Bibliometrics for collaboration works
Authors:
Paolo Rossi,
Alessandro Strumia,
Riccardo Torre
Abstract:
An important issue in bibliometrics is the weighing of co-authorship in the production of scientific collaborations, which are becoming the standard modality of research activity in many disciplines. The problem is especially relevant in the field of high-energy physics, where collaborations reach 3000 authors, but it can no longer be ignored also in other domains, like medicine or biology. We pre…
▽ More
An important issue in bibliometrics is the weighing of co-authorship in the production of scientific collaborations, which are becoming the standard modality of research activity in many disciplines. The problem is especially relevant in the field of high-energy physics, where collaborations reach 3000 authors, but it can no longer be ignored also in other domains, like medicine or biology. We present theoretical and numerical arguments in favour of weighing the individual contributions as $1/N_{\rm aut}^α$ where $N_{\rm aut}$ is the number of co-authors. When counting citations we suggest the exponent $α\approx 1$, that corresponds to fractional counting. When counting the number of papers we suggest $α\approx 1/3 - 1/2$, with the former (latter) value more appropriate for larger (smaller) collaborations. We expect and verify that the $h$ index scales as the square root of the average number of co-authors, and define a fractionalized $h$ index that does not scale with collaboration size.
△ Less
Submitted 14 July, 2020; v1 submitted 1 February, 2019;
originally announced February 2019.
Biblioranking fundamental physics
Authors:
Alessandro Strumia,
Riccardo Torre
Abstract:
We propose measures of the impact of research that improve on existing ones such as counting of number of papers, citations and $h$-index. Since different papers and different fields have largely different average number of co-authors and of references we replace citations with individual citations, shared among co-authors. Next, we improve on citation counting applying the PageRank algorithm to c…
▽ More
We propose measures of the impact of research that improve on existing ones such as counting of number of papers, citations and $h$-index. Since different papers and different fields have largely different average number of co-authors and of references we replace citations with individual citations, shared among co-authors. Next, we improve on citation counting applying the PageRank algorithm to citations among papers. Being time-ordered, this reduces to a weighted counting of citation descendants that we call PaperRank. Similarly, we compute an AuthorRank applying the PageRank algorithm to citations among authors. These metrics quantify the impact of an author or paper taking into account the impact of those authors that cite it. Finally, we show how self- and circular- citations can be eliminated by defining a closed market of citation-coins. We apply these metrics to the InSpire database that covers fundamental physics, ranking papers, authors, journals, institutes, towns, countries, continents, genders, for all-time and in recent time periods.
△ Less
Submitted 6 April, 2021; v1 submitted 28 March, 2018;
originally announced March 2018.
