Showing 1–28 of 28 results for author: Pontelli, E

Constraint Propagation on GPU: A Case Study for the Bin Packing Constraint

Authors: Fabio Tardivo, Laurent Michel, Enrico Pontelli

Abstract: The Bin Packing Problem is one of the most important problems in discrete optimization, as it captures the requirements of many real-world problems. Because of its importance, it has been approached with the main theoretical and practical tools. Resolution approaches based on Linear Programming are the most effective, while Constraint Programming proves valuable when the Bin Packing Problem is a c… ▽ More The Bin Packing Problem is one of the most important problems in discrete optimization, as it captures the requirements of many real-world problems. Because of its importance, it has been approached with the main theoretical and practical tools. Resolution approaches based on Linear Programming are the most effective, while Constraint Programming proves valuable when the Bin Packing Problem is a component of a larger problem. This work focuses on the Bin Packing constraint and explores how GPUs can be used to enhance its propagation algorithm. Two approaches are motivated and discussed, one based on knapsack reasoning and one using alternative lower bounds. The implementations are evaluated in comparison with state-of-the-art approaches on different benchmarks from the literature. The results indicate that the GPU-accelerated lower bounds offers a desirable alternative to tackle large instances. △ Less

Submitted 2 February, 2024; originally announced February 2024.

Proceedings 39th International Conference on Logic Programming

Authors: Enrico Pontelli, Stefania Costantini, Carmine Dodaro, Sarah Gaggl, Roberta Calegari, Artur D'Avila Garcez, Francesco Fabiano, Alessandra Mileo, Alessandra Russo, Francesca Toni

Abstract: This volume contains the Technical Communications presented at the 39th International Conference on Logic Programming (ICLP 2023), held at Imperial College London, UK from July 9 to July 15, 2023. Technical Communications included here concern the Main Track, the Doctoral Consortium, the Application and Systems/Demo track, the Recently Published Research Track, the Birds-of-a-Feather track, the Th… ▽ More This volume contains the Technical Communications presented at the 39th International Conference on Logic Programming (ICLP 2023), held at Imperial College London, UK from July 9 to July 15, 2023. Technical Communications included here concern the Main Track, the Doctoral Consortium, the Application and Systems/Demo track, the Recently Published Research Track, the Birds-of-a-Feather track, the Thematic Tracks on Logic Programming and Machine Learning, and Logic Programming and Explainability, Ethics, and Trustworthiness. △ Less

Submitted 28 August, 2023; originally announced August 2023.

Journal ref: EPTCS 385, 2023

Answer Set Planning: A Survey

Authors: Tran Cao Son, Enrico Pontelli, Marcello Balduccini, Torsten Schaub

Abstract: Answer Set Planning refers to the use of Answer Set Programming (ASP) to compute plans, i.e., solutions to planning problems, that transform a given state of the world to another state. The development of efficient and scalable answer set solvers has provided a significant boost to the development of ASP-based planning systems. This paper surveys the progress made during the last two and a half de… ▽ More Answer Set Planning refers to the use of Answer Set Programming (ASP) to compute plans, i.e., solutions to planning problems, that transform a given state of the world to another state. The development of efficient and scalable answer set solvers has provided a significant boost to the development of ASP-based planning systems. This paper surveys the progress made during the last two and a half decades in the area of answer set planning, from its foundations to its use in challenging planning domains. The survey explores the advantages and disadvantages of answer set planning. It also discusses typical applications of answer set planning and presents a set of challenges for future research. △ Less

Submitted 11 February, 2022; originally announced February 2022.

Comments: 68 pages, 6 figures

Parallel Logic Programming: A Sequel

Authors: Agostino Dovier, Andrea Formisano, Gopal Gupta, Manuel V. Hermenegildo, Enrico Pontelli, Ricardo Rocha

Abstract: Multi-core and highly-connected architectures have become ubiquitous, and this has brought renewed interest in language-based approaches to the exploitation of parallelism. Since its inception, logic programming has been recognized as a programming paradigm with great potential for automated exploitation of parallelism. The comprehensive survey of the first twenty years of research in parallel log… ▽ More Multi-core and highly-connected architectures have become ubiquitous, and this has brought renewed interest in language-based approaches to the exploitation of parallelism. Since its inception, logic programming has been recognized as a programming paradigm with great potential for automated exploitation of parallelism. The comprehensive survey of the first twenty years of research in parallel logic programming, published in 2001, has served since as a fundamental reference to researchers and developers. The contents are quite valid today, but at the same time the field has continued evolving at a fast pace in the years that have followed. Many of these achievements and ongoing research have been driven by the rapid pace of technological innovation, that has led to advances such as very large clusters, the wide diffusion of multi-core processors, the game-changing role of general-purpose graphic processing units, and the ubiquitous adoption of cloud computing. This has been paralleled by significant advances within logic programming, such as tabling, more powerful static analysis and verification, the rapid growth of Answer Set Programming, and in general, more mature implementations and systems. This survey provides a review of the research in parallel logic programming covering the period since 2001, thus providing a natural continuation of the previous survey. The goal of the survey is to serve not only as a reference for researchers and developers of logic programming systems, but also as engaging reading for anyone interested in logic and as a useful source for researchers in parallel systems outside logic programming. Under consideration in Theory and Practice of Logic Programming (TPLP). △ Less

Submitted 24 January, 2022; v1 submitted 22 November, 2021; originally announced November 2021.

