectra directly from broad-band imaging. We present a powerful new approach using a hybrid convolutional neural network with deconvolution instead of batch normalization; this hybrid CNN outperforms other models in our tests. The learned mapping between galaxy imaging and spectra will be transformative for future wide-field surveys, such as with the Vera C. Rubin Observatory and Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope, by multiplying the scientific returns for spectroscopically-limited galaxy samples. △ Less

Submitted 30 November, 2020; v1 submitted 25 September, 2020; originally announced September 2020.

Comments: 5 pages, 2 figures, accepted to the Machine Learning and the Physical Sciences workshop at NeurIPS 2020. Code available at https://github.com/jwuphysics/predicting-spectra-from-images/

DeepMerge: Classifying High-redshift Merging Galaxies with Deep Neural Networks

Authors: A. Ćiprijanović, G. F. Snyder, B. Nord, J. E. G. Peek

Abstract: We investigate and demonstrate the use of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for the task of distinguishing between merging and non-merging galaxies in simulated images, and for the first time at high redshifts (i.e. $z=2$). We extract images of merging and non-merging galaxies from the Illustris-1 cosmological simulation and apply observational and experimental noise that mimics that from the H… ▽ More We investigate and demonstrate the use of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for the task of distinguishing between merging and non-merging galaxies in simulated images, and for the first time at high redshifts (i.e. $z=2$). We extract images of merging and non-merging galaxies from the Illustris-1 cosmological simulation and apply observational and experimental noise that mimics that from the Hubble Space Telescope; the data without noise form a "pristine" data set and that with noise form a "noisy" data set. The test set classification accuracy of the CNN is $79\%$ for pristine and $76\%$ for noisy. The CNN outperforms a Random Forest classifier, which was shown to be superior to conventional one- or two-dimensional statistical methods (Concentration, Asymmetry, the Gini, $M_{20}$ statistics etc.), which are commonly used when classifying merging galaxies. We also investigate the selection effects of the classifier with respect to merger state and star formation rate, finding no bias. Finally, we extract Grad-CAMs (Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping) from the results to further assess and interrogate the fidelity of the classification model. △ Less

Submitted 24 April, 2020; originally announced April 2020.

Comments: 17 pages, 8 figures, submitted to Astronomy & Computing

Algorithms and Statistical Models for Scientific Discovery in the Petabyte Era

Authors: Brian Nord, Andrew J. Connolly, Jamie Kinney, Jeremy Kubica, Gautaum Narayan, Joshua E. G. Peek, Chad Schafer, Erik J. Tollerud, Camille Avestruz, G. Jogesh Babu, Simon Birrer, Douglas Burke, João Caldeira, Douglas A. Caldwell, Joleen K. Carlberg, Yen-Chi Chen, Chuanfei Dong, Eric D. Feigelson, V. Zach Golkhou, Vinay Kashyap, T. S. Li, Thomas Loredo, Luisa Lucie-Smith, Kaisey S. Mandel, J. R. Martínez-Galarza , et al. (13 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: The field of astronomy has arrived at a turning point in terms of size and complexity of both datasets and scientific collaboration. Commensurately, algorithms and statistical models have begun to adapt --- e.g., via the onset of artificial intelligence --- which itself presents new challenges and opportunities for growth. This white paper aims to offer guidance and ideas for how we can evolve our… ▽ More The field of astronomy has arrived at a turning point in terms of size and complexity of both datasets and scientific collaboration. Commensurately, algorithms and statistical models have begun to adapt --- e.g., via the onset of artificial intelligence --- which itself presents new challenges and opportunities for growth. This white paper aims to offer guidance and ideas for how we can evolve our technical and collaborative frameworks to promote efficient algorithmic development and take advantage of opportunities for scientific discovery in the petabyte era. We discuss challenges for discovery in large and complex data sets; challenges and requirements for the next stage of development of statistical methodologies and algorithmic tool sets; how we might change our paradigms of collaboration and education; and the ethical implications of scientists' contributions to widely applicable algorithms and computational modeling. We start with six distinct recommendations that are supported by the commentary following them. This white paper is related to a larger corpus of effort that has taken place within and around the Petabytes to Science Workshops (https://petabytestoscience.github.io/). △ Less

Submitted 4 November, 2019; originally announced November 2019.

Comments: arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:1905.05116

Report number: FERMILAB-FN-1093-A-AE-SCD

Robust Archives Maximize Scientific Accessibility

Authors: J. E. G. Peek, Vandana Desai, Richard L. White, Raffaele D'Abrusco, Joseph M. Mazzarella, Carolyn Grant, Jenny L. Novacescu, Elena Scire, Sherry Winkelman

Abstract: We present a bibliographic analysis of Chandra, Hubble, and Spitzer publications. We find (a) archival data are used in >60% of the publication output and (b) archives for these missions enable a much broader set of institutions and countries to scientifically use data from these missions. Specifically, we find that authors from institutions that have published few papers from a given mission publ… ▽ More We present a bibliographic analysis of Chandra, Hubble, and Spitzer publications. We find (a) archival data are used in >60% of the publication output and (b) archives for these missions enable a much broader set of institutions and countries to scientifically use data from these missions. Specifically, we find that authors from institutions that have published few papers from a given mission publish 2/3 archival publications, while those with many publications typically have 1/3 archival publications. We also show that countries with lower GDP per capita overwhelmingly produce archival publications, while countries with higher GDP per capital produce guest observer and archival publications in equal amounts. We argue that robust archives are thus not only critical for the scientific productivity of mission data, but also the scientific accessibility of mission data. We argue that the astronomical community should support archives to maximize the overall scientific societal impact of astronomy, and represent an excellent investment in astronomy's future. △ Less

Submitted 14 July, 2019; originally announced July 2019.

Comments: White Paper submitted to the NAS call for Astro2020 Decadal Survey APC papers

A Model for Data Citation in Astronomical Research using Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs)

Authors: Jenny Novacescu, Joshua E. G. Peek, Sarah Weissman, Scott W. Fleming, Karen Levay, Elizabeth Fraser

Abstract: Standardizing and incentivizing the use of digital object identifiers (DOIs) to aggregate and identify both data analyzed and data generated by a research project will advance the field of astronomy to match best practices in other research fields like geosciences and medicine. Increase in the use of DOIs will prepare the discipline for changing expectations among funding agencies and publishers,… ▽ More Standardizing and incentivizing the use of digital object identifiers (DOIs) to aggregate and identify both data analyzed and data generated by a research project will advance the field of astronomy to match best practices in other research fields like geosciences and medicine. Increase in the use of DOIs will prepare the discipline for changing expectations among funding agencies and publishers, who increasingly expect accurate and thorough data citation to accompany scientific outputs. The use of DOIs ensures a robust, sustainable, and interoperable approach to data citation in which due credit is given to researchers and institutions who produce and maintain the primary data. We describe in this work the advantages of DOIs for data citation and best practices for integrating a DOI service in an astronomical archive. We report on a pilot project carried out in collaboration with AAS Journals. During the course of the 1.5 year pilot, over 75% of submitting authors opted to use the integrated DOI service to clearly identify data analyzed during their research project when prompted at the time of paper submission. △ Less

Submitted 28 December, 2017; originally announced January 2018.

Comments: 13 pages, 3 figures. Accepted on Dec 19, 2017 for publication in Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series