-
Towards Understanding First-Party Cookie Tracking in the Field
Authors:
Nurullah Demir,
Daniel Theis,
Tobias Urban,
Norbert Pohlmann
Abstract:
Third-party web tracking is a common, and broadly used technique on the Web. Almost every step of users' is tracked, analyzed, and later used in different use cases (e.g., online advertisement). Different defense mechanisms have emerged to counter these practices (e.g., the recent step of browser vendors to ban all third-party cookies). However, all of these countermeasures only target third-party…
▽ More
Third-party web tracking is a common, and broadly used technique on the Web. Almost every step of users' is tracked, analyzed, and later used in different use cases (e.g., online advertisement). Different defense mechanisms have emerged to counter these practices (e.g., the recent step of browser vendors to ban all third-party cookies). However, all of these countermeasures only target third-party trackers, and ignore the first party because the narrative is that such monitoring is mostly used to improve the utilized service (e.g., analytical services).
In this paper, we present a large-scale measurement study that analyzes tracking performed by the first party but utilized by a third party to circumvent standard tracking preventing techniques (i.e., the first party performs the tracking in the name of the third party). We visit the top 15,000 websites to analyze first-party cookies used to track users and a technique called "DNS CNAME cloaking", which can be used by a third party to place first-party cookies. Using this data, we show that 76% sites in our dataset effectively utilize such tracking techniques, and in a long-running analysis, we show that the usage of such cookies increased by more than 50% over 2021. Furthermore, we shed light on the ecosystem utilizing first-party trackers, and find that the established trackers already use such tracking, presumably to avoid tracking blocking.
△ Less
Submitted 10 February, 2022; v1 submitted 3 February, 2022;
originally announced February 2022.
-
Beyond the Front Page: Measuring Third Party Dynamics in the Field
Authors:
Tobias Urban,
Martin Degeling,
Thorsten Holz,
Norbert Pohlmann
Abstract:
In the modern Web, service providers often rely heavily on third parties to run their services. For example, they make use of ad networks to finance their services, externally hosted libraries to develop features quickly, and analytics providers to gain insights into visitor behavior.
For security and privacy, website owners need to be aware of the content they provide their users. However, in r…
▽ More
In the modern Web, service providers often rely heavily on third parties to run their services. For example, they make use of ad networks to finance their services, externally hosted libraries to develop features quickly, and analytics providers to gain insights into visitor behavior.
For security and privacy, website owners need to be aware of the content they provide their users. However, in reality, they often do not know which third parties are embedded, for example, when these third parties request additional content as it is common in real-time ad auctions.
In this paper, we present a large-scale measurement study to analyze the magnitude of these new challenges. To better reflect the connectedness of third parties, we measured their relations in a model we call third party trees, which reflects an approximation of the loading dependencies of all third parties embedded into a given website. Using this concept, we show that including a single third party can lead to subsequent requests from up to eight additional services. Furthermore, our findings indicate that the third parties embedded on a page load are not always deterministic, as 50% of the branches in the third party trees change between repeated visits. In addition, we found that 93% of the analyzed websites embedded third parties that are located in regions that might not be in line with the current legal framework. Our study also replicates previous work that mostly focused on landing pages of websites. We show that this method is only able to measure a lower bound as subsites show a significant increase of privacy-invasive techniques. For example, our results show an increase of used cookies by about 36% when crawling websites more deeply.
△ Less
Submitted 3 February, 2020; v1 submitted 28 January, 2020;
originally announced January 2020.
-
The Unwanted Sharing Economy: An Analysis of Cookie Syncing and User Transparency under GDPR
Authors:
Tobias Urban,
Dennis Tatang,
Martin Degeling,
Thorsten Holz,
Norbert Pohlmann
Abstract:
The European General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), which went into effect in May 2018, leads to important changes in this area: companies are now required to ask for users' consent before collecting and sharing personal data and by law users now have the right to gain access to the personal information collected about them.
In this paper, we study and evaluate the effect of the GDPR on the…
▽ More
The European General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), which went into effect in May 2018, leads to important changes in this area: companies are now required to ask for users' consent before collecting and sharing personal data and by law users now have the right to gain access to the personal information collected about them.
In this paper, we study and evaluate the effect of the GDPR on the online advertising ecosystem. In a first step, we measure the impact of the legislation on the connections (regarding cookie syncing) between third-parties and show that the general structure how the entities are arranged is not affected by the GDPR. However, we find that the new regulation has a statistically significant impact on the number of connections, which shrinks by around 40%. Furthermore, we analyze the right to data portability by evaluating the subject access right process of popular companies in this ecosystem and observe differences between the processes implemented by the companies and how they interpret the new legislation. We exercised our right of access under GDPR with 36 companies that had tracked us online. Although 32 companies (89%) we inquired replied within the period defined by law, only 21 (58%) finished the process by the deadline set in the GDPR. Our work has implications regarding the implementation of privacy law as well as what online tracking companies should do to be more compliant with the new regulation.
△ Less
Submitted 21 November, 2018;
originally announced November 2018.
