Riparian water rights: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
 
(17 intermediate revisions by 12 users not shown)
Line 1:
{{Short description|Property rights adjacent to waterways}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=August 2016}}
{{Property law}}
 
'''Riparian water rights''' (or simply '''riparian rights''') is a system for allocating water among those who possess land along its path. It has its origins in English [[common law]]. [[riparian zone|Riparian]] [[water right]]s exist in many jurisdictions with a common law heritage, such as [[Canada]], [[Australia]], [[New Zealand]], and states in the eastern [[United States]].<ref>{{Cite web|title=Riparian right {{!}} law|url=https://www.britannica.com/topic/riparian-right|access-date=2021-08-31|website=Encyclopedia Britannica|language=en}}</ref>
 
[[Common land]] ownership can be organized into a '''partition unit''', a corporation consisting of the landowners on the shore that formally owns the water area and determines its use.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Riparian doctrine|url=https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/riparian_doctrine|access-date=2021-08-31|website=LII / Legal Information Institute|language=en}}</ref>
 
== General Principleprinciple ==
Under the riparian principle, all landowners whose properties adjoin a body of water have the right to make reasonable use of it as it flows through or over their properties. If there is not enough water to satisfy all users, allotments are generally fixed in proportion to frontage on the water source. These rights cannot be sold or transferred other than with the adjoining land and only in reasonable quantities associated with that land. The water cannot be transferred out of the [[Drainage basin|watershed]] without due consideration as to the rights of the downstream riparian landowners.
 
Line 22 ⟶ 24:
 
== United States ==
{{further|Water law in the United States}}
The United States recognizes two types of water rights. Although use and overlap varies over time and by state, the western arid states that were once under [[Mexico]] and [[Spain]] generally follow the doctrine of [[Prior-appropriation water rights|prior appropriation]], also known as "first-come, first-served", but water rights for the eastern states follow riparian law.
 
===Riparian rights===
Under riparian law, water is a [[public good (economics)|public good]] like the air, sunlight, or wildlife. It is not "owned" by the government, state or private individual but is rather included as part of the land over which it falls from the sky or then travels along the surface.
 
In determining the contours of riparian rights, there is a clear distinction between navigable (public) waters and non-navigable waters. The land below navigable waters is the property of state,<ref>43 USC §&nbsp;1311(A)</ref> and subject to all the public land laws and in most states public trust rights. Navigable waters are treated as public highways with any exclusive riparian right ending at the [[ordinary high water mark]]. Like a road, any riparian right is subordinate to the public's right to travel on the river, but any public right is subject to nuisance laws and the police power of the state. It is not an [[individual right]] or [[liberty interest]]. Because a finding of navigability establishes state versus federal property, navigability for purposes of riverbed title is a federal question determined under federal law. The states retain the power of defining the scope of the [[public trust]] over navigable waters.<ref>PPL Montana v Montana 132 S.Ct. 1215 (2012)</ref> A non-navigable stream is synonymous with private property, or jointly-owned property if it serves as a boundary.
 
The state could choose to divest itself of title to the streambed, but the waters and use of the waters remains subject to the [[Commerce Clause]] of the [[United States Constitution]] which holds an [[easement]] or [[equitable servitude|servitude]], benefiting the federal government for the purpose of regulating commerce on navigable bodies of water.<ref>''Borax Consolidated, Ltd. v. City of Los Angeles'', 29 U.S. 10, 56 S. Ct. 23, 80 L.Ed 9 (1935.)</ref>
 
The reasonable use of the water by a riparian owner is subject to the downstream riparian ownersowner's '"riparian right'" to receive waters undiminished in flow and quality. SinceFederal environmental regulation of non-navigable waters under the [[Clean Water Act of 1972]] was possible, because all surface waters eventually flowflowed to the public ocean,. federalThis regulatoryhas authority underbeen the Cleansubject Watersof Actpolitical controversy, likefor theexample Cleanover Airimplementation Act,of extendsthe beyond[[Clean onlyWater publicRule]].<ref>{{Cite (navigable)web|title=Riparian watersRights|url=https://www.watereducation.org/aquapedia/riparian-rights|access-date=2021-08-31|website=Water toEducation preventFoundation|date=22 downstreamJune pollution.2020 |language=en}}</ref>
 
