Showing 1–21 of 21 results for author: Veselý, P

Structural Properties of Search Trees with 2-way Comparisons

Authors: Sunny Atalig, Marek Chrobak, Erfan Mousavian, Jiri Sgall, Pavel Vesely

Abstract: Optimal 3-way comparison search trees (3WCST's) can be computed using standard dynamic programming in time O(n^3), and this can be further improved to O(n^2) by taking advantage of the Monge property. In contrast, the fastest algorithm in the literature for computing optimal 2-way comparison search trees (2WCST's) runs in time O(n^4). To shed light on this discrepancy, we study structure propertie… ▽ More Optimal 3-way comparison search trees (3WCST's) can be computed using standard dynamic programming in time O(n^3), and this can be further improved to O(n^2) by taking advantage of the Monge property. In contrast, the fastest algorithm in the literature for computing optimal 2-way comparison search trees (2WCST's) runs in time O(n^4). To shed light on this discrepancy, we study structure properties of 2WCST's. On one hand, we show some new threshold bounds involving key weights that can be helpful in deciding which type of comparison should be at the root of the optimal tree. On the other hand, we also show that the standard techniques for speeding up dynamic programming (the Monge property / quadrangle inequality) do not apply to 2WCST's. △ Less

Submitted 3 November, 2023; originally announced November 2023.

Fully Scalable MPC Algorithms for Clustering in High Dimension

Authors: Artur Czumaj, Guichen Gao, Shaofeng H. -C. Jiang, Robert Krauthgamer, Pavel Veselý

Abstract: We design new parallel algorithms for clustering in high-dimensional Euclidean spaces. These algorithms run in the Massively Parallel Computation (MPC) model, and are fully scalable, meaning that the local memory in each machine may be $n^σ$ for arbitrarily small fixed $σ>0$. Importantly, the local memory may be substantially smaller than the number of clusters $k$, yet all our algorithms are fast… ▽ More We design new parallel algorithms for clustering in high-dimensional Euclidean spaces. These algorithms run in the Massively Parallel Computation (MPC) model, and are fully scalable, meaning that the local memory in each machine may be $n^σ$ for arbitrarily small fixed $σ>0$. Importantly, the local memory may be substantially smaller than the number of clusters $k$, yet all our algorithms are fast, i.e., run in $O(1)$ rounds. We first devise a fast MPC algorithm for $O(1)$-approximation of uniform facility location. This is the first fully-scalable MPC algorithm that achieves $O(1)$-approximation for any clustering problem in general geometric setting; previous algorithms only provide $\mathrm{poly}(\log n)$-approximation or apply to restricted inputs, like low dimension or small number of clusters $k$; e.g. [Bhaskara and Wijewardena, ICML'18; Cohen-Addad et al., NeurIPS'21; Cohen-Addad et al., ICML'22]. We then build on this facility location result and devise a fast MPC algorithm that achieves $O(1)$-bicriteria approximation for $k$-Median and for $k$-Means, namely, it computes $(1+\varepsilon)k$ clusters of cost within $O(1/\varepsilon^2)$-factor of the optimum for $k$ clusters. A primary technical tool that we introduce, and may be of independent interest, is a new MPC primitive for geometric aggregation, namely, computing for every data point a statistic of its approximate neighborhood, for statistics like range counting and nearest-neighbor search. Our implementation of this primitive works in high dimension, and is based on consistent hashing (aka sparse partition), a technique that was recently used for streaming algorithms [Czumaj et al., FOCS'22]. △ Less

Submitted 6 July, 2024; v1 submitted 15 July, 2023; originally announced July 2023.

Streaming Facility Location in High Dimension via Geometric Hashing

Authors: Artur Czumaj, Arnold Filtser, Shaofeng H. -C. Jiang, Robert Krauthgamer, Pavel Veselý, Mingwei Yang

