Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2017/10/09
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
Unused logo image, without Wikipedia article (that I can find). Out of educational scope.
--Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 01:01, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:33, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
This image its seems an unauthorized copy from http://www.rtve.es/alacarta/videos/telediario/puerta-alcala-uno-monumentos-mas-fotografiados-capital/3779515/ Txolo (talk) 01:29, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:22, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
This image seems its an unauthorized copy from https://www.123rf.com/photo_17454777_at-the-halfway-point-between-machu-picchu-and-intipunku-peru-with-the-ruins-of-ancient-inca-village-.html Txolo (talk) 01:49, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:22, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
this image seems an unauthorized copy from https://static.vix.com/es/sites/default/files/styles/large/public/imj/nuestrorumbo/L/La-Fortaleza-de-Sacsayhuaman-1_0.jpg?itok=HA2QgHez Txolo (talk) 01:52, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:21, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Apparently this is not a free image. This is similar to https://www.emotiontourperu.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/lineas.jpg Ovruni (talk) 01:53, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:19, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
this image seems an unauthorized copy from https://tr.depositphotos.com/22058985/stock-photo-machu-picchu-top-view-from.html Txolo (talk) 01:54, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:21, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Apparently this is not a free image. This is similar to https://i.ytimg.com/vi/grx2msik8IE/hqdefault.jpg Ovruni (talk) 01:54, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:19, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
this image seems an unauthorized copy from http://www.okvoyage.com/432-forteresse-kuelap/ Txolo (talk) 01:56, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:21, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Apparently this is not a free image. This is similar to https://gcdn.emol.cl/mitos-y-enigmas/files/2016/11/Nazca2bmono.jpg Ovruni (talk) 01:57, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:18, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
this image seems an unauthorized copy from http://www.andina.com.pe/Ingles/noticia-peru-raymi-llacta-festival-showcases-amazonas-tourist-attractions-669422.aspx Txolo (talk) 02:00, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:21, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
this image seems an unauthorized copy from http://donskix.ru/img/126.jpg Txolo (talk) 02:02, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:22, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
this image seems an unauthorized copy from http://turismoi.pe/uploads/church/image/11051/medium_sancarlos_iglesia.JPG Txolo (talk) 02:03, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:21, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Apparently this is not a free image. This is similar to https://gcdn.emol.cl/mitos-y-enigmas/files/2016/11/Nazca-el-colibr%C3%AD.jpg Ovruni (talk) 02:04, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:18, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
this image seems an un authorized copy from http://turismoi.pe/uploads/church/image/10800/large_santana_cu_iglesia.JPG Txolo (talk) 02:05, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:21, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
this image seems an unauthorized copy from http://www.perutoptours.com/jpg/01am/plazuela_museo_iglesia_de_santa_ana_01.jpg Txolo (talk) 02:06, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:20, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
this image seems an unauthorized copy from https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-XtckMvWxQ3I/Vt9O9RV9mrI/AAAAAAAADWM/vZW-IhHUKBc/s1600/plazuela.jpg Txolo (talk) 02:08, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:20, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
this image seems an unauthorized copy from https://lonelyplanetwp.imgix.net/2014/10/Machu-Picchu.jpg?crop=entropy&fit=crop&h=421&sharp=10&vib=20&w=748 Txolo (talk) 02:11, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Apparently this is not a free image. This is similar to https://lonelyplanetwp.imgix.net/2014/10/Machu-Picchu.jpg?crop=entropy&fit=crop&h=421&sharp=10&vib=20&w=748 Ovruni (talk) 02:16, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:19, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:19, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
This is a resize image from https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/70/L%C3%ADneas_de_Nazca%2C_Nazca%2C_Per%C3%BA%2C_2015-07-29%2C_DD_46.JPG Ovruni (talk) 02:12, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:18, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Apparently this is not a free image. This is similar to https://i.pinimg.com/474x/ee/7d/f2/ee7df2d88d4e10f823e7d011d1c90825--peru.jpg Ovruni (talk) 02:14, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
this image is a unauthorized copy from https://i1.wp.com/machuyo.com/portal/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/El-Monasterio-de-Santa-Catalina.jpg?resize=800%2C533 all images from this user seems an unauthorized copys from internet. Txolo (talk) 02:19, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:18, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:18, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Tagged as {{PD-textlogo}} but I think the graphical content is more creative than that. DMacks (talk) 02:26, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:37, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
not own work; from a movie. Anarchyte (work | talk) 01:54, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Hedwig in Washington at 02:35, 9 Oktober 2017 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing - --Krdbot 06:33, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Yafie Achmad Raihan (talk · contribs)
editOut of educational scope. Personal images. Commons is not Facebook.
- File:Bicycle In Room.jpg
- File:Brother's.jpg
- File:5 Years Old.jpg
- File:Asleep In Flight.jpg
- File:Baby Sleeping.jpg
- File:RHN Stand.jpg
- File:RHN.jpg
- File:Sleeping 9 year old boy.jpg
--Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 01:31, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted, source – Facebook. Taivo (talk) 08:17, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Disgusting Picture Yafie Achmad Raihan (talk) 03:49, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept, but it is widely used and cannot be deleted on that reason. Taivo (talk) 08:14, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Embedded Data Bot as Embedded data (embedded data) and the most recent rationale was: suspect=1|1=After 1.5MiB (1547349 bytes, via Ending): Unidentified type (application/octet-stream, data) The file was introduced in an article at ro.wp, so it might be legit. Perhaps it can be cleaned-up, removing any suspect data? Strainu (talk) 11:15, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: Speedy kept – it's a legit file. Embedded Data Bot tagged it due to extra junk attached after actual JPEG data – some cameras do this. --jdx Re: 12:20, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:25, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Watermarked copyright, permission needed - user has copyvio history Train2104 (talk) 11:26, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by JGHowes at 14:24, 9 Oktober 2017 UTC: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work --Krdbot 18:32, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Delete I do not want any of my files on any sites. Marck Gibbs97 (talk) 00:04, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
Oppose: Creative Commons licenses are irrevocable. Nominator's uploads are within project scope and realistically educationally useful. The uploads have been uploaded a considerable amount ago (in August 2017), so courtesy deletions don't apply easily. The quality of uploaded images – while not on the level of valued images – are also good enough to be useful. 2001:2003:54FA:2751:0:0:0:1 01:00, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 16:59, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
The person responsible for the image sent me a message saying that it is to remove this image as soon as possible from the Internet, please I need help. OPS: The source was taken from Facebook — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marck Gibbs97 (talk • contribs) 2017-09-30T22:21:57 (UTC)
Copyrights Contribuidor da Wikipédia (talk) 19:01, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Failed license review. --Y.haruo (talk) 14:31, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
Copyrights Contribuidor da Wikipédia (talk) 19:03, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Guanaco at 06:32, 10 Oktober 2017 UTC: License review: Non-free license, or license disallowing commercial use and/or derivative works --Krdbot 12:31, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
Copyrights Contribuidor da Wikipédia (talk) 19:05, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Guanaco at 06:31, 10 Oktober 2017 UTC: License review: Non-free license, or license disallowing commercial use and/or derivative works --Krdbot 12:31, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
Copyrights Contribuidor da Wikipédia (talk) 19:09, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Guanaco at 06:31, 10 Oktober 2017 UTC: License review: Non-free license, or license disallowing commercial use and/or derivative works --Krdbot 12:31, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
Delete I do not want any of my files on any sites. Marck Gibbs97 (talk) 00:05, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose: Creative Commons licenses are irrevocable. Nominator's uploads are within project scope and realistically educationally useful. The uploads have been uploaded a considerable amount ago (in August 2017), so courtesy deletions don't apply easily. The quality of uploaded images – while not on the level of valued images – are also good enough to be useful. 2001:2003:54FA:2751:0:0:0:1 01:01, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 16:59, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
The person responsible for the image sent me a message saying that it is to remove this image as soon as possible from the Internet, please I need help. OPS:The source was taken from Facebook — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marck Gibbs97 (talk • contribs) 2017-09-30T22:25:29 (UTC)
Copyrights Contribuidor da Wikipédia (talk) 19:10, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Failed license review. --Y.haruo (talk) 14:31, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
Delete I do not want any of my files on any sites. Marck Gibbs97 (talk) 00:05, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose: Creative Commons licenses are irrevocable. Nominator's uploads are within project scope and realistically educationally useful. The uploads have been uploaded a considerable amount ago (in August 2017), so courtesy deletions don't apply easily. The quality of uploaded images – while not on the level of valued images – are also good enough to be useful. 2001:2003:54FA:2751:0:0:0:1 01:01, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:00, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
The author would not imagine that the images are exposed on the internet so I ask that you take as much heat as possible the source is Facebook. OPS: The source was taken from Facebook — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marck Gibbs97 (talk • contribs) 2017-09-30T22:23:12 (UTC)
Copyrights Contribuidor da Wikipédia (talk) 19:17, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Failed license review. --Y.haruo (talk) 14:28, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
Delete I do not want any of my files on any sites. Marck Gibbs97 (talk) 00:05, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose: Creative Commons licenses are irrevocable. Nominator's uploads are within project scope and realistically educationally useful. The uploads have been uploaded a considerable amount ago (in August 2017), so courtesy deletions don't apply easily. The quality of uploaded images – while not on the level of valued images – are also good enough to be useful. 2001:2003:54FA:2751:0:0:0:1 01:01, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 16:59, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Copyrights Contribuidor da Wikipédia (talk) 19:19, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Failed license review. --Y.haruo (talk) 14:30, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Таня Ким25 (talk · contribs)
editUnused personal photos, out of scope
Mjrmtg (talk) 12:00, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 19:14, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
Copyrights Contribuidor da Wikipédia (talk) 18:03, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Y.haruo at 14:18, 10 Oktober 2017 UTC: Non-free Flickr license disallowing commercial use and/or derivative works --Krdbot 18:59, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
Copyrights Contribuidor da Wikipédia (talk) 18:37, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Y.haruo at 14:24, 10 Oktober 2017 UTC: Non-free Flickr license disallowing commercial use and/or derivative works --Krdbot 18:59, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
Copyrights Contribuidor da Wikipédia (talk) 18:38, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Y.haruo at 14:25, 10 Oktober 2017 UTC: Non-free Flickr license disallowing commercial use and/or derivative works --Krdbot 18:59, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
Copyrights Contribuidor da Wikipédia (talk) 18:46, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Y.haruo at 14:20, 10 Oktober 2017 UTC: Non-free Flickr license disallowing commercial use and/or derivative works --Krdbot 18:59, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
Copyrights Contribuidor da Wikipédia (talk) 18:49, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Y.haruo at 14:20, 10 Oktober 2017 UTC: Non-free Flickr license disallowing commercial use and/or derivative works --Krdbot 18:59, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 2607:FB90:917E:7A8F:AC4C:478F:FE28:5A8A as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: <office action>. I do not believe office action, but this is small photo without camera data and the uploader's only contribution. Copyright violation is likely. Taivo (talk) 08:11, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- ticket:2017100910004358 also requests deletion. No evidence of copyright issues though. Ronhjones (Talk) 23:07, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- While Figure Skating competition may be considered a public event and I do not see any privacy violation here, I would support to Löschen it as a courtesy deletion. The image is unused and the subject does not seem to be notable. Unless somebody opposes. Ankry (talk) 08:15, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per Taivo, Ankry and Ronhjones + OTRS ticket. Ruthven (msg) 14:08, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
File:Pandit Navdeep - Black Magic Removal and Protection in California, Texas, Florida, New Jersey, New York, USA.jpg
editOut of COM:SCOPE, merely an advertisement. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:24, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Blatant advertising. Ed (Edgar181) 19:00, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
File:The procession of Yusef Ali Khan.jpg BukhariSaeed (talk) 17:56, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Redirect deleted. --Yann (talk) 19:57, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
Copyright vilolation File:Shahnamah of Firdausi, late 18th century, Mughal, India.jpg BukhariSaeed (talk) 18:01, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Not a copyvio, but duplicate. --Yann (talk) 19:55, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
copyright violation File:A noble lady, Mughal dynasty, India. 17th century.jpg BukhariSaeed (talk) 18:03, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Not a copyvio, but duplicate. --Yann (talk) 19:56, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
