This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Latest comment: 1 month ago5 comments4 people in discussion
This book is in the public domain in the United States, which is the requirement for English Wikisource (where it is in use). Please undelete it temporarily so that a local copy can be created. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 16:32, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
(Jameslwoodward): I’m asking for temporary undeletion, so that the outcome of the deletion discussion can be actuated. The nomination stated that the work would need to be moved locally; this having not happened, there are many errors arising in connection therewith. Temporary undeletion is a common practice, why do you oppose it here? TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 21:44, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
Info The file is available at [1] It can be discussed basing on that source or uploaded to Wikisource from there. Ankry (talk) 22:37, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
/* file:Toi Tet Rong tại Pleiku Gia Lai - 2024.png */ Tôi là nghệ sĩ đã đăng ký tại cục tác giả và cũng đã từng tham gia sản xuất nhạc phim và nhiều lần xuất hiện trên TV. Hiện tại tôi chưa cung cấp đủ thông tin nhưng mọi người đã động thủ xóa hết toàn bộ thông tin đã làm ảnh hưởng nặng nề đến cơ sở dữ liệu thuộc Google (bằng chứng là: Thông tin search An Kun đã bị mất hoàn toàn. Hiện toàn bộ thông tin đã bị Bảng tri thức Google thông báo link chết. Tôi cần một giải thích chính đáng về vấn đề nói tôi PR: trong khi định nghĩa PR tức quảng cáo để họ biết đến một sản phẩm dịch vụ. Nhưng tôi biết rằng:
- Bản thân tôi vừa là nghệ sĩ (singer-songwriter) và vừa là người làm trong lĩnh vực truyền thông đa phương tiện
- Trong khi tôi cũng vừa nắm giữ AN KUN STUDIO/P389HV có vai trò truyền thông và quảng cáo. Nhưng hơn hết là tôi chưa hề đề cập một sản phẩm sẽ sắp ra mắt. Và đương nhiên là thông tin toàn bồ dự án, hành trình của tôi với mục đích thông tin. Đồng bộ dữ liệu với Google và Spotify.
Ghi nhận hãng An Kun Studio (hãng thu) và An Kun (nghệ sĩ chính thức đã được YouTube xác minh) là 2 thông tin riêng:
+ Sản xuất nhạc, phát hành số và giữ bản quyền được quy định tại cục bản quyền tác gia VCPMC
+ Và ghi nhận quyền tại The MLC với AN KUN STUDIO/P389HV có thể kiểm tra tại Public Search
=> Tuy nhiên, nếu mọi người vẫn không tin tôi sẽ cung cấp các giấy tờ và bằng chứng việc sự nổi bật của tôi là có thật. Mọi người đã không hỏi để check kiểm tra nhưng đã xóa toàn bộ dữ liệu. Nguyên đêm hôm qua tới giờ tôi không tài nào liên hệ được cho tới khi tôi buộc phải liên hệ với Creative Commons nên giờ tôi mới có thể thông tin được nhưng mọi thứ về tôi trên Google giờ đã biến mất. Iamankun (talk) 07:10, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
/* File:Avatar chủ đề cái lân - 2024.jpg */ Tôi là nghệ sĩ đã đăng ký tại cục tác giả và cũng đã từng tham gia sản xuất nhạc phim và nhiều lần xuất hiện trên TV. Hiện tại tôi chưa cung cấp đủ thông tin nhưng mọi người đã động thủ xóa hết toàn bộ thông tin đã làm ảnh hưởng nặng nề đến cơ sở dữ liệu thuộc Google (bằng chứng là: Thông tin search An Kun đã bị mất hoàn toàn. Hiện toàn bộ thông tin đã bị Bảng tri thức Google thông báo link chết. Tôi cần một giải thích chính đáng về vấn đề nói tôi PR: trong khi định nghĩa PR tức quảng cáo để họ biết đến một sản phẩm dịch vụ. Nhưng tôi biết rằng: - Bản thân tôi vừa là nghệ sĩ (singer-songwriter) và vừa là người làm trong lĩnh vực truyền thông đa phương tiện - Trong khi tôi cũng vừa nắm giữ AN KUN STUDIO/P389HV có vai trò truyền thông và quảng cáo. Nhưng hơn hết là tôi chưa hề đề cập một sản phẩm sẽ sắp ra mắt. Và đương nhiên là thông tin toàn bồ dự án, hành trình của tôi với mục đích thông tin. Đồng bộ dữ liệu với Google và Spotify.
