Showing 1–7 of 7 results for author: Richardson, H

Challenges for Responsible AI Design and Workflow Integration in Healthcare: A Case Study of Automatic Feeding Tube Qualification in Radiology

Authors: Anja Thieme, Abhijith Rajamohan, Benjamin Cooper, Heather Groombridge, Robert Simister, Barney Wong, Nicholas Woznitza, Mark Ames Pinnock, Maria Teodora Wetscherek, Cecily Morrison, Hannah Richardson, Fernando Pérez-García, Stephanie L. Hyland, Shruthi Bannur, Daniel C. Castro, Kenza Bouzid, Anton Schwaighofer, Mercy Ranjit, Harshita Sharma, Matthew P. Lungren, Ozan Oktay, Javier Alvarez-Valle, Aditya Nori, Stephen Harris, Joseph Jacob

Abstract: Nasogastric tubes (NGTs) are feeding tubes that are inserted through the nose into the stomach to deliver nutrition or medication. If not placed correctly, they can cause serious harm, even death to patients. Recent AI developments demonstrate the feasibility of robustly detecting NGT placement from Chest X-ray images to reduce risks of sub-optimally or critically placed NGTs being missed or delay… ▽ More Nasogastric tubes (NGTs) are feeding tubes that are inserted through the nose into the stomach to deliver nutrition or medication. If not placed correctly, they can cause serious harm, even death to patients. Recent AI developments demonstrate the feasibility of robustly detecting NGT placement from Chest X-ray images to reduce risks of sub-optimally or critically placed NGTs being missed or delayed in their detection, but gaps remain in clinical practice integration. In this study, we present a human-centered approach to the problem and describe insights derived following contextual inquiry and in-depth interviews with 15 clinical stakeholders. The interviews helped understand challenges in existing workflows, and how best to align technical capabilities with user needs and expectations. We discovered the trade-offs and complexities that need consideration when choosing suitable workflow stages, target users, and design configurations for different AI proposals. We explored how to balance AI benefits and risks for healthcare staff and patients within broader organizational and medical-legal constraints. We also identified data issues related to edge cases and data biases that affect model training and evaluation; how data documentation practices influence data preparation and labelling; and how to measure relevant AI outcomes reliably in future evaluations. We discuss how our work informs design and development of AI applications that are clinically useful, ethical, and acceptable in real-world healthcare services. △ Less

Submitted 8 May, 2024; originally announced May 2024.

ACM Class: H.5.m; I.2.m

Gemini 1.5: Unlocking multimodal understanding across millions of tokens of context

Authors: Gemini Team, Petko Georgiev, Ving Ian Lei, Ryan Burnell, Libin Bai, Anmol Gulati, Garrett Tanzer, Damien Vincent, Zhufeng Pan, Shibo Wang, Soroosh Mariooryad, Yifan Ding, Xinyang Geng, Fred Alcober, Roy Frostig, Mark Omernick, Lexi Walker, Cosmin Paduraru, Christina Sorokin, Andrea Tacchetti, Colin Gaffney, Samira Daruki, Olcan Sercinoglu, Zach Gleicher, Juliette Love , et al. (1110 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: In this report, we introduce the Gemini 1.5 family of models, representing the next generation of highly compute-efficient multimodal models capable of recalling and reasoning over fine-grained information from millions of tokens of context, including multiple long documents and hours of video and audio. The family includes two new models: (1) an updated Gemini 1.5 Pro, which exceeds the February… ▽ More In this report, we introduce the Gemini 1.5 family of models, representing the next generation of highly compute-efficient multimodal models capable of recalling and reasoning over fine-grained information from millions of tokens of context, including multiple long documents and hours of video and audio. The family includes two new models: (1) an updated Gemini 1.5 Pro, which exceeds the February version on the great majority of capabilities and benchmarks; (2) Gemini 1.5 Flash, a more lightweight variant designed for efficiency with minimal regression in quality. Gemini 1.5 models achieve near-perfect recall on long-context retrieval tasks across modalities, improve the state-of-the-art in long-document QA, long-video QA and long-context ASR, and match or surpass Gemini 1.0 Ultra's state-of-the-art performance across a broad set of benchmarks. Studying the limits of Gemini 1.5's long-context ability, we find continued improvement in next-token prediction and near-perfect retrieval (>99%) up to at least 10M tokens, a generational leap over existing models such as Claude 3.0 (200k) and GPT-4 Turbo (128k). Finally, we highlight real-world use cases, such as Gemini 1.5 collaborating with professionals on completing their tasks achieving 26 to 75% time savings across 10 different job categories, as well as surprising new capabilities of large language models at the frontier; when given a grammar manual for Kalamang, a language with fewer than 200 speakers worldwide, the model learns to translate English to Kalamang at a similar level to a person who learned from the same content. △ Less

Submitted 8 August, 2024; v1 submitted 8 March, 2024; originally announced March 2024.