Abstract: In Euclidean Uniform Facility Location (UFL), the input is a set of clients in $\mathbb{R}^d$ and the goal is to place facilities to serve them, so as to minimize the total cost of opening facilities plus connecting the clients. We study the setting of dynamic geometric streams, where the clients are presented as a sequence of insertions and deletions of points in the grid $\{1,\ldots,Δ\}^d$, and… ▽ More In Euclidean Uniform Facility Location (UFL), the input is a set of clients in $\mathbb{R}^d$ and the goal is to place facilities to serve them, so as to minimize the total cost of opening facilities plus connecting the clients. We study the setting of dynamic geometric streams, where the clients are presented as a sequence of insertions and deletions of points in the grid $\{1,\ldots,Δ\}^d$, and we focus on the \emph{high-dimensional regime}, where the algorithm must use space polynomial in $d\cdot\logΔ$. We present a new algorithmic framework, based on importance sampling, for $O(1)$-approximation of UFL using only $\mathrm{poly}(d\cdot\logΔ)$ space. This framework is easy to implement in two passes, one for sampling points and the other for estimating their contribution. Over random-order streams, we can extend this to one pass by using the two halves of the stream separately. Our main result, for arbitrary-order streams, computes $O(d / \log d)$-approximation in one pass by combining the two passes differently. This improves upon previous algorithms that either need space $\exp(d)$ or only guarantee $O(d\cdot\log^2Δ)$-approximation, and therefore our algorithms for high dimension are the first to avoid the $O(\logΔ)$-factor in approximation that is inherent to the widely-used quadtree decomposition. Our improvement is achieved by employing a geometric hashing scheme that maps points in $\mathbb{R}^d$ into buckets of bounded diameter, with the key property that every point set of small-enough diameter is hashed into few buckets. By applying an alternative bound for this hashing, we also obtain an $O(1 / ε)$-approximation in one pass, using larger but still sublinear space $O(n^ε)$ where $n$ is the number of clients. We complement our results by showing $1.085$-approximation requires space exponential in $\mathrm{poly}(d\cdot\logΔ)$. △ Less

Submitted 28 January, 2023; v1 submitted 5 April, 2022; originally announced April 2022.

Comments: The abstract is shortened to meet the length constraint of arXiv

Improved Approximation Guarantees for Shortest Superstrings using Cycle Classification by Overlap to Length Ratios

Authors: Matthias Englert, Nicolaos Matsakis, Pavel Veselý

Abstract: In the Shortest Superstring problem, we are given a set of strings and we are asking for a common superstring, which has the minimum number of characters. The Shortest Superstring problem is NP-hard and several constant-factor approximation algorithms are known for it. Of particular interest is the GREEDY algorithm, which repeatedly merges two strings of maximum overlap until a single string remai… ▽ More In the Shortest Superstring problem, we are given a set of strings and we are asking for a common superstring, which has the minimum number of characters. The Shortest Superstring problem is NP-hard and several constant-factor approximation algorithms are known for it. Of particular interest is the GREEDY algorithm, which repeatedly merges two strings of maximum overlap until a single string remains. The GREEDY algorithm, being simpler than other well-performing approximation algorithms for this problem, has attracted attention since the 1980s and is commonly used in practical applications. Tarhio and Ukkonen (TCS 1988) conjectured that GREEDY gives a 2-approximation. In a seminal work, Blum, Jiang, Li, Tromp, and Yannakakis (STOC 1991) proved that the superstring computed by GREEDY is a 4-approximation, and this upper bound was improved to 3.5 by Kaplan and Shafrir (IPL 2005). We show that the approximation guarantee of GREEDY is at most $(13+\sqrt{57})/6 \approx 3.425$, making the first progress on this question since 2005. Furthermore, we prove that the Shortest Superstring can be approximated within a factor of $(37+\sqrt{57})/18\approx 2.475$, improving slightly upon the currently best $2\frac{11}{23}$-approximation algorithm by Mucha (SODA 2013). △ Less

Submitted 6 November, 2021; originally announced November 2021.

Improved Analysis of Online Balanced Clustering

Authors: Marcin Bienkowski, Martin Böhm, Martin Koutecký, Thomas Rothvoß, Jiří Sgall, Pavel Veselý

Abstract: In the online balanced graph repartitioning problem, one has to maintain a clustering of $n$ nodes into $\ell$ clusters, each having $k = n / \ell$ nodes. During runtime, an online algorithm is given a stream of communication requests between pairs of nodes: an inter-cluster communication costs one unit, while the intra-cluster communication is free. An algorithm can change the clustering, paying… ▽ More In the online balanced graph repartitioning problem, one has to maintain a clustering of $n$ nodes into $\ell$ clusters, each having $k = n / \ell$ nodes. During runtime, an online algorithm is given a stream of communication requests between pairs of nodes: an inter-cluster communication costs one unit, while the intra-cluster communication is free. An algorithm can change the clustering, paying unit cost for each moved node. This natural problem admits a simple $O(\ell^2 \cdot k^2)$-competitive algorithm COMP, whose performance is far apart from the best known lower bound of $Ω(\ell \cdot k)$. One of open questions is whether the dependency on $\ell$ can be made linear; this question is of practical importance as in the typical datacenter application where virtual machines are clustered on physical servers, $\ell$ is of several orders of magnitude larger than $k$. We answer this question affirmatively, proving that a simple modification of COMP is $(\ell \cdot 2^{O(k)})$-competitive. On the technical level, we achieve our bound by translating the problem to a system of linear integer equations and using Graver bases to show the existence of a ``small'' solution. △ Less

Submitted 24 August, 2021; v1 submitted 30 June, 2021; originally announced July 2021.

