A map of Digital Humanities research across bibliographic data sources
Authors:
Gianmarco Spinaci,
Giovanni Colavizza,
Silvio Peroni
Abstract:
Purpose. This study presents the results of an experiment we performed to measure the coverage of Digital Humanities (DH) publications in mainstream open and proprietary bibliographic data sources, by further highlighting the relations among DH and other disciplines. Methodology. We created a list of DH journals based on manual curation and bibliometric data. We used that list to identify DH publi…
▽ More
Purpose. This study presents the results of an experiment we performed to measure the coverage of Digital Humanities (DH) publications in mainstream open and proprietary bibliographic data sources, by further highlighting the relations among DH and other disciplines. Methodology. We created a list of DH journals based on manual curation and bibliometric data. We used that list to identify DH publications in the bibliographic data sources under consideration. We used the ERIH-PLUS list of journals to identify Social Sciences and Humanities (SSH) publications. We analysed the citation links they included to understand the relationship between DH publications and SSH and non-SSH fields. Findings. Crossref emerges as the database containing the highest number of DH publications. Citations from and to DH publications show strong connections between DH and research in Computer Science, Linguistics, Psychology, and Pedagogical & Educational Research. Computer Science is responsible for a large part of incoming and outgoing citations to and from DH research, which suggests a reciprocal interest between the two disciplines. Value. This is the first bibliometric study of DH research involving several bibliographic data sources, including open and proprietary databases. Research limitations. The list of DH journals we created might be only partially representative of broader DH research. In addition, some DH publications could have been cut off from the study since we did not consider books and other publications published in proceedings of DH conferences and workshops. Finally, we used a specific time coverage (2000-2018) that could have prevented the inclusion of additional DH publications.
△ Less
Submitted 1 March, 2022; v1 submitted 27 August, 2021;
originally announced August 2021.
Knowledge Graphs Evolution and Preservation -- A Technical Report from ISWS 2019
Authors:
Nacira Abbas,
Kholoud Alghamdi,
Mortaza Alinam,
Francesca Alloatti,
Glenda Amaral,
Claudia d'Amato,
Luigi Asprino,
Martin Beno,
Felix Bensmann,
Russa Biswas,
Ling Cai,
Riley Capshaw,
Valentina Anita Carriero,
Irene Celino,
Amine Dadoun,
Stefano De Giorgis,
Harm Delva,
John Domingue,
Michel Dumontier,
Vincent Emonet,
Marieke van Erp,
Paola Espinoza Arias,
Omaima Fallatah,
Sebastián Ferrada,
Marc Gallofré Ocaña
, et al. (49 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
One of the grand challenges discussed during the Dagstuhl Seminar "Knowledge Graphs: New Directions for Knowledge Representation on the Semantic Web" and described in its report is that of a: "Public FAIR Knowledge Graph of Everything: We increasingly see the creation of knowledge graphs that capture information about the entirety of a class of entities. [...] This grand challenge extends this fur…
▽ More
One of the grand challenges discussed during the Dagstuhl Seminar "Knowledge Graphs: New Directions for Knowledge Representation on the Semantic Web" and described in its report is that of a: "Public FAIR Knowledge Graph of Everything: We increasingly see the creation of knowledge graphs that capture information about the entirety of a class of entities. [...] This grand challenge extends this further by asking if we can create a knowledge graph of "everything" ranging from common sense concepts to location based entities. This knowledge graph should be "open to the public" in a FAIR manner democratizing this mass amount of knowledge." Although linked open data (LOD) is one knowledge graph, it is the closest realisation (and probably the only one) to a public FAIR Knowledge Graph (KG) of everything. Surely, LOD provides a unique testbed for experimenting and evaluating research hypotheses on open and FAIR KG. One of the most neglected FAIR issues about KGs is their ongoing evolution and long term preservation. We want to investigate this problem, that is to understand what preserving and supporting the evolution of KGs means and how these problems can be addressed. Clearly, the problem can be approached from different perspectives and may require the development of different approaches, including new theories, ontologies, metrics, strategies, procedures, etc. This document reports a collaborative effort performed by 9 teams of students, each guided by a senior researcher as their mentor, attending the International Semantic Web Research School (ISWS 2019). Each team provides a different perspective to the problem of knowledge graph evolution substantiated by a set of research questions as the main subject of their investigation. In addition, they provide their working definition for KG preservation and evolution.
△ Less
Submitted 22 December, 2020;
originally announced December 2020.
