Perspectives for self-driving labs in synthetic biology
Authors:
Hector Garcia Martin,
Tijana Radivojevic,
Jeremy Zucker,
Kristofer Bouchard,
Jess Sustarich,
Sean Peisert,
Dan Arnold,
Nathan Hillson,
Gyorgy Babnigg,
Jose Manuel Marti,
Christopher J. Mungall,
Gregg T. Beckham,
Lucas Waldburger,
James Carothers,
ShivShankar Sundaram,
Deb Agarwal,
Blake A. Simmons,
Tyler Backman,
Deepanwita Banerjee,
Deepti Tanjore,
Lavanya Ramakrishnan,
Anup Singh
Abstract:
Self-driving labs (SDLs) combine fully automated experiments with artificial intelligence (AI) that decides the next set of experiments. Taken to their ultimate expression, SDLs could usher a new paradigm of scientific research, where the world is probed, interpreted, and explained by machines for human benefit. While there are functioning SDLs in the fields of chemistry and materials science, we…
▽ More
Self-driving labs (SDLs) combine fully automated experiments with artificial intelligence (AI) that decides the next set of experiments. Taken to their ultimate expression, SDLs could usher a new paradigm of scientific research, where the world is probed, interpreted, and explained by machines for human benefit. While there are functioning SDLs in the fields of chemistry and materials science, we contend that synthetic biology provides a unique opportunity since the genome provides a single target for affecting the incredibly wide repertoire of biological cell behavior. However, the level of investment required for the creation of biological SDLs is only warranted if directed towards solving difficult and enabling biological questions. Here, we discuss challenges and opportunities in creating SDLs for synthetic biology.
△ Less
Submitted 1 November, 2022; v1 submitted 14 October, 2022;
originally announced October 2022.
Proofreading mechanism of Class 2 CRISPR-Cas systems
Authors:
Aset Khakimzhan,
David Garenne,
Benjamin I. Tickman,
Jason Fontana,
James Carothers,
Vincent Noireaux
Abstract:
CRISPR systems experience off-target effects that interfere with the ability to accurately perform genetic edits. While empirical models predict off-target effects in specific platforms, there is a gap for a wide-ranging mechanistic model of CRISPR systems based on evidence from the essential processes of target recognition. In this work, we present a first principles model supported by many exper…
▽ More
CRISPR systems experience off-target effects that interfere with the ability to accurately perform genetic edits. While empirical models predict off-target effects in specific platforms, there is a gap for a wide-ranging mechanistic model of CRISPR systems based on evidence from the essential processes of target recognition. In this work, we present a first principles model supported by many experiments performed in vivo and in vitro. First, we observe and model the conformational changes and discrete stepped DNA unwinding events of SpCas9-CRISPR target recognition process in a cell-free transcription-translation system using truncated guide RNAs, confirming structural and FRET microscopy experiments. Second, we implement an energy landscape to describe single mismatch effects observed in vivo for spCas9 and Cas12a CRISPR systems. From the mismatch analysis results we uncover that CRISPR class 2 systems maintain their kinetic proofreading mechanism by utilizing intermittent energetic barriers and we show how to leverage the landscape to improve target specificity.
△ Less
Submitted 20 April, 2020;
originally announced April 2020.