Generating explanations for answer set programming applications

Authors: Ly Ly Trieu, Tran Cao Son, Enrico Pontelli, Marcello Balduccini

Abstract: We present an explanation system for applications that leverage Answer Set Programming (ASP). Given a program P, an answer set A of P, and an atom a in the program P, our system generates all explanation graphs of a which help explain why a is true (or false) given the program P and the answer set A. We illustrate the functionality of the system using some examples from the literature. We present an explanation system for applications that leverage Answer Set Programming (ASP). Given a program P, an answer set A of P, and an atom a in the program P, our system generates all explanation graphs of a which help explain why a is true (or false) given the program P and the answer set A. We illustrate the functionality of the system using some examples from the literature. △ Less

Submitted 18 April, 2021; originally announced April 2021.

Comments: Paper presented at SPIE 11746, Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning for Multi-Domain Operations Applications III, 117461L (12 April 2021), 14 pages. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:2008.01253

Modelling Multi-Agent Epistemic Planning in ASP

Authors: Alessandro Burigana, Francesco Fabiano, Agostino Dovier, Enrico Pontelli

Abstract: Designing agents that reason and act upon the world has always been one of the main objectives of the Artificial Intelligence community. While for planning in "simple" domains the agents can solely rely on facts about the world, in several contexts, e.g., economy, security, justice and politics, the mere knowledge of the world could be insufficient to reach a desired goal. In these scenarios, epis… ▽ More Designing agents that reason and act upon the world has always been one of the main objectives of the Artificial Intelligence community. While for planning in "simple" domains the agents can solely rely on facts about the world, in several contexts, e.g., economy, security, justice and politics, the mere knowledge of the world could be insufficient to reach a desired goal. In these scenarios, epistemic reasoning, i.e., reasoning about agents' beliefs about themselves and about other agents' beliefs, is essential to design winning strategies. This paper addresses the problem of reasoning in multi-agent epistemic settings exploiting declarative programming techniques. In particular, the paper presents an actual implementation of a multi-shot Answer Set Programming-based planner that can reason in multi-agent epistemic settings, called PLATO (ePistemic muLti-agent Answer seT programming sOlver). The ASP paradigm enables a concise and elegant design of the planner, w.r.t. other imperative implementations, facilitating the development of formal verification of correctness. The paper shows how the planner, exploiting an ad-hoc epistemic state representation and the efficiency of ASP solvers, has competitive performance results on benchmarks collected from the literature. It is under consideration for acceptance in TPLP. △ Less

Submitted 7 August, 2020; originally announced August 2020.

Comments: Paper presented at the 36th International Conference on Logic Programming (ICLP 2019), University Of Calabria, Rende (CS), Italy, September 2020, 16 pages

Journal ref: Theory and Practice of Logic Programming 20 (2020) 593-608

Natural Language Generation for Non-Expert Users

Authors: Van Duc Nguyen, Tran Cao Son, Enrico Pontelli

Abstract: Motivated by the difficulty in presenting computational results, especially when the results are a collection of atoms in a logical language, to users, who are not proficient in computer programming and/or the logical representation of the results, we propose a system for automatic generation of natural language descriptions for applications targeting mainstream users. Differently from many earlie… ▽ More Motivated by the difficulty in presenting computational results, especially when the results are a collection of atoms in a logical language, to users, who are not proficient in computer programming and/or the logical representation of the results, we propose a system for automatic generation of natural language descriptions for applications targeting mainstream users. Differently from many earlier systems with the same aim, the proposed system does not employ templates for the generation task. It assumes that there exist some natural language sentences in the application domain and uses this repository for the natural language description. It does not require, however, a large corpus as it is often required in machine learning approaches. The systems consist of two main components. The first one aims at analyzing the sentences and constructs a Grammatical Framework (GF) for given sentences and is implemented using the Stanford parser and an answer set program. The second component is for sentence construction and relies on GF Library. The paper includes two use cases to demostrate the capability of the system. As the sentence construction is done via GF, the paper includes a use case evaluation showing that the proposed system could also be utilized in addressing a challenge to create an abstract Wikipedia, which is recently discussed in the BlueSky session of the 2018 International Semantic Web Conference. △ Less

Submitted 18 September, 2019; originally announced September 2019.

