Showing 1–9 of 9 results for author: Turner, A M

Steering Llama 2 via Contrastive Activation Addition

Authors: Nina Panickssery, Nick Gabrieli, Julian Schulz, Meg Tong, Evan Hubinger, Alexander Matt Turner

Abstract: We introduce Contrastive Activation Addition (CAA), an innovative method for steering language models by modifying their activations during forward passes. CAA computes "steering vectors" by averaging the difference in residual stream activations between pairs of positive and negative examples of a particular behavior, such as factual versus hallucinatory responses. During inference, these steerin… ▽ More We introduce Contrastive Activation Addition (CAA), an innovative method for steering language models by modifying their activations during forward passes. CAA computes "steering vectors" by averaging the difference in residual stream activations between pairs of positive and negative examples of a particular behavior, such as factual versus hallucinatory responses. During inference, these steering vectors are added at all token positions after the user's prompt with either a positive or negative coefficient, allowing precise control over the degree of the targeted behavior. We evaluate CAA's effectiveness on Llama 2 Chat using multiple-choice behavioral question datasets and open-ended generation tasks. We demonstrate that CAA significantly alters model behavior, is effective over and on top of traditional methods like finetuning and system prompt design, and minimally reduces capabilities. Moreover, we gain deeper insights into CAA's mechanisms by employing various activation space interpretation methods. CAA accurately steers model outputs and sheds light on how high-level concepts are represented in Large Language Models (LLMs). △ Less

Submitted 5 July, 2024; v1 submitted 8 December, 2023; originally announced December 2023.

Understanding and Controlling a Maze-Solving Policy Network

Authors: Ulisse Mini, Peli Grietzer, Mrinank Sharma, Austin Meek, Monte MacDiarmid, Alexander Matt Turner

Abstract: To understand the goals and goal representations of AI systems, we carefully study a pretrained reinforcement learning policy that solves mazes by navigating to a range of target squares. We find this network pursues multiple context-dependent goals, and we further identify circuits within the network that correspond to one of these goals. In particular, we identified eleven channels that track th… ▽ More To understand the goals and goal representations of AI systems, we carefully study a pretrained reinforcement learning policy that solves mazes by navigating to a range of target squares. We find this network pursues multiple context-dependent goals, and we further identify circuits within the network that correspond to one of these goals. In particular, we identified eleven channels that track the location of the goal. By modifying these channels, either with hand-designed interventions or by combining forward passes, we can partially control the policy. We show that this network contains redundant, distributed, and retargetable goal representations, shedding light on the nature of goal-direction in trained policy networks. △ Less

Submitted 12 October, 2023; originally announced October 2023.

Comments: 46 pages

Activation Addition: Steering Language Models Without Optimization

Authors: Alexander Matt Turner, Lisa Thiergart, Gavin Leech, David Udell, Juan J. Vazquez, Ulisse Mini, Monte MacDiarmid

Abstract: Reliably controlling the behavior of large language models is a pressing open problem. Existing methods include supervised finetuning, reinforcement learning from human feedback, prompt engineering and guided decoding. We instead investigate activation engineering: modifying activations at inference-time to predictably alter model behavior. We bias the forward pass with a 'steering vector' implici… ▽ More Reliably controlling the behavior of large language models is a pressing open problem. Existing methods include supervised finetuning, reinforcement learning from human feedback, prompt engineering and guided decoding. We instead investigate activation engineering: modifying activations at inference-time to predictably alter model behavior. We bias the forward pass with a 'steering vector' implicitly specified through natural language. Past work learned these steering vectors; our Activation Addition (ActAdd) method instead computes them by taking activation differences resulting from pairs of prompts. We demonstrate ActAdd on a range of LLMs (LLaMA-3, OPT, GPT-2, and GPT-J), obtaining SOTA on detoxification and negative-to-positive sentiment control. Our approach yields inference-time control over high-level properties of output like topic and sentiment while preserving performance on off-target tasks. ActAdd takes far less compute and implementation effort than finetuning or RLHF, allows users control through natural language, and its computational overhead (as a fraction of inference time) appears stable or improving over increasing model size. △ Less

Submitted 4 June, 2024; v1 submitted 20 August, 2023; originally announced August 2023.