Theory meets Practice at the Median: a worst case comparison of relative error quantile algorithms

Authors: Graham Cormode, Abhinav Mishra, Joseph Ross, Pavel Veselý

Abstract: Estimating the distribution and quantiles of data is a foundational task in data mining and data science. We study algorithms which provide accurate results for extreme quantile queries using a small amount of space, thus helping to understand the tails of the input distribution. Namely, we focus on two recent state-of-the-art solutions: $t$-digest and ReqSketch. While $t$-digest is a popular comp… ▽ More Estimating the distribution and quantiles of data is a foundational task in data mining and data science. We study algorithms which provide accurate results for extreme quantile queries using a small amount of space, thus helping to understand the tails of the input distribution. Namely, we focus on two recent state-of-the-art solutions: $t$-digest and ReqSketch. While $t$-digest is a popular compact summary which works well in a variety of settings, ReqSketch comes with formal accuracy guarantees at the cost of its size growing as new observations are inserted. In this work, we provide insight into which conditions make one preferable to the other. Namely, we show how to construct inputs for $t$-digest that induce an almost arbitrarily large error and demonstrate that it fails to provide accurate results even on i.i.d. samples from a highly non-uniform distribution. We propose practical improvements to ReqSketch, making it faster than $t$-digest, while its error stays bounded on any instance. Still, our results confirm that $t$-digest remains more accurate on the ``non-adversarial'' data encountered in practice. △ Less

Submitted 10 June, 2021; v1 submitted 18 February, 2021; originally announced February 2021.

Comments: Updated experiments, improved presentation. To appear in KDD 2021

ACM Class: F.2.2

Breaking the Barrier of 2 for the Competitiveness of Longest Queue Drop

Authors: Antonios Antoniadis, Matthias Englert, Nicolaos Matsakis, Pavel Veselý

Abstract: We consider the problem of managing the buffer of a shared-memory switch that transmits packets of unit value. A shared-memory switch consists of an input port, a number of output ports, and a buffer with a specific capacity. In each time step, an arbitrary number of packets arrive at the input port, each packet designated for one output port. Each packet is added to the queue of the respective ou… ▽ More We consider the problem of managing the buffer of a shared-memory switch that transmits packets of unit value. A shared-memory switch consists of an input port, a number of output ports, and a buffer with a specific capacity. In each time step, an arbitrary number of packets arrive at the input port, each packet designated for one output port. Each packet is added to the queue of the respective output port. If the total number of packets exceeds the capacity of the buffer, some packets have to be irrevocably evicted. At the end of each time step, each output port transmits a packet in its queue and the goal is to maximize the number of transmitted packets. The Longest Queue Drop (LQD) online algorithm accepts any arriving packet to the buffer. However, if this results in the buffer exceeding its memory capacity, then LQD drops a packet from whichever queue is currently the longest, breaking ties arbitrarily. The LQD algorithm was first introduced in 1991, and is known to be $2$-competitive since 2001. Although LQD remains the best known online algorithm for the problem and is of practical interest, determining its true competitiveness is a long-standing open problem. We show that LQD is 1.6918-competitive, establishing the first $(2-\varepsilon)$ upper bound for the competitive ratio of LQD, for a constant $\varepsilon>0$. △ Less

Submitted 15 May, 2024; v1 submitted 7 December, 2020; originally announced December 2020.

Comments: A preliminary version appeared at ICALP 2021. This version contains an improved analysis which yields a slightly better upper bound. 30 pages

ACM Class: F.2.2

Streaming Algorithms for Geometric Steiner Forest

Authors: Artur Czumaj, Shaofeng H. -C. Jiang, Robert Krauthgamer, Pavel Veselý

Abstract: We consider an important generalization of the Steiner tree problem, the \emph{Steiner forest problem}, in the Euclidean plane: the input is a multiset $X \subseteq \mathbb{R}^2$, partitioned into $k$ color classes $C_1, C_2, \ldots, C_k \subseteq X$. The goal is to find a minimum-cost Euclidean graph $G$ such that every color class $C_i$ is connected in $G$. We study this Steiner forest problem i… ▽ More We consider an important generalization of the Steiner tree problem, the \emph{Steiner forest problem}, in the Euclidean plane: the input is a multiset $X \subseteq \mathbb{R}^2$, partitioned into $k$ color classes $C_1, C_2, \ldots, C_k \subseteq X$. The goal is to find a minimum-cost Euclidean graph $G$ such that every color class $C_i$ is connected in $G$. We study this Steiner forest problem in the streaming setting, where the stream consists of insertions and deletions of points to $X$. Each input point $x\in X$ arrives with its color $\textsf{color}(x) \in [k]$, and as usual for dynamic geometric streams, the input points are restricted to the discrete grid $\{0, \ldots, Δ\}^2$. We design a single-pass streaming algorithm that uses $\mathrm{poly}(k \cdot \logΔ)$ space and time, and estimates the cost of an optimal Steiner forest solution within ratio arbitrarily close to the famous Euclidean Steiner ratio $α_2$ (currently $1.1547 \le α_2 \le 1.214$). This approximation guarantee matches the state-of-the-art bound for streaming Steiner tree, i.e., when $k=1$, and it is a major open question to improve the ratio to $1 + ε$ even for this special case. Our approach relies on a novel combination of streaming techniques, like sampling and linear sketching, with the classical Arora-style dynamic-programming framework for geometric optimization problems, which usually requires large memory and has so far not been applied in the streaming setting. We complement our streaming algorithm for the Steiner forest problem with simple arguments showing that any finite approximation requires $Ω(k)$ bits of space. △ Less