Per COM:SCOPE -> too small to be useful in a project BukhariSaeed (talk) 18:05, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:56, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
Copyrighted picture from http://www.kunsthochschulekassel.de/personen/personen-details/person/vogt-oliver.html 91.34.40.97 14:21, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- Löschen The photo appears to be "©John Brömstrup" per that webpage. — Jeff G. ツ 15:06, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- I had actually been wondering if this isn't such an obvious case that it should have been a speedy deletion? --91.34.40.97 15:18, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
@Designkritikerin: Would you care to comment? — Jeff G. ツ 03:59, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: I'd say this qualifies for 
Speedy delete. --Guanaco (talk) 05:14, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- The image is my own work, it's just that it's my first upload and I didn't read all the documentation on the site. I've uploaded the original image. Sorry for the confusion.--Rockdreamer (talk) 22:08, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: original was uploaded. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:06, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
Used on self promo article on plwiki, no metadata. Possibly not own work. ~Cybularny Speak? 22:12, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, also copyright from http://www.ubieramysamochody.pl/hydrogreen-lublin. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:18, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Blood Pheasant.jpg. Totodu74 (talk) 12:36, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:49, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 08:57, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Not necessarily own work, equivalent at English Wikipedia was non-free w:File:Richie Tozier Viral.jpg ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:09, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 21:54, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: and a copyright violation. --JuTa 03:16, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Photo is copyrighted Kamolan (talk) 21:59, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: source explicitly does not allow reuse. --Guanaco (talk) 08:15, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
no foreseeable educational use, out of project scope Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:01, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 08:14, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope Kamolan (talk) 22:05, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and likely copyvio. --Guanaco (talk) 08:14, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
see File:Deckenverziehrung Puttensaal Bibliothek im Luisenbad.jpg, uploading as new file was a mistake Queryzo (talk) 22:08, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- Service link: File:Deckenverziehrung Puttensaal Bibliothek im Luisenbad.jpg. Queryzo, this should be a speedy deletion reason, cf. e.g. template {{SD}}, reason G1.
- Not related to the request, therefore in German: Aber was denn nun – Luisenbad oder Marienbad (und Verzierung ohne h
). — Speravir – 22:58, 9 October 2017 (UTC) - Ping Queryzo. — Speravir – 23:24, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
- Gute Frage. @Southpark: ? Queryzo (talk) 05:54, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
- Ich müsstes es mal im Artikel nachlesen, Queryzo. Das Ding hat ja mehrfach seinen Namen geändert :-) Ich glaub' Marienbad hieß es zu der Zeit als das entsprechende Gebäude gebaut wurde, wobei Luisenbad in der Geschichte meiner Erinnerung nach für die gesamte Badeanstalt an sich der am längsten dauernde Namen war (und heute glaueb ich der am ehesten verwendete ist). -- Southpark (talk) 19:06, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
- Danke. — Speravir – 00:20, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
- Gute Frage. @Southpark: ? Queryzo (talk) 05:54, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
_at_WMSE_office_in_Stockholm.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_-_2.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_.jpg){kind=link}
,_Santa_Catarina,_Brasil_by_Nivaldo_Cit_Filho_-_panoramio.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Jaime_Ramirez_Gomez.JPG){kind=link}
_POLY,_KATSINA_STATE_OF_NIGERIA_SMALL_IRRIGATION_FARM_LAND.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_at_WMSE_office_in_Stockholm.JPG){kind=link}
_at_WMSE_office_in_Stockholm.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_at_WMSE_office_in_Stockholm.JPG){kind=link}
_at_WMSE_office_in_Stockholm.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-3){kind=link}
_-_2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_-_2.jpg){kind=link}
_-_2.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: by Taivo. --Guanaco (talk) 08:14, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Self nomination. Wikipedia does not consider Indian army website images to have the correct license Adamgerber80 (talk) 22:09, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 08:13, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
- Restored: {{GODL-India}}. Yann (talk) 20:59, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
Self nomination. Wikipedia does not consider Indian army website images to have the correct license Adamgerber80 (talk) 22:09, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 08:13, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Self nomination. Wikipedia does not consider Indian army website images to have the correct license Adamgerber80 (talk) 22:09, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 08:13, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
- Restored: {{GODL-India}}. Yann (talk) 21:03, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
Unclear license Kamolan (talk) 22:09, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 08:13, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Self nomination. Wikipedia does not consider Indian army website images to have the correct license Adamgerber80 (talk) 22:10, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 08:13, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
- Restored: {{GODL-India}}. Yann (talk) 19:49, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
Unclear license, apparently uploader is not person who made this photo Kamolan (talk) 22:11, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 08:13, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
a screenshot does not make it "own work" - no permission Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:12, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 08:13, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Unclear license, apparently photo made before 1990 Kamolan (talk) 22:13, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 08:12, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
not likely to be uploader's own work, possible copyvio Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:13, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 08:12, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
promo material, not within project scope Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:13, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 08:11, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Unclear license, photo couldnt be made after 1964 Kamolan (talk) 22:14, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 08:11, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
no realistic educational use, out of project scope Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:14, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 08:10, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Unclear license, photo made far earlier than 2016, apparently uploader has no rights on this photo Kamolan (talk) 22:15, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 08:10, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope, not hosting Kamolan (talk) 22:17, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 08:10, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
promotional material not realistically useful for an educational purpose - out of scope Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:17, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 08:09, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Unclear license Kamolan (talk) 22:18, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 08:09, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Unclear license, apparently copyrighted Kamolan (talk) 22:19, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 08:09, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Unclear license, apparently copyrighted Kamolan (talk) 22:19, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 08:09, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Unclear license, apparently copyrighted Kamolan (talk) 22:19, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 08:09, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
copyrighted football club logo, not uploader's own work as claimed Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:20, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 08:08, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
personal file, out of project scope Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:20, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 08:08, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by At.embroidery (talk · contribs)
editpromotional material with no foreseeable educational use, weak evidence of permission
- File:Ahmad tayefeh,goldozi,embroidery-گلدوزی-احمد طایفه (31).jpg
- File:Ahmad tayefeh,goldozi,embroidery-گلدوزی-احمد طایفه (30).jpg
- File:Ahmad tayefeh,goldozi,embroidery-گلدوزی-احمد طایفه (29).jpg
- File:Ahmad tayefeh,goldozi,embroidery-گلدوزی-احمد طایفه (28).jpg
- File:Ahmad tayefeh,goldozi,embroidery-گلدوزی-احمد طایفه (27).jpg
- File:Ahmad tayefeh,goldozi,embroidery-گلدوزی-احمد طایفه (25).jpg
- File:Ahmad tayefeh,goldozi,embroidery-گلدوزی-احمد طایفه (24).jpg
- File:Ahmad tayefeh,goldozi,embroidery-گلدوزی-احمد طایفه (23).jpg
- File:Ahmad tayefeh,goldozi,embroidery-گلدوزی-احمد طایفه (22).jpg
- File:Ahmad tayefeh,goldozi,embroidery-گلدوزی-احمد طایفه (21).jpg
- File:Ahmad tayefeh,goldozi,embroidery-گلدوزی-احمد طایفه (20).jpg
- File:Ahmad tayefeh,goldozi,embroidery-گلدوزی-احمد طایفه (19).jpg
- File:Ahmad tayefeh,goldozi,embroidery-گلدوزی-احمد طایفه (18).jpg
- File:Ahmad tayefeh,goldozi,embroidery-گلدوزی-احمد طایفه (17).jpg
- File:Ahmad tayefeh,goldozi,embroidery-گلدوزی-احمد طایفه (16).jpg
- File:Ahmad tayefeh,goldozi,embroidery-گلدوزی-احمد طایفه (15).jpg
- File:Ahmad tayefeh,goldozi,embroidery-گلدوزی-احمد طایفه (14).jpg
- File:Ahmad tayefeh,goldozi,embroidery-گلدوزی-احمد طایفه (13).jpg
- File:Ahmad tayefeh,goldozi,embroidery-گلدوزی-احمد طایفه (12).jpg
- File:Ahmad tayefeh,goldozi,embroidery-گلدوزی-احمد طایفه (11).jpg
- File:Ahmad tayefeh,goldozi,embroidery-گلدوزی-احمد طایفه (10).jpg
- File:Ahmad tayefeh,goldozi,embroidery-گلدوزی-احمد طایفه (9).jpg
- File:Ahmad tayefeh,goldozi,embroidery-گلدوزی-احمد طایفه (8).jpg
- File:Ahmad tayefeh,goldozi,embroidery-گلدوزی-احمد طایفه (7).jpg
- File:Ahmad tayefeh,goldozi,embroidery-گلدوزی-احمد طایفه (6).jpg
- File:Ahmad tayefeh,goldozi,embroidery-گلدوزی-احمد طایفه (5).jpg
- File:Ahmad tayefeh,goldozi,embroidery-گلدوزی-احمد طایفه (4).jpg
- File:Ahmad tayefeh,goldozi,embroidery-گلدوزی-احمد طایفه (3).jpg
- File:Ahmad tayefeh,goldozi,embroidery-گلدوزی-احمد طایفه (2).jpg
- File:Ahmad tayefeh,goldozi,embroidery-گلدوزی-احمد طایفه (1).jpg
- File:Ahmad tayefeh embroidery گلدوزی احمد طایفه.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:22, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 08:08, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
unlikely to be uploader's own work as claimed, possible copyvio Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:23, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 08:07, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
non-notable individual, out of project scope Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:24, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: in use on Wikidata, subject has a Wikipedia article. --Guanaco (talk) 08:06, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Aurelieshop (talk · contribs)
editno realistic educational value, out of project scope
- File:AVITRINE.jpeg
- File:ARDCWIKI.jpeg
- File:ARDCWIKI2.jpeg
- File:APRETAPORTER.jpeg
- File:ALUNETTES.jpeg
- File:Dispaly bijoux.jpg
- File:Air-de-colette-2.jpg
- File:VITRINE JEREMYVILLE.jpg
- File:AIRDECOLETTE.jpg
Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:26, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted the ones that are primarily copyrighted artwork. The retail store images could possibly be useful for something. --Guanaco (talk) 08:05, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by İnsomnia41 (talk · contribs)
editout of scope website screenshots
Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:27, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 08:02, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Synapsenstau78 (talk · contribs)
editScreenshot/logo of copyrighted software
Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:28, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 08:02, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mohdjareesh (talk · contribs)
editpersonal files, out of project scope
Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:29, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 08:01, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
no evidence the software is freely licensed, possible copyvios
Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:29, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 08:01, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
no realistic educational use Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:30, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 08:02, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
no evidence of permission Eeekster (talk) 22:17, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. GeorgHH • talk 01:26, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
Promotional material, out of scope. Missvain (talk) 19:51, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
- Löschen. Out of scope Kgorman-ucb (talk) 20:05, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Note that the two images under this name are not related. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:16, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
Unused logo image, without Wikipedia article (that I can find). Out of educational scope. Logo may also be above COM:TOO. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 22:55, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 08:01, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Logo may be above COM:TOO --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 23:08, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 08:01, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
orphaned logo files, no realistic educational use
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:11, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 08:00, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
orphaned logo file, no realistic educational use Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:11, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 08:00, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
orphaned personal files, out of scope
Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:12, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 07:59, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Wings of PegasuS (talk · contribs)
editcommons is not a webhost,
- File:Rrt.jpg
- File:Universe 5-037.jpg
- File:Universe 5-025.jpg
- File:Universe 5-036.jpg
- File:St. Universe Days chap 2-006.jpg
- File:Cutted-026.jpg
- File:Cutted-021.jpg
- File:Cutted-019.jpg
- File:Cutted-013.jpg
- File:Hug12.jpg
- File:Aki.jpg
- File:Takumi đau buồn trước cái chết của Lyn.jpg
- File:PegasuS Takumi.jpg
Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:13, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and likely copyvio. --Guanaco (talk) 07:59, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ana-oeneka (talk · contribs)
editpromo photos with no realistic encyclopedic use
Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:14, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 07:56, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
personal file, outside of project scope Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:16, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Support Thanks @Jon Kolbert: --Alaa :)..! 23:17, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 07:56, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
personal file, out of project scope Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:17, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 07:57, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Derivative work might be above COM:TOO, and is as well out of scope. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 23:23, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 07:57, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
I no longer wish to share this painting which is mine. (I am the painter) Serredjouhri222 (talk) 23:54, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: File is not in use or necessarily in scope. --Guanaco (talk) 08:00, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
per COM:ADVERT Life has teeth (talk) 00:07, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:03, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
per COM:ADVERT Life has teeth (talk) 00:07, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:03, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal images
Life has teeth (talk) 00:08, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:04, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Life has teeth (talk) 00:21, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:04, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pontyarelle Pacheco (talk · contribs)
editOut of scope - unused personal/promotional images
- File:Bloodfire Formação Atual.jpg
- File:Carlos Augusto.jpg
- File:Marcus Fire.jpg
- File:Breno Nicollas.jpg
- File:Pontyarelle.jpg
- File:Patrynne Pacheco.jpg
- File:Bloodfire(band).jpg
- File:Capa EP Dangerous Game.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Life has teeth (talk) 00:23, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:04, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
_.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope - unused personal image Life has teeth (talk) 00:27, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
_.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:05, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
_.jpg){kind=link}
Unused logo image, without Wikipedia article (that I can find). Out of scope. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 00:28, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:05, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Unused photo of an unidentified person/person without Wikipedia article/Wikidata entry. Out of educational scope. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 00:30, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:05, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Life has teeth (talk) 00:30, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:06, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Life has teeth (talk) 00:31, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:06, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Life has teeth (talk) 00:32, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:07, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Life has teeth (talk) 00:33, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:07, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Unused logo image, without Wikipedia article (that I can find). Out of educational scope. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 00:35, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:07, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Life has teeth (talk) 00:36, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:07, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Unused logo image, without Wikipedia article (that I can find). Out of educational scope. (Is this a parody logo of PonHub?) --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 00:59, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:08, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nickpicture65 (talk · contribs)
editOut of project scope. Personal photos and not being used on any pages. We have plenty of images of this variety already. {{Nopenis}} applies.
- File:Pierced erect.jpg
- File:Chastity plugged.jpg
- File:Blowjob men.jpg
- File:Nude men after swimming.jpg
- File:Knight pierced erect.jpg
- File:Masturbate2.jpg
- File:Backsite.jpg
- File:Masturbate.jpg
Majora (talk) 00:59, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- Löschen Per nomination, not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:01, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- Löschen out of scope. TonyBallioni (talk) 01:13, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- Löschen Per nomination, I cannot see these images used in any educational setting. Alex Shih (talk) 01:55, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:09, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:59, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- All of the uploads from this user have been nominated for deletion as out of project scope. Please see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Nickpicture65. This can be closed as a duplicate. --Majora (talk) 01:01, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:11, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Unused logo image, without Wikipedia article (that I can find). Out of educational scope. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 01:02, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:11, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Unused logo image, without Wikipedia article (article on pl.wikipedia was deleted per Wikipedia:Poczekalnia/artykuły/2017:09:18:Domodi). Out of educational scope. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 01:06, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:11, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Unused logo image, without Wikipedia article (that I can find). Out of educational scope. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 01:24, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:11, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Unused logo image, without Wikipedia article (that I can find). Out of educational scope. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 01:30, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:12, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal photo Apocheir (talk) 02:36, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:12, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal photo Apocheir (talk) 02:37, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:12, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Low quality, embedded PNG, replaced by Agaricon V2.svg Nothingserious (talk) 04:09, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- Löschen per nom. File:Agaricon V2.svg looks good, whereas the nom'ed file is a {{BadSVG}}. @Nothingserious: there's the standard template for tagging this sort of file:) DMacks (talk) 04:50, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unused poor duplicate. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:14, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:51, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:14, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Unused private image. Self-promotion. No other useful contributions. DavidIvar (talk) 07:43, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:15, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Unused private image. Self-promotion. No other contributions. DavidIvar (talk) 07:47, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:15, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Unused private image. No other contributions. DavidIvar (talk) 07:49, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:15, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Unused private image. No other contributions. DavidIvar (talk) 07:50, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:15, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Unused private image. No other contributions. DavidIvar (talk) 07:51, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:16, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Advertising. Specifically in the description. Subject otherwise redundant and mediocre quality. Not used. DavidIvar (talk) 08:03, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:16, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Unused private image. Not educationally useful. No useful contributions. DavidIvar (talk) 08:10, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:17, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Low quality, unused private image. Not educationally useful. No useful contributions. DavidIvar (talk) 08:11, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:16, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:37, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:37, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:36, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:36, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:36, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:37, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Private image. Self-promotion. No useful contributions. DavidIvar (talk) 08:08, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:17, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Private image. Self-promotion. No useful contributions. DavidIvar (talk) 08:08, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:17, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal logo, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 09:11, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:17, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Personal photo. Out of scope. Castillo blanco (talk) 09:21, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:18, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Useless low resolution image Totodu74 (talk) 09:37, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:18, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Personal photo. Out of scope. Castillo blanco (talk) 09:42, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:18, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:40, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:19, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:41, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:19, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:25, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:19, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dennismukoya (talk · contribs)
editOut of scope. Wikimedia Commons is not a personal photo album. Not in use.
Wikicology (talk) 14:04, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:20, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Multiple issues: Out of scope and this is a small photo with no EXIF Metadata. Wikicology (talk) 14:11, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:21, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Multiple issues: Out of scope and this is a small photo with no EXIF Metadata.
Wikicology (talk) 14:13, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:22, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Imported by error on Commons Petro [pronto?] 14:14, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:23, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by এ এইস সাকিব (talk · contribs)
editOut of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:23, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope. Wikimedia Commons is not a personal photo album. Not in use. Wikicology (talk) 14:41, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:23, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope. Wikimedia Commons is not a personal photo album. Not in use. Wikicology (talk) 14:45, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:24, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Commons is not your personal image hosting site COM:SELFIE
Elisfkc (talk) 14:48, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:25, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope. Wikimedia Commons is not a personal photo album. Not in use.
Wikicology (talk) 14:48, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:25, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope. Wikimedia Commons is not a personal photo album. Not in use. Wikicology (talk) 14:50, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:25, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Storabi1993 (talk · contribs)
editUnused logo image, without Wikipedia article (that I can find). Out of educational scope.
--Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 15:17, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:25, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Unused logo image, without Wikipedia article (that I can find). Out of educational scope. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 15:24, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:26, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Reqvidd (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia, except sandbox in sv.wiki and uploading a personal photo, which is used only in the sandbox. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 15:30, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:26, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Small unused photo about non-notable person (no mention in en.wiki), out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 16:42, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:27, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
per COM:PENIS, no unique educational value over existing files
Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:38, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:28, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ČarodějniceElinaofficial (talk · contribs)
editPersonal files, commons is not a webhost
- File:Ee1 logo-tile.jpg
- File:OFICIÁLNÍ PLAKÁT Č.E (3).jpg
- File:Znak eliny č.gif
- File:Čarodějnice Elina plakát (3).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:45, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:29, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable website, screenshot is a possible copyvio - out of project scope
Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:49, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:29, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
unused personal file, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 18:20, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:30, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable company, out of project scope
Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:22, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:30, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
spam, out of project scope Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:31, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:32, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
No useful purpose Richard Symonds (talk) 18:38, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:32, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
autopromo, used only on user's sandbox page, which is his only contrubution to fr.wiki Pibwl (talk) 20:37, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:33, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
unused, out of scope Pibwl (talk) 20:37, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:33, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
personal photo - out of project scope Jon Kolbert (talk) 21:31, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:34, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
no realistic educational use, out of project scope Jon Kolbert (talk) 21:35, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:34, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
no foreseeable use, out of project scope Jon Kolbert (talk) 21:37, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:35, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
not realistically educational, out of project scope Jon Kolbert (talk) 21:38, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:35, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
personal images, out of project scope.
