Showing 1–8 of 8 results for author: Smith, D H

CS1-LLM: Integrating LLMs into CS1 Instruction

Authors: Annapurna Vadaparty, Daniel Zingaro, David H. Smith IV, Mounika Padala, Christine Alvarado, Jamie Gorson Benario, Leo Porter

Abstract: The recent, widespread availability of Large Language Models (LLMs) like ChatGPT and GitHub Copilot may impact introductory programming courses (CS1) both in terms of what should be taught and how to teach it. Indeed, recent research has shown that LLMs are capable of solving the majority of the assignments and exams we previously used in CS1. In addition, professional software engineers are often… ▽ More The recent, widespread availability of Large Language Models (LLMs) like ChatGPT and GitHub Copilot may impact introductory programming courses (CS1) both in terms of what should be taught and how to teach it. Indeed, recent research has shown that LLMs are capable of solving the majority of the assignments and exams we previously used in CS1. In addition, professional software engineers are often using these tools, raising the question of whether we should be training our students in their use as well. This experience report describes a CS1 course at a large research-intensive university that fully embraces the use of LLMs from the beginning of the course. To incorporate the LLMs, the course was intentionally altered to reduce emphasis on syntax and writing code from scratch. Instead, the course now emphasizes skills needed to successfully produce software with an LLM. This includes explaining code, testing code, and decomposing large problems into small functions that are solvable by an LLM. In addition to frequent, formative assessments of these skills, students were given three large, open-ended projects in three separate domains (data science, image processing, and game design) that allowed them to showcase their creativity in topics of their choosing. In an end-of-term survey, students reported that they appreciated learning with the assistance of the LLM and that they interacted with the LLM in a variety of ways when writing code. We provide lessons learned for instructors who may wish to incorporate LLMs into their course. △ Less

Submitted 17 April, 2024; originally announced June 2024.

Comments: to be published in Proceedings of the 29th ACM conference on innovation and technology in computer science education (ITiCSE)

Evaluating Micro Parsons Problems as Exam Questions

Authors: Zihan Wu, David H. Smith IV

Abstract: Parsons problems are a type of programming activity that present learners with blocks of existing code and requiring them to arrange those blocks to form a program rather than write the code from scratch. Micro Parsons problems extend this concept by having students assemble segments of code to form a single line of code rather than an entire program. Recent investigations into micro Parsons probl… ▽ More Parsons problems are a type of programming activity that present learners with blocks of existing code and requiring them to arrange those blocks to form a program rather than write the code from scratch. Micro Parsons problems extend this concept by having students assemble segments of code to form a single line of code rather than an entire program. Recent investigations into micro Parsons problems have primarily focused on supporting learners leaving open the question of micro Parsons efficacy as an exam item and how students perceive it when preparing for exams. To fill this gap, we included a variety of micro Parsons problems on four exams in an introductory programming course taught in Python. We use Item Response Theory to investigate the difficulty of the micro Parsons problems as well as the ability of the questions to differentiate between high and low ability students. We then compare these results to results for related questions where students are asked to write a single line of code from scratch. Finally, we conduct a thematic analysis of the survey responses to investigate how students' perceptions of micro Parsons both when practicing for exams and as they appear on exams. △ Less

Submitted 29 May, 2024; originally announced May 2024.

Comments: This work is to appear in ITiCSE 2024. Both authors contributed equally to this research

ACM Class: K.3.2; K.3.1; H.5.2

Explaining Code with a Purpose: An Integrated Approach for Developing Code Comprehension and Prompting Skills

Authors: Paul Denny, David H. Smith IV, Max Fowler, James Prather, Brett A. Becker, Juho Leinonen