Submitted 10 May, 2024; v1 submitted 9 November, 2020; originally announced November 2020.

Relative Error Streaming Quantiles

Authors: Graham Cormode, Zohar Karnin, Edo Liberty, Justin Thaler, Pavel Veselý

Abstract: Estimating ranks, quantiles, and distributions over streaming data is a central task in data analysis and monitoring. Given a stream of $n$ items from a data universe equipped with a total order, the task is to compute a sketch (data structure) of size polylogarithmic in $n$. Given the sketch and a query item $y$, one should be able to approximate its rank in the stream, i.e., the number of stream… ▽ More Estimating ranks, quantiles, and distributions over streaming data is a central task in data analysis and monitoring. Given a stream of $n$ items from a data universe equipped with a total order, the task is to compute a sketch (data structure) of size polylogarithmic in $n$. Given the sketch and a query item $y$, one should be able to approximate its rank in the stream, i.e., the number of stream elements smaller than or equal to $y$. Most works to date focused on additive $\varepsilon n$ error approximation, culminating in the KLL sketch that achieved optimal asymptotic behavior. This paper investigates multiplicative $(1\pm\varepsilon)$-error approximations to the rank. Practical motivation for multiplicative error stems from demands to understand the tails of distributions, and hence for sketches to be more accurate near extreme values. The most space-efficient algorithms due to prior work store either $O(\log(\varepsilon^2 n)/\varepsilon^2)$ or $O(\log^3(\varepsilon n)/\varepsilon)$ universe items. We present a randomized sketch storing $O(\log^{1.5}(\varepsilon n)/\varepsilon)$ items that can $(1\pm\varepsilon)$-approximate the rank of each universe item with high constant probability; this space bound is within an $O(\sqrt{\log(\varepsilon n)})$ factor of optimal. Our algorithm does not require prior knowledge of the stream length and is fully mergeable, rendering it suitable for parallel and distributed computing environments. △ Less

Submitted 24 August, 2023; v1 submitted 3 April, 2020; originally announced April 2020.

Comments: Final version of the paper to appear in Journal of the ACM. Compared to the previous version, we removed any restrictions on the accuracy parameters in the main result and thoroughly revised the paper. 48 pages, 2 figures

ACM Class: F.2.2

Streaming Algorithms for Bin Packing and Vector Scheduling

Authors: Graham Cormode, Pavel Veselý

Abstract: Problems involving the efficient arrangement of simple objects, as captured by bin packing and makespan scheduling, are fundamental tasks in combinatorial optimization. These are well understood in the traditional online and offline cases, but have been less well-studied when the volume of the input is truly massive, and cannot even be read into memory. This is captured by the streaming model of c… ▽ More Problems involving the efficient arrangement of simple objects, as captured by bin packing and makespan scheduling, are fundamental tasks in combinatorial optimization. These are well understood in the traditional online and offline cases, but have been less well-studied when the volume of the input is truly massive, and cannot even be read into memory. This is captured by the streaming model of computation, where the aim is to approximate the cost of the solution in one pass over the data, using small space. As a result, streaming algorithms produce concise input summaries that approximately preserve the optimum value. We design the first efficient streaming algorithms for these fundamental problems in combinatorial optimization. For Bin Packing, we provide a streaming asymptotic $1+\varepsilon$-approximation with $\widetilde{O}\left(\frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right)$ memory, where $\widetilde{O}$ hides logarithmic factors. Moreover, such a space bound is essentially optimal. Our algorithm implies a streaming $d+\varepsilon$-approximation for Vector Bin Packing in $d$ dimensions, running in space $\widetilde{O}\left(\frac{d}{\varepsilon}\right)$. For the related Vector Scheduling problem, we show how to construct an input summary in space $\widetilde{O}(d^2\cdot m / \varepsilon^2)$ that preserves the optimum value up to a factor of $2 - \frac{1}{m} +\varepsilon$, where $m$ is the number of identical machines. △ Less

Submitted 13 May, 2019; originally announced May 2019.

