One Step at a Time: Does Gradualism Build Coordination?
Authors:
Maoliang Ye,
Jie Zheng,
Plamen Nikolov,
Sam Asher
Abstract:
This study investigates a potential mechanism to promote coordination. With theoretical guidance using a belief-based learning model, we conduct a multi-period, binary-choice, and weakest-link laboratory coordination experiment to study the effect of gradualism - increasing the required levels (stakes) of contributions slowly over time rather than requiring a high level of contribution immediately…
▽ More
This study investigates a potential mechanism to promote coordination. With theoretical guidance using a belief-based learning model, we conduct a multi-period, binary-choice, and weakest-link laboratory coordination experiment to study the effect of gradualism - increasing the required levels (stakes) of contributions slowly over time rather than requiring a high level of contribution immediately - on group coordination performance. We randomly assign subjects to three treatments: starting and continuing at a high stake, starting at a low stake but jumping to a high stake after a few periods, and starting at a low stake while gradually increasing the stakes over time (the Gradualism treatment). We find that relative to the other two treatments, groups coordinate most successfully at high stakes in the Gradualism treatment. We also find evidence that supports the belief-based learning model. These findings point to a simple mechanism for promoting successful voluntary coordination.
△ Less
Submitted 2 June, 2020;
originally announced June 2020.
Partial Identification of Expectations with Interval Data
Authors:
Sam Asher,
Paul Novosad,
Charlie Rafkin
Abstract:
A conditional expectation function (CEF) can at best be partially identified when the conditioning variable is interval censored. When the number of bins is small, existing methods often yield minimally informative bounds. We propose three innovations that make meaningful inference possible in interval data contexts. First, we prove novel nonparametric bounds for contexts where the distribution of…
▽ More
A conditional expectation function (CEF) can at best be partially identified when the conditioning variable is interval censored. When the number of bins is small, existing methods often yield minimally informative bounds. We propose three innovations that make meaningful inference possible in interval data contexts. First, we prove novel nonparametric bounds for contexts where the distribution of the censored variable is known. Second, we show that a class of measures that describe the conditional mean across a fixed interval of the conditioning space can often be bounded tightly even when the CEF itself cannot. Third, we show that a constraint on CEF curvature can either tighten bounds or can substitute for the monotonicity assumption often made in interval data applications. We derive analytical bounds that use the first two innovations, and develop a numerical method to calculate bounds under the third. We show the performance of the method in simulations and then present two applications. First, we resolve a known problem in the estimation of mortality as a function of education: because individuals with high school or less are a smaller and thus more negatively selected group over time, estimates of their mortality change are likely to be biased. Our method makes it possible to hold education rank bins constant over time, revealing that current estimates of rising mortality for less educated women are biased upward in some cases by a factor of three. Second, we apply the method to the estimation of intergenerational mobility, where researchers frequently use coarsely measured education data in the many contexts where matched parent-child income data are unavailable. Conventional measures like the rank-rank correlation may be uninformative once interval censoring is taken into account; CEF interval-based measures of mobility are bounded tightly.
△ Less
Submitted 28 February, 2018;
originally announced February 2018.
