-
An Efficient Multi-objective Evolutionary Approach for Solving the Operation of Multi-Reservoir System Scheduling in Hydro-Power Plants
Authors:
C. G. Marcelino,
G. M. C. Leite,
C. A. D. M Delgado,
L. B. de Oliveira,
E. F. Wanner,
S. Jiménez-Fernández,
S. Salcedo-Sanz
Abstract:
This paper tackles the short-term hydro-power unit commitment problem in a multi-reservoir system - a cascade-based operation scenario. For this, we propose a new mathematical modelling in which the goal is to maximize the total energy production of the hydro-power plant in a sub-daily operation, and, simultaneously, to maximize the total water content (volume) of reservoirs. For solving the probl…
▽ More
This paper tackles the short-term hydro-power unit commitment problem in a multi-reservoir system - a cascade-based operation scenario. For this, we propose a new mathematical modelling in which the goal is to maximize the total energy production of the hydro-power plant in a sub-daily operation, and, simultaneously, to maximize the total water content (volume) of reservoirs. For solving the problem, we discuss the Multi-objective Evolutionary Swarm Hybridization (MESH) algorithm, a recently proposed multi-objective swarm intelligence-based optimization method which has obtained very competitive results when compared to existing evolutionary algorithms in specific applications. The MESH approach has been applied to find the optimal water discharge and the power produced at the maximum reservoir volume for all possible combinations of turbines in a hydro-power plant. The performance of MESH has been compared with that of well-known evolutionary approaches such as NSGA-II, NSGA-III, SPEA2, and MOEA/D in a realistic problem considering data from a hydro-power energy system with two cascaded hydro-power plants in Brazil. Results indicate that MESH showed a superior performance than alternative multi-objective approaches in terms of efficiency and accuracy, providing a profit of \$412,500 per month in a projection analysis carried out.
△ Less
Submitted 28 July, 2021; v1 submitted 20 July, 2021;
originally announced July 2021.
-
A multi-objective time series analysis of community mobility reduction comparing first and second COVID-19 waves
Authors:
Gabriela Cavalcante da Silva,
Fernanda Monteiro de Almeida,
Sabrina Oliveira,
Leonardo C. T. Bezerra,
Elizabeth F. Wanner,
Ricardo H. C. Takahashi
Abstract:
With the logistic challenges faced by most countries for the production, distribution, and application of vaccines for the novel coronavirus disease~(COVID-19), social distancing~(SD) remains the most tangible approach to mitigate the spread of the virus. To assist SD monitoring, several tech companies have made publicly available anonymized mobility data. In this work, we conduct a multi-objectiv…
▽ More
With the logistic challenges faced by most countries for the production, distribution, and application of vaccines for the novel coronavirus disease~(COVID-19), social distancing~(SD) remains the most tangible approach to mitigate the spread of the virus. To assist SD monitoring, several tech companies have made publicly available anonymized mobility data. In this work, we conduct a multi-objective mobility reduction rate comparison between the first and second COVID-19 waves in several localities from America and Europe using Google community mobility reports~(CMR) data. Through multi-dimensional visualization, we are able to compare in a Pareto-compliant way the reduction in mobility from the different lockdown periods for each locality selected, simultaneously considering all place categories provided in CMR. In addition, our analysis comprises a 56-day lockdown period for each locality and COVID-19 wave, which we analyze both as 56-day periods and as 14-day consecutive windows. Results vary considerably as a function of the locality considered, particularly when the temporal evolution of the mobility reduction is considered. We thus discuss each locality individually, relating social distancing measures and the reduction observed.
△ Less
Submitted 28 February, 2021;
originally announced March 2021.
-
Analyzing Dominance Move (MIP-DoM) Indicator for Multi- and Many-objective Optimization
Authors:
Claudio Lucio do Val Lopes,
Flávio Vinícius Cruzeiro Martins,
Elizabeth Fialho Wanner,
Kalyanmoy Deb
Abstract:
Dominance move (DoM) is a binary quality indicator that can be used in multi-objective and many-objective optimization to compare two solution sets obtained from different algorithms. The DoM indicator can differentiate the sets for certain important features, such as convergence, spread, uniformity, and cardinality. DoM does not use any reference, and it has an intuitive and physical meaning, sim…
▽ More
Dominance move (DoM) is a binary quality indicator that can be used in multi-objective and many-objective optimization to compare two solution sets obtained from different algorithms. The DoM indicator can differentiate the sets for certain important features, such as convergence, spread, uniformity, and cardinality. DoM does not use any reference, and it has an intuitive and physical meaning, similar to the $ε$-indicator, and calculates the minimum total move of members of one set so that all elements in another set are to be dominated or identical to at least one member of the first set. Despite the aforementioned properties, DoM is hard to calculate, particularly in higher dimensions. There is an efficient and exact method to calculate it in a bi-objective case only. This work proposes a novel approach to calculate DoM using a mixed integer programming (MIP) approach, which can handle sets with three or more objectives and is shown to overcome the $ε$-indicator's information loss. Experiments, in the bi-objective space, are done to verify the model's correctness. Furthermore, other experiments, using 3, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30-objective problems are performed to show how the model behaves in higher-dimensional cases. Algorithms, such as IBEA, MOEA/D, NSGA-III, NSGA-II, and SPEA2 are used to generate the solution sets (however any other algorithms can also be used with the proposed MIP-DoM indicator). Further extensions are discussed to handle certain idiosyncrasies with some solution sets and also to improve the quality indicator and its use for other situations.
△ Less
Submitted 5 February, 2021; v1 submitted 21 December, 2020;
originally announced December 2020.
-
Google COVID-19 community mobility reports: insights from multi-criteria decision making
Authors:
Gabriela Cavalcante da Silvaa,
Sabrina Oliveirab,
Elizabeth F. Wanner,
Leonardo C. T. Bezerra
Abstract:
Social distancing (SD) has been critical in the fight against the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19). To aid SD monitoring, many technology companies have made available mobility data, the most prominent example being the community mobility reports (CMR) provided by Google. Given the wide range of research fields that have been drawing insights from CMR data, there has been a rising concern for…
▽ More
Social distancing (SD) has been critical in the fight against the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19). To aid SD monitoring, many technology companies have made available mobility data, the most prominent example being the community mobility reports (CMR) provided by Google. Given the wide range of research fields that have been drawing insights from CMR data, there has been a rising concern for methodological discussion on how to use them. Indeed, Google recently released their own guidelines, concerning the nature of the place categories and the need for calibrating regional values. In this work, we discuss how measures developed in the field of multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) might benefit researchers analyzing this data. Concretely, we discuss how Pareto dominance and performance measures adopted in MCDM enable the mobility evaluation for (i) multiple categories for a given time period and (ii) multiple categories over multiple time periods. We empirically demonstrate these approaches conducting both a region- and country-level analysis, comparing some of the most relevant outbreak examples from different continents.
△ Less
Submitted 17 September, 2020;
originally announced September 2020.
-
An Assignment Problem Formulation for Dominance Move Indicator
Authors:
Claudio Lucio do Val Lopes,
Flávio Vinícius Cruzeiro Martins,
Elizabeth F. Wanner
Abstract:
Dominance move (DoM) is a binary quality indicator to compare solution sets in multiobjective optimization. The indicator allows a more natural and intuitive relation when comparing solution sets. It is Pareto compliant and does not demand any parameters or reference sets. In spite of its advantages, the combinatorial calculation nature is a limitation. The original formulation presents an efficie…
▽ More
Dominance move (DoM) is a binary quality indicator to compare solution sets in multiobjective optimization. The indicator allows a more natural and intuitive relation when comparing solution sets. It is Pareto compliant and does not demand any parameters or reference sets. In spite of its advantages, the combinatorial calculation nature is a limitation. The original formulation presents an efficient method to calculate it in a biobjective case only. This work presents an assignment formulation to calculate DoM in problems with three objectives or more. Some initial experiments, in the biobjective space, were done to present the model correctness. Next, other experiments, using three dimensions, were also done to show how DoM could be compared with other indicators: inverted generational distance (IGD) and hypervolume (HV). Results show the assignment formulation for DoM is valid for more than three objectives. However, there are some strengths and weaknesses, which are discussed and detailed. Some notes, considerations, and future research paths conclude this work.
△ Less
Submitted 14 May, 2020; v1 submitted 25 February, 2020;
originally announced February 2020.
-
Dominance Move calculation using a MIP approach for comparison of multi and many-objective optimization solution sets
Authors:
Claudio Lucio do Val Lopes,
Flávio Vinícius Cruzeiro Martins,
Elizabeth Fialho Wanner
Abstract:
Dominance move (DoM) is a binary quality indicator that can be used in multiobjective optimization. It can compare solution sets while representing some important features such as convergence, spread, uniformity, and cardinality. DoM has an intuitive concept and considers the minimum move of one set needed to weakly Pareto dominate the other set. Despite the aforementioned properties, DoM is hard…
▽ More
Dominance move (DoM) is a binary quality indicator that can be used in multiobjective optimization. It can compare solution sets while representing some important features such as convergence, spread, uniformity, and cardinality. DoM has an intuitive concept and considers the minimum move of one set needed to weakly Pareto dominate the other set. Despite the aforementioned properties, DoM is hard to calculate. The original formulation presents an efficient and exact method to calculate it in a biobjective case only. This work presents a new approach to calculate and extend DoM to deal with three or more objectives. The idea is to use a mixed integer programming (MIP) approach to calculate DoM. Some initial experiments, in the biobjective space, were done to verify the model correctness. Furthermore, other experiments, using three, five, and ten objective functions were done to show how the model behaves in higher dimensional cases. Algorithms such as IBEA, MOEAD, NSGAIII, NSGAII, and SPEA2 were used to generate the solution sets, however any other algorithms could be used with DoM indicator. The results have confirmed the effectiveness of the MIP DoM in problems with more than three objective functions. Final notes, considerations, and future research are discussed to exploit some solution sets particularities and improve the model and its use for other situations.
△ Less
Submitted 10 January, 2020;
originally announced January 2020.
-
Sample size calculations for the experimental comparison of multiple algorithms on multiple problem instances
Authors:
Felipe Campelo,
Elizabeth F. Wanner
Abstract:
This work presents a statistically principled method for estimating the required number of instances in the experimental comparison of multiple algorithms on a given problem class of interest. This approach generalises earlier results by allowing researchers to design experiments based on the desired best, worst, mean or median-case statistical power to detect differences between algorithms larger…
▽ More
This work presents a statistically principled method for estimating the required number of instances in the experimental comparison of multiple algorithms on a given problem class of interest. This approach generalises earlier results by allowing researchers to design experiments based on the desired best, worst, mean or median-case statistical power to detect differences between algorithms larger than a certain threshold. Holm's step-down procedure is used to maintain the overall significance level controlled at desired levels, without resulting in overly conservative experiments. This paper also presents an approach for sampling each algorithm on each instance, based on optimal sample size ratios that minimise the total required number of runs subject to a desired accuracy in the estimation of paired differences. A case study investigating the effect of 21 variants of a custom-tailored Simulated Annealing for a class of scheduling problems is used to illustrate the application of the proposed methods for sample size calculations in the experimental comparison of algorithms.
△ Less
Submitted 5 August, 2019;
originally announced August 2019.
