-
Depth Separations in Neural Networks: Separating the Dimension from the Accuracy
Authors:
Itay Safran,
Daniel Reichman,
Paul Valiant
Abstract:
We prove an exponential separation between depth 2 and depth 3 neural networks, when approximating an $\mathcal{O}(1)$-Lipschitz target function to constant accuracy, with respect to a distribution with support in $[0,1]^{d}$, assuming exponentially bounded weights. This addresses an open problem posed in \citet{safran2019depth}, and proves that the curse of dimensionality manifests in depth 2 app…
▽ More
We prove an exponential separation between depth 2 and depth 3 neural networks, when approximating an $\mathcal{O}(1)$-Lipschitz target function to constant accuracy, with respect to a distribution with support in $[0,1]^{d}$, assuming exponentially bounded weights. This addresses an open problem posed in \citet{safran2019depth}, and proves that the curse of dimensionality manifests in depth 2 approximation, even in cases where the target function can be represented efficiently using depth 3. Previously, lower bounds that were used to separate depth 2 from depth 3 required that at least one of the Lipschitz parameter, target accuracy or (some measure of) the size of the domain of approximation scale polynomially with the input dimension, whereas we fix the former two and restrict our domain to the unit hypercube. Our lower bound holds for a wide variety of activation functions, and is based on a novel application of an average- to worst-case random self-reducibility argument, to reduce the problem to threshold circuits lower bounds.
△ Less
Submitted 11 February, 2024;
originally announced February 2024.
-
Optimality in Mean Estimation: Beyond Worst-Case, Beyond Sub-Gaussian, and Beyond $1+α$ Moments
Authors:
Trung Dang,
Jasper C. H. Lee,
Maoyuan Song,
Paul Valiant
Abstract:
There is growing interest in improving our algorithmic understanding of fundamental statistical problems such as mean estimation, driven by the goal of understanding the limits of what we can extract from valuable data. The state of the art results for mean estimation in $\mathbb{R}$ are 1) the optimal sub-Gaussian mean estimator by [LV22], with the tight sub-Gaussian constant for all distribution…
▽ More
There is growing interest in improving our algorithmic understanding of fundamental statistical problems such as mean estimation, driven by the goal of understanding the limits of what we can extract from valuable data. The state of the art results for mean estimation in $\mathbb{R}$ are 1) the optimal sub-Gaussian mean estimator by [LV22], with the tight sub-Gaussian constant for all distributions with finite but unknown variance, and 2) the analysis of the median-of-means algorithm by [BCL13] and a lower bound by [DLLO16], characterizing the big-O optimal errors for distributions for which only a $1+α$ moment exists for $α\in (0,1)$. Both results, however, are optimal only in the worst case. We initiate the fine-grained study of the mean estimation problem: Can algorithms leverage useful features of the input distribution to beat the sub-Gaussian rate, without explicit knowledge of such features?
We resolve this question with an unexpectedly nuanced answer: "Yes in limited regimes, but in general no". For any distribution $p$ with a finite mean, we construct a distribution $q$ whose mean is well-separated from $p$'s, yet $p$ and $q$ are not distinguishable with high probability, and $q$ further preserves $p$'s moments up to constants. The main consequence is that no reasonable estimator can asymptotically achieve better than the sub-Gaussian error rate for any distribution, matching the worst-case result of [LV22]. More generally, we introduce a new definitional framework to analyze the fine-grained optimality of algorithms, which we call "neighborhood optimality", interpolating between the unattainably strong "instance optimality" and the trivially weak "admissibility" definitions. Applying the new framework, we show that median-of-means is neighborhood optimal, up to constant factors. It is open to find a neighborhood-optimal estimator without constant factor slackness.
△ Less
Submitted 21 November, 2023;
originally announced November 2023.
-
Finite-Sample Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Location
Authors:
Shivam Gupta,
Jasper C. H. Lee,
Eric Price,
Paul Valiant
Abstract:
We consider 1-dimensional location estimation, where we estimate a parameter $λ$ from $n$ samples $λ+ η_i$, with each $η_i$ drawn i.i.d. from a known distribution $f$. For fixed $f$ the maximum-likelihood estimate (MLE) is well-known to be optimal in the limit as $n \to \infty$: it is asymptotically normal with variance matching the Cramér-Rao lower bound of $\frac{1}{n\mathcal{I}}$, where…
▽ More
We consider 1-dimensional location estimation, where we estimate a parameter $λ$ from $n$ samples $λ+ η_i$, with each $η_i$ drawn i.i.d. from a known distribution $f$. For fixed $f$ the maximum-likelihood estimate (MLE) is well-known to be optimal in the limit as $n \to \infty$: it is asymptotically normal with variance matching the Cramér-Rao lower bound of $\frac{1}{n\mathcal{I}}$, where $\mathcal{I}$ is the Fisher information of $f$. However, this bound does not hold for finite $n$, or when $f$ varies with $n$. We show for arbitrary $f$ and $n$ that one can recover a similar theory based on the Fisher information of a smoothed version of $f$, where the smoothing radius decays with $n$.
△ Less
Submitted 18 July, 2022; v1 submitted 6 June, 2022;
originally announced June 2022.
-
Optimal Sub-Gaussian Mean Estimation in $\mathbb{R}$
Authors:
Jasper C. H. Lee,
Paul Valiant
Abstract:
We revisit the problem of estimating the mean of a real-valued distribution, presenting a novel estimator with sub-Gaussian convergence: intuitively, "our estimator, on any distribution, is as accurate as the sample mean is for the Gaussian distribution of matching variance." Crucially, in contrast to prior works, our estimator does not require prior knowledge of the variance, and works across the…
▽ More
We revisit the problem of estimating the mean of a real-valued distribution, presenting a novel estimator with sub-Gaussian convergence: intuitively, "our estimator, on any distribution, is as accurate as the sample mean is for the Gaussian distribution of matching variance." Crucially, in contrast to prior works, our estimator does not require prior knowledge of the variance, and works across the entire gamut of distributions with bounded variance, including those without any higher moments. Parameterized by the sample size $n$, the failure probability $δ$, and the variance $σ^2$, our estimator is accurate to within $σ\cdot(1+o(1))\sqrt{\frac{2\log\frac{1}δ}{n}}$, tight up to the $1+o(1)$ factor. Our estimator construction and analysis gives a framework generalizable to other problems, tightly analyzing a sum of dependent random variables by viewing the sum implicitly as a 2-parameter $ψ$-estimator, and constructing bounds using mathematical programming and duality techniques.
△ Less
Submitted 16 November, 2020;
originally announced November 2020.
-
Worst-Case Analysis for Randomly Collected Data
Authors:
Justin Y. Chen,
Gregory Valiant,
Paul Valiant
Abstract:
We introduce a framework for statistical estimation that leverages knowledge of how samples are collected but makes no distributional assumptions on the data values. Specifically, we consider a population of elements $[n]={1,\ldots,n}$ with corresponding data values $x_1,\ldots,x_n$. We observe the values for a "sample" set $A \subset [n]$ and wish to estimate some statistic of the values for a "t…
▽ More
We introduce a framework for statistical estimation that leverages knowledge of how samples are collected but makes no distributional assumptions on the data values. Specifically, we consider a population of elements $[n]={1,\ldots,n}$ with corresponding data values $x_1,\ldots,x_n$. We observe the values for a "sample" set $A \subset [n]$ and wish to estimate some statistic of the values for a "target" set $B \subset [n]$ where $B$ could be the entire set. Crucially, we assume that the sets $A$ and $B$ are drawn according to some known distribution $P$ over pairs of subsets of $[n]$. A given estimation algorithm is evaluated based on its "worst-case, expected error" where the expectation is with respect to the distribution $P$ from which the sample $A$ and target sets $B$ are drawn, and the worst-case is with respect to the data values $x_1,\ldots,x_n$. Within this framework, we give an efficient algorithm for estimating the target mean that returns a weighted combination of the sample values--where the weights are functions of the distribution $P$ and the sample and target sets $A$, $B$--and show that the worst-case expected error achieved by this algorithm is at most a multiplicative $π/2$ factor worse than the optimal of such algorithms. The algorithm and proof leverage a surprising connection to the Grothendieck problem. This framework, which makes no distributional assumptions on the data values but rather relies on knowledge of the data collection process, is a significant departure from typical estimation and introduces a uniform algorithmic analysis for the many natural settings where membership in a sample may be correlated with data values, such as when sampling probabilities vary as in "importance sampling", when individuals are recruited into a sample via a social network as in "snowball sampling", or when samples have chronological structure as in "selective prediction".
△ Less
Submitted 26 October, 2020; v1 submitted 8 November, 2019;
originally announced November 2019.
-
Uncertainty about Uncertainty: Optimal Adaptive Algorithms for Estimating Mixtures of Unknown Coins
Authors:
Jasper C. H. Lee,
Paul Valiant
Abstract:
Given a mixture between two populations of coins, "positive" coins that each have -- unknown and potentially different -- bias $\geq\frac{1}{2}+Δ$ and "negative" coins with bias $\leq\frac{1}{2}-Δ$, we consider the task of estimating the fraction $ρ$ of positive coins to within additive error $ε$. We achieve an upper and lower bound of $Θ(\fracρ{ε^2Δ^2}\log\frac{1}δ)$ samples for a $1-δ$ probabili…
▽ More
Given a mixture between two populations of coins, "positive" coins that each have -- unknown and potentially different -- bias $\geq\frac{1}{2}+Δ$ and "negative" coins with bias $\leq\frac{1}{2}-Δ$, we consider the task of estimating the fraction $ρ$ of positive coins to within additive error $ε$. We achieve an upper and lower bound of $Θ(\fracρ{ε^2Δ^2}\log\frac{1}δ)$ samples for a $1-δ$ probability of success, where crucially, our lower bound applies to all fully-adaptive algorithms. Thus, our sample complexity bounds have tight dependence for every relevant problem parameter. A crucial component of our lower bound proof is a decomposition lemma (see Lemmas 17 and 18) showing how to assemble partially-adaptive bounds into a fully-adaptive bound, which may be of independent interest: though we invoke it for the special case of Bernoulli random variables (coins), it applies to general distributions. We present simulation results to demonstrate the practical efficacy of our approach for realistic problem parameters for crowdsourcing applications, focusing on the "rare events" regime where $ρ$ is small. The fine-grained adaptive flavor of both our algorithm and lower bound contrasts with much previous work in distributional testing and learning.
△ Less
Submitted 5 February, 2021; v1 submitted 19 April, 2019;
originally announced April 2019.
-
Implicit regularization for deep neural networks driven by an Ornstein-Uhlenbeck like process
Authors:
Guy Blanc,
Neha Gupta,
Gregory Valiant,
Paul Valiant
Abstract:
We consider networks, trained via stochastic gradient descent to minimize $\ell_2$ loss, with the training labels perturbed by independent noise at each iteration. We characterize the behavior of the training dynamics near any parameter vector that achieves zero training error, in terms of an implicit regularization term corresponding to the sum over the data points, of the squared $\ell_2$ norm o…
▽ More
We consider networks, trained via stochastic gradient descent to minimize $\ell_2$ loss, with the training labels perturbed by independent noise at each iteration. We characterize the behavior of the training dynamics near any parameter vector that achieves zero training error, in terms of an implicit regularization term corresponding to the sum over the data points, of the squared $\ell_2$ norm of the gradient of the model with respect to the parameter vector, evaluated at each data point. This holds for networks of any connectivity, width, depth, and choice of activation function. We interpret this implicit regularization term for three simple settings: matrix sensing, two layer ReLU networks trained on one-dimensional data, and two layer networks with sigmoid activations trained on a single datapoint. For these settings, we show why this new and general implicit regularization effect drives the networks towards "simple" models.
△ Less
Submitted 22 July, 2020; v1 submitted 19 April, 2019;
originally announced April 2019.
