-
A Comparison of Neuroelectrophysiology Databases
Authors:
Priyanka Subash,
Alex Gray,
Misque Boswell,
Samantha L. Cohen,
Rachael Garner,
Sana Salehi,
Calvary Fisher,
Samuel Hobel,
Satrajit Ghosh,
Yaroslav Halchenko,
Benjamin Dichter,
Russell A. Poldrack,
Chris Markiewicz,
Dora Hermes,
Arnaud Delorme,
Scott Makeig,
Brendan Behan,
Alana Sparks,
Stephen R Arnott,
Zhengjia Wang,
John Magnotti,
Michael S. Beauchamp,
Nader Pouratian,
Arthur W. Toga,
Dominique Duncan
Abstract:
As data sharing has become more prevalent, three pillars - archives, standards, and analysis tools - have emerged as critical components in facilitating effective data sharing and collaboration. This paper compares four freely available intracranial neuroelectrophysiology data repositories: Data Archive for the BRAIN Initiative (DABI), Distributed Archives for Neurophysiology Data Integration (DAN…
▽ More
As data sharing has become more prevalent, three pillars - archives, standards, and analysis tools - have emerged as critical components in facilitating effective data sharing and collaboration. This paper compares four freely available intracranial neuroelectrophysiology data repositories: Data Archive for the BRAIN Initiative (DABI), Distributed Archives for Neurophysiology Data Integration (DANDI), OpenNeuro, and Brain-CODE. The aim of this review is to describe archives that provide researchers with tools to store, share, and reanalyze both human and non-human neurophysiology data based on criteria that are of interest to the neuroscientific community. The Brain Imaging Data Structure (BIDS) and Neurodata Without Borders (NWB) are utilized by these archives to make data more accessible to researchers by implementing a common standard. As the necessity for integrating large-scale analysis into data repository platforms continues to grow within the neuroscientific community, this article will highlight the various analytical and customizable tools developed within the chosen archives that may advance the field of neuroinformatics.
△ Less
Submitted 30 August, 2023; v1 submitted 26 June, 2023;
originally announced June 2023.
-
RenderSelect: a Cloud Broker Framework for Cloud Renderfarm Services
Authors:
Annette J Ruby,
Banu W Aisha,
Chandran P Subash
Abstract:
In the 3D studios the animation scene files undergo a process called as rendering, where the 3D wire frame models are converted into 3D photorealistic images. As the rendering process is both a computationally intensive and a time consuming task, the cloud services based rendering in cloud render farms is gaining popularity among the animators. Though cloud render farms offer many benefits, the an…
▽ More
In the 3D studios the animation scene files undergo a process called as rendering, where the 3D wire frame models are converted into 3D photorealistic images. As the rendering process is both a computationally intensive and a time consuming task, the cloud services based rendering in cloud render farms is gaining popularity among the animators. Though cloud render farms offer many benefits, the animators hesitate to move from their traditional offline rendering to cloud services based render farms as they lack the knowledge, expertise and the time to compare the render farm service providers based on the Quality of Service (QoS) offered by them, negotiate the QoS and monitor whether the agreed upon QoS is actually offered by the renderfarm service providers. In this paper we propose a Cloud Service Broker (CSB) framework called the RenderSelect that helps in the dynamic ranking, selection, negotiation and monitoring of the cloud based render farm services. The cloud services based renderfarms are ranked and selected services based on multi criteria QoS requirements. Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP), the popular Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) method is used for ranking and selecting the cloud services based renderfarms. The AHP method of ranking is illustrated in detail with an example. It could be verified that AHP method ranks the cloud services effectively with less time and complexity.
△ Less
Submitted 28 November, 2016;
originally announced November 2016.
-
Comparison of Multi Criteria Decision Making Algorithms for Ranking Cloud Renderfarm Services
Authors:
Annette J Ruby,
Banu W Aisha,
Chandran P Subash
Abstract:
Cloud services that provide a complete environment for the animators to render their files using the resources in the cloud are called Cloud Renderfarm Services. The objective of this work is to rank and compare the performance of these services using two popular Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) Algorithms namely the Analytical Hierarchical Processing (AHP) and SAW (Simple Additive Weighting)…
▽ More
Cloud services that provide a complete environment for the animators to render their files using the resources in the cloud are called Cloud Renderfarm Services. The objective of this work is to rank and compare the performance of these services using two popular Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) Algorithms namely the Analytical Hierarchical Processing (AHP) and SAW (Simple Additive Weighting) methods. The performance of three real time cloud renderfarm services are ranked and compared based on five Quality of Service (QoS) attributes that are important to these services namely the Render Node Cost, File Upload Time, Availability, Elasticity and Service Response Time. The performance of these cloud renderfarm services are ranked in four different simulations by varying the weights assigned for each QoS attribute and the ranking obtained are compared. The results show that AHP and SAW assigned similar ranks to all three cloud renderfarm services for all simulations.
△ Less
Submitted 29 November, 2016;
originally announced November 2016.