Comments: In Proceedings ICLP 2019, arXiv:1909.07646

Journal ref: EPTCS 306, 2019, pp. 280-294

Phylotastic: An Experiment in Creating, Manipulating, and Evolving Phylogenetic Biology Workflows Using Logic Programming

Authors: Thanh Hai Nguyen, Enrico Pontelli, Tran Cao Son

Abstract: Evolutionary Biologists have long struggled with the challenge of developing analysis workflows in a flexible manner, thus facilitating the reuse of phylogenetic knowledge. An evolutionary biology workflow can be viewed as a plan which composes web services that can retrieve, manipulate, and produce phylogenetic trees. The Phylotastic project was launched two years ago as a collaboration between e… ▽ More Evolutionary Biologists have long struggled with the challenge of developing analysis workflows in a flexible manner, thus facilitating the reuse of phylogenetic knowledge. An evolutionary biology workflow can be viewed as a plan which composes web services that can retrieve, manipulate, and produce phylogenetic trees. The Phylotastic project was launched two years ago as a collaboration between evolutionary biologists and computer scientists, with the goal of developing an open architecture to facilitate the creation of such analysis workflows. While composition of web services is a problem that has been extensively explored in the literature, including within the logic programming domain, the incarnation of the problem in Phylotastic provides a number of additional challenges. Along with the need to integrate preferences and formal ontologies in the description of the desired workflow, evolutionary biologists tend to construct workflows in an incremental manner, by successively refining the workflow, by indicating desired changes (e.g., exclusion of certain services, modifications of the desired output). This leads to the need of successive iterations of incremental replanning, to develop a new workflow that integrates the requested changes while minimizing the changes to the original workflow. This paper illustrates how Phylotastic has addressed the challenges of creating and refining phylogenetic analysis workflows using logic programming technology and how such solutions have been used within the general framework of the Phylotastic project. Under consideration in Theory and Practice of Logic Programming (TPLP). △ Less

Submitted 1 May, 2018; originally announced May 2018.

Comments: Paper presented at the 34th International Conference on Logic Programming (ICLP 2018), Oxford, UK, July 14 to July 17, 2018 17 pages, LaTeX, 10 PDF figures (arXiv:YYMM.NNNNN)

Solving Distributed Constraint Optimization Problems Using Logic Programming

Authors: Tiep Le, Tran Cao Son, Enrico Pontelli, William Yeoh

Abstract: This paper explores the use of Answer Set Programming (ASP) in solving Distributed Constraint Optimization Problems (DCOPs). The paper provides the following novel contributions: (1) It shows how one can formulate DCOPs as logic programs; (2) It introduces ASP-DPOP, the first DCOP algorithm that is based on logic programming; (3) It experimentally shows that ASP-DPOP can be up to two orders of mag… ▽ More This paper explores the use of Answer Set Programming (ASP) in solving Distributed Constraint Optimization Problems (DCOPs). The paper provides the following novel contributions: (1) It shows how one can formulate DCOPs as logic programs; (2) It introduces ASP-DPOP, the first DCOP algorithm that is based on logic programming; (3) It experimentally shows that ASP-DPOP can be up to two orders of magnitude faster than DPOP (its imperative programming counterpart) as well as solve some problems that DPOP fails to solve, due to memory limitations; and (4) It demonstrates the applicability of ASP in a wide array of multi-agent problems currently modeled as DCOPs. Under consideration in Theory and Practice of Logic Programming (TPLP). △ Less

Submitted 10 May, 2017; originally announced May 2017.

Comments: Under consideration in Theory and Practice of Logic Programming (TPLP)

The Collaborative Virtual Affinity Group Model: Principles and Design

Authors: Ahmad Al-Jarrah, Enrico Pontelli, Clinton Jeffery

Abstract: The problem addressed in this paper is the challenge arising in enabling collaborative learning in the context distance education models. While research has made quantum leaps in the development of both effective collaborative pedagogical models as well as online learning environments, the research at the intersection of these two areas has been scarce. This paper presents the design for a new col… ▽ More The problem addressed in this paper is the challenge arising in enabling collaborative learning in the context distance education models. While research has made quantum leaps in the development of both effective collaborative pedagogical models as well as online learning environments, the research at the intersection of these two areas has been scarce. This paper presents the design for a new collaborative virtual model, named Collaborative Virtual Affinity Group model (CVAG), which is an extension of the successful Affinity Group Research (ARG) model. The new model provides an integration of the principles underlying ARG with the traditional principles of virtual learning environments. The CVAG model is explored in the context of introductory Computer Science courses|where students are focused on learning the basic principles of computer programming. △ Less

Submitted 15 March, 2017; originally announced March 2017.

A Realistic Dataset for the Smart Home Device Scheduling Problem for DCOPs

Authors: William Kluegel, Muhammad Aamir Iqbal, Ferdinando Fioretto, William Yeoh, Enrico Pontelli

Abstract: The field of Distributed Constraint Optimization has gained momentum in recent years thanks to its ability to address various applications related to multi-agent cooperation. While techniques to solve Distributed Constraint Optimization Problems (DCOPs) are abundant and have matured substantially since the field inception, the number of DCOP realistic applications and benchmark used to asses the p… ▽ More The field of Distributed Constraint Optimization has gained momentum in recent years thanks to its ability to address various applications related to multi-agent cooperation. While techniques to solve Distributed Constraint Optimization Problems (DCOPs) are abundant and have matured substantially since the field inception, the number of DCOP realistic applications and benchmark used to asses the performance of DCOP algorithms is lagging behind. To contrast this background we (i) introduce the Smart Home Device Scheduling (SHDS) problem, which describe the problem of coordinating smart devices schedules across multiple homes as a multi-agent system, (ii) detail the physical models adopted to simulate smart sensors, smart actuators, and homes environments, and (iii) introduce a DCOP realistic benchmark for SHDS problems. △ Less

Submitted 22 February, 2017; originally announced February 2017.

