ING 4727: Difference between revisions

ING 4727 was built in 1990. It was a dry cargo cover-top barge with a steel hull. It had an overall length of {{convert|200&nbsp;feet (61&nbsp;|ft|m)}}, a beam of {{convert|35&nbsp;feet (10.7&nbsp;|ft|m)}} and a height of {{convert|12&nbsp;feet (3.7&nbsp;|ft|m)}}, plus a coaming height of approximately {{convert|4&nbsp;feet (1.2&nbsp;|ft|m)}} above the deck. The [[fiberglass]] covers atop the hopper added another approximately {{convert|5&nbsp;feet (1.5&nbsp;|ft|m)}} of height. The cargo hopper yielded 84659 [[Unit cube|cubes]] of volume. Fully loaded to a draft of {{convert|10&nbsp;feet (3&nbsp;|ft|m)}}, the barge could carry 1,877 tons of cargo. Light (empty) draft was {{convert|1&nbsp;foot |ft|4 & +1/2&nbsp;inches (0.4&nbsp;|in|m)}}.<ref>{{cite web | author=Ingram Barge Company| year=2005| title=Ingram Draft Registers | formaturl=PDFhttp://www.ingrambarge.com/additional/Ingram_Draft_Registers.pdf| access-date=2006-01-18| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060114105026/http://www.ingrambarge.com/additional/Ingram_Draft_Registers.pdf | accessdatearchive-date=2006-01-1814| url-status=dead}}</ref>

Shortly before Katrina, ING 4727 was under charter by [[Lafarge North America]], having recently delivered a load of [[cement]], and was reportedly empty just before the storm. ING 4727 was reportedly in the [[Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet Canal]] in New Orleans when the storm hit.<ref>{{cite journal|title=Breakaway Barge Follow-up |journal=GCMA News |date=November–December 2005 |issue=35 |url=http://www.gulfcoastmariners.org/newsletters/novdec2005_35/newsletternovdec_2005_35.htm#breakway%20barge |format= |archiveurlarchive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061101100032/http://www.gulfcoastmariners.org/newsletters/novdec2005_35/newsletternovdec_2005_35.htm#breakway |archivedatearchive-date=2006-11-01 |deadurl=yes |dfurl-status=dead }}</ref> <!-- if there is better information on exactly where the barge was, please provide a source--> Evidently not secured adequately for [[hurricane]] conditions, the barge found its way into the [[Industrial Canal]] (also known as the Inner Harbor Navigational Canal) where it went through (or caused—see below) a breach into the [[Lower 9th Ward]] neighborhood.

While many other vessels in southeast Louisiana broke their moorings during the storm, ING 4727 became particularly notable both due to its size and because of where it landed. Although its dimensions are standard for barges in commerce on the [[Mississippi River System]] (of which the Industrial Canal is a part), it is larger than most Louisianan houses.<ref>{{cite web | title=Barges and Tugboats | work=Coosa-Alabama River Improvement Association | url=http://www.caria.org/barges_tugboats.html | accessdateaccess-date=2006-03-08 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060427151038/http://www.caria.org/barges_tugboats.html | archive-date=2006-04-27 | url-status=dead }}</ref> During and right after the storm, ING 4727 was moved around by currents in the flooded neighborhood, smashing houses and cars beneath it in an area of several city blocks.

A week after the storm Army Corps of Engineers project manager Al Naomi gave his preliminary impression, saying, "One would think it's the barge that did it," and confirming that the barge striking the floodwalls would have "precipitated a tremendous collapse".<ref>{{cite journal | title=Corps trying to find reasons for collapse | journal=Times-Picayune | date=6 September 2005 | url=http://www.nola.com/weblogs/print.ssf?/mtlogs/nola_tporleans/archives/print077196.html }}</ref> However, in the preliminary report presented to Congress, experts say that the barge was drawn through an existing hole in the floodwall, and that it was the topping of the Industrial Canal floodwall, not the barge, that caused the break.<ref>{{cite journal | author=Seed, R.B. | title=Preliminary Report on the Performance of the New Orleans Levee Systems in Hurricane Katrina | date=17 November 2005 | url=http://hsgac.senate.gov/_files/Katrina/Preliminary_Report.pdf | display-authors=etal | access-date=24 February 2006 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060301125801/http://hsgac.senate.gov/_files/Katrina/Preliminary_Report.pdf | archive-date=1 March 2006 | url-status=dead }}</ref> The LSU report subsequently found that overtopping did not occur, rather, design failures precipited the levee failures.

By late 2007, several investigations were completed that included analysis of the question of whether the barge had a causative role in one or more of the failures in the floodwalls atop the Industrial Canal levees, or whether it came into the city from an already-existing breach. The investigators funded by the National Science Foundation—from the University of California at Berkeley—concluded that the barge went through an already-existing breach caused by foundation failure of the floodwall. Another group of investigators, funded by the State of Louisiana, came to the same conclusion. Finally, a $20 million study, funded by the Department of Defense/United States Army Corps of Engineers, blamed the Industrial Canal levee failures on overtopping of the floodwalls by the storm surge and resulting scour and undermining of the foundation and not the barge.

On 22 February 2006, salvage work began which lifted the barge approximately {{convert|4&nbsp;feet (1.2&nbsp;|ft|m)}} into the air using inflatable bags so that the bottom of the vessel could be inspected for damage, and on 24 February Titan Maritime began the process of cutting up and removing it from the area. A number of pieces were under court order to be preserved as evidence in pending lawsuits,<ref>{{cite journal | author=Gwen Filosa | title=A symbol of the storm finally being carted away | journal=Times-Picayune | date=24 February 2006 | url=http://www.nola.com/news/t-p/frontpage/index.ssf?/base/news-5/114076415339890.xml }}</ref> although that order has been modified to allow for the disposal of all remaining portions of the barge .{{Citation needed|date=April 2008}}. Removal of the pieces of the barge from the Lower 9th Ward was completed the third week of March 2006.

On 4 June 2007, a Federalfederal trial looking into possible liability of Ingram and other parties for damage from the barge began in New Orleans.<ref>{{cite journal | author=Associated Press report | title=Barge At Center Of Post-Katrina Lawsuit | journal=WDSU | date=5 March 2007 | url=http://www.wdsu.com/news/13441889/detail.html?rss=no&psp=news

On March 31, 2008, Judge Helen Berrigan, Chief Judge for the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, issued an Opinionopinion that exonerated the barge owner, Ingram Barge Company, from any liability for the ING 4727 breaking free of its moorings during or after Hurricane Katrina passed through the New Orleans area.<ref>{{cite journal | authoragency= Associated Press| title=La.: Judge exonerates Ingram Barge | journal=Forbes | date=2 April 2008 | url=https://www.forbes.com/markets/feeds/afx/2008/04/02/afx4845949.html