Updating Quantum Cryptography Report ver. 1
Authors:
Donna Dodson,
Mikio Fujiwara,
Philippe Grangier,
Masahito Hayashi,
Kentaro Imafuku,
Ken-ichi Kitayama,
Prem Kumar,
Christian Kurtsiefer,
Gaby Lenhart,
Norbert Luetkenhaus,
Tsutomu Matsumoto,
William J. Munro,
Tsuyoshi Nishioka,
Momtchil Peev,
Masahide Sasaki,
Yutaka Sata,
Atsushi Takada,
Masahiro Takeoka,
Kiyoshi Tamaki,
Hidema Tanaka,
Yasuhiro Tokura,
Akihisa Tomita,
Morio Toyoshima,
Rodney van Meter,
Atsuhiro Yamagishi
, et al. (2 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Quantum cryptographic technology (QCT) is expected to be a fundamental technology for realizing long-term information security even against as-yet-unknown future technologies. More advanced security could be achieved using QCT together with contemporary cryptographic technologies. To develop and spread the use of QCT, it is necessary to standardize devices, protocols, and security requirements a…
▽ More
Quantum cryptographic technology (QCT) is expected to be a fundamental technology for realizing long-term information security even against as-yet-unknown future technologies. More advanced security could be achieved using QCT together with contemporary cryptographic technologies. To develop and spread the use of QCT, it is necessary to standardize devices, protocols, and security requirements and thus enable interoperability in a multi-vendor, multi-network, and multi-service environment. This report is a technical summary of QCT and related topics from the viewpoints of 1) consensual establishment of specifications and requirements of QCT for standardization and commercialization and 2) the promotion of research and design to realize New-Generation Quantum Cryptography.
△ Less
Submitted 27 May, 2009;
originally announced May 2009.
Phase-Remapping Attack in Practical Quantum Key Distribution Systems
Authors:
Chi-Hang Fred Fung,
Bing Qi,
Kiyoshi Tamaki,
Hoi-Kwong Lo
Abstract:
Quantum key distribution (QKD) can be used to generate secret keys between two distant parties. Even though QKD has been proven unconditionally secure against eavesdroppers with unlimited computation power, practical implementations of QKD may contain loopholes that may lead to the generated secret keys being compromised. In this paper, we propose a phase-remapping attack targeting two practical…
▽ More
Quantum key distribution (QKD) can be used to generate secret keys between two distant parties. Even though QKD has been proven unconditionally secure against eavesdroppers with unlimited computation power, practical implementations of QKD may contain loopholes that may lead to the generated secret keys being compromised. In this paper, we propose a phase-remapping attack targeting two practical bidirectional QKD systems (the "plug & play" system and the Sagnac system). We showed that if the users of the systems are unaware of our attack, the final key shared between them can be compromised in some situations. Specifically, we showed that, in the case of the Bennett-Brassard 1984 (BB84) protocol with ideal single-photon sources, when the quantum bit error rate (QBER) is between 14.6% and 20%, our attack renders the final key insecure, whereas the same range of QBER values has been proved secure if the two users are unaware of our attack; also, we demonstrated three situations with realistic devices where positive key rates are obtained without the consideration of Trojan horse attacks but in fact no key can be distilled. We remark that our attack is feasible with only current technology. Therefore, it is very important to be aware of our attack in order to ensure absolute security. In finding our attack, we minimize the QBER over individual measurements described by a general POVM, which has some similarity with the standard quantum state discrimination problem.
△ Less
Submitted 5 March, 2007; v1 submitted 17 January, 2006;
originally announced January 2006.