Comments: 15 pages, OPTMAS17

Solving DCOPs with Distributed Large Neighborhood Search

Authors: Ferdinando Fioretto, Agostino Dovier, Enrico Pontelli, William Yeoh, Roie Zivan

Abstract: The field of Distributed Constraint Optimization has gained momentum in recent years, thanks to its ability to address various applications related to multi-agent cooperation. Nevertheless, solving Distributed Constraint Optimization Problems (DCOPs) optimally is NP-hard. Therefore, in large-scale, complex applications, incomplete DCOP algorithms are necessary. Current incomplete DCOP algorithms s… ▽ More The field of Distributed Constraint Optimization has gained momentum in recent years, thanks to its ability to address various applications related to multi-agent cooperation. Nevertheless, solving Distributed Constraint Optimization Problems (DCOPs) optimally is NP-hard. Therefore, in large-scale, complex applications, incomplete DCOP algorithms are necessary. Current incomplete DCOP algorithms suffer of one or more of the following limitations: they (a) find local minima without providing quality guarantees; (b) provide loose quality assessment; or (c) are unable to benefit from the structure of the problem, such as domain-dependent knowledge and hard constraints. Therefore, capitalizing on strategies from the centralized constraint solving community, we propose a Distributed Large Neighborhood Search (D-LNS) framework to solve DCOPs. The proposed framework (with its novel repair phase) provides guarantees on solution quality, refining upper and lower bounds during the iterative process, and can exploit domain-dependent structures. Our experimental results show that D-LNS outperforms other incomplete DCOP algorithms on both structured and unstructured problem instances. △ Less

Submitted 22 February, 2017; v1 submitted 22 February, 2017; originally announced February 2017.

Accelerating Exact and Approximate Inference for (Distributed) Discrete Optimization with GPUs

Authors: Ferdinando Fioretto, Enrico Pontelli, William Yeoh, Rina Dechter

Abstract: Discrete optimization is a central problem in artificial intelligence. The optimization of the aggregated cost of a network of cost functions arises in a variety of problems including (W)CSP, DCOP, as well as optimization in stochastic variants such as the tasks of finding the most probable explanation (MPE) in belief networks. Inference-based algorithms are powerful techniques for solving discret… ▽ More Discrete optimization is a central problem in artificial intelligence. The optimization of the aggregated cost of a network of cost functions arises in a variety of problems including (W)CSP, DCOP, as well as optimization in stochastic variants such as the tasks of finding the most probable explanation (MPE) in belief networks. Inference-based algorithms are powerful techniques for solving discrete optimization problems, which can be used independently or in combination with other techniques. However, their applicability is often limited by their compute intensive nature and their space requirements. This paper proposes the design and implementation of a novel inference-based technique, which exploits modern massively parallel architectures, such as those found in Graphical Processing Units (GPUs), to speed up the resolution of exact and approximated inference-based algorithms for discrete optimization. The paper studies the proposed algorithm in both centralized and distributed optimization contexts. The paper demonstrates that the use of GPUs provides significant advantages in terms of runtime and scalability, achieving up to two orders of magnitude in speedups and showing a considerable reduction in execution time (up to 345 times faster) with respect to a sequential version. △ Less

Submitted 15 June, 2017; v1 submitted 18 August, 2016; originally announced August 2016.

Journal ref: Constraints (2018) 23: 1

Distributed Constraint Optimization Problems and Applications: A Survey

Authors: Ferdinando Fioretto, Enrico Pontelli, William Yeoh

Abstract: The field of Multi-Agent System (MAS) is an active area of research within Artificial Intelligence, with an increasingly important impact in industrial and other real-world applications. Within a MAS, autonomous agents interact to pursue personal interests and/or to achieve common objectives. Distributed Constraint Optimization Problems (DCOPs) have emerged as one of the prominent agent architectu… ▽ More The field of Multi-Agent System (MAS) is an active area of research within Artificial Intelligence, with an increasingly important impact in industrial and other real-world applications. Within a MAS, autonomous agents interact to pursue personal interests and/or to achieve common objectives. Distributed Constraint Optimization Problems (DCOPs) have emerged as one of the prominent agent architectures to govern the agents' autonomous behavior, where both algorithms and communication models are driven by the structure of the specific problem. During the last decade, several extensions to the DCOP model have enabled them to support MAS in complex, real-time, and uncertain environments. This survey aims at providing an overview of the DCOP model, giving a classification of its multiple extensions and addressing both resolution methods and applications that find a natural mapping within each class of DCOPs. The proposed classification suggests several future perspectives for DCOP extensions, and identifies challenges in the design of efficient resolution algorithms, possibly through the adaptation of strategies from different areas. △ Less

Submitted 10 January, 2018; v1 submitted 19 February, 2016; originally announced February 2016.