Parametrically Retargetable Decision-Makers Tend To Seek Power

Authors: Alexander Matt Turner, Prasad Tadepalli

Abstract: If capable AI agents are generally incentivized to seek power in service of the objectives we specify for them, then these systems will pose enormous risks, in addition to enormous benefits. In fully observable environments, most reward functions have an optimal policy which seeks power by keeping options open and staying alive. However, the real world is neither fully observable, nor must trained… ▽ More If capable AI agents are generally incentivized to seek power in service of the objectives we specify for them, then these systems will pose enormous risks, in addition to enormous benefits. In fully observable environments, most reward functions have an optimal policy which seeks power by keeping options open and staying alive. However, the real world is neither fully observable, nor must trained agents be even approximately reward-optimal. We consider a range of models of AI decision-making, from optimal, to random, to choices informed by learning and interacting with an environment. We discover that many decision-making functions are retargetable, and that retargetability is sufficient to cause power-seeking tendencies. Our functional criterion is simple and broad. We show that a range of qualitatively dissimilar decision-making procedures incentivize agents to seek power. We demonstrate the flexibility of our results by reasoning about learned policy incentives in Montezuma's Revenge. These results suggest a safety risk: Eventually, retargetable training procedures may train real-world agents which seek power over humans. △ Less

Submitted 11 October, 2022; v1 submitted 27 June, 2022; originally announced June 2022.

Comments: 10-page main paper, 36 pages total, poster at NeurIPS 2022

On Avoiding Power-Seeking by Artificial Intelligence

Authors: Alexander Matt Turner

Abstract: We do not know how to align a very intelligent AI agent's behavior with human interests. I investigate whether -- absent a full solution to this AI alignment problem -- we can build smart AI agents which have limited impact on the world, and which do not autonomously seek power. In this thesis, I introduce the attainable utility preservation (AUP) method. I demonstrate that AUP produces conservati… ▽ More We do not know how to align a very intelligent AI agent's behavior with human interests. I investigate whether -- absent a full solution to this AI alignment problem -- we can build smart AI agents which have limited impact on the world, and which do not autonomously seek power. In this thesis, I introduce the attainable utility preservation (AUP) method. I demonstrate that AUP produces conservative, option-preserving behavior within toy gridworlds and within complex environments based off of Conway's Game of Life. I formalize the problem of side effect avoidance, which provides a way to quantify the side effects an agent had on the world. I also give a formal definition of power-seeking in the context of AI agents and show that optimal policies tend to seek power. In particular, most reward functions have optimal policies which avoid deactivation. This is a problem if we want to deactivate or correct an intelligent agent after we have deployed it. My theorems suggest that since most agent goals conflict with ours, the agent would very probably resist correction. I extend these theorems to show that power-seeking incentives occur not just for optimal decision-makers, but under a wide range of decision-making procedures. △ Less

Submitted 23 June, 2022; originally announced June 2022.

Comments: 287 pages, PhD thesis

Formalizing the Problem of Side Effect Regularization

Authors: Alexander Matt Turner, Aseem Saxena, Prasad Tadepalli

Abstract: AI objectives are often hard to specify properly. Some approaches tackle this problem by regularizing the AI's side effects: Agents must weigh off "how much of a mess they make" with an imperfectly specified proxy objective. We propose a formal criterion for side effect regularization via the assistance game framework. In these games, the agent solves a partially observable Markov decision process… ▽ More AI objectives are often hard to specify properly. Some approaches tackle this problem by regularizing the AI's side effects: Agents must weigh off "how much of a mess they make" with an imperfectly specified proxy objective. We propose a formal criterion for side effect regularization via the assistance game framework. In these games, the agent solves a partially observable Markov decision process (POMDP) representing its uncertainty about the objective function it should optimize. We consider the setting where the true objective is revealed to the agent at a later time step. We show that this POMDP is solved by trading off the proxy reward with the agent's ability to achieve a range of future tasks. We empirically demonstrate the reasonableness of our problem formalization via ground-truth evaluation in two gridworld environments. △ Less

Submitted 8 November, 2022; v1 submitted 23 June, 2022; originally announced June 2022.

Comments: 14 pages, accepted to ML Safety Workshop at NeurIPS 2022. Alexander Turner and Aseem Saxena contributed equally

Avoiding Side Effects in Complex Environments

Authors: Alexander Matt Turner, Neale Ratzlaff, Prasad Tadepalli

Abstract: Reward function specification can be difficult. Rewarding the agent for making a widget may be easy, but penalizing the multitude of possible negative side effects is hard. In toy environments, Attainable Utility Preservation (AUP) avoided side effects by penalizing shifts in the ability to achieve randomly generated goals. We scale this approach to large, randomly generated environments based on… ▽ More Reward function specification can be difficult. Rewarding the agent for making a widget may be easy, but penalizing the multitude of possible negative side effects is hard. In toy environments, Attainable Utility Preservation (AUP) avoided side effects by penalizing shifts in the ability to achieve randomly generated goals. We scale this approach to large, randomly generated environments based on Conway's Game of Life. By preserving optimal value for a single randomly generated reward function, AUP incurs modest overhead while leading the agent to complete the specified task and avoid many side effects. Videos and code are available at https://avoiding-side-effects.github.io/. △ Less

Submitted 22 October, 2020; v1 submitted 11 June, 2020; originally announced June 2020.

Comments: Accepted as spotlight paper at NeurIPS 2020. 10 pages main paper; 19 pages with appendices

Optimal Policies Tend to Seek Power

Authors: Alexander Matt Turner, Logan Smith, Rohin Shah, Andrew Critch, Prasad Tadepalli

Abstract: Some researchers speculate that intelligent reinforcement learning (RL) agents would be incentivized to seek resources and power in pursuit of their objectives. Other researchers point out that RL agents need not have human-like power-seeking instincts. To clarify this discussion, we develop the first formal theory of the statistical tendencies of optimal policies. In the context of Markov decisio… ▽ More Some researchers speculate that intelligent reinforcement learning (RL) agents would be incentivized to seek resources and power in pursuit of their objectives. Other researchers point out that RL agents need not have human-like power-seeking instincts. To clarify this discussion, we develop the first formal theory of the statistical tendencies of optimal policies. In the context of Markov decision processes, we prove that certain environmental symmetries are sufficient for optimal policies to tend to seek power over the environment. These symmetries exist in many environments in which the agent can be shut down or destroyed. We prove that in these environments, most reward functions make it optimal to seek power by keeping a range of options available and, when maximizing average reward, by navigating towards larger sets of potential terminal states. △ Less

Submitted 28 January, 2023; v1 submitted 3 December, 2019; originally announced December 2019.

Comments: Accepted to NeurIPS 2021 as spotlight paper. 12 pages, 44 pages with appendices. Since the 2021 acceptance, we updated the paper to point out that optimal policies can be qualitatively divorced from real-world learned policies

Conservative Agency via Attainable Utility Preservation

Authors: Alexander Matt Turner, Dylan Hadfield-Menell, Prasad Tadepalli

Abstract: Reward functions are easy to misspecify; although designers can make corrections after observing mistakes, an agent pursuing a misspecified reward function can irreversibly change the state of its environment. If that change precludes optimization of the correctly specified reward function, then correction is futile. For example, a robotic factory assistant could break expensive equipment due to a… ▽ More Reward functions are easy to misspecify; although designers can make corrections after observing mistakes, an agent pursuing a misspecified reward function can irreversibly change the state of its environment. If that change precludes optimization of the correctly specified reward function, then correction is futile. For example, a robotic factory assistant could break expensive equipment due to a reward misspecification; even if the designers immediately correct the reward function, the damage is done. To mitigate this risk, we introduce an approach that balances optimization of the primary reward function with preservation of the ability to optimize auxiliary reward functions. Surprisingly, even when the auxiliary reward functions are randomly generated and therefore uninformative about the correctly specified reward function, this approach induces conservative, effective behavior. △ Less

Submitted 10 June, 2020; v1 submitted 25 February, 2019; originally announced February 2019.

Comments: Published in AI, Ethics, and Society 2020