Commons:Deletion requests/Uploads by Corpx from ShaggyBevo.com: Difference between revisions

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
create
 
Corpx (talk | contribs)
R
Line 22: Line 22:


These images are sourced from the forum [http://www.shaggybevo.com ShaggyBevo.com]. However unless one is a registered user and logged in, this forum cannot be searched nor can threads be linked to that can be viewed. The license permissions are stated to come from the authors via PMs or chat messages, e.g. "Picture taken by aaronisnotcool of ShaggyBevo.com and permission granted to upload here under CC2.0 license through correspondence through site PM," or "orangesky : 'I license my pics of Mack Brown, Major Applewhite, and Will Muschamp under cc 2.5. Corpx (talk) 09:09, 30 July 2008 (UTC) '. This is a completely unverifiable means to confirm the licensing or indicate that the authors are aware of how the licenses work. Several of these images were tagged for <nowiki>{{LicenseReview}}</nowiki>, which was reverted by CorpX for reasons such as "dont mess with templates you dont know how to use" or "source is dynamic and threads are pruned all the time. no way to provide active link." --[[User:BrokenSphere|<span style="color:#2B60DE;">'''Broken'''</span><span style="color:#E8A317;">'''Sphere'''</span>]] ([[User talk:BrokenSphere|Talk]]) 02:18, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
These images are sourced from the forum [http://www.shaggybevo.com ShaggyBevo.com]. However unless one is a registered user and logged in, this forum cannot be searched nor can threads be linked to that can be viewed. The license permissions are stated to come from the authors via PMs or chat messages, e.g. "Picture taken by aaronisnotcool of ShaggyBevo.com and permission granted to upload here under CC2.0 license through correspondence through site PM," or "orangesky : 'I license my pics of Mack Brown, Major Applewhite, and Will Muschamp under cc 2.5. Corpx (talk) 09:09, 30 July 2008 (UTC) '. This is a completely unverifiable means to confirm the licensing or indicate that the authors are aware of how the licenses work. Several of these images were tagged for <nowiki>{{LicenseReview}}</nowiki>, which was reverted by CorpX for reasons such as "dont mess with templates you dont know how to use" or "source is dynamic and threads are pruned all the time. no way to provide active link." --[[User:BrokenSphere|<span style="color:#2B60DE;">'''Broken'''</span><span style="color:#E8A317;">'''Sphere'''</span>]] ([[User talk:BrokenSphere|Talk]]) 02:18, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
*I dont know what your problem is. You first went through tagging images with a template that you obviously do not know [http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Rick_barnes_shaggybevo.png&diff=43483754&oldid=29420002 how to use] and now you've nominated them for deletion. A bunch of the High Res ones are from flickr as well, but they were were apparently deleted since upload to commons. The only one that had a problem was one with a logo on a scoreboard, and I requested deletion for that. Anyway, if you question my sources, feel free to contact the associated posters on the forum and they'll confirm it. It's stupid to delete something because you cant verify it. [[User:Corpx|Corpx]] ([[User talk:Corpx|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 03:49, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:49, 6 September 2010

  • Add {{delete|reason=Fill in reason for deletion here!|subpage=Uploads by Corpx from ShaggyBevo.com|year=2024|month=July|day=22}} to the description page of each file.
  • Notify the uploader(s) with {{subst:idw||Uploads by Corpx from ShaggyBevo.com|plural}} ~~~~
  • Add {{Commons:Deletion requests/Uploads by Corpx from ShaggyBevo.com}} at the end of today's log.

Uploads by Corpx from ShaggyBevo.com

These images are sourced from the forum ShaggyBevo.com. However unless one is a registered user and logged in, this forum cannot be searched nor can threads be linked to that can be viewed. The license permissions are stated to come from the authors via PMs or chat messages, e.g. "Picture taken by aaronisnotcool of ShaggyBevo.com and permission granted to upload here under CC2.0 license through correspondence through site PM," or "orangesky : 'I license my pics of Mack Brown, Major Applewhite, and Will Muschamp under cc 2.5. Corpx (talk) 09:09, 30 July 2008 (UTC) '. This is a completely unverifiable means to confirm the licensing or indicate that the authors are aware of how the licenses work. Several of these images were tagged for {{LicenseReview}}, which was reverted by CorpX for reasons such as "dont mess with templates you dont know how to use" or "source is dynamic and threads are pruned all the time. no way to provide active link." --BrokenSphere (Talk) 02:18, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • I dont know what your problem is. You first went through tagging images with a template that you obviously do not know how to use and now you've nominated them for deletion. A bunch of the High Res ones are from flickr as well, but they were were apparently deleted since upload to commons. The only one that had a problem was one with a logo on a scoreboard, and I requested deletion for that. Anyway, if you question my sources, feel free to contact the associated posters on the forum and they'll confirm it. It's stupid to delete something because you cant verify it. Corpx (talk) 03:49, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]