Journal ref: Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 61 (2018), 623-698

An Action Language for Multi-Agent Domains: Foundations

Authors: Chitta Baral, Gregory Gelfond, Enrico Pontelli, Tran Cao Son

Abstract: In multi-agent domains (MADs), an agent's action may not just change the world and the agent's knowledge and beliefs about the world, but also may change other agents' knowledge and beliefs about the world and their knowledge and beliefs about other agents' knowledge and beliefs about the world. The goals of an agent in a multi-agent world may involve manipulating the knowledge and beliefs of othe… ▽ More In multi-agent domains (MADs), an agent's action may not just change the world and the agent's knowledge and beliefs about the world, but also may change other agents' knowledge and beliefs about the world and their knowledge and beliefs about other agents' knowledge and beliefs about the world. The goals of an agent in a multi-agent world may involve manipulating the knowledge and beliefs of other agents' and again, not just their knowledge/belief about the world, but also their knowledge about other agents' knowledge about the world. Our goal is to present an action language (mA+) that has the necessary features to address the above aspects in representing and RAC in MADs. mA+ allows the representation of and reasoning about different types of actions that an agent can perform in a domain where many other agents might be present -- such as world-altering actions, sensing actions, and announcement/communication actions. It also allows the specification of agents' dynamic awareness of action occurrences which has future implications on what agents' know about the world and other agents' knowledge about the world. mA+ considers three different types of awareness: full-, partial- awareness, and complete oblivion of an action occurrence and its effects. This keeps the language simple, yet powerful enough to address a large variety of knowledge manipulation scenarios in MADs. The semantics of mA+ relies on the notion of state, which is described by a pointed Kripke model and is used to encode the agent's knowledge and the real state of the world. It is defined by a transition function that maps pairs of actions and states into sets of states. We illustrate properties of the action theories, including properties that guarantee finiteness of the set of initial states and their practical implementability. Finally, we relate mA+ to other related formalisms that contribute to RAC in MADs. △ Less

Submitted 26 December, 2020; v1 submitted 5 November, 2015; originally announced November 2015.

Comments: 49 pages, 12 figures

Logic and Constraint Logic Programming for Distributed Constraint Optimization

Authors: Tiep Le, Enrico Pontelli, Tran Cao Son, William Yeoh

Abstract: The field of Distributed Constraint Optimization Problems (DCOPs) has gained momentum, thanks to its suitability in capturing complex problems (e.g., multi-agent coordination and resource allocation problems) that are naturally distributed and cannot be realistically addressed in a centralized manner. The state of the art in solving DCOPs relies on the use of ad-hoc infrastructures and ad-hoc cons… ▽ More The field of Distributed Constraint Optimization Problems (DCOPs) has gained momentum, thanks to its suitability in capturing complex problems (e.g., multi-agent coordination and resource allocation problems) that are naturally distributed and cannot be realistically addressed in a centralized manner. The state of the art in solving DCOPs relies on the use of ad-hoc infrastructures and ad-hoc constraint solving procedures. This paper investigates an infrastructure for solving DCOPs that is completely built on logic programming technologies. In particular, the paper explores the use of a general constraint solver (a constraint logic programming system in this context) to handle the agent-level constraint solving. The preliminary experiments show that logic programming provides benefits over a state-of-the-art DCOP system, in terms of performance and scalability, opening the doors to the use of more advanced technology (e.g., search strategies and complex constraints) for solving DCOPs. △ Less

Submitted 14 May, 2014; v1 submitted 7 May, 2014; originally announced May 2014.

Comments: To appear in Theory and Practice of Logic Programming (TPLP)

MSC Class: 68-06

An Implementation of Bubbling

Authors: Abdulla Alqaddoumi, Enrico Pontelli

Abstract: Non-determinism is of great importance in functional logic programming. It provides expressiveness and efficiency to functional logic computations. In this paper we describe an implementation of the multi-paradigm functional logic language Curry. The evaluation strategy employed by the implementation is based on definitional trees and needed narrowing for deterministic operations, while non-determ… ▽ More Non-determinism is of great importance in functional logic programming. It provides expressiveness and efficiency to functional logic computations. In this paper we describe an implementation of the multi-paradigm functional logic language Curry. The evaluation strategy employed by the implementation is based on definitional trees and needed narrowing for deterministic operations, while non-deterministic operations will depend on the graph transformation, bubbling. Bubbling preserves the completeness of non-deterministic operations and avoids unnecessary large-scale reconstruction of expressions done by other approaches. △ Less

Submitted 16 December, 2011; originally announced December 2011.

