Commons:Categories for discussion/2022/08

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


We have Economy by century, individual Economics by century subcategories and a Economic history parent category, individual Category:Economy by decade subcategories, and individual Category:Economics by year subcategories. I think we can pick economic history to be consistent. There is also Category:Economic history by century which should be merged into this category, whatever the final naming is. Ricky81682 (talk) 04:53, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Ricky81682 enwiki also uses en:Category:Economic history by century Estopedist1 (talk) 05:46, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Estopedist1 Okay, but each subcategory is X-century economic history not Economics in the X century. We don't have to follow English. Ricky81682 (talk) 22:27, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Should be moved to Category:Red Tarn (Helvellyn) per usual spelling Amakuru (talk) 11:19, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion of one or several categories is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Existing page technical errors when creating Category with wrong (title Category:The Notorious B.I.G.) -- Leonaardog (talk) 20:10, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Question. @Leonaardog: There is nothing left the original name from what I can tell. Isn't this just a template:badname situation? I see the wikidata links between the page and the category are there which is minor. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 20:50, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Hello, @Ricky81682: , It was a technical error of mine instead of analyzing the data first in Wikidata I quickly created the category. I was editing The Notorious BIG article and clicked to category and it didn't show up no category for the author and I thought there were no elements related to him yet. I apologize. Delete since the title is wrong and does not serve to direct for main category. I changed my mind i think it would be nice to redirect to the main category what do you think? -- Leonaardog (talk) 21:12, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    If you want to do a category redirect, that's fine but I don't think we need a full discussion about it. The issue is that the BIG category is linked to the current category which is a bit silly, but that's on Wikidata. Ricky81682 (talk) 20:19, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Hi, @Ricky81682: , I don't know how to do it, please do it Redirect. -- Leonaardog (talk) 20:27, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Redirected. Wikidata entry is corrected Estopedist1 (talk) 11:27, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate of Category:Elizabeth O'Neill Iamthecheese44 (talk) 01:09, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion of one or several categories is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This neighborhood is now called "East Bde Maka Ska", see wikipedia article for reference thibaultmol (talk) 21:28, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support renaming of category to East Bde Maka Ska, Minneapolis. Eco84 (talk) 22:38, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Renamed. Solution per enwiki and in line with parent Category:Neighborhoods in Minneapolis Estopedist1 (talk) 11:39, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure if I put this category in the right category. It's not one of the main neighboorhouds, but more of a district of one of the neigborhoods (see wikipedia page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dinkytown) thibaultmol (talk) 21:34, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • It looks fine to me. As there is media and a referenced article on en:w, a category for it is legitimate. There are other cases where neighborhoods or sections of a city have a name and identity historically recognized by locals that are not the same as official city government divisions, nothing wrong with having categories for such. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:11, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
See also: Commons:Categories for discussion/2022/08/Category:Sakamoto ohina kaidou.

Not a very clear name: Define “big” as to why this should be a separate category. Especially since almost all images are taken in one location in Tokushima. Rename acordingly or move images to general cat. Zenwort (talk) 09:53, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Zenwort the "big" may be a transliteration of the Japanese-language word. The category in question has two interwiki links. Japanese help may be necessary here Estopedist1 (talk) 11:52, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
See also: Commons:Categories for discussion/2022/08/Category:Big hinamatsuri.

According to WP conventions “kaidou” should be transliterated as “kaidō” (i.e. Hepurn-shiki). Even better rename to English so non-Japanese speakers get an idea what this cat is about. Zenwort (talk) 09:56, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong category, right name is Category:Trams on line 12 in Frankfurt am Main‎ Urmelbeauftragter (talk) 12:51, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted, category already empty. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:12, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion of one or several categories is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

wrong category, right name is Category:Trams on line 11 in Frankfurt am Main‎ Urmelbeauftragter (talk) 12:52, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted as empty. -- Túrelio (talk) 15:15, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Is this category necessary? Every one of the maps here are maps of both Junction City, Arkansas and Junction City, Louisiana which is covered by Category:Sanborn Fire Insurance Map from Junction City, Union County, Arkansas and Junction City, Clairborne and Union Parishes, Louisiana. It seems like the combined category is better than splitting this into this category and a Category:Sanborn Fire Insurance Map from Junction City, Clairborne and Union Parishes, Louisiana category since the maps cover both and there are no maps for each one separately.. Ricky81682 (talk) 19:51, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think this is a redirection category, if that is the case I nominate it for deletion. FanNihongo (talk) 03:27, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion of one or several categories is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Refers to one of many “mother and child” sculptiures. Category name ought to contain location, e.g. “Plastik Mutter und Kind (Ottakring)” Zenwort (talk) 05:45, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Enhancing999: redirecting specific Category:Plastik Mutter und Kind to general Category:Sculptures of mothers with children and creating a replacement for the specific category with Category:Plastik Mutter und Kind (Ottakring) causes all occurrences of Category:Plastik Mutter und Kind to point to the wrong target and no occurrence to the right one. See [1], [2], [3] best --Herzi Pinki (talk) 06:38, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

situation is resolved. --Herzi Pinki (talk) 06:40, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion of one or several categories is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

no entries Mateus2019 (talk) 03:36, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Danke Mateus2019, dass Du mich darauf aufmerksam gemacht hast. Ein Teil der Bilder von der FotoTour ist jetzt hochgeladen, noch etwas pauschal, eine bessere Beschreibung und korrekte Kategorisierung hole ich nach. Grüße --Pimpinellus((D)) • WikiMUC05:23, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No further action required Category is filled in the meantime. GeorgHHtalk   13:27, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion of one or several categories is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This category duplicates "Category:Kriegsgräberstätte Reimsbach", which was created four years earlier. Motacilla (talk) 09:43, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Redirected Estopedist1 (talk) 12:04, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion of one or several categories is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Renaming to “… (historical entrance)”: The entrance via the subway under the Western (Spanish) tracks _was_ the _only_ public access to the station. Now, as the building is being converted into a hotel and all tracks around it are gone, this new term fits the situation best. Hamlet 570 de (talk) 15:01, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest a compromise: "west historical entrance". -angerdan (talk) 23:41, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category deleted, after the files have been moved to Category:Estación de Canfranc (historical entrance) GeorgHHtalk   13:36, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Typo category *angys* (talk) 16:46, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted, empty category -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:15, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The category has been redirected to Roman Catholic Churches in the Northern Territory. While the Northen Territory and the Diocese of Darwin cover exactly the same territoty they come down two completely separate category trees. Mattinbgn (talk) 05:24, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Both categories are important. On the one hand the category for the church area and on the other hand the area with the state area.--NeverDoING (talk) 05:28, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I think both should be kept. The boundaries of the diocese or the territory or both could change in the future. (Probably not likely with the territory, but not impossible.) --Auntof6 (talk) 21:39, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]