- File:No me importa el tipo de las letras.jpg
- File:La dulce sinfonía aristócrata.jpg
- File:Strella.jpg
Jon Kolbert (talk) 21:41, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:35, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
no educational use, out of project scope Jon Kolbert (talk) 21:42, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:35, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
not a webhost for product galleries, out of project scope
Jon Kolbert (talk) 21:45, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:36, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
above Com:TOO Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:18, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:13, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Commons2017isBack (talk · contribs)
editabove Com:TOO
- File:Two Car Logo.png
- File:Imōto Sae Ireba Ii. Logo.jpg
- File:Ryūō no Oshigoto! Logo.png
- File:Sanrio Danshi Logo.png
- File:Konohana Kitan Logo.png
- File:Yurucamp Logo.jpg
- File:Skirt no Naka wa Kedamono Deshita. Logo.png
- File:Nora to Oujo to Noraneko Heart Logo.png
- File:Blend S Logo.png
- File:Violet Evergarden Logo.png
- File:Anonymous Noise Logo.jpg
- File:Ramen Daisuki Koizumi-san Logo.png
- File:Kabukibu! Logo.jpg
- File:Shōjo Kageki Revue Starlight logo.png
- File:Dive!! Logo.png
Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:19, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:15, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Not in PD the author died in in 1998, https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_d%27Anty , a permission from the copyright holder must be sent to OTRS Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:49, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:15, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Artpediacoll (talk · contribs)
editArtwork cited to http://suzumeu.tokyo/ with no evidence of permission.
- File:歪んだ月.jpg
- File:夜明け前.jpg
- File:目覚め.jpg
- File:名前を呼んで.jpg
- File:未来.jpg
- File:夢の砦.jpg
- File:抹消.jpg
- File:青い鳥.jpg
- File:世界の何処にいたって.jpg
- File:星を見つけて.jpg
- File:真昼の星.jpg
- File:私だけ.jpg
- File:再会を探して.jpg
- File:The night is still young.jpg
- File:意識.jpg
DMacks (talk) 04:53, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:15, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alexis davo (talk · contribs)
editSmall photos with no EXIF metadata. Possible copyvios.
Wikicology (talk) 14:29, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:16, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
File:BALNEÁRIO CAMBORIÚ (Ilha das Cabras), Santa Catarina, Brasil by Nivaldo Cit Filho - panoramio.jpg
edit,_Santa_Catarina,_Brasil_by_Nivaldo_Cit_Filho_-_panoramio.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Santa_Catarina,_Brasil_by_Nivaldo_Cit_Filho_-_panoramio.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Non used / low res / No relevance art work Sturm (talk) 00:42, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:40, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Probably screenshoted from one of RiceGum's videos; definitely not CC BY-SA. Zhangj1079 (Saluton!) 01:23, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- As well, no metadata; and link doesn't specify where the image is under CC BY-SA. Zhangj1079 (Saluton!) 01:24, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:41, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Per com:derivative. I mean the background photo needs to be freely licensed, too. Mhhossein talk 05:22, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:42, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
not needed anymore Polyglot (talk) 05:26, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused file with limited value. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:43, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Small image, no EXIF. B dash (talk) 06:12, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: unused personal image, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:43, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
This is a drawing, not a photograph. Evidences of anonymous publication (of the cover artwork) or dead of author is required Discasto talk 08:28, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, copyvio. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:45, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
What is it? Out of project scope?
Это что здесь? Зачем нужен? Taivo (talk) 08:31, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: no context to give it educational value. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:45, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Yinxingcoboo (talk · contribs)
editUnused personal photos of unclear educational purpose, also likely not own work.
Wcam (talk) 12:44, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:48, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Personal photo. Out of scope. Castillo blanco (talk) 13:02, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:49, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
A personal photograph. Photographs of the terraces can be found in Category:Mammoth Hot Springs. Robert Weemeyer (talk) 13:37, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep It has been cropped. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 13:47, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- Good idea. Thanks. Keep -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 15:01, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- Good idea. Thanks.
Kept: per discussion. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:50, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope. Wikimedia Commons is not a personal photo album. Wikicology (talk) 13:56, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:50, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Innocent Mtui (talk · contribs)
editOut of scope. Commons is not a personal photo album.
- File:Bodaboda transport 04.jpg
- File:Bodaboda transport 05.jpg
- File:Bodaboda transport 03.jpg
- File:Bodaboda transport 02.jpg
- File:Bodaboda transport 01.jpg
- File:Muziki.jpg
- File:Ku sign.jpg
- File:Signing a contract for tipatone Ltd.jpg
- File:Mahojiano.jpg
- File:Bus ride.jpg
Wikicology (talk) 14:01, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- It is typical for bicycles and taxi-motorcycles that only one or two persons use it for transport. In Category:Moped boda-boda and Category:Taxi motorcycles there are not manymany photos from Tanzania, or? Keep some of the photos! 'Signing a contract' shows Category:Signing a contract. 'Bus ride' is a good photo, I would keep it, and 'Mahojiano' maybe useful for Preparation (principle), Category:People waiting and Category:Interviews, but is not an important photo of future celebrities (see also related photo: File:Mahojiano chuo.jpg). The photo descriptions should be improved. --LudwigSebastianMicheler (talk) 09:04, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: most as out of scope. 'Bus ride' is clearly a personal photo without educational value. 'Mahojiano' and 'Signing a contract' are personal images that add no value to their respective categories that already have many better alternatives. Kept two images in the under-represented Category:Moped boda-boda. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:59, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Small image with no EXIF Metadata. Possible copyvio. Wikicology (talk) 14:09, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio, readily found on internet using Google Image. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:57, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Possible copyvio. See here for example Wikicology (talk) 14:17, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- Afek91 is actually Afek Ben Chahed so the author of the picture.
- Afek, you might want to indicate on your user page your name and/or links to your social accounts so that if you publish pictures on Commons after you have already published them elsewhere, there would be no issue. Moumou82 (talk) 18:58, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- Wikicology, thank you for your note, but the picture is mine. It is my name Afek Ben Chahed.
- Moumou82, thank you for the clarification, I will add the links. (talk) 10:08, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:09, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Possible infringement of copyright protected works. We need evidence of permission from the artist.
- File:IMG-20170903-WA0091.jpg
- File:IMG-20170903-WA0081.jpg
- File:IMG-20170903-WA0031.jpg
- File:IMG-20170903-WA0087.jpg
- File:IMG-20170903-WA0104.jpg
- File:IMG-20170903-WA0030.jpg
Wikicology (talk) 14:57, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:12, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
A google image search reveals that this is from facebook. no evidence of permission Gbawden (talk) 14:58, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:12, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
This map has too many problems and cannot be incrementally fixed: 1) it uses Wikipedia as a source for over half its data, in violation of WP:CIRC, 2) the map legend has no units or descriptions to say what the percentages represent (percentage of what???) making it basically useless, and 3) it shows little in the way of cartographic thought or design, other than use of a decent projection. Darkest tree (talk) 15:30, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- You can remove it from articles.....but Commons does not care about OR or CIRC. Any crap can be uploaded. Add a warning like at File:NouvelleFrance-Vraie-Version.png--Moxy (talk) 16:26, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks for that suggestion. Darkest tree (talk) 17:18, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
- 1) Not hard to fix. The Wikipedia articles have sources, and perhaps there's more up-to-date info. 2) Percentage of what else could it be, other than total population? Let's fix the wording. 3) Sadly, this one is a valid issue. I'm not a cartographer. Though I could give it another try in order to improve readability, it'll probably never be good enough. I'll upload a replacement sometime during this week. If it's still not good enough, do as you wish. Locoluis (talk) 12:42, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
- First, let me say thank you for your contributions. I'm not trying to discourage you from making maps or other graphic content, which is sorely needed across the Project. If you do want a map to be used on Wikipedia, the standards for the sources and data that go into it are quite a bit higher than what I'm hearing (above) is allowed to be uploaded to Commons. Second, good cartography is an art form, and unfortunately I don't have any electronic resources I can point you straight to, because all of mine came from paper textbooks and professors' lectures in college long ago. You can start with these five things, however, that every map should include:
- A title in the map itself that explains what the map shows
- A descriptive key or legend that explains what exactly the symbology or themes on the map represent
- A north arrow
- An appropriately-sized scale (although on a very small-scale (meaning large area) or global-scale map, this gets tricky due to the projection), and
- A neatline that borders the entire map.
- First, let me say thank you for your contributions. I'm not trying to discourage you from making maps or other graphic content, which is sorely needed across the Project. If you do want a map to be used on Wikipedia, the standards for the sources and data that go into it are quite a bit higher than what I'm hearing (above) is allowed to be uploaded to Commons. Second, good cartography is an art form, and unfortunately I don't have any electronic resources I can point you straight to, because all of mine came from paper textbooks and professors' lectures in college long ago. You can start with these five things, however, that every map should include:
Hope this helps. Darkest tree (talk) 17:46, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, and in use. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:15, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
DrugstoreAP (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia, except subpage in fr.wiki and uploading a photo, which is used only on the subpage. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 16:05, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:16, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Probably not own work, unclear copyright situation. May also be out of scope, "proposed" flag of unknown importance. Jcb (talk) 17:35, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:17, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Picture of artwork, uploaded presumably by the artist himself: OTRS verification required? 91.34.40.97 17:48, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:18, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mediastud~commonswiki (talk · contribs)
editCopyrighted per COM:TOYS
Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:20, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:19, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
derivative of copyrighted works, also out of project scope Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:21, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:19, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
possible copyvio, out of project scope Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:23, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:20, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ADVFN FRANCE (talk · contribs)
editpersonal files, out of project scope
Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:24, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:20, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
personal files, out of project scope
- File:Afbeelding8.png
- File:Afbeelding7.png
- File:Afbeelding5.png
- File:Afbeelding6.png
- File:Afbeelding4.png
- File:Afbeelding1.png
- File:Afbeelding2.png
- File:Afbeelding3.png
- File:Tfd profielfoto.png
- File:The Force Dimension Logo 04.png
- File:The Force Dimension Logo 03.jpg
- File:The Force Dimension Logo 02.jpg
- File:The Force Dimension Logo.jpg
Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:25, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:21, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
unlikely uploader's own work, copyrighted TV screenshot Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:33, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:22, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Malishka99 (talk · contribs)
editcopyrighted TV screenshots, not uploader's own work
- File:Worth Seeing.png
- File:STEP BY STEP.jpg
- File:Business words.png
- File:LanguageOfBusiness.jpg
- File:Labour of Love.png
- File:Keep Fit.png
- File:Here and there.jpg
Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:33, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:22, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Sorry, in my opinion the photo is out of project scope due to bad quality. Taivo (talk) 19:25, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, many better alternatives available. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:23, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Redirect to a deleted file. Rahul Bott (talk) 19:38, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- Speedy delete CSD G2: broken redirect --bjh21 (talk) 21:33, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:23, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Vijay Rupani
editSee Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Files from narendramodiofficial Flickr stream. Established case of Flickrwashing.
- File:Gujarat CM Vijay Rupani.JPG
- File:Narendra Modi meeting disabled people and their families (1).jpg
- File:Prime Narendra Modi at Samajik Adhikarita Shivir, in Navsari, GJ.jpg
- File:Prime Narendra Modi at Samajik Adhikarita Shivir, in Navsari, Gujarat.jpg
- File:Prime Narendra Modi during a visit to Limkheda.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Rahul Bott (talk) 19:55, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:24, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
{{BadSVG}}, orphaned/replaced by File:Diclofenac-Synthesen.svg. Leyo 20:02, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:24, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Low resolution images with no metadata. Range of quality - I'm not convinced these are own work.