Ghi nhận hãng An Kun Studio (hãng thu) và An Kun (nghệ sĩ chính thức đã được YouTube xác minh) là 2 thông tin riêng:
+ Sản xuất nhạc, phát hành số và giữ bản quyền được quy định tại cục bản quyền tác gia VCPMC + Và ghi nhận quyền tại The MLC với AN KUN STUDIO/P389HV có thể kiểm tra tại Public Search + Website hãng: [3]https://www.ankun.dev
=> Tuy nhiên, nếu mọi người vẫn không tin tôi sẽ cung cấp các giấy tờ và bằng chứng việc sự nổi bật của tôi là có thật. Mọi người đã không hỏi để check kiểm tra nhưng đã xóa toàn bộ dữ liệu. Nguyên đêm hôm qua tới giờ tôi không tài nào liên hệ được cho tới khi tôi buộc phải liên hệ với Creative Commons nên giờ tôi mới có thể thông tin được nhưng mọi thứ về tôi trên Google giờ đã biến mất. Iamankun (talk) 07:35, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
Latest comment: 1 month ago3 comments3 people in discussion
Hello. This picture is available for free use in an Iranian news agency named "Shahrara News" (https://shrr.ir/000Kns). I uploaded the picture, only for informative reasons and I acknowledge that no copyright infringement has been done by me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by The.shahab (talk • contribs) 07:33, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
I find it rather unfortunate that when admins close with arguments they don't bother making in the discussion itself (super-arguments).
Somehow this was closed, before the super-arguments of the deleting admin used to justify their deletion were addressed. Both arguments were not brought up in the initial discussion.
The uploader of the files seems to be a person affiliated with the project.
The summary deletion initiated on Wikidata after the deletion request doesn't seem to have any arguments brought forward and probably violated their policy as the item was in use at Commons on deletion.
Oppose Aside from the scope question, there are copyright questions. The first file is a detailed European map which is claimed to be "own work". I don't believe that as it is almost certain that it was copied or traced from an existing map. The second file is a copyrighted logo. Our consistent policy is that logos require a free license from an authorized official of the organization via VRT. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:48, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
I guess we could have asked the uploader to provide that in 2006, if that was custom back then.
Not sure if copyright is much of an issue. Maybe you can undelete them so we can all have a second look. It didn't have occurred to anyone before supervoting this July. Enhancing999 (talk) 12:55, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
Not done: no consensus to undelete in either request, in fact consensus was not to restore. Unanswered copyright issues. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:46, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed.Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Not done: Facebook image This image will be restored automatically, without further action by the uploader, if and when a free license is received, read, and approved at VRT. The current backlog at VRT is 3 days.
. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:58, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
Not done: Facebook image This image will be restored automatically, without further action by the uploader, if and when a free license is received, read, and approved at VRT. The current backlog at VRT is 3 days.
. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:58, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
You did not list the other photograph under sources, and it looks like a straight copyvio without that information. Abzeronow (talk) 19:16, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
As the uploader it is your responsibility to list all pertinent information on a file. I Support restoration but I wanted to explain that Krd's deletion was not wrong based on the information given at the time. Abzeronow (talk) 19:30, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
Latest comment: 1 month ago11 comments5 people in discussion
Wrongfully deleted own work. I was there on that bridge in Cambridge, MA in the end of March 2018 and took the picture. Estrellato (talk) 19:18, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
I can't. That mobile phone is long smashed and I don't have any computer from that time either. Can you at least reupload it to userspace or something to keep as a memory? Otherwise the picture is lost forever. Estrellato (talk) 19:29, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
The only other option I could see is having the original Facebook link, and seeing if it was posted on your personal Facebook page. Since that would potentially involve sensitive information, VRT might be the best option here but I'll see what a few VRT agents/administrators think @Elcobbola: @Aafi: Abzeronow (talk) 19:42, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi @Estrellato: We would need a release through COM:VRT. Please either email us at permissions-commonswikimedia.org or use COM:RELGEN, sufficiently demonstrating that you are the copyrights holder. These files may be undeleted after a VRT agent confirms that explicit permissions have been received. Regards, Aafi (talk)07:55, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi @Aafi. Wouldn't just showing you this be enough? My identity has already been outed by LTAs so many times, I really don't care anymore. Plus, I doubt they will see something they didn't already know.
It just feels like a much easier process. Full album, with all the deleted pictures in question included. I can email you a picture of my passport if you still don't believe me.
And if I need to reiterate. Nobody took those photos but me. I am the sole copyright owner to everything in that album. Estrellato (talk) 08:50, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
You can also edit that post to add a statement (or a comment underneath it) that "I agree to publish these images under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International license." 0x0a (talk) 13:58, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
Not done: Facebook image This image will be restored automatically, without further action by the uploader, if and when a free license is received, read, and approved at VRT. The current backlog at VRT is 3 days.
. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:12, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
Latest comment: 1 month ago5 comments2 people in discussion
Wrongfully deleted own work. I was there that day and took that photo. You can even check my instagram for proof if its really necessary. @davidalfaustinon April 19, 2018. Third picture in the gallery. If it has metadata from Facebook its because I lost my phone and thats where I had it stored Estrellato (talk) 19:22, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Yes, it was deleted because the metadata shows it was taken from Facebook. Since almost all images taken from Facebook cannot be kept on Commons, such images must have a free license from the actual photographer using VRT. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:30, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
But I am the actual photographer. I just don't have access anymore to the device I used for the photo. Like I said, check my instagram. Why would I upload if there is if was not my photo? I might have the original facebook post too. Estrellato (talk) 00:20, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
Not done: Facebook image This image will be restored automatically, without further action by the uploader, if and when a free license is received, read, and approved at VRT. The current backlog at VRT is 3 days.
. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:13, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
Latest comment: 1 month ago6 comments4 people in discussion
Wrongfully deleted wiki-competion prize that was created by pictures already available on Commonsm all the credits to the original uploaders were in the description. Estrellato (talk) 19:08, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
Oppose per COM:EVID. If you are the copyright holder of this work, you need to either (a) provide an evidence that the book cover was published under the CC-BY-SA 4.0 license or (b) send a free license permission via email following VRT. Ankry (talk) 14:15, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
Not done: This image will be restored automatically, without further action by the uploader, if and when a free license is received, read, and approved at VRT. The current backlog at VRT is 3 days.
. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:59, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed.Please do not make any edits to this archive.
I suspect that the user obtained these pictures from the National Palace Museum website without providing the correct source and authorship. However, according to a notice on the site, images from the collection are released under either a CC0 license (for 1-megapixel images) or a CC BY license (for 6-megapixel images). Therefore, these images may be freely licensed. Here's an example. Please restore them temporarily so that I can fix them. 0x0a (talk) 15:46, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
Latest comment: 1 month ago5 comments3 people in discussion
Wrongfully deleted own work. I painted this myself then enhanced it using some program but still completely my own work. Estrellato (talk) 19:14, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
@Estrellato: If I understand what you say correctly, you were hired or authorized by Ecatzingo Municipality to create their official coat of arms? And you, not Ecatzingo Municipality, retain rights to license it? Is this accurate? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:12, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
@Infrogmation: Absolutely not. I was editing articles about municipalities in Mexico State (Estado de México) on Swedish Wikipedia. Most of them had Coat of Arms available on Commons, and to me their licences seemed to check out, so I applied them to the geobox in the articles (see for example sv:Acolman). See also Category:Coats of arms of municipalities of Mexico (state) for all of the CoA's of Mexico State. When I got to sv:Ecatzingo, I realized their was no Coat of Arms on Commons, so I decided to try to draw one myself, using inspiration from what I saw here, from this now archived source. I drew it with a lead pencil and a A4 paper. Just enough to make it reassemble the actual CoA, but without copying it completely to not infringe on any copyright. The actual official one, adopted in 1996 looks like this (PDF warning), see Page 6. No, I do not get paid or hired to do anything on any Wikimedia project. Everything I do here is volunteer-work in my spare time. Hopefully this gives some clarity. Best regards, Estrellato (talk) 14:23, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
Latest comment: 1 month ago13 comments4 people in discussion
Wrongfully deleted own work. I painted this myself, as you can clearly see this is a drawing and I have all the right to it. I vividly remember drawing it in my room when I realized the weapon for en:Ecatzingo was missing. Estrellato (talk) 19:16, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