Comments: 19 pages, 1 figure, submitted

ACM Class: F.2.2

Tight Lower Bound for Comparison-Based Quantile Summaries

Authors: Graham Cormode, Pavel Veselý

Abstract: Quantiles, such as the median or percentiles, provide concise and useful information about the distribution of a collection of items, drawn from a totally ordered universe. We study data structures, called quantile summaries, which keep track of all quantiles, up to an error of at most $\varepsilon$. That is, an $\varepsilon$-approximate quantile summary first processes a stream of items and then,… ▽ More Quantiles, such as the median or percentiles, provide concise and useful information about the distribution of a collection of items, drawn from a totally ordered universe. We study data structures, called quantile summaries, which keep track of all quantiles, up to an error of at most $\varepsilon$. That is, an $\varepsilon$-approximate quantile summary first processes a stream of items and then, given any quantile query $0\le φ\le 1$, returns an item from the stream, which is a $φ'$-quantile for some $φ' = φ\pm \varepsilon$. We focus on comparison-based quantile summaries that can only compare two items and are otherwise completely oblivious of the universe. The best such deterministic quantile summary to date, due to Greenwald and Khanna (SIGMOD '01), stores at most $O(\frac{1}{\varepsilon}\cdot \log \varepsilon N)$ items, where $N$ is the number of items in the stream. We prove that this space bound is optimal by showing a matching lower bound. Our result thus rules out the possibility of constructing a deterministic comparison-based quantile summary in space $f(\varepsilon)\cdot o(\log N)$, for any function $f$ that does not depend on $N$. As a corollary, we improve the lower bound for biased quantiles, which provide a stronger, relative-error guarantee of $(1\pm \varepsilon)\cdot φ$, and for other related computational tasks. △ Less

Submitted 16 January, 2020; v1 submitted 9 May, 2019; originally announced May 2019.

Comments: 20 pages, 2 figures, major revison of the construction (Sec. 3) and some other parts of the paper

ACM Class: F.2.2

A $φ$-Competitive Algorithm for Scheduling Packets with Deadlines

Authors: Pavel Veselý, Marek Chrobak, Łukasz Jeż, Jiří Sgall

Abstract: In the online packet scheduling problem with deadlines (PacketSchD, for short), the goal is to schedule transmissions of packets that arrive over time in a network switch and need to be sent across a link. Each packet has a deadline, representing its urgency, and a non-negative weight, that represents its priority. Only one packet can be transmitted in any time slot, so if the system is overloaded… ▽ More In the online packet scheduling problem with deadlines (PacketSchD, for short), the goal is to schedule transmissions of packets that arrive over time in a network switch and need to be sent across a link. Each packet has a deadline, representing its urgency, and a non-negative weight, that represents its priority. Only one packet can be transmitted in any time slot, so if the system is overloaded, some packets will inevitably miss their deadlines and be dropped. In this scenario, the natural objective is to compute a transmission schedule that maximizes the total weight of packets that are successfully transmitted. The problem is inherently online, with the scheduling decisions made without the knowledge of future packet arrivals. The central problem concerning PacketSchD, that has been a subject of intensive study since 2001, is to determine the optimal competitive ratio of online algorithms, namely the worst-case ratio between the optimum total weight of a schedule (computed by an offline algorithm) and the weight of a schedule computed by a (deterministic) online algorithm. We solve this open problem by presenting a $φ$-competitive online algorithm for PacketSchD (where $φ\approx 1.618$ is the golden ratio), matching the previously established lower bound. △ Less

Submitted 20 October, 2023; v1 submitted 18 July, 2018; originally announced July 2018.

Comments: Final version of the article, as it existed immediately prior to editing and production by SIAM and being published in SIAM Journal on Computing, published with SIAM's permission

MSC Class: 68W27 ACM Class: F.2.2

Journal ref: SIAM J. Comput. 51(5): 1626-1691 (2022)

Parameterized Approximation Schemes for Steiner Trees with Small Number of Steiner Vertices

Authors: Pavel Dvořák, Andreas Emil Feldmann, Dušan Knop, Tomáš Masařík, Tomáš Toufar, Pavel Veselý

Abstract: We study the Steiner Tree problem, in which a set of terminal vertices needs to be connected in the cheapest possible way in an edge-weighted graph. This problem has been extensively studied from the viewpoint of approximation and also parametrization. In particular, on one hand Steiner Tree is known to be APX-hard, and W[2]-hard on the other, if parameterized by the number of non-terminals (Stein… ▽ More We study the Steiner Tree problem, in which a set of terminal vertices needs to be connected in the cheapest possible way in an edge-weighted graph. This problem has been extensively studied from the viewpoint of approximation and also parametrization. In particular, on one hand Steiner Tree is known to be APX-hard, and W[2]-hard on the other, if parameterized by the number of non-terminals (Steiner vertices) in the optimum solution. In contrast to this we give an efficient parameterized approximation scheme (EPAS), which circumvents both hardness results. Moreover, our methods imply the existence of a polynomial size approximate kernelization scheme (PSAKS) for the considered parameter. We further study the parameterized approximability of other variants of Steiner Tree, such as Directed Steiner Tree and Steiner Forest. For neither of these an EPAS is likely to exist for the studied parameter: for Steiner Forest an easy observation shows that the problem is APX-hard, even if the input graph contains no Steiner vertices. For Directed Steiner Tree we prove that approximating within any function of the studied parameter is W[1]-hard. Nevertheless, we show that an EPAS exists for Unweighted Directed Steiner Tree, but a PSAKS does not. We also prove that there is an EPAS and a PSAKS for Steiner Forest if in addition to the number of Steiner vertices, the number of connected components of an optimal solution is considered to be a parameter. △ Less

Submitted 14 July, 2020; v1 submitted 2 October, 2017; originally announced October 2017.

Comments: 23 pages, 6 figures An extended abstract appeared in proceedings of STACS 2018

ACM Class: F.2.2; G.2.2

Journal ref: SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics 35(1), 546-574 (2021)

On Packet Scheduling with Adversarial Jamming and Speedup

Authors: Martin Böhm, Łukasz Jeż, Jiří Sgall, Pavel Veselý

Abstract: In Packet Scheduling with Adversarial Jamming packets of arbitrary sizes arrive over time to be transmitted over a channel in which instantaneous jamming errors occur at times chosen by the adversary and not known to the algorithm. The transmission taking place at the time of jamming is corrupt, and the algorithm learns this fact immediately. An online algorithm maximizes the total size of packets… ▽ More In Packet Scheduling with Adversarial Jamming packets of arbitrary sizes arrive over time to be transmitted over a channel in which instantaneous jamming errors occur at times chosen by the adversary and not known to the algorithm. The transmission taking place at the time of jamming is corrupt, and the algorithm learns this fact immediately. An online algorithm maximizes the total size of packets it successfully transmits and the goal is to develop an algorithm with the lowest possible asymptotic competitive ratio, where the additive constant may depend on packet sizes. Our main contribution is a universal algorithm that works for any speedup and packet sizes and, unlike previous algorithms for the problem, it does not need to know these properties in advance. We show that this algorithm guarantees 1-competitiveness with speedup 4, making it the first known algorithm to maintain 1-competitiveness with a moderate speedup in the general setting of arbitrary packet sizes. We also prove a lower bound of $φ+1\approx 2.618$ on the speedup of any 1-competitive deterministic algorithm, showing that our algorithm is close to the optimum. Additionally, we formulate a general framework for analyzing our algorithm locally and use it to show upper bounds on its competitive ratio for speedups in $[1,4)$ and for several special cases, recovering some previously known results, each of which had a dedicated proof. In particular, our algorithm is 3-competitive without speedup, matching both the (worst-case) performance of the algorithm by Jurdzinski et al. and the lower bound by Anta et al. △ Less

Submitted 6 August, 2018; v1 submitted 19 May, 2017; originally announced May 2017.

Comments: Appeared in Proc. of the 15th Workshop on Approximation and Online Algorithms (WAOA 2017)

ACM Class: F.2.2

Logarithmic price of buffer downscaling on line metrics

Authors: Marcin Bienkowski, Martin Böhm, Łukasz Jeż, Paweł Laskoś-Grabowski, Jan Marcinkowski, Jiří Sgall, Aleksandra Spyra, Pavel Veselý

Abstract: We consider the reordering buffer problem on a line consisting of n equidistant points. We show that, for any constant delta, an (offline) algorithm that has a buffer (1-delta) k performs worse by a factor of Omega(log n) than an offline algorithm with buffer k. In particular, this demonstrates that the O(log n)-competitive online algorithm MovingPartition by Gamzu and Segev (ACM Trans. on Algorit… ▽ More We consider the reordering buffer problem on a line consisting of n equidistant points. We show that, for any constant delta, an (offline) algorithm that has a buffer (1-delta) k performs worse by a factor of Omega(log n) than an offline algorithm with buffer k. In particular, this demonstrates that the O(log n)-competitive online algorithm MovingPartition by Gamzu and Segev (ACM Trans. on Algorithms, 6(1), 2009) is essentially optimal against any offline algorithm with a slightly larger buffer. △ Less

Submitted 22 July, 2017; v1 submitted 16 October, 2016; originally announced October 2016.

MSC Class: 68W01; 68W05; 68W40; 68Q25

Online Packet Scheduling with Bounded Delay and Lookahead

Authors: Martin Böhm, Marek Chrobak, Łukasz Jeż, Fei Li, Jiří Sgall, Pavel Veselý

Abstract: We study the online bounded-delay packet scheduling problem (BDPS), where packets of unit size arrive at a router over time and need to be transmitted over a network link. Each packet has two attributes: a non-negative weight and a deadline for its transmission. The objective is to maximize the total weight of the transmitted packets. This problem has been well studied in the literature, yet its o… ▽ More We study the online bounded-delay packet scheduling problem (BDPS), where packets of unit size arrive at a router over time and need to be transmitted over a network link. Each packet has two attributes: a non-negative weight and a deadline for its transmission. The objective is to maximize the total weight of the transmitted packets. This problem has been well studied in the literature, yet its optimal competitive ratio remains unknown: the best upper bound is $1.828$, still quite far from the best lower bound of $φ\approx 1.618$. In the variant of BDPS with $s$-bounded instances, each packet can be scheduled in at most $s$ consecutive slots, starting at its release time. The lower bound of $φ$ applies even to the special case of $2$-bounded instances, and a $φ$-competitive algorithm for $3$-bounded instances was given in Chin et al. Improving that result, and addressing a question posed by Goldwasser, we present a $φ$-competitive algorithm for $4$-bounded instances. We also study a variant of BDPS where an online algorithm has the additional power of $1$-lookahead, knowing at time $t$ which packets will arrive at time $t+1$. For BDPS with $1$-lookahead restricted to $2$-bounded instances, we present an online algorithm with competitive ratio $(\sqrt{13} - 1)/2 \approx 1.303$ and we prove a nearly tight lower bound of $(1 + \sqrt{17})/4 \approx 1.281$. △ Less

Submitted 30 June, 2016; originally announced June 2016.

Comments: 18 pages, 4 figures, submitted to ISAAC 2016

ACM Class: F.2.2

Online Chromatic Number is PSPACE-Complete

Authors: Martin Böhm, Pavel Veselý

Abstract: In the online graph coloring problem, vertices from a graph G, known in advance, arrive in an online fashion and an algorithm must immediately assign a color to each incoming vertex v so that the revealed graph is properly colored. The exact location of v in the graph G is not known to the algorithm. The online chromatic number of G is the smallest number of colors such that some online algorithm… ▽ More In the online graph coloring problem, vertices from a graph G, known in advance, arrive in an online fashion and an algorithm must immediately assign a color to each incoming vertex v so that the revealed graph is properly colored. The exact location of v in the graph G is not known to the algorithm. The online chromatic number of G is the smallest number of colors such that some online algorithm is able to properly color G for any incoming order. We prove that computing the online chromatic number of a graph is PSPACE-complete. △ Less

Submitted 26 June, 2017; v1 submitted 20 April, 2016; originally announced April 2016.

MSC Class: 68Q25 ACM Class: F.2.2

A Two-Phase Algorithm for Bin Stretching with Stretching Factor 1.5

Authors: Martin Böhm, Jiří Sgall, Rob van Stee, Pavel Veselý

Abstract: Online Bin Stretching is a semi-online variant of bin packing in which the algorithm has to use the same number of bins as an optimal packing, but is allowed to slightly overpack the bins. The goal is to minimize the amount of overpacking, i.e., the maximum size packed into any bin. We give an algorithm for Online Bin Stretching with a stretching factor of 1.5 for any number of bins. We build on… ▽ More Online Bin Stretching is a semi-online variant of bin packing in which the algorithm has to use the same number of bins as an optimal packing, but is allowed to slightly overpack the bins. The goal is to minimize the amount of overpacking, i.e., the maximum size packed into any bin. We give an algorithm for Online Bin Stretching with a stretching factor of 1.5 for any number of bins. We build on previous algorithms and use a two-phase approach. However, our analysis is technically more complicated and uses amortization over the bins with the help of two weight functions. △ Less

Submitted 20 August, 2016; v1 submitted 29 January, 2016; originally announced January 2016.

Comments: Preprint of a journal version; updated title and some minor edits. The conference version can be found at arXiv:1404.5569 version 2

MSC Class: 68W27; 68W40

Online Algorithms for Multi-Level Aggregation

Authors: Marcin Bienkowski, Martin Böhm, Jaroslaw Byrka, Marek Chrobak, Christoph Dürr, Lukáš Folwarczný, Łukasz Jeż, Jiří Sgall, Nguyen Kim Thang, Pavel Veselý

Abstract: In the Multi-Level Aggregation Problem (MLAP), requests arrive at the nodes of an edge-weighted tree T, and have to be served eventually. A service is defined as a subtree X of T that contains its root. This subtree X serves all requests that are pending in the nodes of X, and the cost of this service is equal to the total weight of X. Each request also incurs waiting cost between its arrival and… ▽ More In the Multi-Level Aggregation Problem (MLAP), requests arrive at the nodes of an edge-weighted tree T, and have to be served eventually. A service is defined as a subtree X of T that contains its root. This subtree X serves all requests that are pending in the nodes of X, and the cost of this service is equal to the total weight of X. Each request also incurs waiting cost between its arrival and service times. The objective is to minimize the total waiting cost of all requests plus the total cost of all service subtrees. MLAP is a generalization of some well-studied optimization problems; for example, for trees of depth 1, MLAP is equivalent to the TCP Acknowledgment Problem, while for trees of depth 2, it is equivalent to the Joint Replenishment Problem. Aggregation problem for trees of arbitrary depth arise in multicasting, sensor networks, communication in organization hierarchies, and in supply-chain management. The instances of MLAP associated with these applications are naturally online, in the sense that aggregation decisions need to be made without information about future requests. Constant-competitive online algorithms are known for MLAP with one or two levels. However, it has been open whether there exist constant competitive online algorithms for trees of depth more than 2. Addressing this open problem, we give the first constant competitive online algorithm for networks of arbitrary (fixed) number of levels. The competitive ratio is O(D^4 2^D), where D is the depth of T. The algorithm works for arbitrary waiting cost functions, including the variant with deadlines. We also show several additional lower and upper bound results for some special cases of MLAP, including the Single-Phase variant and the case when the tree is a path. △ Less

Submitted 28 December, 2016; v1 submitted 9 July, 2015; originally announced July 2015.

Online Bin Stretching with Three Bins

Authors: Martin Böhm, Jiří Sgall, Rob van Stee, Pavel Veselý

Abstract: Online Bin Stretching is a semi-online variant of bin packing in which the algorithm has to use the same number of bins as an optimal packing, but is allowed to slightly overpack the bins. The goal is to minimize the amount of overpacking, i.e., the maximum size packed into any bin. We give an algorithm for Online Bin Stretching with a stretching factor of $11/8 = 1.375$ for three bins. Addition… ▽ More Online Bin Stretching is a semi-online variant of bin packing in which the algorithm has to use the same number of bins as an optimal packing, but is allowed to slightly overpack the bins. The goal is to minimize the amount of overpacking, i.e., the maximum size packed into any bin. We give an algorithm for Online Bin Stretching with a stretching factor of $11/8 = 1.375$ for three bins. Additionally, we present a lower bound of $45/33 = 1.\overline{36}$ for Online Bin Stretching on three bins and a lower bound of $19/14$ for four and five bins that were discovered using a computer search. △ Less

Submitted 1 February, 2016; v1 submitted 22 April, 2014; originally announced April 2014.

Comments: Preprint of a journal version. See version 2 for the conference paper. Conference paper split into two journal submissions; see arXiv:1601.08111

MSC Class: 68W27; 68W40

Online Colored Bin Packing

Authors: Martin Böhm, Jiří Sgall, Pavel Veselý

Abstract: In the Colored Bin Packing problem a sequence of items of sizes up to $1$ arrives to be packed into bins of unit capacity. Each item has one of $c\geq 2$ colors and an additional constraint is that we cannot pack two items of the same color next to each other in the same bin. The objective is to minimize the number of bins. In the important special case when all items have size zero, we characte… ▽ More In the Colored Bin Packing problem a sequence of items of sizes up to $1$ arrives to be packed into bins of unit capacity. Each item has one of $c\geq 2$ colors and an additional constraint is that we cannot pack two items of the same color next to each other in the same bin. The objective is to minimize the number of bins. In the important special case when all items have size zero, we characterize the optimal value to be equal to color discrepancy. As our main result, we give an (asymptotically) 1.5-competitive algorithm which is optimal. In fact, the algorithm always uses at most $\lceil1.5\cdot OPT\rceil$ bins and we show a matching lower bound of $\lceil1.5\cdot OPT\rceil$ for any value of $OPT\geq 2$. In particular, the absolute ratio of our algorithm is $5/3$ and this is optimal. For items of unrestricted sizes we give an asymptotically $3.5$-competitive algorithm. When the items have sizes at most $1/d$ for a real $d \geq 2$ the asymptotic competitive ratio is $1.5+d/(d-1)$. We also show that classical algorithms First Fit, Best Fit and Worst Fit are not constant competitive, which holds already for three colors and small items. In the case of two colors---the Black and White Bin Packing problem---we prove that all Any Fit algorithms have absolute competitive ratio $3$. When the items have sizes at most $1/d$ for a real $d \geq 2$ we show that the Worst Fit algorithm is absolutely $(1+d/(d-1))$-competitive. △ Less

Submitted 3 December, 2014; v1 submitted 22 April, 2014; originally announced April 2014.

Comments: Added lower bound of 2.5 for at least three colors, expanded some proofs