Rama

Archives : 1 — 50 | 51 — 100 | 101 — 150 | 151 — 200 | 201 — 250 | 251 — 300 | 301 — 350 | 351 — 400 | 401 — 450 | 501 — 550 | 551 — 600 | 601 — 650

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The mad woman-Theodore Gericault-MBA Lyon B825-IMG 0477.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

A...

A.

A.(bis)

Quality Image Promotion

File:Graffiti-IMG 5792.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Graffiti-IMG 5792.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canon-IMG 1779-white.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canon-IMG 1784-white.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Sig-pro-SP2022-p1030058.jpg

The photo you have authored titled Sig-pro-SP2022-p1030058.jpg has an incorrect description. The photo not of a Sig SP2022. Note that an SP2022 does not have a take-down lever, but has an extended slide stop that doubles as a takedown pin. Your photo clearly shows a separate slide stop and takedown lever. The photo appears to be of a Sig Sauer P226.

Image

Hi,

Please could you contact me ([email protected]) regarding one of your images: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:EdoJapaneseArquebuse.jpg

many thanks,

Stuart Anslow

Picture from the Rhône

Dear Rama,

I am Elisa and I work at the EPFL ( Ecole politechnique de Lausanne ( Suisse)) I would like to know who took the picture https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/ee/Leman_img_0573.jpg/673px-Leman_img_0573.jpg and if it was really taken the 2th June 2007. Thanks a lot

Please contact me at: [email protected]

Best Wishes

I want to talk to improve my ability to contribute on wiki

Hi ...... where r u from?

File:Salginatobel Bridge mg 4079.jpg

Dear Rama,

the chair 'Entwerfen und Baugestaltung' at the Technical University in Darmstadt (Germany) of Prof. Johann Eisele would like to use for a publication with a publisher (2.000 copies and optional another 2.000 copies) your image of the Salginatobel bridge (File:Salginatobel Bridge mg 4079.jpg). The imagesize is approximatley around 20 x 20 centimetres. In the image index we would publish you by the following indication: Rama, Wikimedia Commons,lizenziert unter Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.0 France, URL: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Salginatobel_Bridge_mg_4079.jpg

Therefor I would like to get your permission. Please contact me via email: [email protected]

Thank you

Best regards

Benjamin Trautmann

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Axel Arnbak-IMG 9036.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Copyright request

Dear Rama,

First of all, I just wanted to say thank you for your work in making pictures available on Wikimedia Commons.

I would like to use one of your photos in a publication I am working on at the moment, and since it will be produced by a charity organization my royalties are not large (and would quickly be swallowed up if I had to pay for images).

My publisher, however, has requested that I confirm with you that you are willing to give me permission to use the following:

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Zakkur_Stele_0154.jpg

Are you fine with this? Could you please contact me at [email protected]

Once again, thanks for your work and I look forward to hearing back from you.

All the best,

Dr Aaron Chalmers

File:Robespierre IMG 2303.jpg

Dear Rama,

I'm working for a french historical revue. For a an article on Robespierre I would like to use your photo of the bust of him by Deseine taken at Château de Vizille. Could you contact me soon at : jsuarezsophiapublications.fr ? I wish you a merry christmas.

Trying to contact Rama

Rama-

I would like to use a modified version of your photograph "Japanese Arrowheads of Various Functions" in my unpublished Master's thesis from the University of Nevada, Reno. I have cited you based on the license agreement. Can you please provide me with a year the photograph was taken or uploaded to add to my references, and perhaps a first and last name so that the citation meets the requirements of my University? Thank you. Email is the best way to contact me. Please respond to [email protected].

-Mike Lenzi Master's Student Anthropology Department University of Nevada, Reno [email protected]

Photo supprimée sans avertissement préalable

Bonjour Rama. Je ne suis pas content. Je découvre aujourd'hui que tu as supprimé une photo que j'ai faite de la signature du peintre Edgard Maxence (File:Lourdes église Rosaire mosaïques Ascension signature.JPG) sans me prévenir au préalable, et sans aucune explication. Certes, ce peintre est décédé en 1954 mais cette photo ne représente qu'une partie très limitée d'un tableau beaucoup plus imposant réalisé en 1899 que je n'ai volontairement pas déposé sur commons, et que je me suis noté pour 2025. De plus, elle prouve l'orthographe réelle du prénom de cet artiste, parfois erroné. Cela fait des années que je dépose des photos sur commons et c'est la première fois qu'on me rejette un extrait correspondant à la signature d'un artiste. N'existe-t-il pas une exception pour les extraits minimes (pour cette photo, environ 2 % de la surface du tableau) d'œuvres  ? Père Igor (talk) 21:17, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

Bonjour,

désolé de t'avoir contrarié. Cette image était l'une parmi d'autres dans une catégorie étonamment fortement peuplée pour un copyvio aussi évident, du coup j'ai tout supprimé sans faire beaucoup dans le détail.