Multimodal Healthcare AI: Identifying and Designing Clinically Relevant Vision-Language Applications for Radiology

Authors: Nur Yildirim, Hannah Richardson, Maria T. Wetscherek, Junaid Bajwa, Joseph Jacob, Mark A. Pinnock, Stephen Harris, Daniel Coelho de Castro, Shruthi Bannur, Stephanie L. Hyland, Pratik Ghosh, Mercy Ranjit, Kenza Bouzid, Anton Schwaighofer, Fernando Pérez-García, Harshita Sharma, Ozan Oktay, Matthew Lungren, Javier Alvarez-Valle, Aditya Nori, Anja Thieme

Abstract: Recent advances in AI combine large language models (LLMs) with vision encoders that bring forward unprecedented technical capabilities to leverage for a wide range of healthcare applications. Focusing on the domain of radiology, vision-language models (VLMs) achieve good performance results for tasks such as generating radiology findings based on a patient's medical image, or answering visual que… ▽ More Recent advances in AI combine large language models (LLMs) with vision encoders that bring forward unprecedented technical capabilities to leverage for a wide range of healthcare applications. Focusing on the domain of radiology, vision-language models (VLMs) achieve good performance results for tasks such as generating radiology findings based on a patient's medical image, or answering visual questions (e.g., 'Where are the nodules in this chest X-ray?'). However, the clinical utility of potential applications of these capabilities is currently underexplored. We engaged in an iterative, multidisciplinary design process to envision clinically relevant VLM interactions, and co-designed four VLM use concepts: Draft Report Generation, Augmented Report Review, Visual Search and Querying, and Patient Imaging History Highlights. We studied these concepts with 13 radiologists and clinicians who assessed the VLM concepts as valuable, yet articulated many design considerations. Reflecting on our findings, we discuss implications for integrating VLM capabilities in radiology, and for healthcare AI more generally. △ Less

Submitted 21 February, 2024; originally announced February 2024.

Comments: to appear at CHI 2024

RadEdit: stress-testing biomedical vision models via diffusion image editing

Authors: Fernando Pérez-García, Sam Bond-Taylor, Pedro P. Sanchez, Boris van Breugel, Daniel C. Castro, Harshita Sharma, Valentina Salvatelli, Maria T. A. Wetscherek, Hannah Richardson, Matthew P. Lungren, Aditya Nori, Javier Alvarez-Valle, Ozan Oktay, Maximilian Ilse

Abstract: Biomedical imaging datasets are often small and biased, meaning that real-world performance of predictive models can be substantially lower than expected from internal testing. This work proposes using generative image editing to simulate dataset shifts and diagnose failure modes of biomedical vision models; this can be used in advance of deployment to assess readiness, potentially reducing cost a… ▽ More Biomedical imaging datasets are often small and biased, meaning that real-world performance of predictive models can be substantially lower than expected from internal testing. This work proposes using generative image editing to simulate dataset shifts and diagnose failure modes of biomedical vision models; this can be used in advance of deployment to assess readiness, potentially reducing cost and patient harm. Existing editing methods can produce undesirable changes, with spurious correlations learned due to the co-occurrence of disease and treatment interventions, limiting practical applicability. To address this, we train a text-to-image diffusion model on multiple chest X-ray datasets and introduce a new editing method RadEdit that uses multiple masks, if present, to constrain changes and ensure consistency in the edited images. We consider three types of dataset shifts: acquisition shift, manifestation shift, and population shift, and demonstrate that our approach can diagnose failures and quantify model robustness without additional data collection, complementing more qualitative tools for explainable AI. △ Less

Submitted 3 April, 2024; v1 submitted 20 December, 2023; originally announced December 2023.