Comments: Online Proceedings of the 11th International Colloquium on Implementation of Constraint LOgic Programming Systems (CICLOPS 2011), Lexington, KY, U.S.A., July 10, 2011

ACM Class: D.1.6; D.3

Answer Sets for Logic Programs with Arbitrary Abstract Constraint Atoms

Authors: E. Pontelli, T. C. Son, P. H. Tu

Abstract: In this paper, we present two alternative approaches to defining answer sets for logic programs with arbitrary types of abstract constraint atoms (c-atoms). These approaches generalize the fixpoint-based and the level mapping based answer set semantics of normal logic programs to the case of logic programs with arbitrary types of c-atoms. The results are four different answer set definitions which… ▽ More In this paper, we present two alternative approaches to defining answer sets for logic programs with arbitrary types of abstract constraint atoms (c-atoms). These approaches generalize the fixpoint-based and the level mapping based answer set semantics of normal logic programs to the case of logic programs with arbitrary types of c-atoms. The results are four different answer set definitions which are equivalent when applied to normal logic programs. The standard fixpoint-based semantics of logic programs is generalized in two directions, called answer set by reduct and answer set by complement. These definitions, which differ from each other in the treatment of negation-as-failure (naf) atoms, make use of an immediate consequence operator to perform answer set checking, whose definition relies on the notion of conditional satisfaction of c-atoms w.r.t. a pair of interpretations. The other two definitions, called strongly and weakly well-supported models, are generalizations of the notion of well-supported models of normal logic programs to the case of programs with c-atoms. As for the case of fixpoint-based semantics, the difference between these two definitions is rooted in the treatment of naf atoms. We prove that answer sets by reduct (resp. by complement) are equivalent to weakly (resp. strongly) well-supported models of a program, thus generalizing the theorem on the correspondence between stable models and well-supported models of a normal logic program to the class of programs with c-atoms. We show that the newly defined semantics coincide with previously introduced semantics for logic programs with monotone c-atoms, and they extend the original answer set semantics of normal logic programs. We also study some properties of answer sets of programs with c-atoms, and relate our definitions to several semantics for logic programs with aggregates presented in the literature. △ Less

Submitted 10 October, 2011; originally announced October 2011.

Journal ref: Journal Of Artificial Intelligence Research, Volume 29, pages 353-389, 2007

Autonomous Agents Coordination: Action Languages meet CLP(FD) and Linda

Authors: Agostino Dovier, Andrea Formisano, Enrico Pontelli

Abstract: The paper presents a knowledge representation formalism, in the form of a high-level Action Description Language for multi-agent systems, where autonomous agents reason and act in a shared environment. Agents are autonomously pursuing individual goals, but are capable of interacting through a shared knowledge repository. In their interactions through shared portions of the world, the agents deal w… ▽ More The paper presents a knowledge representation formalism, in the form of a high-level Action Description Language for multi-agent systems, where autonomous agents reason and act in a shared environment. Agents are autonomously pursuing individual goals, but are capable of interacting through a shared knowledge repository. In their interactions through shared portions of the world, the agents deal with problems of synchronization and concurrency; the action language allows the description of strategies to ensure a consistent global execution of the agents' autonomously derived plans. A distributed planning problem is formalized by providing the declarative specifications of the portion of the problem pertaining a single agent. Each of these specifications is executable by a stand-alone CLP-based planner. The coordination among agents exploits a Linda infrastructure. The proposal is validated in a prototype implementation developed in SICStus Prolog. To appear in Theory and Practice of Logic Programming (TPLP). △ Less

Submitted 4 October, 2011; originally announced October 2011.

CLP-based protein fragment assembly

Authors: Alessandro Dal Palu', Agostino Dovier, Federico Fogolari, Enrico Pontelli

Abstract: The paper investigates a novel approach, based on Constraint Logic Programming (CLP), to predict the 3D conformation of a protein via fragments assembly. The fragments are extracted by a preprocessor-also developed for this work- from a database of known protein structures that clusters and classifies the fragments according to similarity and frequency. The problem of assembling fragments into a c… ▽ More The paper investigates a novel approach, based on Constraint Logic Programming (CLP), to predict the 3D conformation of a protein via fragments assembly. The fragments are extracted by a preprocessor-also developed for this work- from a database of known protein structures that clusters and classifies the fragments according to similarity and frequency. The problem of assembling fragments into a complete conformation is mapped to a constraint solving problem and solved using CLP. The constraint-based model uses a medium discretization degree Ca-side chain centroid protein model that offers efficiency and a good approximation for space filling. The approach adapts existing energy models to the protein representation used and applies a large neighboring search strategy. The results shows the feasibility and efficiency of the method. The declarative nature of the solution allows to include future extensions, e.g., different size fragments for better accuracy. △ Less

Submitted 29 July, 2010; originally announced July 2010.

