-
Neural Injective Functions for Multisets, Measures and Graphs via a Finite Witness Theorem
Authors:
Tal Amir,
Steven J. Gortler,
Ilai Avni,
Ravina Ravina,
Nadav Dym
Abstract:
Injective multiset functions have a key role in the theoretical study of machine learning on multisets and graphs. Yet, there remains a gap between the provably injective multiset functions considered in theory, which typically rely on polynomial moments, and the multiset functions used in practice, which rely on $\textit{neural moments}$ $\unicode{x2014}$ whose injectivity on multisets has not be…
▽ More
Injective multiset functions have a key role in the theoretical study of machine learning on multisets and graphs. Yet, there remains a gap between the provably injective multiset functions considered in theory, which typically rely on polynomial moments, and the multiset functions used in practice, which rely on $\textit{neural moments}$ $\unicode{x2014}$ whose injectivity on multisets has not been studied to date.
In this paper, we bridge this gap by showing that moments of neural networks do define injective multiset functions, provided that an analytic non-polynomial activation is used. The number of moments required by our theory is optimal essentially up to a multiplicative factor of two. To prove this result, we state and prove a $\textit{finite witness theorem}$, which is of independent interest.
As a corollary to our main theorem, we derive new approximation results for functions on multisets and measures, and new separation results for graph neural networks. We also provide two negative results: (1) moments of piecewise-linear neural networks cannot be injective multiset functions; and (2) even when moment-based multiset functions are injective, they can never be bi-Lipschitz.
△ Less
Submitted 29 October, 2023; v1 submitted 10 June, 2023;
originally announced June 2023.
-
Knowledge-based Extraction of Cause-Effect Relations from Biomedical Text
Authors:
Sachin Pawar,
Ravina More,
Girish K. Palshikar,
Pushpak Bhattacharyya,
Vasudeva Varma
Abstract:
We propose a knowledge-based approach for extraction of Cause-Effect (CE) relations from biomedical text. Our approach is a combination of an unsupervised machine learning technique to discover causal triggers and a set of high-precision linguistic rules to identify cause/effect arguments of these causal triggers. We evaluate our approach using a corpus of 58,761 Leukaemia-related PubMed abstracts…
▽ More
We propose a knowledge-based approach for extraction of Cause-Effect (CE) relations from biomedical text. Our approach is a combination of an unsupervised machine learning technique to discover causal triggers and a set of high-precision linguistic rules to identify cause/effect arguments of these causal triggers. We evaluate our approach using a corpus of 58,761 Leukaemia-related PubMed abstracts consisting of 568,528 sentences. We could extract 152,655 CE triplets from this corpus where each triplet consists of a cause phrase, an effect phrase and a causal trigger. As compared to the existing knowledge base - SemMedDB (Kilicoglu et al., 2012), the number of extractions are almost twice. Moreover, the proposed approach outperformed the existing technique SemRep (Rindflesch and Fiszman, 2003) on a dataset of 500 sentences.
△ Less
Submitted 10 March, 2021;
originally announced March 2021.
-
Distilling Interpretable Models into Human-Readable Code
Authors:
Walker Ravina,
Ethan Sterling,
Olexiy Oryeshko,
Nathan Bell,
Honglei Zhuang,
Xuanhui Wang,
Yonghui Wu,
Alexander Grushetsky
Abstract:
The goal of model distillation is to faithfully transfer teacher model knowledge to a model which is faster, more generalizable, more interpretable, or possesses other desirable characteristics. Human-readability is an important and desirable standard for machine-learned model interpretability. Readable models are transparent and can be reviewed, manipulated, and deployed like traditional source c…
▽ More
The goal of model distillation is to faithfully transfer teacher model knowledge to a model which is faster, more generalizable, more interpretable, or possesses other desirable characteristics. Human-readability is an important and desirable standard for machine-learned model interpretability. Readable models are transparent and can be reviewed, manipulated, and deployed like traditional source code. As a result, such models can be improved outside the context of machine learning and manually edited if desired. Given that directly training such models is difficult, we propose to train interpretable models using conventional methods, and then distill them into concise, human-readable code.