Abstract: Reading, understanding and explaining code have traditionally been important skills for novices learning programming. As large language models (LLMs) become prevalent, these foundational skills are more important than ever given the increasing need to understand and evaluate model-generated code. Brand new skills are also needed, such as the ability to formulate clear prompts that can elicit inten… ▽ More Reading, understanding and explaining code have traditionally been important skills for novices learning programming. As large language models (LLMs) become prevalent, these foundational skills are more important than ever given the increasing need to understand and evaluate model-generated code. Brand new skills are also needed, such as the ability to formulate clear prompts that can elicit intended code from an LLM. Thus, there is great interest in integrating pedagogical approaches for the development of both traditional coding competencies and the novel skills required to interact with LLMs. One effective way to develop and assess code comprehension ability is with ``Explain in plain English'' (EiPE) questions, where students succinctly explain the purpose of a fragment of code. However, grading EiPE questions has always been difficult given the subjective nature of evaluating written explanations and this has stifled their uptake. In this paper, we explore a natural synergy between EiPE questions and code-generating LLMs to overcome this limitation. We propose using an LLM to generate code based on students' responses to EiPE questions -- not only enabling EiPE responses to be assessed automatically, but helping students develop essential code comprehension and prompt crafting skills in parallel. We investigate this idea in an introductory programming course and report student success in creating effective prompts for solving EiPE questions. We also examine student perceptions of this activity and how it influences their views on the use of LLMs for aiding and assessing learning. △ Less

Submitted 9 March, 2024; originally announced March 2024.

Comments: Accepted to ITiCSE 2024

Interactions with Prompt Problems: A New Way to Teach Programming with Large Language Models

Authors: James Prather, Paul Denny, Juho Leinonen, David H. Smith IV, Brent N. Reeves, Stephen MacNeil, Brett A. Becker, Andrew Luxton-Reilly, Thezyrie Amarouche, Bailey Kimmel

Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have upended decades of pedagogy in computing education. Students previously learned to code through \textit{writing} many small problems with less emphasis on code reading and comprehension. Recent research has shown that free code generation tools powered by LLMs can solve introductory programming problems presented in natural language with ease. In this paper, we pr… ▽ More Large Language Models (LLMs) have upended decades of pedagogy in computing education. Students previously learned to code through \textit{writing} many small problems with less emphasis on code reading and comprehension. Recent research has shown that free code generation tools powered by LLMs can solve introductory programming problems presented in natural language with ease. In this paper, we propose a new way to teach programming with Prompt Problems. Students receive a problem visually, indicating how input should be transformed to output, and must translate that to a prompt for an LLM to decipher. The problem is considered correct when the code that is generated by the student prompt can pass all test cases. In this paper we present the design of this tool, discuss student interactions with it as they learn, and provide insights into this new class of programming problems as well as the design tools that integrate LLMs. △ Less

Submitted 19 January, 2024; originally announced January 2024.

Comments: accepted for CHI 2024

Unsupervised detection of coordinated information operations in the wild

Authors: D. Hudson Smith, Carl Ehrett, Patrick L. Warren

Abstract: This paper introduces and tests an unsupervised method for detecting novel coordinated inauthentic information operations (CIOs) in realistic settings. This method uses Bayesian inference to identify groups of accounts that share similar account-level characteristics and target similar narratives. We solve the inferential problem using amortized variational inference, allowing us to efficiently in… ▽ More This paper introduces and tests an unsupervised method for detecting novel coordinated inauthentic information operations (CIOs) in realistic settings. This method uses Bayesian inference to identify groups of accounts that share similar account-level characteristics and target similar narratives. We solve the inferential problem using amortized variational inference, allowing us to efficiently infer group identities for millions of accounts. We validate this method using a set of five CIOs from three countries discussing four topics on Twitter. Our unsupervised approach increases detection power (area under the precision-recall curve) relative to a naive baseline (by a factor of 76 to 580), relative to the use of simple flags or narratives on their own (by a factor of 1.3 to 4.8), and comes quite close to a supervised benchmark. Our method is robust to observing only a small share of messaging on the topic, having only weak markers of inauthenticity, and to the CIO accounts making up a tiny share of messages and accounts on the topic. Although we evaluate the results on Twitter, the method is general enough to be applied in many social-media settings. △ Less

Submitted 11 January, 2024; originally announced January 2024.