Comments: special issue dedicated to ICLP 2010

Journal ref: Theory and Practice of Logic Programming, special issue dedicated to ICLP 2010. 10(4-6): pp 709-724, July 2010

Logic Programming for Finding Models in the Logics of Knowledge and its Applications: A Case Study

Authors: Chitta Baral, Gregory Gelfond, Enrico Pontelli, Tran Cao Son

Abstract: The logics of knowledge are modal logics that have been shown to be effective in representing and reasoning about knowledge in multi-agent domains. Relatively few computational frameworks for dealing with computation of models and useful transformations in logics of knowledge (e.g., to support multi-agent planning with knowledge actions and degrees of visibility) have been proposed. This paper exp… ▽ More The logics of knowledge are modal logics that have been shown to be effective in representing and reasoning about knowledge in multi-agent domains. Relatively few computational frameworks for dealing with computation of models and useful transformations in logics of knowledge (e.g., to support multi-agent planning with knowledge actions and degrees of visibility) have been proposed. This paper explores the use of logic programming (LP) to encode interesting forms of logics of knowledge and compute Kripke models. The LP modeling is expanded with useful operators on Kripke structures, to support multi-agent planning in the presence of both world-altering and knowledge actions. This results in the first ever implementation of a planner for this type of complex multi-agent domains. △ Less

Submitted 21 July, 2010; originally announced July 2010.

Comments: 16 pages, 1 figure, International Conference on Logic Programming 2010

Journal ref: Theory and Practice of Logic Programming, Volume 10, Special Issue 4-6, July 2010, pages 675-690

Multi-valued Action Languages in CLP(FD)

Authors: Agostino Dovier, Andrea Formisano, Enrico Pontelli

Abstract: Action description languages, such as A and B, are expressive instruments introduced for formalizing planning domains and planning problem instances. The paper starts by proposing a methodology to encode an action language (with conditional effects and static causal laws), a slight variation of B, using Constraint Logic Programming over Finite Domains. The approach is then generalized to raise t… ▽ More Action description languages, such as A and B, are expressive instruments introduced for formalizing planning domains and planning problem instances. The paper starts by proposing a methodology to encode an action language (with conditional effects and static causal laws), a slight variation of B, using Constraint Logic Programming over Finite Domains. The approach is then generalized to raise the use of constraints to the level of the action language itself. A prototype implementation has been developed, and the preliminary results are presented and discussed. To appear in Theory and Practice of Logic Programming (TPLP) △ Less

Submitted 15 December, 2009; originally announced December 2009.

Justifications for Logic Programs under Answer Set Semantics

Authors: Enrico Pontelli, Tran Cao Son, Omar Elkhatib

Abstract: The paper introduces the notion of off-line justification for Answer Set Programming (ASP). Justifications provide a graph-based explanation of the truth value of an atom w.r.t. a given answer set. The paper extends also this notion to provide justification of atoms during the computation of an answer set (on-line justification), and presents an integration of on-line justifications within the c… ▽ More The paper introduces the notion of off-line justification for Answer Set Programming (ASP). Justifications provide a graph-based explanation of the truth value of an atom w.r.t. a given answer set. The paper extends also this notion to provide justification of atoms during the computation of an answer set (on-line justification), and presents an integration of on-line justifications within the computation model of Smodels. Off-line and on-line justifications provide useful tools to enhance understanding of ASP, and they offer a basic data structure to support methodologies and tools for debugging answer set programs. A preliminary implementation has been developed in ASP-PROLOG. (To appear in Theory and Practice of Logic Programming (TPLP)) △ Less

Submitted 3 December, 2008; originally announced December 2008.

Comments: 59 pages, 7 figures

PALS: Efficient Or-Parallelism on Beowulf Clusters

Authors: Enrico Pontelli, Karen Villaverde, Hai-Feng Guo, Gopal Gupta

Abstract: This paper describes the development of the PALS system, an implementation of Prolog capable of efficiently exploiting or-parallelism on distributed-memory platforms--specifically Beowulf clusters. PALS makes use of a novel technique, called incremental stack-splitting. The technique proposed builds on the stack-splitting approach, previously described by the authors and experimentally validated… ▽ More This paper describes the development of the PALS system, an implementation of Prolog capable of efficiently exploiting or-parallelism on distributed-memory platforms--specifically Beowulf clusters. PALS makes use of a novel technique, called incremental stack-splitting. The technique proposed builds on the stack-splitting approach, previously described by the authors and experimentally validated on shared-memory systems, which in turn is an evolution of the stack-copying method used in a variety of parallel logic and constraint systems--e.g., MUSE, YAP, and Penny. The PALS system is the first distributed or-parallel implementation of Prolog based on the stack-splitting method ever realized. The results presented confirm the superiority of this method as a simple yet effective technique to transition from shared-memory to distributed-memory systems. PALS extends stack-splitting by combining it with incremental copying; the paper provides a description of the implementation of PALS, including details of how distributed scheduling is handled. We also investigate methodologies to effectively support order-sensitive predicates (e.g., side-effects) in the context of the stack-splitting scheme. Experimental results obtained from running PALS on both Shared Memory and Beowulf systems are presented and analyzed. △ Less

Submitted 9 July, 2006; originally announced July 2006.

