Bills

AB 2655: Defending Democracy from Deepfake Deception Act of 2024.

  • Session Year: 2023-2024
  • House: Assembly

Current Status:

In Progress

(2024-08-28: In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 30 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.)

Introduced

First Committee Review

First Chamber

Second Committee Review

Second Chamber

Enacted

Version:

Existing law establishes requirements for the conduct of election campaigns, including requirements regarding the endorsement of candidates, political corporations, campaign funds, fair campaign practices, and libel and slander. Existing law, until January 1, 2027, prohibits any person, committee, or other entity from distributing, with actual malice, materially deceptive audio or visual media of a candidate for elective office with the intent to injure the candidates reputation or to deceive a voter into voting for or against the candidate, within 60 days of the election. Existing law requires specified actions pertaining to elections to be given precedence when they are filed in court, including actions involving the registration of voters, the certification of candidates and measures, and election contests, and, until January 1, 2027, actions involving the foregoing prohibition against materially deceptive media.

This bill, to be known as the Defending Democracy from Deepfake Deception Act of 2024, would require a large online platform, as defined, to block the posting of materially deceptive content related to elections in California, during specified periods before and after an election. The bill would require a large online platform to label certain additional content inauthentic, fake, or false during specified periods before and after an election in California.

The bill would require a large online platform to develop procedures for California residents to report content that has not been blocked or labeled in compliance with the act. The bill would also authorize candidates for elected office, elected officials, elections officials, the Attorney General, and a district attorney or city attorney to seek injunctive relief against a large online platform for noncompliance with the act, as specified, and would assign precedence to such actions when they are filed in court.

The bill would exempt from its provisions a broadcasting station and a regularly published online newspaper, magazine, or other periodical of general circulation that satisfy specified requirements. The bill would also exempt content that is satire or parody.

The bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 35 of the Code of Civil Procedure proposed by AB 2839 to be operative only if this bill and AB 2839 are enacted and this bill is enacted last.

Discussed in Hearing

Assembly Floor57SEC
Aug 28, 2024

Assembly Floor

Senate Floor3MIN
Aug 27, 2024

Senate Floor

Senate Standing Committee on Appropriations46SEC
Aug 5, 2024

Senate Standing Committee on Appropriations

Senate Standing Committee on Judiciary13MIN
Jul 2, 2024

Senate Standing Committee on Judiciary

Senate Standing Committee on Elections and Constitutional Amendments15MIN
Jun 18, 2024

Senate Standing Committee on Elections and Constitutional Amendments

Assembly Floor1MIN
May 22, 2024

Assembly Floor

Assembly Standing Committee on Judiciary28MIN
Apr 23, 2024

Assembly Standing Committee on Judiciary

Assembly Standing Committee on Judiciary51SEC
Apr 23, 2024

Assembly Standing Committee on Judiciary

View Older Hearings

News Coverage: