-
ElectionRumors2022: A Dataset of Election Rumors on Twitter During the 2022 US Midterms
Authors:
Joseph S Schafer,
Kayla Duskin,
Stephen Prochaska,
Morgan Wack,
Anna Beers,
Lia Bozarth,
Taylor Agajanian,
Mike Caulfield,
Emma S Spiro,
Kate Starbird
Abstract:
Understanding the spread of online rumors is a pressing societal challenge and an active area of research across domains. In the context of the 2022 U.S. midterm elections, one influential social media platform for sharing information -- including rumors that may be false, misleading, or unsubstantiated -- was Twitter (now renamed X). To increase understanding of the dynamics of online rumors abou…
▽ More
Understanding the spread of online rumors is a pressing societal challenge and an active area of research across domains. In the context of the 2022 U.S. midterm elections, one influential social media platform for sharing information -- including rumors that may be false, misleading, or unsubstantiated -- was Twitter (now renamed X). To increase understanding of the dynamics of online rumors about elections, we present and analyze a dataset of 1.81 million Twitter posts corresponding to 135 distinct rumors which spread online during the midterm election season (September 5 to December 1, 2022). We describe how this data was collected, compiled, and supplemented, and provide a series of exploratory analyses along with comparisons to a previously-published dataset on 2020 election rumors. We also conduct a mixed-methods analysis of three distinct rumors about the election in Arizona, a particularly prominent focus of 2022 election rumoring. Finally, we provide a set of potential future directions for how this dataset could be used to facilitate future research into online rumors, misinformation, and disinformation.
△ Less
Submitted 22 July, 2024;
originally announced July 2024.
-
Echo Chambers in the Age of Algorithms: An Audit of Twitter's Friend Recommender System
Authors:
Kayla Duskin,
Joseph S. Schafer,
Jevin D. West,
Emma S. Spiro
Abstract:
The presence of political misinformation and ideological echo chambers on social media platforms is concerning given the important role that these sites play in the public's exposure to news and current events. Algorithmic systems employed on these platforms are presumed to play a role in these phenomena, but little is known about their mechanisms and effects. In this work, we conduct an algorithm…
▽ More
The presence of political misinformation and ideological echo chambers on social media platforms is concerning given the important role that these sites play in the public's exposure to news and current events. Algorithmic systems employed on these platforms are presumed to play a role in these phenomena, but little is known about their mechanisms and effects. In this work, we conduct an algorithmic audit of Twitter's Who-To-Follow friend recommendation system, the first empirical audit that investigates the impact of this algorithm in-situ. We create automated Twitter accounts that initially follow left and right affiliated U.S. politicians during the 2022 U.S. midterm elections and then grow their information networks using the platform's recommender system. We pair the experiment with an observational study of Twitter users who already follow the same politicians. Broadly, we find that while following the recommendation algorithm leads accounts into dense and reciprocal neighborhoods that structurally resemble echo chambers, the recommender also results in less political homogeneity of a user's network compared to accounts growing their networks through social endorsement. Furthermore, accounts that exclusively followed users recommended by the algorithm had fewer opportunities to encounter content centered on false or misleading election narratives compared to choosing friends based on social endorsement.
△ Less
Submitted 9 April, 2024;
originally announced April 2024.
-
Followback Clusters, Satellite Audiences, and Bridge Nodes: Coengagement Networks for the 2020 US Election
Authors:
Andrew Beers,
Joseph S. Schafer,
Ian Kennedy,
Morgan Wack,
Emma S. Spiro,
Kate Starbird
Abstract:
The 2020 United States presidential election was, and has continued to be, the focus of pervasive and persistent mis- and disinformation spreading through our media ecosystems, including social media. This event has driven the collection and analysis of large, directed social network datasets, but such datasets can resist intuitive understanding. In such large datasets, the overwhelming number of…
▽ More
The 2020 United States presidential election was, and has continued to be, the focus of pervasive and persistent mis- and disinformation spreading through our media ecosystems, including social media. This event has driven the collection and analysis of large, directed social network datasets, but such datasets can resist intuitive understanding. In such large datasets, the overwhelming number of nodes and edges present in typical representations create visual artifacts, such as densely overlapping edges and tightly-packed formations of low-degree nodes, which obscure many features of more practical interest. We apply a method, coengagement transformations, to convert such networks of social data into tractable images. Intuitively, this approach allows for parameterized network visualizations that make shared audiences of engaged viewers salient to viewers. Using the interpretative capabilities of this method, we perform an extensive case study of the 2020 United States presidential election on Twitter, contributing an empirical analysis of coengagement. By creating and contrasting different networks at different parameter sets, we define and characterize several structures in this discourse network, including bridging accounts, satellite audiences, and followback communities. We discuss the importance and implications of these empirical network features in this context. In addition, we release open-source code for creating coengagement networks from Twitter and other structured interaction data.
△ Less
Submitted 30 May, 2023; v1 submitted 28 February, 2023;
originally announced March 2023.