La signature en elle-même me semble passer comme non-coprightable, mais ton argument de minimis me semble un peu limite, vu les parties de la mosaïque qu'on voit autour; j'aurais tendance à dire qu'en l'état, ça ne passe pas. Ceci dit, je ne connais pas la mosaïque entière, de sort que nous n'avons pas le même point de vue sur la chose, et tu pourrais me trouver biaisé du fait que c'est moi qui ai supprimé l'image.

Ceci dit, le remède est facile: utiliser ton image pour en extraire la signature. On pourrait même la sortir en SVG. Si ça t'arrange, je peux m'en charger.

Bonne continuation ! Rama (talk) 21:45, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

À titre de comparaison, l'œuvre globale est une des chapelles de la basilique de Lourdes et a donc les mêmes dimensions que la mosaïque de cette autre chapelle. L'extrait que j'ai importé (la signature) ne représente qu'environ 2 % de l'œuvre totale, visible ici, photo du bas, au centre. On y voit un morceau de robe dont dépasse le bout d'un pied et le haut de nombreuses lettres majuscules. Si tu es d'accord, je peux la réimporter, en coupant encore plus les bords mais il me parait intéressant de conserver la particularité que représente cette signature sur une mosaïque, avec la date 1899, et la mention « pinxit », qui indique que c'est lui qui l'a peinte. Si tout va bien d'ici là pour toi comme pour moi, tu pourras juger en janvier 2025 de la place minime qu'occupe cette signature par rapport à l'ensemble. Père Igor (talk) 10:21, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Est-ce que cette version File:Lourdes église Rosaire mosaïques Ascension signature-cropped.JPG te paraîtrait aller ? Je peux te restaurer le fichier File:Lourdes église Rosaire mosaïques Ascension signature.JPG si tu n'as plus l'original et que tu préfères retailler toi-même, tiens-moi au courant.

En espérant qu'on aille tous bien en 2025 et que le droit d'auteur n'ait pas été porté à des durées absurdes d'ici là. Bonne continuation ! Rama (talk) 11:04, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

OK pour ta nouvelle version. Merci. Père Igor (talk) 13:02, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Bruce Schneier-signature.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Bruce Schneier-signature.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

• File:Caspar Bowden-signature.jpg
• File:William Binney-signature.jpg

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 17:15, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

Card Models

Per IRC Disscussion- Where to start ? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:06, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

Hello,

we could start with a sub-page somewhere in user-space, such as User:ShakespeareFan00/Card_Models. Since had had the seminal idea, I suggest you do the honours? Cheers! Rama (talk) 07:27, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

User:ShakespeareFan00/Card_Models - Created a very basic page... I'd appreciate your input on what the primary focus should be. Drawing polyhedral nets is probably straightforawrd (and commons might already have a number of these!) ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 19:50, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

An Image of Yours was Used on a Major News Site Without Credit or SA-Licensing

Hello Rama:

Just wanted to give you a heads up that your photo, Canon Telelenses MG 0492

Canon Telelenses MG 0492

was used in this CP24 story (a Canadian TV news channel and web site claiming to reach "1.55 million viewers daily in Toronto") without either crediting you (instead, crediting "Wikimedia" which is, of course, absurd that any writer for a TV station would be so ignorant of basic copyright law) or complying with the copyleft provisions of the CC-BY-SA or CeCILL. Not sure if you want to sue the crap out of them, demand compensation, or just politely inform them of your error, but there you go. Best of luck!

WIDEnet (What I've been up to, Let's Chat) 02:23, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

Hello,

thank you, I have sent a message to explain why correct credits are important for the world of Free culture, it usually works wonders.

CHeers! Rama (talk) 06:49, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Ariane 5 (VA208) (8218854876).jpg

File:Ariane 5 (VA208) (8218854876).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Uwe W. (talk) 20:00, 27 July 2015 (UTC)