In 2023 the United States Supreme Court ruled in [[Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency (2023)|''Sackett v. EPA'']] by a 5-4 decision that the EPA could only regulate waters in the United States which have not been isolated from larger bodies of water.<ref>{{Cite web|title=The Supreme Court has narrowed the scope of the Clean Water Act|url=https://www.npr.org/2023/05/25/1178150234/supreme-court-epa-clean-water-act|access-date=2023-08-14|website=NPR|language=en}}</ref>
 
===States' involvement===
Line 38 ⟶ 43:
Lands between the high and low water marks on navigable rivers are subject to the police powers of the states.<ref>(See ''United States v. Pennsylvania Salt Mfg. Co.'', 16 F.2d 476 (E.D. Pa., 1926))</ref> In the case of the original 13 states, upon ratification of the US Constitution, title to these submerged lands remained vested in the several states similar to the public or common roads.
 
As new lands were acquired by the United States, either by purchase or treaty, title to the highways and the beds of all navigable, or tidal, water bodies became vested in the United States unless they had been validly conveyed into private ownership by the former sovereign.<ref>''McKnight v. Brodell'', 212 F.Supp 45</ref> During the territorial period, the United States held these title "in trust" for the benefit of the future states that would be carved out of the territory.<ref>''Hymes v. Grimes Company'', 165 F. 2d 323</ref> Each of the states were to come into the Union on an "[[equal footing]]" with the original 13 states. Under the [[equal footing doctrine]], territorial states are vested with the same sovereign title rights to navigable [[wetlands|submerged lands]] as the original 13 states.<ref>''Pollard v. Hagan'', 44 U.S. 212, 3 How. 212, 11 L.Ed. 565 (1845)</ref> However, during the territorial period, the United States could convey certain of these lands under the limited circumstances of promoting commerce.<ref>''Brewer Elliot Oil and Gas Co. v. U S.'', 260 U.S. 77, 43 S.Ct 60, 67 L.Ed. 140 (1922)</ref>
 
Ownership of lands submerged by navigable waters was resolved by Congress passing the [[Submerged Lands Act]],<ref>43 U.S.C.A. 1301</ref> which confirmed state title to the beds of all tidal and navigable bodies of water. While the act conveyed land title to the states, non-navigable stream beds remained treated like dry lands and contiguous to the adjoining estates. Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tides, even if non-navigable, also passed to the states, but the continued ownership and public use of these tidal/marsh lands are based on state laws.
 
== See also ==
{{div col-begin|colwidth=28em}}
{{col-2}}
* [[Air rights]]
* [[Common law]]
* [[Countryside and Rights of Way Act 2000]] (in the UK)
* [[Crown land]] (see "logging and mineral rights" under [[crown land#Canada|Canada]])
Line 57 ⟶ 62:
* [[United States groundwater law]]
* [[Right to light]]
{{div col- end}}
 
==References==
Line 63 ⟶ 68:
 
==External links==
* [http://law.jrank.org/pages/11246/Water-Rights.html American Law and Legal Information Encyclopedia]
* [http://www.blm.gov/nstc/WaterLaws/appsystems.html Western States Water Laws: Water Approciation System]
* [http://www.lawyerintl.com/law-articles/2683-Is%20Lake%20View%20One%20Of%20Your%20Riparian%20Rights Is Lake View one of your Riparian Rights]
Line 69 ⟶ 73:
 
{{Property navbox}}
{{Authority control}}
 
{{Use dmy dates|date=August 2016}}
 
[[Category:Riparian zone]]