-
Understanding Internet of Things Malware by Analyzing Endpoints in their Static Artifacts
Authors:
Afsah Anwar,
Jinchun Choi,
Abdulrahman Alabduljabbar,
Hisham Alasmary,
Jeffrey Spaulding,
An Wang,
Songqing Chen,
DaeHun Nyang,
Amro Awad,
David Mohaisen
Abstract:
The lack of security measures among the Internet of Things (IoT) devices and their persistent online connection gives adversaries a prime opportunity to target them or even abuse them as intermediary targets in larger attacks such as distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) campaigns. In this paper, we analyze IoT malware and focus on the endpoints reachable on the public Internet, that play an essent…
▽ More
The lack of security measures among the Internet of Things (IoT) devices and their persistent online connection gives adversaries a prime opportunity to target them or even abuse them as intermediary targets in larger attacks such as distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) campaigns. In this paper, we analyze IoT malware and focus on the endpoints reachable on the public Internet, that play an essential part in the IoT malware ecosystem. Namely, we analyze endpoints acting as dropzones and their targets to gain insights into the underlying dynamics in this ecosystem, such as the affinity between the dropzones and their target IP addresses, and the different patterns among endpoints. Towards this goal, we reverse-engineer 2,423 IoT malware samples and extract strings from them to obtain IP addresses. We further gather information about these endpoints from public Internet-wide scanners, such as Shodan and Censys. For the masked IP addresses, we examine the Classless Inter-Domain Routing (CIDR) networks accumulating to more than 100 million (78.2% of total active public IPv4 addresses) endpoints. Our investigation from four different perspectives provides profound insights into the role of endpoints in IoT malware attacks, which deepens our understanding of IoT malware ecosystems and can assist future defenses.
△ Less
Submitted 25 March, 2021;
originally announced March 2021.
-
Exploring the Attack Surface of Blockchain: A Systematic Overview
Authors:
Muhammad Saad,
Jeffrey Spaulding,
Laurent Njilla,
Charles Kamhoua,
Sachin Shetty,
DaeHun Nyang,
Aziz Mohaisen
Abstract:
In this paper, we systematically explore the attack surface of the Blockchain technology, with an emphasis on public Blockchains. Towards this goal, we attribute attack viability in the attack surface to 1) the Blockchain cryptographic constructs, 2) the distributed architecture of the systems using Blockchain, and 3) the Blockchain application context. To each of those contributing factors, we ou…
▽ More
In this paper, we systematically explore the attack surface of the Blockchain technology, with an emphasis on public Blockchains. Towards this goal, we attribute attack viability in the attack surface to 1) the Blockchain cryptographic constructs, 2) the distributed architecture of the systems using Blockchain, and 3) the Blockchain application context. To each of those contributing factors, we outline several attacks, including selfish mining, the 51% attack, Domain Name System (DNS) attacks, distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks, consensus delay (due to selfish behavior or distributed denial-of-service attacks), Blockchain forks, orphaned and stale blocks, block ingestion, wallet thefts, smart contract attacks, and privacy attacks. We also explore the causal relationships between these attacks to demonstrate how various attack vectors are connected to one another. A secondary contribution of this work is outlining effective defense measures taken by the Blockchain technology or proposed by researchers to mitigate the effects of these attacks and patch associated vulnerabilities
△ Less
Submitted 6 April, 2019;
originally announced April 2019.
-
Analyzing Endpoints in the Internet of Things Malware
Authors:
Jinchun Choi,
Afsah Anwar,
Hisham Alasmary,
Jeffrey Spaulding,
DaeHun Nyang,
Aziz Mohaisen
Abstract:
The lack of security measures in the Internet of Things (IoT) devices and their persistent online connectivity give adversaries an opportunity to target them or abuse them as intermediary targets for larger attacks such as distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) campaigns. In this paper, we analyze IoT malware with a focus on endpoints to understand the affinity between the dropzones and their target…
▽ More
The lack of security measures in the Internet of Things (IoT) devices and their persistent online connectivity give adversaries an opportunity to target them or abuse them as intermediary targets for larger attacks such as distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) campaigns. In this paper, we analyze IoT malware with a focus on endpoints to understand the affinity between the dropzones and their target IP addresses, and to understand the different patterns among them. Towards this goal, we reverse-engineer 2,423 IoT malware samples to obtain IP addresses. We further augment additional information about the endpoints from Internet-wide scanners, including Shodan and Censys. We then perform a deep data-driven analysis of the dropzones and their target IP addresses and further examine the attack surface of the target device space.
△ Less
Submitted 9 February, 2019;
originally announced February 2019.
-
Domain Name System Security and Privacy: Old Problems and New Challenges
Authors:
Ah Reum Kang,
Jeffrey Spaulding,
Aziz Mohaisen
Abstract:
The domain name system (DNS) is an important protocol in today's Internet operation, and is the standard naming convention between domain names, names that are easy to read, understand, and remember by humans, to IP address of Internet resources. The wealth of research activities on DNS in general and security and privacy in particular suggest that all problems in this domain are solved. Reality h…
▽ More
The domain name system (DNS) is an important protocol in today's Internet operation, and is the standard naming convention between domain names, names that are easy to read, understand, and remember by humans, to IP address of Internet resources. The wealth of research activities on DNS in general and security and privacy in particular suggest that all problems in this domain are solved. Reality however is that despite the large body of literature on various aspects of DNS, there are still many challenges that need to be addressed. In this paper, we review the various activities in the research community on DNS operation, security, and privacy, and outline various challenges and open research directions that need to be tackled.
△ Less
Submitted 22 June, 2016;
originally announced June 2016.
-
The Landscape of Domain Name Typosquatting: Techniques and Countermeasures
Authors:
Jeffrey Spaulding,
Shambhu Upadhyaya,
Aziz Mohaisen
Abstract:
With more than 294 million registered domain names as of late 2015, the domain name ecosystem has evolved to become a cornerstone for the operation of the Internet. Domain names today serve everyone, from individuals for their online presence to big brands for their business operations. Such ecosystem that facilitated legitimate business and personal uses has also fostered "creative" cases of misu…
▽ More
With more than 294 million registered domain names as of late 2015, the domain name ecosystem has evolved to become a cornerstone for the operation of the Internet. Domain names today serve everyone, from individuals for their online presence to big brands for their business operations. Such ecosystem that facilitated legitimate business and personal uses has also fostered "creative" cases of misuse, including phishing, spam, hit and traffic stealing, online scams, among others. As a first step towards this misuse, the registration of a legitimately-looking domain is often required. For that, domain typosquatting provides a great avenue to cybercriminals to conduct their crimes.
In this paper, we review the landscape of domain name typosquatting, highlighting models and advanced techniques for typosquatted domain names generation, models for their monetization, and the existing literature on countermeasures. We further highlight potential fruitful directions on technical countermeasures that are lacking in the literature.
△ Less
Submitted 8 March, 2016;
originally announced March 2016.