Showing 1–2 of 2 results for author: Schiper, N
-
Ring Paxos: High-Throughput Atomic Broadcast
Authors:
Parisa Jalili Marandi,
Marco Primi,
Nicolas Schiper,
Fernando Pedone
Abstract:
Atomic broadcast is an important communication primitive often used to implement state-machine replication. Despite the large number of atomic broadcast algorithms proposed in the literature, few papers have discussed how to turn these algorithms into efficient executable protocols. This paper focuses on a class of atomic broadcast algorithms based on Paxos, with its corresponding desirable proper…
▽ More
Atomic broadcast is an important communication primitive often used to implement state-machine replication. Despite the large number of atomic broadcast algorithms proposed in the literature, few papers have discussed how to turn these algorithms into efficient executable protocols. This paper focuses on a class of atomic broadcast algorithms based on Paxos, with its corresponding desirable properties: safety under asynchrony assumptions, liveness under weak synchrony assumptions, and resiliency-optimality. The paper presents two protocols, M-Ring Paxos and U-Ring Paxos, derived from Paxos. The protocols inherit the properties of Paxos and can be implemented very efficiently. We report a detailed performance analysis of M-Ring Paxos and U-Ring Paxos and compare them to other atomic broadcast protocols.
△ Less
Submitted 23 January, 2014;
originally announced January 2014.
-
Vive la Différence: Paxos vs. Viewstamped Replication vs. Zab
Authors:
Robbert Van Renesse,
Nicolas Schiper,
Fred B. Schneider
Abstract:
Paxos, Viewstamped Replication, and Zab are replication protocols that ensure high-availability in asynchronous environments with crash failures. Various claims have been made about similarities and differences between these protocols. But how does one determine whether two protocols are the same, and if not, how significant the differences are?
We propose to address these questions using refine…
▽ More
Paxos, Viewstamped Replication, and Zab are replication protocols that ensure high-availability in asynchronous environments with crash failures. Various claims have been made about similarities and differences between these protocols. But how does one determine whether two protocols are the same, and if not, how significant the differences are?
We propose to address these questions using refinement mappings, where protocols are expressed as succinct specifications that are progressively refined to executable implementations. Doing so enables a principled understanding of the correctness of the different design decisions that went into implementing the various protocols. Additionally, it allowed us to identify key differences that have a significant impact on performance.
△ Less
Submitted 27 February, 2014; v1 submitted 22 September, 2013;
originally announced September 2013.