Co-audit: tools to help humans double-check AI-generated content

Authors: Andrew D. Gordon, Carina Negreanu, José Cambronero, Rasika Chakravarthy, Ian Drosos, Hao Fang, Bhaskar Mitra, Hannah Richardson, Advait Sarkar, Stephanie Simmons, Jack Williams, Ben Zorn

Abstract: Users are increasingly being warned to check AI-generated content for correctness. Still, as LLMs (and other generative models) generate more complex output, such as summaries, tables, or code, it becomes harder for the user to audit or evaluate the output for quality or correctness. Hence, we are seeing the emergence of tool-assisted experiences to help the user double-check a piece of AI-generat… ▽ More Users are increasingly being warned to check AI-generated content for correctness. Still, as LLMs (and other generative models) generate more complex output, such as summaries, tables, or code, it becomes harder for the user to audit or evaluate the output for quality or correctness. Hence, we are seeing the emergence of tool-assisted experiences to help the user double-check a piece of AI-generated content. We refer to these as co-audit tools. Co-audit tools complement prompt engineering techniques: one helps the user construct the input prompt, while the other helps them check the output response. As a specific example, this paper describes recent research on co-audit tools for spreadsheet computations powered by generative models. We explain why co-audit experiences are essential for any application of generative AI where quality is important and errors are consequential (as is common in spreadsheet computations). We propose a preliminary list of principles for co-audit, and outline research challenges. △ Less

Submitted 2 October, 2023; originally announced October 2023.

Analysis of parallel I/O use on the UK national supercomputing service, ARCHER using Cray LASSi and EPCC SAFE

Authors: Andrew Turner, Dominic Sloan-Murphy, Karthee Sivalingam, Harvey Richardson, Julian Kunkel

Abstract: In this paper, we describe how we have used a combination of the LASSi tool (developed by Cray) and the SAFE software (developed by EPCC) to collect and analyse Lustre I/O performance data for all jobs running on the UK national supercomputing service, ARCHER; and to provide reports on I/O usage for users in our standard reporting framework. We also present results from analysis of parallel I/O us… ▽ More In this paper, we describe how we have used a combination of the LASSi tool (developed by Cray) and the SAFE software (developed by EPCC) to collect and analyse Lustre I/O performance data for all jobs running on the UK national supercomputing service, ARCHER; and to provide reports on I/O usage for users in our standard reporting framework. We also present results from analysis of parallel I/O use on ARCHER and analysis on the potential impact of different applications on file system performance using metrics we have derived from the LASSi data. We show that the performance data from LASSi reveals how the same application can stress different components of the file system depending on how it is run, and how the LASSi risk metrics allow us to identify use cases that could potentially cause issues for global I/O performance and work with users to improve their I/O use. We use the IO-500 benchmark to help us understand how LASSi risk metrics correspond to observed performance on the ARCHER file systems. We also use LASSi data imported into SAFE to identify I/O use patterns associated with different research areas, understand how the research workflow gives rise to the observed patterns and project how this will affect I/O requirements in the future. Finally, we provide an overview of likely future directions for the continuation of this work. △ Less

Submitted 10 June, 2019; originally announced June 2019.

Comments: 15 pages, 19 figures, 5 tables, 2019 Cray User Group Meeting (CUG) , Montreal, Canada

LASSi: Metric based I/O analytics for HPC

Authors: Karthee Sivalingam, Harvey Richardson, Adrian Tate, Martin Lafferty

Abstract: LASSi is a tool aimed at analyzing application usage and contention caused by use of shared resources (filesystem or network) in a HPC system. LASSi was initially developed to support the ARCHER system where there are large variations in application requirements and occasional user complaints regarding filesystem performance manifested by variation in job runtimes or poor interactive response. LAS… ▽ More LASSi is a tool aimed at analyzing application usage and contention caused by use of shared resources (filesystem or network) in a HPC system. LASSi was initially developed to support the ARCHER system where there are large variations in application requirements and occasional user complaints regarding filesystem performance manifested by variation in job runtimes or poor interactive response. LASSi takes an approach of defining derivative risk and ops metrics that relate to unusually high application I/O behaviour. The metrics are shown to correlate to applications that can experience variable performance or that may impact the performance of other applications. LASSi uses I/O statistics over time to provide application I/O profiles and has been automated to generate daily reports for ARCHER. We demonstrate how LASSi provides holistic I/O analysis by monitoring filesystem I/O, generating coarse profiles of filesystems and application runs and automating analysis of application slowdown using metrics. △ Less

Submitted 10 June, 2019; originally announced June 2019.

Comments: 12 pages, 6 figures, 3 tables, SpringSim-HPC, 2019 April 29-May 2, Tucson, AZ, 2019 Society for Modeling and Simulation International (SCS)