Comments: 34 pages, 10 figures

Code Generation Based Grading: Evaluating an Auto-grading Mechanism for "Explain-in-Plain-English" Questions

Authors: David H. Smith IV, Craig Zilles

Abstract: Comprehending and elucidating the purpose of code is often cited as being a key learning objective within introductory programming courses. To address this objective ``Explain-in-Plain-English'' questions, in which students are shown a segment of code and asked to provide an abstract description of the code's purpose, have been adopted. However, given EiPE questions require a natural language resp… ▽ More Comprehending and elucidating the purpose of code is often cited as being a key learning objective within introductory programming courses. To address this objective ``Explain-in-Plain-English'' questions, in which students are shown a segment of code and asked to provide an abstract description of the code's purpose, have been adopted. However, given EiPE questions require a natural language response, they often require manual grading which is time-consuming for course staff and delays feedback for students. With the advent of large language models (LLMs) capable of generating code, responses to EiPE questions can be used to generate code segments, the correctness of which can then be easily verified using test cases. We refer to this approach as "Code Generation Based Grading" (CGBG) and in this paper we explore its agreement with human graders using EiPE responses from past exams in an introductory programming course taught in Python. Overall, we find that CGBG achieves moderate agreement with human graders with the primary area of disagreement being its leniency with respect to low-level and line-by-line descriptions of code. △ Less

Submitted 24 November, 2023; originally announced November 2023.

On the Relevance of Temporal Features for Medical Ultrasound Video Recognition

Authors: D. Hudson Smith, John Paul Lineberger, George H. Baker

Abstract: Many medical ultrasound video recognition tasks involve identifying key anatomical features regardless of when they appear in the video suggesting that modeling such tasks may not benefit from temporal features. Correspondingly, model architectures that exclude temporal features may have better sample efficiency. We propose a novel multi-head attention architecture that incorporates these hypothes… ▽ More Many medical ultrasound video recognition tasks involve identifying key anatomical features regardless of when they appear in the video suggesting that modeling such tasks may not benefit from temporal features. Correspondingly, model architectures that exclude temporal features may have better sample efficiency. We propose a novel multi-head attention architecture that incorporates these hypotheses as inductive priors to achieve better sample efficiency on common ultrasound tasks. We compare the performance of our architecture to an efficient 3D CNN video recognition model in two settings: one where we expect not to require temporal features and one where we do. In the former setting, our model outperforms the 3D CNN - especially when we artificially limit the training data. In the latter, the outcome reverses. These results suggest that expressive time-independent models may be more effective than state-of-the-art video recognition models for some common ultrasound tasks in the low-data regime. △ Less

Submitted 16 October, 2023; originally announced October 2023.

Comments: 14 pages, 4 figures, published in MICCAI 23

Journal ref: International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, pp. 744-753. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2023

Investigating the Essential of Meaningful Automated Formative Feedback for Programming Assignments

Authors: Qiang Hao, Jack P Wilson, Camille Ottaway, Naitra Iriumi, Kai Arakawa, David H Smith IV

Abstract: This study investigated the essential of meaningful automated feedback for programming assignments. Three different types of feedback were tested, including (a) What's wrong - what test cases were testing and which failed, (b) Gap - comparisons between expected and actual outputs, and (c) Hint - hints on how to fix problems if test cases failed. 46 students taking a CS2 participated in this study.… ▽ More This study investigated the essential of meaningful automated feedback for programming assignments. Three different types of feedback were tested, including (a) What's wrong - what test cases were testing and which failed, (b) Gap - comparisons between expected and actual outputs, and (c) Hint - hints on how to fix problems if test cases failed. 46 students taking a CS2 participated in this study. They were divided into three groups, and the feedback configurations for each group were different: (1) Group One - What's wrong, (2) Group Two - What's wrong + Gap, (3) Group Three - What's wrong + Gap + Hint. This study found that simply knowing what failed did not help students sufficiently, and might stimulate system gaming behavior. Hints were not found to be impactful on student performance or their usage of automated feedback. Based on the findings, this study provides practical guidance on the design of automated feedback. △ Less

Submitted 25 June, 2019; v1 submitted 21 June, 2019; originally announced June 2019.

Journal ref: 2019 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC)