Redefining Relationships in Music
Authors:
Christian Detweiler,
Beth Coleman,
Fernando Diaz,
Lieke Dom,
Chris Donahue,
Jesse Engel,
Cheng-Zhi Anna Huang,
Larry James,
Ethan Manilow,
Amanda McCroskery,
Kyle Pedersen,
Pamela Peter-Agbia,
Negar Rostamzadeh,
Robert Thomas,
Marco Zamarato,
Ben Zevenbergen
Abstract:
AI tools increasingly shape how we discover, make and experience music. While these tools can have the potential to empower creativity, they may fundamentally redefine relationships between stakeholders, to the benefit of some and the detriment of others. In this position paper, we argue that these tools will fundamentally reshape our music culture, with profound effects (for better and for worse)…
▽ More
AI tools increasingly shape how we discover, make and experience music. While these tools can have the potential to empower creativity, they may fundamentally redefine relationships between stakeholders, to the benefit of some and the detriment of others. In this position paper, we argue that these tools will fundamentally reshape our music culture, with profound effects (for better and for worse) on creators, consumers and the commercial enterprises that often connect them. By paying careful attention to emerging Music AI technologies and developments in other creative domains and understanding the implications, people working in this space could decrease the possible negative impacts on the practice, consumption and meaning of music. Given that many of these technologies are already available, there is some urgency in conducting analyses of these technologies now. It is important that people developing and working with these tools address these issues now to help guide their evolution to be equitable and empower creativity. We identify some potential risks and opportunities associated with existing and forthcoming AI tools for music, though more work is needed to identify concrete actions which leverage the opportunities while mitigating risks.
△ Less
Submitted 16 December, 2022; v1 submitted 13 December, 2022;
originally announced December 2022.
Android Private Compute Core Architecture
Authors:
Eugenio Marchiori,
Sarah de Haas,
Sergey Volnov,
Ronnie Falcon,
Roxanne Pinto,
Marco Zamarato
Abstract:
Android's Private Compute Core (PCC) is a secure, isolated environment within the operating system, that maintains separation from apps while enabling users and developers to maintain control over their data. It is backed by open-source code in the Android Framework introduced in Android 12. PCC allows features to communicate with a server to receive model updates and contribute to global model tr…
▽ More
Android's Private Compute Core (PCC) is a secure, isolated environment within the operating system, that maintains separation from apps while enabling users and developers to maintain control over their data. It is backed by open-source code in the Android Framework introduced in Android 12. PCC allows features to communicate with a server to receive model updates and contribute to global model training through Private Compute Services (PCS), the core of which has been open sourced. PCC is part of the OS, and by virtue of being isolated, constrained, and trusted, it can host sophisticated ML features. The hosted features themselves, running inside PCC, can be closed source and updatable. In this way, PCC enables machine learning features to process ambient and OS-level data and improve over time, while restricting the availability of information about individual users to servers or apps.
△ Less
Submitted 22 September, 2022; v1 submitted 21 September, 2022;
originally announced September 2022.