-
Redrawing the 'Color Line': Examining Racial Segregation in Associative Networks on Twitter
Authors:
Nina Cesare,
Hedwig Lee,
Tyler McCormick,
Emma S. Spiro
Abstract:
Online social spaces are increasingly salient contexts for associative tie formation. However, the racial composition of associative networks within most of these spaces has yet to be examined. In this paper, we use data from the social media platform Twitter to examine racial segregation patterns in online associative networks. Acknowledging past work on the role that social structure and agency…
▽ More
Online social spaces are increasingly salient contexts for associative tie formation. However, the racial composition of associative networks within most of these spaces has yet to be examined. In this paper, we use data from the social media platform Twitter to examine racial segregation patterns in online associative networks. Acknowledging past work on the role that social structure and agency play in influencing the racial composition of individuals' networks, we argue that Twitter blurs the influence of these forces and may invite users to generate networks that are both more or less segregated than what has been observed offline, depending on use. While we expect to find some level of racial segregation within this space, this paper unpacks the extent to which we observe same-race connectedness for black and white users, assesses whether these patterns are likely generated by opportunity or by choice, and contextualizes results by comparing them with patterns of same-race connectedness observed offline.
△ Less
Submitted 11 May, 2017;
originally announced May 2017.
-
Networks of Gratitude: Structures of Thanks and User Expectations in Workplace Appreciation Systems
Authors:
Emma S. Spiro,
J. Nathan Matias,
Andrés Monroy-Hernández
Abstract:
Appreciation systems--platforms for users to exchange thanks and praise--are becoming common in the workplace, where employees share appreciation, managers are notified, and aggregate scores are sometimes made visible. Who do people thank on these systems, and what do they expect from each other and their managers? After introducing the design affordances of 13 appreciation systems, we discuss a s…
▽ More
Appreciation systems--platforms for users to exchange thanks and praise--are becoming common in the workplace, where employees share appreciation, managers are notified, and aggregate scores are sometimes made visible. Who do people thank on these systems, and what do they expect from each other and their managers? After introducing the design affordances of 13 appreciation systems, we discuss a system we call Gratia, in use at a large multinational company for over four years. Using logs of 422,000 appreciation messages and user surveys, we explore the social dynamics of use and ask if use of the system addresses the recognition problem. We find that while thanks is mostly exchanged among employees at the same level and different parts of the company, addressing the recognition problem, managers do not always act on that recognition in ways that employees expect.
△ Less
Submitted 26 May, 2016;
originally announced May 2016.
-
Is Anyone Out There? Unpacking Q&A Hashtags on Twitter
Authors:
Jeffrey M. Rzeszotarski,
Emma S. Spiro,
Jorge Nathan Matias,
Andrés Monroy-Hernández,
Meredith Ringel Morris
Abstract:
In addition to posting news and status updates, many Twitter users post questions that seek various types of subjective and objective information. These questions are often labeled with "Q&A" hashtags, such as #lazyweb or #twoogle. We surveyed Twitter users and found they employ these Q&A hashtags both as a topical signifier (this tweet needs an answer!) and to reach out to those beyond their imme…
▽ More
In addition to posting news and status updates, many Twitter users post questions that seek various types of subjective and objective information. These questions are often labeled with "Q&A" hashtags, such as #lazyweb or #twoogle. We surveyed Twitter users and found they employ these Q&A hashtags both as a topical signifier (this tweet needs an answer!) and to reach out to those beyond their immediate followers (a community of helpful tweeters who monitor the hashtag). However, our log analysis of thousands of hashtagged Q&A exchanges reveals that nearly all replies to hashtagged questions come from a user's immediate follower network, contradicting user's beliefs that they are tapping into a larger community by tagging their question tweets. This finding has implications for designing next-generation social search systems that reach and engage a wide audience of answerers.
△ Less
Submitted 5 July, 2015;
originally announced July 2015.
-
The h-Index of a Graph and its Application to Dynamic Subgraph Statistics
Authors:
David Eppstein,
Emma S. Spiro
Abstract:
We describe a data structure that maintains the number of triangles in a dynamic undirected graph, subject to insertions and deletions of edges and of degree-zero vertices. More generally it can be used to maintain the number of copies of each possible three-vertex subgraph in time O(h) per update, where h is the h-index of the graph, the maximum number such that the graph contains $h$ vertices…
▽ More
We describe a data structure that maintains the number of triangles in a dynamic undirected graph, subject to insertions and deletions of edges and of degree-zero vertices. More generally it can be used to maintain the number of copies of each possible three-vertex subgraph in time O(h) per update, where h is the h-index of the graph, the maximum number such that the graph contains $h$ vertices of degree at least h. We also show how to maintain the h-index itself, and a collection of h high-degree vertices in the graph, in constant time per update. Our data structure has applications in social network analysis using the exponential random graph model (ERGM); its bound of O(h) time per edge is never worse than the Theta(sqrt m) time per edge necessary to list all triangles in a static graph, and is strictly better for graphs obeying a power law degree distribution. In order to better understand the behavior of the h-index statistic and its implications for the performance of our algorithms, we also study the behavior of the h-index on a set of 136 real-world networks.
△ Less
Submitted 23 April, 2009;
originally announced April 2009.