- File:Wingwalkers.jpg
- File:F 35.jpg
- File:AH 64.jpg
- File:SU 27.jpg
- File:De Havilland Sea Vixen.jpg
- File:B17 Memphis Belle.jpg
- File:Memphis Belle..jpg
- File:Photokora1.jpg
-mattbuck (Talk) 20:33, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- I think it probably is own work. This dude spammed those pics in a number of pl.wiki articles (see [1]), probably in an effort to promote himself. He added them to articles without any deeper thought so it seems plausible to me that he uploaded them in a similar manner: haphazardly, not paying attention to whether he's selecting only his best work. Łukasz Wolf Golowanow (talk) 19:34, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, not found elsewhere on the internet using Google Image. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:30, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 20:49, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, dubious source and author. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:32, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
the word mugshot is missing Jon-doe (talk) 01:28, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep: I've renamed the file to match the style of your other uploads. I hope that helps. In future, you can use the "Move" option on the "More" menu to request renaming. --bjh21 (talk) 21:20, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: renamed. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:35, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Created by Nipponese Dog Calvero LTA 173.12.56.169 13:28, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
- Keep. This is not a reason to delete anything. Depicted person is notable. The photo is properly licensed and has complete EXIF. Taivo (talk) 15:04, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: as per Taivo. --Daphne Lantier 18:42, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal photo 100.35.73.190 03:08, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- Löschen: Self-promotion.--Lanwi1(Talk) 16:40, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep en:Peter Huang is still notable. Jason can be cropped away. Taivo (talk) 11:34, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
Kommentar: No problem if can remove attention seeker. --Lanwi1(Talk) 11:42, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep (revised) only if cropped as proposed by Taivo, which I've done here for this discussion. The Chinese-wiki article is here zh:黃文雄 (人權活動家). JGHowes talk - 13:09, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
the infomration just on the person could be useful. Artix Kreiger (talk) 14:09, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep per above - The subject has an EN article and as such this image could be used, No valid reason for deletion. –Davey2010Talk 20:04, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:36, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Special:Diff/731504130 Kadı Message 18:04, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- Also: File:Peter Huang and Jason Lin 2018-03-25.jpg Kadı Message 18:05, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep, courtesy deletions are usually only for subjects who either didn't choose to have their images uploaded or for uploaders a fortnight or so after the original upload. This image has been up for years and is the source file for an image of a notable individual. The uploader chose to irrevocably release this file to the Wikimedia Commons where it has been for years, it would set bad precedent to delete it now simply because the subject changed his mind years later. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 18:07, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- Löschen：A certain man of letters once said something like this:"Is it right because it has always been like that?"
- Just because something has always existed does not mean that it should be accepted. It seems to me that the vandal's act of uploading the document was for one reason only - to promote himself, this is also in some ways contrary to the foundation's policy.and the fact that he was photographed with a well-known figure in the photo was just a cover, similar to "the fox standing in front of the tiger and claiming to be the king of the forest".Why do we have to use this when there are more documents available?——維基百科最忠誠的反對者 (talk) 20:51, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- I assumed that the Nipponese Dog Cavero requested his own photographs to be taken down because of privacy when I first saw this request. Regardless of the intent of these photographs, they could still be taken to be "An example of a well-known human rights activist posing with other human rights activists". The main question here is "Can these files be realistically used in an educational context?" And I think that the answer easily is "Yes", we've had several discussions about this in the past and every time the answer is "Yes". Please see: "Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Jason Lin". Also, you can start a request to globally ban him yourself, he currently isn't globally banned and if you want to do this you can easily start a request. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 21:07, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep per discussion above, no valid reason for deletion. –Davey2010Talk 21:49, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:28, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Unused personal photo 100.35.73.190 03:08, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- Löschen: Self-promotion.--Lanwi1(Talk) 16:40, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep en:Neil Peng is notable. The photo is big and has EXIF data. Taivo (talk) 11:37, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
- Kommentar (revised): But 林浩生(Jason Lin) isn't still notable. See Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Jason Lin. --Lanwi1(Talk) 11:44, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
- Jason can be cropped away. Taivo (talk) 11:44, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
- Kommentar: No problem if can remove attention seeker. --Lanwi1(Talk) 12:10, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
- Jason can be cropped away. Taivo (talk) 11:44, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
- Löschen (revised), after looking over the many images we already have of the notable subject (see Category:Neil Peng), there's really no need to keep this unused personal photo, even if cropped. See also related DR's:
- Keep per above - The subject has an EN article and as such this image could be used, No valid reason for deletion. –Davey2010Talk 20:05, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:39, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
This file is a portrait of a user who has been Globall Banned and it's not useful to keep it and it is likely to advertise this user. A request for removal is therefore made. 維基百科最忠誠的反對者 (talk) 15:57, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep, courtesy deletions are usually only for subjects who either didn't choose to have their images uploaded or for uploaders a fortnight or so after the original upload. This image has been up for years and is the source file for an image of a notable individual. The uploader chose to irrevocably release this file to the Wikimedia Commons where it has been for years, it would set bad precedent to delete it now simply because the subject changed his mind years later. The status of a user being globally banned doesn't change the value of the image, we shouldn't condemn the memory (Damnatio memoriae) of globally banned users, this isn't the Roman Empire or Ancient Egypt where we remove all mentions of people we don't like so any memories of them will disappear. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 18:12, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- Addendum, such images are usually honeypots for easily discovering socks as well, by removing them you're actually making it more difficult to identify NDC socks. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 18:17, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- Thank u for participating in the discussion, but note that I have also proposed the deletion of other file he has uploaded, so please focus the discussion in one page（This）.——維基百科最忠誠的反對者 (talk) 21:02, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep same as discussion above, image could be used etc. –Davey2010Talk 21:13, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep: The nominator has seriously got no argument for getting this file deleted. ─ The Aafī (talk) 18:20, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:44, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
Appears to be photo of a family including several children at their own home (not a public place). Suggest deletion unless express consent provided/available. Prashanthns (talk) 07:38, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:40, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Aeen.pasar (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia, except userpage in fa.wiki and uploading two photos about himself (one of them is now deleted), which are used only on the userpage. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 09:09, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:41, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Looks like being captured from a still photograph. —Vensatry (Ping me) 09:21, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:42, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Duplicate of File:Biologist holding a gray bat at a gray bat survey site.jpg. Totodu74 (talk) 10:51, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: as duplicate. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:46, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Jahlandomusic (talk · contribs)
editpersonal files, out of project scope
Jon Kolbert (talk) 21:32, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:32, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by جواهربازار (talk · contribs)
editlikely not uploader's own work
- File:اندازه گیری سایز انگشت.jpg
- File:جلاسنج.jpg
- File:مایع ظرفشویی.jpg
- File:دستمال نخی.jpg
- File:Limpieza-anillos.jpg
Jon Kolbert (talk) 21:44, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and spam. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:33, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Chaksius185 (talk · contribs)
editCopyrighted comic cover ; COM:NETCOPYRIGHT
- File:Zombie Rising Vol 2 cover.jpg
- File:Damned Issue 1 cover art.png
- File:Vrica-dawn-of-the-wolf-graphic-novel page 07.jpg
- File:Vrica-dawn-of-the-wolf-graphic-novel page 01.jpg
Lacrymocéphale (talk) 11:25, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- Sorry but I've asked for a speedy deletion instead. --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 11:30, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: close DR only. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:47, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Useless low resolution picture (already 118 files in Category:Accipiter cooperii). Totodu74 (talk) 12:11, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:47, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Great Indian bustard.jpg. Totodu74 (talk) 12:34, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as duplicate. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:48, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
See https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_policy#Not_educationally_useful , as the user uploaded a number of photos of the same person (the user himself?) Malyacko (talk) 12:42, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:49, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
See https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_policy#Not_educationally_useful , as the user uploaded a number of photos of the same person (the user himself?) Malyacko (talk) 12:42, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:49, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
See https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_policy#Not_educationally_useful , as the user uploaded a number of photos of the same person (the user himself?) Malyacko (talk) 12:42, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:49, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
See https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_policy#Not_educationally_useful , as the user uploaded a number of photos of the same person (the user himself?) Malyacko (talk) 12:42, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:49, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
See https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_policy#Not_educationally_useful , as the user uploaded a number of photos of the same person (the user himself?) Malyacko (talk) 12:42, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:49, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
See https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_policy#Not_educationally_useful , as the user uploaded a number of photos of the same person (the user himself?) Malyacko (talk) 12:42, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:49, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Station by living architect Santiago Calatrava. Unfortunately there is still no FOP in Italy. GiorgioGaleotti (talk) 00:19, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:29, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Station by living architect Santiago Calatrava. Unfortunately there is still no FOP in Italy. GiorgioGaleotti (talk) 00:23, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:29, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
According to Commons:Currency#Bahamas.2C_The it seems this image counts as a copyright violation. The uploader has 3 uploads all are similar cropped images of Bahama banknotes. Offnfopt(talk) 00:48, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
The other two images are File:Milo Butler, Governor General of the Bahamas.png and File:Lynden Pindling, banknote portrait.png. - Offnfopt(talk) 00:50, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- Details from banknotes are copyright free. The banknotes themselves are a different matter. Arglebargle79 (talk) 01:17, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
- Arglebargle79 can you give the details to which part of law says this type of use is ok? That would allow these images to stay and allow us to update our information here on commons. - Offnfopt(talk) 02:01, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: There is no reason whatever to believe that details at this level do not have a copyright. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:32, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Small image, no EXIF. B dash (talk) 06:49, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:00, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Derivative work of multiple photos with unknown origin. Probably copyright violation.
ru:Производное произведение множества фотографии, происхождение которых неизвестно. Вероятно нарушение авторских прав. Taivo (talk) 08:01, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:02, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Not neccessarily own work, equivalent at English Wikipedia was non-free w:File:Whitehorse flag.png, date of 1950 on flag may be too recent to assume PD status. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:12, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- ShakespeareFan00 I understand what copyright is, but I don't believe that stamps and coats of arms can be protected by copyright if they're public. Does the country or the city reassert this right? I don't think so. Allice Hunter (talk) 20:15, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- This is Canadian in origin? Only some Canadian govt works are public. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 20:16, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- It's used at en:Whitehorse, Yukon, so it's in Canada. Ronhjones (Talk) 22:00, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
- This is Canadian in origin? Only some Canadian govt works are public. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 20:16, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Flags and coats of arms certainly have a copyright until it expires. Stamps do in some countries, not all. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:04, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
The user uploads other people's works with a wrong licence. The sources of these images say they're copyrighted, or have no info on copyright protection (which, afaik, means we should assume that the images are copyrighted).
I have omitted some older images wich might need some additional consideration, as some of them may actually be in public domain and only need their licences updated. There are also two images from wikimapia, one with a watermark - I'm not sure if their use is acceptable here on Commons, since I didn't find any info on the image's licence. I've omitted these as well, so someone might want to check all the remaining uploads by this user.