The proposed distillation methodology approximates a model's univariate numerical functions with piecewise-linear curves in a localized manner. The resulting curve model representations are accurate, concise, human-readable, and well-regularized by construction. We describe a piecewise-linear curve-fitting algorithm that produces high-quality results efficiently and reliably across a broad range of use cases. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the overall distillation technique and our curve-fitting algorithm using four datasets across the tasks of classification, regression, and ranking.
△ Less
Submitted 8 February, 2021; v1 submitted 20 January, 2021;
originally announced January 2021.
-
Interpretable Learning-to-Rank with Generalized Additive Models
Authors:
Honglei Zhuang,
Xuanhui Wang,
Michael Bendersky,
Alexander Grushetsky,
Yonghui Wu,
Petr Mitrichev,
Ethan Sterling,
Nathan Bell,
Walker Ravina,
Hai Qian
Abstract:
Interpretability of learning-to-rank models is a crucial yet relatively under-examined research area. Recent progress on interpretable ranking models largely focuses on generating post-hoc explanations for existing black-box ranking models, whereas the alternative option of building an intrinsically interpretable ranking model with transparent and self-explainable structure remains unexplored. Dev…
▽ More
Interpretability of learning-to-rank models is a crucial yet relatively under-examined research area. Recent progress on interpretable ranking models largely focuses on generating post-hoc explanations for existing black-box ranking models, whereas the alternative option of building an intrinsically interpretable ranking model with transparent and self-explainable structure remains unexplored. Developing fully-understandable ranking models is necessary in some scenarios (e.g., due to legal or policy constraints) where post-hoc methods cannot provide sufficiently accurate explanations. In this paper, we lay the groundwork for intrinsically interpretable learning-to-rank by introducing generalized additive models (GAMs) into ranking tasks. Generalized additive models (GAMs) are intrinsically interpretable machine learning models and have been extensively studied on regression and classification tasks. We study how to extend GAMs into ranking models which can handle both item-level and list-level features and propose a novel formulation of ranking GAMs. To instantiate ranking GAMs, we employ neural networks instead of traditional splines or regression trees. We also show that our neural ranking GAMs can be distilled into a set of simple and compact piece-wise linear functions that are much more efficient to evaluate with little accuracy loss. We conduct experiments on three data sets and show that our proposed neural ranking GAMs can achieve significantly better performance than other traditional GAM baselines while maintaining similar interpretability.
△ Less
Submitted 14 May, 2020; v1 submitted 5 May, 2020;
originally announced May 2020.
-
Analyzing the hate and counter speech accounts on Twitter
Authors:
Binny Mathew,
Navish Kumar,
Ravina,
Pawan Goyal,
Animesh Mukherjee
Abstract:
The online hate speech is proliferating with several organization and countries implementing laws to ban such harmful speech. While these restrictions might reduce the amount of such hateful content, it does so by restricting freedom of speech. Thus, an promising alternative supported by several organizations is to counter such hate speech with more speech. In this paper, We analyze hate speech an…
▽ More
The online hate speech is proliferating with several organization and countries implementing laws to ban such harmful speech. While these restrictions might reduce the amount of such hateful content, it does so by restricting freedom of speech. Thus, an promising alternative supported by several organizations is to counter such hate speech with more speech. In this paper, We analyze hate speech and the corresponding counters (aka counterspeech) on Twitter. We perform several lexical, linguistic and psycholinguistic analysis on these user accounts and obverse that counter speakers employ several strategies depending on the target community. The hateful accounts express more negative sentiments and are more profane. We also find that the hate tweets by verified accounts have much more virality as compared to a tweet by a non-verified account. While the hate users seem to use words more about envy, hate, negative emotion, swearing terms, ugliness, the counter users use more words related to government, law, leader. We also build a supervised model for classifying the hateful and counterspeech accounts on Twitter and obtain an F-score of 0.77. We also make our dataset public to help advance the research on hate speech.
△ Less
Submitted 6 December, 2018;
originally announced December 2018.
