Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Newyorkbrad (talk | contribs) m →Statement by Newyorkbrad: minor copyedit, fmt |
Newyorkbrad (talk | contribs) m →Statement by Newyorkbrad: typo |
||
Line 509:
=== Statement by Newyorkbrad ===
As an arbitrator I drafted most of the decision in the ''Noleander'' case, which it's hard for me to believe was 13 years ago. I think the principles I drafted stand up well to rereading at this late date; but as I just pointed out in another section of this page, there is a limit to how much any discussion of current policy should be steered by a general principle contained in a wiki-ancient arbitration decision which, like any ArbCom decision, was written in the context of a particular set of facts.
That being said, those who flatter me by seeking guidance from principles contained in old ArbCom decisions that I drafted in my past wiki-life might also enjoy [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/International Churches of Christ#Conflict of interest]], although the relevant policies have evolved somewhat since that time (as has the threshold of disruption necessary to trigger an ArbCom case to begin with, but I digress).
| |||