- File:Буксир Корець.jpg
- File:Артилерійський катер "Рівне" ВМСУ.jpg
- File:Артилерійський катер Рівне ВМСУ.png
- File:Панорама м. Трускавець.jpg
- File:Будинок культури с. Воронки.jpg
- File:Свято-Миколаївська церква (с. Воронки Рівненської обл.).jpg
- File:Оз. Воронки.jpg
- File:АК-03 ВМСУ.jpg
- File:Школа (Грибовиця).jpg
- File:Успенська церква (Грибовиця).jpg
- File:Вид на ліс (Грибовиця).jpg
- File:Сільська рада (Грибовиця).jpg
- File:Будинок культури (Грибовиця).jpg
- File:Озеро Стигло (Грибовиця).jpg
- File:Верхнє Висоцьке.jpg
- File:Панорама с. В. Висоцьке.jpg
- File:Церква Св. Миколая (В.Висоцьке).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Piramidion (talk) 10:50, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:06, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
File:Kay Worden's "The Wave" sculpture detail - Newport, Rhode Island, USA - August 16, 2015 01.jpg
edit
Detail of sculpture by Kay Worden who died in 2015. No FOP for statues in USA. GiorgioGaleotti (talk) 11:12, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:07, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
File:Kay Worden's "The Wave" sculpture detail - Newport, Rhode Island, USA - August 16, 2015 02.jpg
edit
Detail of sculpture by Kay Worden who died in 2015. No FOP for statues in USA. GiorgioGaleotti (talk) 11:13, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:07, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
The copyright holder is "Cory Steffen ". There is no evidence that uploader is the same peron as "Cory Steffen ". Evidence of permission should be sent to our support team. Wikicology (talk) 12:43, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Delete: Too suspect. The photographer is not shy of publishing himself on the www. So why would he use a pseudonym here? On the balance of probabilities, I consider this to have been upload by a suspected paid editor (also situated in Salt Lake City who is contributing to the article that this image is used on) without the permission of this photographer.10:55, 10 October 2017 (UTC)- Keep Permission was granted by the photographer. I tagged the file page with the appropriate OTRS template. 4nn1l2 (talk) 19:13, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Don't know if this was a result of an email I sent to the photographer but now we have an OTRS P.g.champion (talk) 15:23, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per OTRS. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:09, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
FOP-violating depictions of Gare de Wissembourg
edit- File:Bahnhof Wissembourg 2017 (16∶10).jpg
- File:Bahnhof Wissembourg 2017-2.jpg
- File:Bahnhof Wissembourg 2017-3.jpg
- File:Bahnhof Wissembourg 2017.jpg
- File:Gare de Wissembourg (retouchée).jpg
- File:Gare de Wissembourg.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
No FOP in france. The building was built in 1966, so the artist certanly isn’t dead long enough. Please also transfer the images to dewiki according to w:de:Wikipedia:Bildrechte#Panoramafreiheit (Schutzlandprinzip). --Nenntmichruhigip (talk) 13:02, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- Wehr euch gegen diese krankhaften Gesetze. Wehrt euch dagegen. Es macht keinen Sinn wie dumme Schafe solche Gesetzen gegen die Panoramafreiheit nachzudackeln!!--Leif von Speyer (talk) 15:14, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:10, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Image of a protected work. Evidence of permission is required. See COM:OTRS. Wikicology (talk) 14:25, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:12, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Possible copyvios. All this images were lifted from the internet. See here for example.
- File:Vielles femmes comoriennes cueillant des fleurs d'ylang-ylang.jpg
- File:Vielle femme comorienne cueillant des fleurs d'ylang-ylang.jpg
- File:Vielle femme comorienne cueillant des fleurs d'ylang-lang.jpg
- File:Travail aux enfants.png
- File:Ministre de l'emploi et de transport.png
- File:Jeune fille comorienne travaillante à la cueillete des fleur d'ylang-ylang.png
- File:Jeune couple comorien marié.jpg
- File:Fete du grand mariage comorien Djaliko.jpg
- File:Femme comorienne vendant des poissons seches.jpg
- File:Femmes comoriennes sechantes la vanilles.jpg
- File:Femme comorienne sechante des clous du giroffle.jpg
- File:Femme comorienne travaillant dans une entreprise de poisson.jpg
- File:Femme comorienne ingenieuse en fibre optique.jpg
- File:Beautée unique comorienne.jpg
Wikicology (talk) 14:37, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- OK. I nominated myself some of these for deletion, but this one [2] seems to have correct Meta Data. Ji-Elle (talk) 18:27, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- Ji-Elle, we need permission from the copyright holder. See here for example. Regards. Wikicology (talk) 12:32, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
![[2]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Femmes_comoriennes_sechantes_la_vanilles.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination - the one cited above with metadata appears much larger at the UNDP site with an explicit copyright notice. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:15, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Above COM:TOO Thibaut120094 (talk) 10:17, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:41, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MaghrebNet (talk · contribs)
editHistorical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Mohand Arab Tlili directeur à l'ENIEM et il est l'un des membres fondateurs du Rassemblement pour la culture et la démocratie en compagnie de plusieurs hauts gradés.jpg
- File:Hocine Ait Ahmed en compagnie de Mohand Arab Tlili à l'ENIEM.jpg
- File:Mohand Arab Tlili, ancien directeur à L'ENIEM et membre fondateur du RCD avec Hocine Ait Ahmed.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:59, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:41, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:41, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by J alfredolg (talk · contribs)
editSeems to be TV screenshot.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:02, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:41, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Gabriel Nunes de Azevedo (talk · contribs)
editHistorical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Mario Luiz Thompson.jpg
- File:Belchior por Mario Luiz Thompson.jpg
- File:Capa do disco Refavela, de Gilberto Gil.jpg
- File:João Paulo II em viagem apostólica ao Brasil.jpg
- File:Haroldo de Campos.jpg
- File:Mario Luiz Thompson e Gilberto Gil.jpg
- File:Festival de Águas Claras.jpg
- File:Chico Buarque e Milton Nascimento.jpg
- File:Alceu Valença .jpg
- File:Lula nas greves do ABC paulista .jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:09, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:42, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
File:HOPE by Robert Indiana - 7th Ave. & West 53rd St., New York, NY, USA - August 20, 2015.jpg
edit
Sculpture by living artist Robert Indiana. No FOP for sculptures in the USA. GiorgioGaleotti (talk) 00:51, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Jameslwoodward at 19:33, 16 Oktober 2017 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:HOPE by Robert Indiana - 7th Ave. & West 53rd St., New York, NY, USA - August 20, 2015.jpg --Krdbot 00:18, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
The butterfly in the logo is way above COM:TOO Thibaut120094 (talk) 12:11, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:52, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
_Jaime_Ramirez_Gomez.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Jaime_Ramirez_Gomez.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
It would surprise me if this portrait is actually "own work" as claimed. Small size, EXIF from an HP Photosmart . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:29, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
_Jaime_Ramirez_Gomez.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:50, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
_Jaime_Ramirez_Gomez.JPG){kind=link}
Screenshot of non-free software/mobile app. #young[Who?] 15:08, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:47, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
- also file:Adam Cook 2016 Lecture.jpg
Derivative work of bacground photo with unknown origin and license. Taivo (talk) 15:25, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:45, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
- also file:Mike Gitahi.jpg
OTRS-permission from author Kevin Buo or copyright holder Buoart is needed. Taivo (talk) 16:12, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination + maybe out of scope too. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:44, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
It was removed just yesterday as File:Sexofrot3.jpg. Osado (talk) 19:03, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:39, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work': rather small-sized format, one-file-upload, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Kommentar: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 20:30, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - though smaller there is an older result with google. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:38, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
no evidence of permission, seems to complex to qualify for {{PD-textlogo}} Jon Kolbert (talk) 21:30, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:34, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
likely not uploader's own work, possible copyvio Jon Kolbert (talk) 21:36, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:34, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 21:36, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:35, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
Unclear license, apparently copyrighted Kamolan (talk) 22:03, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:35, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии: в производной работе используется карта неясного лицензионного статуса Dogad75 (talk) 20:05, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: derivative copyvio. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 08:16, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
Japanese calligraphy surpasses COM:TOO#Japan Thibaut120094 (talk) 09:44, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- To establish originality, according the Japan law, there is a need to establish "thoughts or sentiments are expressed in a creative way".
- So the question to answer is: "what thoughts or sentiments are expressed in a creative way in the choices made by the author during a calligraphy session?".
- If a reasonable answer to this question could be offered, we should delete this file, if not, we should keep it --Dereckson (talk) 10:01, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- P.S. If we've a contributor versed in Japan legal precedents search, we could ask them to try to find if there are cases about copyright and calligraphy.
- That is not a picture anyway. Japanese calligraphy of whom? I don't think a digital 2D ばらかもん logo surpasses the threshold of originality. The shape is just stylized, exactly as the Japanese laws allow.--Sakretsu (talk) 10:19, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- Probably by the author of the manga, the painting was obviously scanned/digitized and yes "thoughts or sentiments are expressed in a creative way" in Japanese calligraphy since this is an art.
- In any case, this image does not only consists of "simple geometric shapes or text". --Thibaut120094 (talk) 11:42, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
- That is not a picture anyway. Japanese calligraphy of whom? I don't think a digital 2D ばらかもん logo surpasses the threshold of originality. The shape is just stylized, exactly as the Japanese laws allow.--Sakretsu (talk) 10:19, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
I looked into this archive of copyright-related court precedents and will quote here. Translation mine.
| " | Letters themselves should be available as common property for all to use, considering its utility in information transfer. [...] However, such calligraphic works that are created by artists and admired as artworks would be those where the creator has a wide variety of elements including form, movement and speed of the brush, thickness of the ink, and ink-spread to choose and adopt; and it is natural that creative expressions that would be considered "calligraphy" should be treated as copyrighted works as products of the creator's intellectual and cultural mental activity, regardless of whether the creator is a professional calligrapher or not. | ” |
The Barakamon logo in question here is depicted in a unique style -- certainly not like any of the traditional calligraphy styles -- with lively lines in the individual letter forms and rhythm in the overall letter balance. (Notice how ば and も are larger while ら, か and ん are smaller to reflect the rhythm of the title. This size difference ventures out from standard orthography.) Going back to the case precedent, this case happens to be a case where the calligraphy in question was used as a store logo. The court decision continues with how we should think about the utilitarian aspect of calligraphy as a logo and how copyright protection might or might not reach too far when it comes to the best interest of the public. The court rules that utilizing a work of art would not strip creativity from the work, and hence will not affect the outcome whether it's being used as a logo or admired as pure art, and finally rules that
| " | for those works that possess sufficient artistic creativity to satisfy the aesthetic sense of an average citizen should be given copyright protection as works of art. | ” |
I agree that the conclusion comes down to be subjective, as is any case on TOO. If you ask me, an average citizen, it looks like calligraphy like I mentioned earlier, so I lean towards delete. However my opinion does not rule out a different average citizen thinking otherwise.