@Abzeronow For your info. Not sure if the date is even relevant though, since its not an exact copy - just a similar illustration made with a pen and paper. Estrellato (talk) 19:47, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
The date would be relevant since Mexican government works are publication + 100 years. If 1996 was when the coat of arms that this was based on was published, it wouldn't be PD until 2097. COM:GVT Mexico. Abzeronow (talk) 19:52, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
Yeah I know that. But there are 100s Coat of Arms for Mexican Municipaliies on commons, that are just similar illustrations, bot attempting to be exact replications and that's how we get around that. If you compare to the actual CoA, you will see my illustration is more "inspirered by" than a realistic copy. This goes for the other uploads by other users as well. Estrellato (talk) 20:04, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
If it is only inspired and not presenting the actual CoA, then (a) the file name suggesting that this is the CoA of Ecatzingo would be misleading and (b) the file may be out of COM:SCOPE. At least, useless for Wikipedia articles related to Ecatzingo. Ankry (talk) 14:27, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
Ok sure but at least let me keep them for personal memories? This is beyond a witchhunt at this point. And sure you could restore it and rename it like "Illustration inspired by Ecatzingo coat of arms". I just feel like a lot of these deletion reasons are nonsense and false, and just because I made one mistake (which was because I misinterpreted another user), now all I ever done is wrong. This feels like borderline bullying at this point. Estrellato (talk) 18:05, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
Like this was deleted because the admin in question said it was "safe to assume all my files are copyvios". Based on what? That is a ridiculous statement, that goes against every principle of assuming good faith. See User talk:Krd. Estrellato (talk) 18:08, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
Latest comment: 1 month ago3 comments3 people in discussion
I took this photo and I own the copyright, but for some reason, there was an upload issue when I first tried to send the photo in. When I tried to re-upload, I was told to try an undeletion request instead. All I'm looking for, is for this to be CREATIVE COMMONS ATTRIBUTION 4, and I'm not sure what went wrong originally. The exact file name is Jasper Harris Forbes Headshot Final.jpeg. I will also attach a link to my website here in case you want to contact me. Thank you in advance!
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed.Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Public domain images
Latest comment: 1 month ago5 comments5 people in discussion
The images below were deleted in discussions (1, 2) without comment which were closed in a matter of hours. The images are derived from judicial opinions, which are in the public domain; thus, the images, which are a necessary, constituent part of said opinions, are also in the public domain. The claim that the images are “fair use in the original document” is nonsensical; the opinion is not copyrighted, so there is no need for a fair use analysis. In any case, even if you do not accept this argument, it is the accepted opinion of English Wikisource, where the files are in use; I ask that they be undeleted temporarily so that they can be re-uploaded locally. Here are the files:
I can't see the images, but if they were pre-existing images, then being a part of a court case cannot change the copyright. The text of the judge's opinion is public domain, but if the judge did not author the images as part of the decision, then their copyright is unchanged. Any use a judge needs to make of the images would be fair use of course, and therefore their use when published as part of the decision (or other discussion about the case) would also be legal as fair use, but usages in other contexts would still be covered by the copyright. If you sue for copyright infringement, and the subject of the infringement is published in the decision, and that causes the photo to become public domain thus no more infringement is possible, then how do you sue while protecting your copyright? Being public domain in this situation is nonsensical, to me. If the images are the near-black images seen in File:Cariou v. Prince.pdf rather than the originals seen in other scans, there may be so much detail lost that they really aren't reproductions anymore, but the originals seem basically certain to still have copyright. Wikisource should have a clear case for fair use, but standalone images on Commons, not really. Temporary undeletion to move them to Wikisource should be fine, I would think. Carl Lindberg (talk) 12:37, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
These are clearly copyrighted photographs and artworks (note: these are the originals) so a fair use analysis would be needed (I think they would be covered under fair use). I'd be fine with temporary undeletion for local use on English Wikisource. Abzeronow (talk) 17:02, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
Latest comment: 1 month ago2 comments2 people in discussion
This photo was taken by the New York State Senate and is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License — Preceding unsigned comment added by Katdv (talk • contribs) 2024-08-01T14:22:11 (UTC)
Opposehttps://www.nysenate.gov/policies-and-waivers: Creation of derivative works and commercial usage allowed provided that such derivative works and commercial usage do not relate to political fundraising. This is a restriction we don’t accept in Wikimedia Commons as the media files hosted here should be free to use for any purpose. --Geohakkeri (talk) 14:39, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
Signing your posts is required on talk pages and it is a Commons policy to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.
Latest comment: 1 month ago3 comments3 people in discussion
I am the management of GOLD RECORD, which this artist is affiliated with. I am the management of this artist and have all rights to all copyrighted material, including video, images and music. Therefore, you are completely enslaved to me regarding the images you upload here.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Velocity~jawiki (talk • contribs) 16:39, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
Latest comment: 1 month ago3 comments3 people in discussion
I am the management of GOLD RECORD, which this artist is affiliated with. I am the management of this artist and have all rights to all copyrighted material, including video, images and music. Therefore, you are completely enslaved to me regarding the images you upload here.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Velocity~jawiki (talk • contribs) 16:43, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
Latest comment: 1 month ago3 comments3 people in discussion
Why you want to delete the picture I have uploaded? I am Copyright Holder and I give permission to upload the Picture. What kind of permission you need from me? What Evidence I should give for my own work? It is not fair to delete without any reason. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by PARMJEETPALLU (talk • contribs)
Not done: This image will be restored automatically, without further action by the uploader, if and when a free license is received, read, and approved at VRT. The current backlog at VRT is 3 days.
. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:15, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed.Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Latest comment: 1 month ago3 comments3 people in discussion
Hello. I work for the airport and uploaded this logo to replace the old one on the Wikipedia page about Liverpool John Lennon Airport. We have full rights to upload
Not done: This image will be restored automatically, without further action by the uploader, if and when a free license is received, read, and approved at VRT. The current backlog at VRT is 3 days.
. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:15, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed.Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Latest comment: 1 month ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Undeletion Request for File: Sashani Nichole Actress.jpg
File Name: Sashani Nichole Actress.jpg
Reason for Request:
Dear Wikimedia Commons Administrators,
I am the original photographer and copyright holder of the file named Sashani Nichole Actress.jpg. The image has been marked as a copyright violation, but I would like to clarify that I have given permission for this photo to be used on IMDb, where it is legitimately hosted with my consent.
Evidence of Ownership and Permission:
1. Authorship Statement: I took this photo myself approximately 10 years ago and hold all rights to it. Unfortunately, I do not have immediate access to the original metadata as it is stored on a hard drive that I cannot access at the moment.
2. Permission to IMDb: I have authorized IMDb to use this image, and it is displayed there with my permission.
3. Context of the Photo: This photo was taken in Novi Michigan during a test photo shoot in my garage at home. I was testing my new Canon camera and 85 mm lens at 1.2 aperture to see the depth of field and it turned out so well was used for IMDB.
I kindly request the undeletion of this file, as the presence of the image on IMDb is not a copyright violation but a legitimate use authorized by me. I am willing to provide additional information if needed once I can access my hard drive.
Not done: This image will be restored automatically, without further action by the uploader, if and when a free license is received, read, and approved at VRT. The current backlog at VRT is 3 days.
. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:11, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed.Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Images of Fontana luminosa (L'Aquila)
Latest comment: 1 month ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Hi everyone, I'm writing here in order to request the undeletion of the following images:
They were all deleted last year after this DR and they all depict a fountain, the it:Fontana luminosa, in the city of L'Aquila. The monument was commissioned by the local mayor (during fascism called "podestà") to the sculptor it:Nicola D'Antino, who finished it in 1933 (see here and here). Therefore, it fell under Template:PD-ItalyGov in 1954, way before the URAA, so no issue with US copyright.--Friniate (talk) 21:30, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Oppose That may be, but the requirement here is that it must be PD in the USA and the country of origin. It was published by the Oxford University Press. The author, Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan, died in 1975, so it will have a UK copyright until 1/1/2046. It is available at https://archive.org/download/Sarvepalli.Radhakrishnan.Indian.Philosophy.Volume.1-2. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:11, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
Info The file is available at [1] It can be discussed basing on that source or uploaded to Wikisource from there. Ankry (talk) 22:37, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
Not done: See above. --Yann (talk) 18:25, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Erledigt Estrellato (talk) 17:20, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
Support restoration but I wanted to explain that Krd's deletion was not wrong based on the information given at the time. Abzeronow (talk) 19:30, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
wikimedia.org or use COM:RELGEN, sufficiently demonstrating that you are the copyrights holder. These files may be undeleted after a VRT agent confirms that explicit permissions have been received. Regards, Aafi (talk) 07:55, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Kommentar Related DR: Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with insource:"Cariou v. Prince". Yann (talk) 11:46, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
