User talk:Stemoc: Difference between revisions

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Line 45: Line 45:
== [[:File:Germany lifts the 2014 FIFA World Cup.jpg]] ==
== [[:File:Germany lifts the 2014 FIFA World Cup.jpg]] ==
{{Autotranslate|1=File:Germany lifts the 2014 FIFA World Cup.jpg|2=File:Germany lifts the 2014 FIFA World Cup.jpg|3=|base=Idw}} [[User:Fma12|Fma12]] ([[User talk:Fma12|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 14:06, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
{{Autotranslate|1=File:Germany lifts the 2014 FIFA World Cup.jpg|2=File:Germany lifts the 2014 FIFA World Cup.jpg|3=|base=Idw}} [[User:Fma12|Fma12]] ([[User talk:Fma12|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 14:06, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

== [[:File:Philipp Lahm lifts the 2014 FIFA World Cup.jpg]] ==
{{Autotranslate|1=File:Philipp Lahm lifts the 2014 FIFA World Cup.jpg|2=|3=|base=Idw}} <font face="Lucida Sans">'''[[User:LGA|<font color="#90EE90">LGA</font>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:LGA|<font color="#8B0000"><sub>talk</sub></font>]]'''<sup style="margin-left:-4ex">[[Special:Contributions/LGA|<font color="#006400">edits</font>]]</sup></font> 01:39, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:39, 30 August 2014

Archives

License review

Hi Stemoc. I hope you don't mind this personal request. But I'm having trouble with these Flickr files listed in Category:Flickr images not found. Apparently when I click the image links as provided in those images the files do appear, but the Flickr review bot couldn't recognize it and returned a result of "File not found". Could you help me review these files manually by yourself? Again, thank you very much and sorry if I caused you any inconvenience. Frozeficent (talk) 04:42, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure what images you are talking about, the bot has reviewed all the images you uploaded...sometimes it reviews it once every hour and the only time it doesn't is if the image itself has been manipulated (cropped) as its not able to determine the size feom the exif data on the image itself on flickr..--Stemoc (talk) 04:57, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oh I'm sorry, I forgot to give you the link Category:Flickr images not found. I don't know, all those images were in the same Flickr album, but some of them were reported fine, while some were reported not found. Frozeficent (talk) 05:04, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, russavia (talk) 08:21, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I think you have made mistake by adding speedy deletion tag on the following image File:Paul Walker01.jpg, The picture uploaded from Flickr and its successfully verified by the FlickreviewR, Therefore i have also added source of the content. Do you really think its violated the policy? Please explain? Its already under CC 2.0 which is shareable and fully rights to post on Wiki Commons. --PrinceSulaiman (talk) 15:24, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, not every image on Flickr belongs to the person who uploaded it. Tim uploaded those images from elsewhere, as a hommage to Walker, he doesn't own the rights to all those images of Walker adn thus its not allowed for use on commons, please DO NOT remove my deletion request again.....--Stemoc (talk) 15:43, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Please provide a proof of the licence before you delete, Since you don't have the proof who owns the image. --PrinceSulaiman (talk) 15:46, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
thats your job not mine, I didn't add the picture here, you did..you prove to me that that image should be added to commons...--Stemoc (talk) 15:50, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The source i provided it already has the licence, So there is nothing more else to prove it. Without proving a proof please consider stay away from putting speedy deletion without a knowledge. I believe this licence is shareable which was widespread through other medias including multiple language wiki common. --PrinceSulaiman (talk) 15:56, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
You have been blocked for a similar offence, please try to avoid this in the future and abide by our policies and do not remove the deletions request....--Stemoc (talk) 16:03, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category for WC2014 pic

Hi Stemoc! Your WC 2014 celebration pic here needs to be moved to the actual final category Category:FIFA World Cup 2014 Final 2014-07-13 (Germany – Argentina). Thanks. -- Cheers, Horst-schlaemma (talk) 16:50, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm aware, but its was 'transcluded protected' image then so I couldn't touch it but now its not and someone has moved the category...which i think is idiotic, because there is only ONE final, you do NOT need to make a sub-category for a FINAL--Stemoc (talk) 01:35, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

About the Christina Aguilera picture

I'm asking Richard Harbaugh, who is the owner, and the ABC group, to make the pic avaliable for Derivatives, so I have to ask you to wait for his answer. The pic is not (c) so I hope yo can wait until he gave me an answer. Thank you very much. - Daviddavid00 (talk) 02:53, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

unfortunately i do not have the powers to do that but once you can get the licence changed, you can re-upload and it will be passed..that said, it would be even better if you can ask Harbaugh to change to the same licence for all his images, btw, there is no licence for derivatives, its either (cc-by) or (cc-by-sa)[Attribution-ShareAlike Creative Commons], the only 2 licence wikipedia allows....--Stemoc (talk) 02:59, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]


File:Philipp Lahm lifts the 2014 FIFA World Cup.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fma12 (talk) 13:59, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]


File:Germany lifts the 2014 FIFA World Cup.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fma12 (talk) 14:06, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Philipp Lahm lifts the 2014 FIFA World Cup.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

LGA talkedits 01:39, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]