Note 1: There's another incident deliberated in Tokyo District and Tokyo High Court, but since the part about "what makes calligraphy copyrightable" looks pretty much the same so I will merely link and not translate.)
Note 2: Please do not blanket-apply the same argument to all the media in Category:Japanese calligraphy logos. For instance, both File:IDEMITSU KOSAN logo.png and File:Yamaichi Securities logo.svg look like they're written in standard styles to me, and lacks the unique calligraphic expressions like the Barakamon logo. [Edit: I realized that there's a high chance that Yamaichi Securities logo was designed old enough to be copyright-expired, but my point was to argue that TOO of calligraphy could easily sit on the fence and should be looked at on a case-by-case basis.]
--朝彦 | asahiko (talk) 14:00, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
- Thank you for the detailed explanation. I agree now that the file should be deleted--Sakretsu (talk) 14:40, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Yasu (talk) 15:12, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lucie.karanfilyan (talk · contribs)
editAs per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ալիքսանեան Գրիգոր.jpg - No source given, highly unlikely to be own work. To apply {{PD-old-assumed}}, we'd want to wait at least 120 years since creation.
Themightyquill (talk) 07:12, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Not old enough to be kept. Ruthven (msg) 18:10, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Solomon203 as Copyvio (copyvio) Solomon203 (talk) 08:11, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 18:06, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
Detta mitt foto har förvanskats utan min tillåtelse. Lars (Lon) Olsson (talk) 11:49, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
_Olsson-2017-10-09T11:49:00.000Z-File:Stockholm._G%C3%B6sta_Bohmans_Plats.JPG){kind=link}
Kept: You uploaded the file yourself, in 2013. Ruthven (msg) 18:14, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
copyvio 1977 http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k96032672/f5.item (always the same) Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 11:53, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- L'image est dans le domaine public. - Groupir ! (talk) 12:04, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- Faux. La photo est de Patrick Chauvel [né en 1949 même pas mort https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patrick_Chauvel], photographe non-crédité sur commons [ici le nom du photographe http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k96032672/f4.item].
- Gallica mentionne toujours "domaine public" comme droits sur les images mises en ligne ; il arrive souvent que cette mention soit erronée. --Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 14:42, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
- Est-on sûr que la mention soit ici erronée ? Dans le cas présent, c'est le magazine tout entier qui semble être dans le domaine public... - Groupir ! (talk) 06:20, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
- Ah, d'accord ... ça fait toujours plaisir d'être écouté - Groupir ! (talk) 19:00, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
- Est-on sûr que la mention soit ici erronée ? Dans le cas présent, c'est le magazine tout entier qui semble être dans le domaine public... - Groupir ! (talk) 06:20, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 18:15, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
photographie professionnelle - sans nom du photographe sans autorisation (source probable magazine "salut les copains") Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 12:08, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 18:15, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
copyvio http://www.critique-film.fr/gerard-rinaldi-membre-des-charlots-nous-a-quitte/ Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 12:14, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 18:15, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
© Bernard Loyau Que sont devenus les Charlots ? https://www.telestar.fr/culture/les-charlots-44-ans-apres-les-bidasses-en-folie-que-sont-ils-devenus-photos-158444 Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 12:19, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 18:15, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
_POLY,_KATSINA_STATE_OF_NIGERIA_SMALL_IRRIGATION_FARM_LAND.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_POLY,_KATSINA_STATE_OF_NIGERIA_SMALL_IRRIGATION_FARM_LAND.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyright holder is "Artist-freed". There is no evidence that uploader is the same person as "Artist-freed'. Evidence of permission is required. Wikicology (talk) 13:36, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
_POLY,_KATSINA_STATE_OF_NIGERIA_SMALL_IRRIGATION_FARM_LAND.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 18:15, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
_POLY,_KATSINA_STATE_OF_NIGERIA_SMALL_IRRIGATION_FARM_LAND.jpg){kind=link}
This image appears on many places on the web. I suspect that this is COM:Flickrwashing. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:55, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Keep Hi Jim, take a look at the Flickr user's photostream, there the uncropped photo appears showing the Flickr user, if you continue thru the photos you'll see the user with other people. (original photo: Saying hi to Ronda Rousey photostream example:Trip to see some land formations and rocks, Pedro Gaytan Venegas and Chewy) I don't believe it to be Flickr washing, it's likely other websites are reusing the Wikimedia Commons resource without crediting. (–the original uploader) Jdcollins13 - chat
Kept: per Jdcollins13. Ruthven (msg) 18:15, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 18:16, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
Imagen subida sin el consentimiento del autor Soosie. (talk) 23:26, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: already on YouTube in 2012. Ruthven (msg) 18:21, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
Small image, no EXIF. B dash (talk) 06:15, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:15, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
Somewhat unlikely own work, due to watermark across image and hit [3] from year 2013. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:21, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:14, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
Image with no EXIF metadata. Possible copyvio. See here for example. Wikicology (talk) 14:26, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:14, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Muhammad mudassir (talk · contribs)
editVideo clip and song. No evidence of permission(s).
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:13, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Zvizd Kučevo (talk · contribs)
editUnlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.ekucevo.rs/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/IMG_0825-960x600_c.jpg.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:12, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
Depicted person is notable. But this is small photo without metadata and the uploader's only contribution. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 16:47, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:11, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
It's from here this file 2003:DE:3EB:DC5:7CC6:E8B9:8AF4:67FB 16:56, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Ich habe vom Autor die Erlaubnis, das Bild hier einzustellen (©Jörg Zogel).
- @Nikodemia: dann brauchst du eine Genehmigung Commons:OTRS/de --2003:DE:3EB:D7E:B428:4B46:F01:E925 22:31, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:11, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work': one-file-upload, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Kommentar: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 20:34, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:10, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
not uploader's own work, possibly above the threshold of originality for the Netherlands Jon Kolbert (talk) 21:40, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:09, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
Logo might be above COM:TOO --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 00:57, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 08:19, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation of [4]: article was uploaded in June 2014, file was uploaded in January 2015 Zhangj1079 (Saluton!) 01:46, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 08:20, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
Tagged as {{PD-textlogo}} but I think the graphical content is more creative than that. DMacks (talk) 02:27, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 08:20, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
agged as {{PD-textlogo}} but I think the graphical content is more creative than that. DMacks (talk) 02:47, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 08:20, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
Alas though the reproduction is indeed licensed under CC-BY-SA, the underlying artwork is still copyrighted. — Racconish ☎ 06:29, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 08:22, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
Case similar to Commons:Deletion requests/File:Wêneistan şirnex2.jpg. OoS. E4024 (talk) 07:06, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 08:23, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 14:38, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 08:24, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Better svg version exists: File:Logo Le Temps (Schweiz).svg. Vanjagenije (talk) 21:29, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: still in use. Ruthven (msg) 08:25, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
erreur d'attribution (photographe), sans autorisation - Claire Garguier est présente sur la photo, can be "a selfie" Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 14:30, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 08:34, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
manquent le nom et l'autorisation du photographe - can be a selfie ! Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 14:32, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 08:34, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Machinathor (talk · contribs)
editHistorical coats of arms. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:07, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep free licensed files made of parts of free licensed files (cc-by-sa and uncopyrighted). Kathisma (talk) 16:30, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per Kathisma. Ruthven (msg) 22:50, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mike Holiday (talk · contribs)
editHistorical paintings. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:08, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
I gave the authors and dates. Ask me a question. I will answer. Or describe where to enter the information.
Kept: painting from XVIII century; deleted more recent one. Ruthven (msg) 22:44, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Duplicate see File:Day 214 - West Midlands Police - Firearms Officer uniform and equipment (7690257016).jpg both from Flickr. The West Midlands Police posted it twice on Flickr different url's. Other image being used in articles so nominated this one. Melbguy05 (talk) 17:22, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 22:40, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Likely an image found on the Internet, not own work. B dash (talk) 06:18, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- Speedy delete Already online in 2007.
I haven't found any source on Internet.--Ruthven (msg) 08:22, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Y.haruo (talk) 16:23, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ΓΕΩΡΓΙΟΣ ΣΑΡΑΦΟΥΔΗΣ (talk · contribs)
edit | If you are the copyright holder, please email our permissions verification team (VRT). | →  |
- File:Georgios Sarafoudis (footballer).png
- File:Georgios Sarafoudis.png same image, just zoomed in. Guanaco (talk) 21:35, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
- File:Georgios Sarafoudis (footballer).jpg
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Guanaco (talk) 21:21, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, probably copyvio. --Y.haruo (talk) 16:45, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Not necessarily own work, Equivalent at English Wikipedia was non-free w:File:Victoria-flag.png ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:11, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- ShakespeareFan00 Why can't the file be public in English wikipedia and can't be in the others? Allice Hunter (talk) 20:12, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- The issue was a mismatch in status, If it's "free" then it means the license is wrong at English Wikipedia. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 20:15, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 17:07, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by K-iczn as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Not text logo. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 09:08, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- There are two rows. The first one says ガリレイドンナ (Garirei Donna in Japanese), the second Storia di tre sorelle a caccia di un mistero (in Italian). Both texts are allowed by Japanese laws per COM:TOO#Japan (Although the shape is stylized, the text is in a normal arrangement and keeps its function of being read as a sequence of letters).
There are three figures: a rudder, a crescent moon and a 2D geometric fish. Logos composed merely of geometric shapes and texts are not copyrightable in general.
