Revision as of 04:55, 12 July 2024 edit Sdrqaz (talk \| contribs) Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators 26,535 edits →‎Amendment request: World War II and the history of Jews in Poland: Support repeal of both topic bans and interaction ban →‎Clarification request: Desysoppings: Not a fan of elections, but fine with amending procedures now ← Previous edit		Revision as of 05:10, 12 July 2024 edit undo Newyorkbrad (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Administrators 45,189 edits m →‎Statement by Newyorkbrad: typo Next edit →
Line 624: :{{ping\|Alanscottwalker}} If the questions you're raising are actually being disputed in practice rather merely in theory, then perhaps the relevant ''policy page'' might warrant discussion or clarification. However, I still don't think any such clarification is best raised in the context of asking the Arbitration Committee, which does not generally set policy, to parse or refine a principle written by a completely different group of arbitrators in a 17-year-old case. [[User:Newyorkbrad\|Newyorkbrad]] ([[User talk:Newyorkbrad\|talk]]) 18:02, 6 July 2024 (UTC) :{{ping\|Alanscottwalker}} Please note that I was not yet an arbitrator at the time of this case. [[User:Newyorkbrad\|Newyorkbrad]] ([[User talk:Newyorkbrad\|talk]]) 18:55, 6 July 2024 (UTC) :{{ping\|Barkeep49}} Although I am still unsure of the value of rewriting principles from old ~~decision~~decisions, simply deleting the reference to copyrights as is being proposed should not create any risk. As I read the motion, the Committee is not saying that quoting an e-mail on-wiki always violates the author's copyright or never violates the copyright—both of which would be overbroad and therefore untrue statements—but is simply not addressing the issue, since there is no need for it to do so. [[User:Newyorkbrad\|Newyorkbrad]] ([[User talk:Newyorkbrad\|talk]]) 17:35, 11 July 2024 (UTC) ===Alanscottwalker===

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment: Difference between revisions