Showing 1–2 of 2 results for author: Scharke, H
-
Safety of the Intended Functionality Concept Integration into a Validation Tool Suite
Authors:
Víctor J. Expósito Jiménez,
Bernhard Winkler,
Joaquim M. Castella Triginer,
Heiko Scharke,
Hannes Schneider,
Eugen Brenner,
Georg Macher
Abstract:
Nowadays, the increasing complexity of Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) and Automated Driving (AD) means that the industry must move towards a scenario-based approach to validation rather than relying on established technology-based methods. This new focus also requires the validation process to take into account Safety of the Intended Functionality (SOTIF), as many scenarios may trigger…
▽ More
Nowadays, the increasing complexity of Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) and Automated Driving (AD) means that the industry must move towards a scenario-based approach to validation rather than relying on established technology-based methods. This new focus also requires the validation process to take into account Safety of the Intended Functionality (SOTIF), as many scenarios may trigger hazardous vehicle behaviour. Thus, this work demonstrates how the integration of the SOTIF process within an existing validation tool suite can be achieved. The necessary adaptations are explained with accompanying examples to aid comprehension of the approach.
△ Less
Submitted 31 August, 2023;
originally announced August 2023.
-
State of the Art Study of the Safety Argumentation Frameworks for Automated Driving System Safety
Authors:
Ilona Cieslik,
Víctor J. Expósito Jiménez,
Helmut Martin,
Heiko Scharke,
Hannes Schneider
Abstract:
The automotive industry is experiencing a transition from assisted to highly automated driving. New concepts for validation of Automated Driving System (ADS) include amongst other a shift from a "technology based" approach to a "scenario based" assessment. The safety validation and type approval process of ADS are seen as the biggest challenges for the automotive industry today. Having in mind a v…
▽ More
The automotive industry is experiencing a transition from assisted to highly automated driving. New concepts for validation of Automated Driving System (ADS) include amongst other a shift from a "technology based" approach to a "scenario based" assessment. The safety validation and type approval process of ADS are seen as the biggest challenges for the automotive industry today. Having in mind a variety of existing white papers, standardization activities and regulatory approaches, manufactures still struggle with selecting the best practices that keep aligned with their Safety Management System and Safety Culture. A step forward would be to implement a harmonized global safety assurance scheme that is compliant with relevant regulations, laws, standards, and reflects local rules. Today many communities (regulatory bodies, local authorities, industrial stake-holders) work on proof-of-concept framework for the Safety Argumentation as an answer to this problem. Unfortunately, there is still no consensus on one definitive methodology and a set of safety metrics to measure ADS safety. An objective of this summary report is to facilitate a comprehensive review and analysis of the literature concerning available methods and approaches for vehicle safety, engineering frameworks, processes of scenario-based evaluation and a vendor- and technology-neutral Safety Argumentation approaches and tools.
△ Less
Submitted 31 January, 2023;
originally announced February 2023.