Comments: 63 pages, 32 figures, 5 tabels. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming (to appear)

An Unfolding-Based Semantics for Logic Programming with Aggregates

Authors: Tran Cao Son, Enrico Pontelli, Islam Elkabani

Abstract: The paper presents two equivalent definitions of answer sets for logic programs with aggregates. These definitions build on the notion of unfolding of aggregates, and they are aimed at creating methodologies to translate logic programs with aggregates to normal logic programs or positive programs, whose answer set semantics can be used to defined the semantics of the original programs. The first… ▽ More The paper presents two equivalent definitions of answer sets for logic programs with aggregates. These definitions build on the notion of unfolding of aggregates, and they are aimed at creating methodologies to translate logic programs with aggregates to normal logic programs or positive programs, whose answer set semantics can be used to defined the semantics of the original programs. The first definition provides an alternative view of the semantics for logic programming with aggregates described by Pelov et al. The second definition is similar to the traditional answer set definition for normal logic programs, in that, given a logic program with aggregates and an interpretation, the unfolding process produces a positive program. The paper shows how this definition can be extended to consider aggregates in the head of the rules. The proposed views of logic programming with aggregates are simple and coincide with the ultimate stable model semantics, and with other semantic characterizations for large classes of program (e.g., programs with monotone aggregates and programs that are aggregate-stratified). Moreover, it can be directly employed to support an implementation using available answer set solvers. The paper describes a system, called ASP^A, that is capable of computing answer sets of programs with arbitrary (e.g., recursively defined) aggregates. △ Less

Submitted 9 May, 2006; originally announced May 2006.

A Constructive Semantic Characterization of Aggregates in ASP

Authors: Tran Cao Son, Enrico Pontelli

Abstract: This technical note describes a monotone and continuous fixpoint operator to compute the answer sets of programs with aggregates. The fixpoint operator relies on the notion of aggregate solution. Under certain conditions, this operator behaves identically to the three-valued immediate consequence operator $Φ^{aggr}_P$ for aggregate programs, independently proposed Pelov et al. This operator allo… ▽ More This technical note describes a monotone and continuous fixpoint operator to compute the answer sets of programs with aggregates. The fixpoint operator relies on the notion of aggregate solution. Under certain conditions, this operator behaves identically to the three-valued immediate consequence operator $Φ^{aggr}_P$ for aggregate programs, independently proposed Pelov et al. This operator allows us to closely tie the computational complexity of the answer set checking and answer sets existence problems to the cost of checking a solution of the aggregates in the program. Finally, we relate the semantics described by the operator to other proposals for logic programming with aggregates. To appear in Theory and Practice of Logic Programming (TPLP). △ Less

Submitted 8 February, 2006; v1 submitted 13 January, 2006; originally announced January 2006.

Comments: 21 pages

ACM Class: D.1.6; D.3.1; D.3.2; D.3.3

Planning with Preferences using Logic Programming

Authors: Tran Cao Son, Enrico Pontelli

Abstract: We present a declarative language, PP, for the high-level specification of preferences between possible solutions (or trajectories) of a planning problem. This novel language allows users to elegantly express non-trivial, multi-dimensional preferences and priorities over such preferences. The semantics of PP allows the identification of most preferred trajectories for a given goal. We also provi… ▽ More We present a declarative language, PP, for the high-level specification of preferences between possible solutions (or trajectories) of a planning problem. This novel language allows users to elegantly express non-trivial, multi-dimensional preferences and priorities over such preferences. The semantics of PP allows the identification of most preferred trajectories for a given goal. We also provide an answer set programming implementation of planning problems with PP preferences. △ Less

Submitted 31 August, 2005; originally announced August 2005.

Comments: 47 pages, to appear in TPLP

ACM Class: F.4.1

Set Unification

Authors: Agostino Dovier, Enrico Pontelli, Gianfranco Rossi

Abstract: The unification problem in algebras capable of describing sets has been tackled, directly or indirectly, by many researchers and it finds important applications in various research areas--e.g., deductive databases, theorem proving, static analysis, rapid software prototyping. The various solutions proposed are spread across a large literature. In this paper we provide a uniform presentation of u… ▽ More The unification problem in algebras capable of describing sets has been tackled, directly or indirectly, by many researchers and it finds important applications in various research areas--e.g., deductive databases, theorem proving, static analysis, rapid software prototyping. The various solutions proposed are spread across a large literature. In this paper we provide a uniform presentation of unification of sets, formalizing it at the level of set theory. We address the problem of deciding existence of solutions at an abstract level. This provides also the ability to classify different types of set unification problems. Unification algorithms are uniformly proposed to solve the unification problem in each of such classes. The algorithms presented are partly drawn from the literature--and properly revisited and analyzed--and partly novel proposals. In particular, we present a new goal-driven algorithm for general ACI1 unification and a new simpler algorithm for general (Ab)(Cl) unification. △ Less

Submitted 30 August, 2005; v1 submitted 9 October, 2001; originally announced October 2001.

Comments: 58 pages, 9 figures, 1 table. To appear in Theory and Practice of Logic Programming (TPLP)

ACM Class: F.2.2; F.4.1; I.1.2; I.2.3