According to COM:TOO#Japan, a work is eligible for copyright when it is a production in which thoughts or sentiments are expressed in a creative way and which falls within the literary, scientific, artistic or musical domain. That is not the case, the file should be kept.--Sakretsu (talk) 10:34, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- Löschen mainly for the small background illustation. If the "Cup Noodle" case was non-copyrightable, it may apply to this provided that the small backgound illustation is removed. If someone wants to keep the redacted image (and does the modification), I can support revision deletion instead of full deletion. whym (talk) 12:04, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: Background removed. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 20:44, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
DW rather than own work. No source for the base map. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 17:28, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:58, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
althoug moved from EN-WP, unclear copyright issues as a thumbnail-format file without EXIF data, claimed "Met the subject personally..." - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 17:41, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:58, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
This was uploaded by en:User:Nguyenjx and added to en:Blaise Garza on en.wiki. But it's claimed as "own work" but the author is given as Blaise Garza. If Nguyenjx is in fact Blaise Garza then presumably we'd need an OTRS release, wouldn't we? I've asked at en:User:Nguyenjx if he's saying he is Blaise Garza but have had no reply yet - on the one hand Outing rules mean he doesn't have to answer that, but on the other hand he presumably does have to confirm who he is for copyright reasons. Without that confirmation, I think the image should be deleted. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 18:40, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:58, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
Not necessarily own work, the equivalent at English Wikipedia was non-free w:File:FrederictonNBCAFlag.jpg, However, most of what is on this flag is standard heraldic elements.. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:08, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- ShakespeareFan00 I don't believe that a simple symbol of a city is eligible to be protected by copyright. Allice Hunter (talk) 20:01, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:03, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
Not necessarily own work, Equivalent at English Wikipedia was non-free w:File:St. John's, NL flag.gif, however, this is mostly heraldic and could be re-drawn? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:10, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- ShakespeareFan00 Is there a way to load the file without inflicting copyright? Flags and coats of arms are something public, I don't think they are eligible to be copyrighted, there are a number of similar items that have already been uploaded and haven't suffered from this problem. Allice Hunter (talk) 20:11, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- Löschen Flags and coats of arms are not necessarily public domain, as they are subject to artist interpretation. @Allice Hunter: You uploaded that file and put it as your own work, but did you actually draw that yourself, either digitally or freehand? If no, then that means someone else did, and it was certainly not so long ago that the copyright would have expired. The flag was already uploaded to the English Wikipedia server as "fair use" several years ago,[5] but that does not apply to files at Wikimedia Commons, which has a much stricter copyright policy. The flag/coat of arms could (and should) be recreated using vector format. Wikimandia (talk) 04:39, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:03, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
Questionable authorship claims in light of Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Sistemasgp. —LX (talk, contribs) 11:49, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:04, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
As the source of the image is BBC Farsi, British copyright laws apply, not Iranian ones. Underlying lk (talk) 16:10, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:05, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
As the source of the image is BBC Farsi, British copyright laws apply, not Iranian ones. Underlying lk (talk) 16:11, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:05, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Bogus license. Jcb (talk) 17:22, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:05, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
The website provided as the source for this image appears to be copyrighted: [6][7]. As such, I cannot find any evidence that there is permission for us to use this image as a free image. Ultimately, I suspect that this image might be the work of a US govt employee (Marine or Soldier), which would likely mean it is in the public domain; however, I have not yet been able to find any evidence to support this. If better sourcing could be found, I would gladly vote to keep it; however, in its current form I suspect it will need to be deleted. AustralianRupert (talk) 00:40, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete: the stated source is not specific enough to find the image in question and therefore assess the uploader's claim that the author is in fact "http://www.dipity.com/13TrimbleL" and that they have released the image into the public domain. To be honest though this seems quite unlikely given the age of the image and would therefore need evidence to support such a claim. A Google image search does return a few other instances of this image appearing in other places, but none that would shed lights on its provenance or copyright status that I could see. Anotherclown (talk) 10:24, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:02, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Reproduction of diagram from URL (http://www.geocities.jp/jtqsw192/FIG/800anacn/step_res.png). Licsak (talk) 14:07, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- User:Tetsuo00 claimed that the author of the site: "http://www.geocities.jp/jtqsw192/ " (and below) is mine and maintain these site myself. But there are no mention that the maintainer of the site and [User:Tetsuo00] are the same person. Instead, the maintainer of the site mentioned that "Wikipedia Japanese version is cited as a reference." If the creator of these schematic is drawn by the maintainer, These schematics need no copyright credits for using. But in the case that both are separate persons, not only are they violate license requred reuse / secondary use, and then the deliverables return by him to Wikimedia commons again, so copyright of commons' media will be contaminated. --Licsak (talk) 16:35, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
I cannot speak English well. So please write Japanese.
This diagram picture file and follow was made & send to wikipedia Commons area,by me. used in [[8]]
【Remove discusions】wikipedia JAPAN にて一括で論議中 [[9]]
& There is the lated display [This page is Original Lesson conntents of wikipedia.:Analog commputer]
in my HomePage.
"http://www.geocities.jp/jtqsw192/FIG/800anacn/analog.htm#5" Ⅷ．
So You must not remove the File. --Tetsuo00 (talk) 16:17, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
- @Tetsuo00: In order to help us set up the matter, can you add a license Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) in your webpage?
あなたのウェブページにライセンスを追加できますか？ （クリエイティブ・コモンズの表示/継承 ライセンス） — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ruthven (talk • contribs) 2017-10-30T08:34 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination & no CC BY-SA 4.0 license at source provided. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:02, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Reproduction of diagram from URL (http://www.geocities.jp/jtqsw192/REF/anaragi1963/rg17-11p120.htm)(***). Licsak (talk) 14:09, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- User:Tetsuo00 claimed that the author of the site: "http://www.geocities.jp/jtqsw192/ " (and below) is mine and maintain these site myself. But there are no mention that the maintainer of the site and [User:Tetsuo00] are the same person. Instead, the maintainer of the site mentioned that "Wikipedia Japanese version is cited as a reference." If the creator of these schematic is drawn by the maintainer, These schematics need no copyright credits for using. But in the case that both are separate persons, not only are they violate license requred reuse / secondary use, and then the deliverables return by him to Wikimedia commons again, so copyright of commons' media will be contaminated. --Licsak (talk) 16:37, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
- I cannot speak English well. So please write Japanese.
This diagram picture file and follow was made & send to wikipedia Commons area,by me. used in [[10]]
【Remove discusions】wikipedia JAPAN にて一括で論議中 [[11]]
& There is the lated display [This page is Original Lesson conntents of wikipedia.:Analog commputer]
in my HomePage.
"http://www.geocities.jp/jtqsw192/FIG/800anacn/analog.htm#5" Ⅷ．
So You must not remove the File.
--Tetsuo00 (talk) 16:19, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination & no CC BY-SA 4.0 license at source provided. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:03, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Reproduction of diagram from URL (http://www.geocities.jp/jtqsw192/FIG/800anacn/analog.htm ). Licsak (talk) 14:16, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- User:Tetsuo00 claimed that the author of the site: "http://www.geocities.jp/jtqsw192/ " (and below) is mine and maintain these site myself. But there are no mention that the maintainer of the site and [User:Tetsuo00] are the same person. Instead, the maintainer of the site mentioned that "Wikipedia Japanese version is cited as a reference." If the creator of these schematic is drawn by the maintainer, These schematics need no copyright credits for using. But in the case that both are separate persons, not only are they violate license requred reuse / secondary use, and then the deliverables return by him to Wikimedia commons again, so copyright of commons' media will be contaminated. --Licsak (talk) 16:39, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
規約通りの投稿で削除理由なし
I cannot speak English well. So please write Japanese.
This diagram picture file and follow was made & send to wikipedia Commons area,by me. used in [[12]]
【Remove discusions】wikipedia JAPAN にて一括で論議中 [[13]]
& There is the lated display [This page is Original Lesson conntents of wikipedia.:Analog commputer]
in my HomePage.
"http://www.geocities.jp/jtqsw192/FIG/800anacn/analog.htm#5" Ⅷ．
So You must not remove the File. --Tetsuo00 (talk) 16:22, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination & no CC BY-SA 4.0 license at source provided. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:03, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Reproduction of diagram from URL (http://www.geocities.jp/jtqsw192/FIG/800anacn/analog.htm ). Licsak (talk) 14:18, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- User:Tetsuo00 claimed that the author of the site: "http://www.geocities.jp/jtqsw192/ " (and below) is mine and maintain these site myself. But there are no mention that the maintainer of the site and [User:Tetsuo00] are the same person. Instead, the maintainer of the site mentioned that "Wikipedia Japanese version is cited as a reference." If the creator of these schematic is drawn by the maintainer, These schematics need no copyright credits for using. But in the case that both are separate persons, not only are they violate license requred reuse / secondary use, and then the deliverables return by him to Wikimedia commons again, so copyright of commons' media will be contaminated. --Licsak (talk) 16:40, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
規約通りの投稿で削除理由なし
I cannot speak English well. So please write Japanese.
This diagram picture file and follow was made & send to wikipedia Commons area,by me. used in [[14]]
【Remove discusions】wikipedia JAPAN にて一括で論議中 [[15]]
& There is the lated display [This page is Original Lesson conntents of wikipedia.:Analog commputer]
in my HomePage.
"http://www.geocities.jp/jtqsw192/FIG/800anacn/analog.htm#5" Ⅷ．
So You must not remove the File. --Tetsuo00 (talk) 16:23, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination & no CC BY-SA 4.0 license at source provided. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:03, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Reproduction of diagram from URL (http://www.geocities.jp/jtqsw192/photo/19640108/dsp_anacon.htm and http://www.geocities.jp/jtqsw192/FIG/800anacn/analog.htm ). Licsak (talk) 14:21, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- User:Tetsuo00 claimed that the author of the site: "http://www.geocities.jp/jtqsw192/ " (and below) is mine and maintain these site myself. But there are no mention that the maintainer of the site and [User:Tetsuo00] are the same person. Instead, the maintainer of the site mentioned that "Wikipedia Japanese version is cited as a reference." If the creator of these schematic is drawn by the maintainer, These schematics need no copyright credits for using. But in the case that both are separate persons, not only are they violate license requred reuse / secondary use, and then the deliverables return by him to Wikimedia commons again, so copyright of commons' media will be contaminated. --Licsak (talk) 16:41, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
規約通りの投稿で削除理由なし
I cannot speak English well. So please write Japanese.
This diagram picture file and follow was made & send to wikipedia Commons area,by me. used in [[16]]
【Remove discusions】wikipedia JAPAN にて一括で論議中 [[17]]
& There is the lated display [This page is Original Lesson conntents of wikipedia.:Analog commputer]
in my HomePage.
"http://www.geocities.jp/jtqsw192/FIG/800anacn/analog.htm#5" Ⅷ．
So You must not remove the File. --Tetsuo00 (talk) 16:25, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination & no CC BY-SA 4.0 license at source provided. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:04, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Reproduction of diagram from URL (http://www.geocities.jp/jtqsw192/FIG/800anacn/analog.htm ). Licsak (talk) 14:25, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- User:Tetsuo00 claimed that the author of the site: "http://www.geocities.jp/jtqsw192/ " (and below) is mine and maintain these site myself. But there are no mention that the maintainer of the site and [User:Tetsuo00] are the same person. Instead, the maintainer of the site mentioned that "Wikipedia Japanese version is cited as a reference." If the creator of these schematic is drawn by the maintainer, These schematics need no copyright credits for using. But in the case that both are separate persons, not only are they violate license requred reuse / secondary use, and then the deliverables return by him to Wikimedia commons again, so copyright of commons' media will be contaminated. --Licsak (talk) 16:43, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
規約通りの投稿で削除理由なし I cannot speak English well. So please write Japanese.
This diagram picture file and follow was made & send to wikipedia Commons area,by me. used in [[18]]
【Remove discusions】wikipedia JAPAN にて一括で論議中 [[19]]
& There is the lated display [This page is Original Lesson conntents of wikipedia.:Analog commputer]
in my HomePage.
"http://www.geocities.jp/jtqsw192/FIG/800anacn/analog.htm#5" Ⅷ．
So You must not remove the File. --Tetsuo00 (talk) 16:26, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination & no CC BY-SA 4.0 license at source provided. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:04, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
